Recommended Posts

This is a combination of a screenshot of a real Longhorn desktop aurora using some more addittional effects and graphics. My personal custom version has two models added in. I will be working with this idea further and changing a few things and making more different versions. :cool:

http://img26.exs.cx/img26/4089/aurora3uc.jpg

585229207[/snapback]

Is it supposed to me more attractive to give the middle finger? :no:

2. They are models (the one on the left (Laura) is from Empire clothing) and I'm sure they're over 18 if they're posing like that and are on the internet.

585232544[/snapback]

Really?

Where that? heh?

Found the site... : http://www.empire-clothing.com/eindex1.htm

Now where is the girl that erverybody want?

People don't like very much your wallpapers.

They just like this girl...

The only thing that you have done is to take a background and put the girl on it...

I'm not sure that I would want a wallpaper that flips me off. If that turns you on, then you need to just start taking Viagra, it probably works better than that anyway.

Oh and by the way, those might be models, but then again if you think about it, hoes are models too.

Edit: Not choosing sides at all. Worse things have been posted on Neowin. They don't really fit into the picture though.... try some other background. Not sure what, but I'm sure you'll think of something.

585232757[/snapback]

So don't use it if you don't like it. No one's forcing you to keep coming in here being negative about it. No, it doesn't really turn me on. I happened to like the colors used in the photos of them. And damn it will people get off of this ho labeling. Nobody knows them. We don't know for sure who they are and what they're like. And exactly, there has been worse here. The theme of this is using a Longhorn aurora, so I'm staying with it. And so many people, probably yourself included, dislike the girls so there's no point in me trying a different background.

Take a break to wash your eyes, this Aurora Background is more real then you are, if you have Avalon CTP installed you can even see it in action... But I guess you don't...

585232815[/snapback]

Thanks Jemaho. And thanks to AeroXperience for finally sharing some aurora backgrounds and other Longhorn stuff.

Yep, I think chaning the background would help a lot. I still don't like her flipping me off though, too bad about that. :pinch:

585232818[/snapback]

Like I all ready said, I just like the way the colors looked. Maybe if I had other ideas for a better background, if other people could think of some, I will consider trying it.

Is it supposed to me more attractive to give the middle finger?  :no:

585232835[/snapback]

No. It's just some trend some people like doing when thier pictures are taken. I had a friend that always enjoyed doing that. It's not really like they're trying to be mean or offend you though. It's just some trend, I don't really know.

So did we find their names? :p

585233332[/snapback]

The Empire clothing model is Laura.

Now where is the girl that erverybody want? People don't like very much your wallpapers. They just like this girl...The only thing that you have done is to take a background and put the girl on it...

585233481[/snapback]

There's a wallpaper section there. Look for it. Again, no one is being forced to enter any thread they don't like or if they don't like the person. If they do it, they just want to spam or troll and get themselves in trouble. And yes, that is a very common way a lot of wallpapers are made.

Here's a bigger version, minus some aurora effects. I think it looks better now and some things fit better now that the resolution is bigger. I'll probably work on a few other versions. I'm not good with graphics and I only like clean and simple. So if you want something more advanced, you're asking the wrong person.

aurora2kp.jpg

There's a wallpaper section there. Look for it. Again, no one is being forced to enter any thread they don't like or if they don't like the person. If they do it, they just want to spam or troll and get themselves in trouble. And yes, that is a very common way a lot of wallpapers are made.

585233556[/snapback]

NO unable to find out... hah... why not you send the link there?

Erveryone want it :)

Can you make this wall without 2 chicks on it??

585233566[/snapback]

Yes I just did for you and anyone else who wants it. It's below all this.

NO unable to find out... hah... why not you send the link there? Erveryone want it :)

585233649[/snapback]

You must not have looked hard and long enough. I'll dig it up later.

aurora7kt.jpg

nice one trunten :)

585234690[/snapback]

:) Thanks, I knew you'd like the ideas. :p Which I'm now out of so no one has to worry any more. :rolleyes: Unless someone wants a version with just one girl and not both. :turned:

Brutal honesty is my policy. (Y)

I stand by my claims.

585234715[/snapback]

I'm okay with that, I'm not going to argue with them. Everyone's entitled to there own opinions. In fact, I always admire your honesty. (Y)

But I worry about you being in the buff in this thread with these girls though.... :unsure: :wacko:

Lemmie take a minute to explain why I said your aurora was fake. I'm not saying your image is bad. What I was tryign to say is that you are posing that background as something doable currently, and that it was made by you. The wall I beleive was made by Trunten (I have the picture, however forgot to put the credit on it when I saved it), so the "your own work" is most liekly fake. The back ground I recall from the poster of the original said he made it by combining walls for MCE, some aurora screens, and the Longhorn orb png found hidden in 4074. Hope that clears that up.

Can you make it without the chicks or the Longhorn orb?

585236806[/snapback]

Read below this post. :)

Lemmie take a minute to explain why I said your aurora was fake.  I'm not saying your image is bad.  What I was tryign to say is that you are posing that background as something doable currently, and that it was made by you.  The wall I beleive was made by Trunten (I have the picture, however forgot to put the credit on it when I saved it), so the "your own work" is most liekly fake.  The back ground I recall from the poster of the original said he made it by combining walls for MCE, some aurora screens, and the Longhorn orb png found hidden in 4074.  Hope that clears that up.

585237753[/snapback]

Yea, it's all just a bit of miscommunication. I forgot to credit the right people in my original post like I had been doing in my other threads, and waited until later instead. :blush: So yea, now that this thread served its purpose, I'll clear up the confusion now. ;)

This is the original aurora background (since it got requested by itself anyway). I came up with an idea to add some things to it, like I had previously done with a Media Center Edition background. So all I can take credit for was the simple idea for adding some things onto it. We had "Classix Girls", and even an attempted "Longhorn Girls" a long time ago, so I felt like trying "Aurora Girls". :p :laugh:

Credit for the original aurora background should probably go to Microsoft, but credit for sharing it (this one) goes to "thesleeper" over at AeroXperience. (Y) The other graphics (other aurora effects) were posted by BOFH at ieXbeta a long time ago. :cool: The Empire clothing model, Laura, we all ready covered that. :rofl: But I don't know who the other one is or where she came from. :ninja:

aurora2yg.jpg

the wall looks better without the girls :shifty:

thanks for re-posting the wall without decorations :)

because the girls collage is not so fine :pinch:

the first girl in black looks nice to me though not the second one :happy:

do they really look like like underage ? or too undressed ? really ? :no:

but yeah, we've all seen these girls too much lately :sleep:

constructive criticism please guys :yes:

Ive been watching your stuff for a long time, ive also seen you go through more dragonball names then id care to remember,

buddy, im sorry this is Sh!t. you could have come up with something 100 times more creative then throwing 2 decent (not my type) chicks on a background with a glow around em. Do yourself a favor, and study the skill.

Thanks very much.  :)

585240807[/snapback]

You're welcome.

the wall looks better without the girls, thanks for re-posting the wall without decorations, because the girls collage is not so fine,

the first girl in black looks nice to me though not the second one, do they really look like like underage? or too undressed? really? but yeah, we've all seen these girls too much lately. constructive criticism please guys

585244009[/snapback]

You're welcome. They don't look too young to me or too "undressed". If they had, I wouldn't have bothered with any of this. I can't help that so many other people really liked them, that's beyond my control.

i have to say this is one of the funniest threads ive read on here thx trunten and Keldyn

585244025[/snapback]

There's always good times when the two of us are around.

We still need the name of the unknown female :p

585244318[/snapback]

I doubt that we'll ever know. At least I don't know.

Ive been watching your stuff for a long time, ive also seen you go through more dragonball names then id care to remember, buddy, im sorry this is Sh!t. you could have come up with something 100 times more creative then throwing 2 decent (not my type) chicks on a background with a glow around em. Do yourself a favor, and study the skill.

585247332[/snapback]

You've been around about as long as I have. I have made worse than this before, and if you haven't ever seen it, than be glad you only saw this. Graphics are not one of my better talents, however I don't give a ****. I know only what I need to know and want to know. I like clean and simple. Heck, I even learned from Radish? himself a few years ago about how that's the better way to go. Doubt he'd remember, but I learned some stuff from him. Anyway, no one's being forced to come into here and look at my works if they don't like them. Especially if they know who I am and what I have made and can make. Why people insist on entering threads just to start up trouble is beyond me. And by the way, this account has never had a name change. But since the secret's out thanks to you, if you did know the other old me, that one only had two changes and only two Dragonball Z like names. I never had a lot that would be hard to remember.

I am done with my ideas for these wallpapers, but only because I choose to and not because of what others think. Thank you to those that had kind words to say and liked my works. I'm done with this thread, do with it whatever you want now....

Graphics are not one of my better talents, however I don't give a ****. I know only what I need to know and want to know. I like clean and simple.

585248332[/snapback]

Hey, graphics may not be you're strong point, but you've still got bucket loads more talent that me! I've got no sense of colour coordination or style, so I wouldn't even dare to attempt a wallpaper, even if it is "just" putting a few bits together!

In all honesty, the one with the girls on isn't my cup of tea, but I do like the one with the orb.

Thanks for taking the time to share your work!

(And thanks for putting up with some un-needed crap!)

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • The proportion (or number of iterations) has nothing to with this aspect of Copyright I am describing. In short, it doesn't matter how many times the manager tells you to change something or how. Your work product is always YOURS until and unless you then assign that to the person representing the client/company, usually for financial compensation -- either in salary or as a subcontract work for hire payment. if iterations determined copyright, then businesses would have learned to just keep making changes until they could claim they owned the copyright, without having to compensate the artist for their work. And that would be BAD. The only place where the amount of changes does have a role is in how much does a human modify a previous public domain work (from any source) before it is considered fair use or their own work, etc. For example, if a human makes substantial changes to a public domain (re: AI, by definition) work, then they can then claim that derivative work as their own...but NEVER the original version, of course. That's why anyone can make a movie about Dracula, for example, as long as it is based on the public domain novel, but not if they take new ideas from copyrighted movies made afterwards. As one of the people who personally advised the US Copyright Office on their recent ruling on these very issues, be assured that I specifically used the terminology precisely -- though I made it simple enough for laymen to understand it. If I made this confusing by doing so, I apologize. But, to be clear regarding your assumption that I would agree to your second statement that I quoted above -- the answer is NO. If AI does the work, no matter how much "direction" you give it, it cannot be copyrighted. All AI generated content is in the Public Domain and therefore the copyright cannot be assigned to ANYONE, even you -- until and unless substantial modifications are made to it BY A HUMAN BEING (yourself or a contracted artist/writer/etc.) and then that copyright on the derivative work is legally (in writing) transferred to you. This is a critical distinction. And it is important that people, especially AI sloppers, understand this. For example, YouTube is not paying AI slop generators for the copyright, etc. of their AI slop. What YouTube is doing is sharing AD REVENUE for permission to publish your AI slop. Copyright/ownership/rights never come into it. Importantly, that means that anyone can copy any AI slopware on YouTube, etc. and rehost it anywhere they want, even back on YouTube, and there is nothing legal that YouTube can do about it with regards to copyright protections, ownership, DMCA, etc. Anyone is legally free to use any AI slopware in any way they want. When this ruling was pending, I warned Disney legal of all of this before they did their OpenAI deal -- that it would literally dilute their entire IP portfolio forever. They ignored that warning for the PR and stock bump. But that is why, when the ruling came down last year, Disney quickly extricated themselves from that OpenAI deal, even eating the initial upfront fees -- followed closely by OpenAI ending their entire AI video generating business model. They adjusted their PR release dates to make this less obvious to shareholders, of course. Phew. I hope that this clears up the key distinctions for you and anyone reading. If you have any additional questions or even hypotheticals about AI and Copyright, please feel free to ask.
    • Each of the devices displayed on this page now has a little volume meter next to it to show if there is audio actively playing. About time.
    • Owing to the nature of Windows feature enablement updates, it was distributed over Windows Update services as a complete system upgrade rather than as an ordinary cumulative update
    • Microsoft confirms Windows 11 26H2, urges IT admins to prepare for release by Usama Jawad Windows 11 typically follows an annual update cycle, but Microsoft recently broke that tradition a bit by releasing a "26H1" version in the first half of this year as a "scoped" build for select new silicon PCs only. This version was not available for customers using 24H2 and 25H2 builds, as Microsoft is busy preparing version 26H2 for them, confirmed officially for the first time. In a Windows IT Pro blog, Microsoft has urged IT admins to prepare for the upcoming release of Windows 11 version 26H2. The company has confirmed that this will be a small enablement package (eKB) that will simply light up certain disabled features that are already present in the operating system's code base. This means that the "refined" Windows update and deployment experience will be simpler and quicker, with minimal disruptions, as the feature update will simply toggle a few flags rather than performing a complete replacement. Microsoft has explained that this is all possible because the standard Windows 11 releases share the same servicing branch and hence, the same source code. However, this also means that Windows 11 26H1 users won't be able to upgrade to 26H2 as that is a different branch, but this is something we have known for a while now. Similar to previous annual feature updates, Windows 11 26H2 will offer the following support cycles: 24 months of support for Home, Pro, Pro EDU, and Pro for Workstations editions 36 months of support for Enterprise, Education, IoT Enterprise, and Enterprise Multi-session editions Microsoft has not confirmed a concrete release date for Windows 11 26H2, but noted that it is "coming soon". If we go by the ongoing release cadence, we can expect it to begin rolling out in early October 2026. As such, IT admins have been encouraged to begin validating Windows Insider releases in the Experimental Channel, plan rollout rings, and strategize the utilization of their existing deployment tools.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Collaborator
      ryansurfer98 went up a rank
      Collaborator
    • Week One Done
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Year In
      Skeet Campbell earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Month Later
      Sharbel earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      576
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      188
    3. 3
      Michael Scrip
      79
    4. 4
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      78
    5. 5
      neufuse
      72
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!