Surely not STILL overpriced?


Recommended Posts

Yer if you replaced Overpriced with Quality Style and Uniqueness.  :p

585232476[/snapback]

Quality can be debateable. They aren't that bad or anything but Apple has had their share of flaws.

Style is pretty much opinion. And they have had blunders there too. Not many people considered the original iMac stylish. :) Which brings us to unique.

Apple tends to shine here.... But so does Marilyn Manson, Dennis Rodman, and well you get the idea. I personally don't want a Marilyn Manson computer. jk. :p

Apple tends to shine here....  But so does Marilyn Manson, Dennis Rodman, and well you get the idea.  I personally don't want a Marilyn Manson computer. jk.  :p

585232573[/snapback]

That was an interesting analogy, but on tha note, I'd have to agree that neither do I!

I love my cinema and at that price it sure would have had me purchaseing one a whole lot sooner. But for what it was worth, it was well worth the wait.

saying it's only $200 more makes no sense here. the dell monitors are only in the $700-$800 price range to begin with. so $200 more than that is actually quite a lot. I could see if we were comparing things that were $2000 and $2200 then the difference would be small. But we're talking products here that the difference is 1/4 the total price.

Why do some people think Apple stuff is "worth" hundreds of dollars more to be pretty?  It makes no sense to me.  If you want to get ripped off go ahead. 

Here's some news.  The Apple brand is not worth paying for.  If you think so, I'd like to know why. Apple is really good at one thing.  Manipulating people.

585232199[/snapback]

Can I assume you wear $20 sneakers and hand me down clothes then?

People pay for aesthetic qualities in most things. Is it worth it in this case? Could be, the Cinema displays look a lot nicer than the Dells, which look like they're straight out of the office.

Why do some people think Apple stuff is "worth" hundreds of dollars more to be pretty?? It makes no sense to me.? If you want to get ripped off go ahead.?

Here's some news.? The Apple brand is not worth paying for.? If you think so, I'd like to know why. Apple is really good at one thing.? Manipulating people.

585232199[/snapback]

Actually i would argue that Apple's machines are honestly priced, not overpriced, with strong evidence of this being IBM giving up its PC side because of lack of profits it just shows that the PC makers have been put under so much pressure from consumers and corps that they have now underpriced themselves so much that they have forced themselves into a situation where the wallmart type margins are just not even worth bothering about. Apple just refuses to use loss leaders or support crap margins and as such for the last few years they have remained healthy.

IBM will not be the last to drop its PC division, many will soon follow through closure and merger, in fact i predict that in around 5 years time the western PC sales market will have consolidated to only a handful of well know brands. The only areas with any chance of selling PC's in this style will be in the Pacific Rim with China leading the way this is not only due to the incredible demand in place but also due to the lower labour costs and most of all PC manufacturing under their sphere of influence. Companies such as Dell will survive because they can maintain low margins with the contracts that they have, HP and such others have other areas in which they can subsidise PC sales, the only others likely to survive are those that are considered to be niche such as specialised products from the likes of Alienware and CAD and scientific specific sellers.

As for the common thread arguements...

The Dell vs Apple LCD example is quite common in these threads and while i realise that the 20" from Dell is a better product at a lower price i would also say that the monitor is being sold as a loss leader being subsidised by other areas in the company, i don't really care though because i have 2 of the Apple 23" screens and as far as i am aware i made a good decision.

Another example of an assumed overcharging from Apple is the iPod, now unless anyone can provide me a clear breakdown of the component prices, development costs, marketing costs and support costs showing that Apple is making these things with an above average margin i will concede but after checking the Best Buy website i saw that the iPod was $30 cheaper than a similar offering from iRiver the next most popular brand of MP3 players, so like the system price myth i will just put this down to the usual 8 year old's thing to say to make him sound intelligent.

And im not even going to mention the differences between Mac and PC as regards to technical specifics, OS capabilities, or even expense such as R & D an area where many PC manufacturers don't have alot of due to the unified nature of a PC.

Bottom Line: Unless you actually think about what your posting before you post you will look very silly indeed, another person who has actually bothered to look into PC vs Mac cost debates the issue in this link

Edit: Seems Apple has finally decided to sort out prices of systems they ship overseas http://www.macosxrumors.com/articles/2005/...urope-by-10%25/

Edited by noyb
Can I assume you wear $20 sneakers and hand me down clothes then?

Thats totally different. I don't know about you but I don't wear my monitor.

Aesthetics have their place, but I don't believe for the most part that the Apple stuff is worth paying "extra". It all depends if you bite on to their markting.

I don't believe IBM dropped the PC side because they were suffering as much as they wanted to focus on other aspects that are more profitable. I beoieve they were doing quite well with their notebooks.

I can definately see the market coming togethor more though. I mean it already has.

What it will come down to is who can lower costs to make stuff. Apple is smart though, with their manipulative marketing. They have successfully fabricated their niche market. I think about the only company that is seen as a "niche" with equal or better alternatives. :)

I believe the reason for Apple's higher prices is due soley to the fact that they sell less so they have to sell at higher margins.

Thats totally different. I don't know about you but I don't wear my monitor.

585236382[/snapback]

Well, a monitor is a piece of furniture for some people. Do you have crappy, worn chairs with stains all over them?

You get my point. Some people like the way things look, and to them it's worth more money.

Aesthetics have their place, but I don't believe for the most part that the Apple stuff is worth paying "extra". It all depends if you bite on to their markting.

I don't believe IBM dropped the PC side because they were suffering as much as they wanted to focus on other aspects that are more profitable.  I beoieve they were doing quite well with their notebooks.

585236382[/snapback]

As for the Mac, i would say for what i use my machines for i get more for my buck, the OS in my opinion is far superior to Windows and alot more finished and refined than Linux and lets not forget that when talking about portables Apple does really well on price, and if you go to the high end workstation scale Mac's are often cheaper than the PC side, go even higher to server and storage systems and you will see that Apple are blowing the competition away on value. As for the budget system until it seems January 11th Apple have said to analysts that they just don't want to make a budget machine because of the low margins.

As for the IBM not making ends meat from PC's see here -> https://www.neowin.net/forum/index.php?showtopic=266137

Well, a monitor is a piece of furniture for some people. Do you have crappy, worn chairs with stains all over them?

You get my point. Some people like the way things look, and to them it's worth more money.

585236516[/snapback]

Well I suppose, but then the Dell for instance isn't exactly an old piece of furniture. Its very understated and that mite fit well with some people. Anyway I see where your coming from.

Well I suppose, but then the Dell for instance isn't exactly an old piece of furniture.  Its very understated and that mite fit well with some people. Anyway I see where your coming from.

585236548[/snapback]

I agree, in this case it probably isn't worth the difference. My only problem with the Dell is it looks office stock, where as the Apple ones actually look like they belong in a house.

But what do I know, my case/monitor/and keyboard are all different colors, and the case glows blue.

But what do I know, my case/monitor/and keyboard are all different colors, and the case glows blue.

Beige monitor, Black keyboard and blue case. :happy:

if you've been jaded by dell than I can understand that too. They are supposed to be very good about getting you a good monitor though. Even if it takes 3 times. :no:

Aesthetics have their place, but I don't believe for the most part that the Apple stuff is worth paying "extra". It all depends if you bite on to their markting.

585236382[/snapback]

Marketing? Do they advertise the Cinema Displays on TV or something? :laugh:

Well, a monitor is a piece of furniture for some people. Do you have crappy, worn chairs with stains all over them?

You get my point. Some people like the way things look, and to them it's worth more money.

585236516[/snapback]

I completely agree. When I was shopping for a Display I only considered the Cinema Display because I am having a desk custom built around the monitor, so that it can be seen from all angles and the visible cabling is minimal. The Dell wouldn't have worked for this.

Of course the cinema disiplays are still overpriced. Howevers I think it was a good move on Apple's part to lower the prices like they have done - maybe a few more users will buy some. Though I think that Apple should let people purchase the cinema displays for even less money if they purchase a Power Mac G5 along with it. That might get some more people to get some.... :p

Marketing? Do they advertise the Cinema Displays on TV or something? laugh.gif

Not that I know of. But Apple has managed to establish themselves as a company that claims to be for the "discerning" consumer. This includes pretty much everything they sell. This is probably due more to people like you. When I said marketing I am talking about the whole Apple stigma that people tend to get caught up in.

It is a nice display and the lower price does make it more attractive. When you throw in a education discount it ends up being like what? 900? I'm still not sure if its worth the extra to me. I'd have toi see some in person next to other options.

^^^^ Rofl, for some reason the idea of advertising a screen while watching a screen (TV) is kinda amusing to me. !  :laugh:

:unsure:

lol

585241059[/snapback]

Yeah just imagine if they were showing the ad on the display in the ad. Wrap your mind around that. :)

Apple screen still overpriced (20") and still a poorer screen

12ms Dell, vs. 16ms Apple. and Dell is brighter too

so now you're only paying 200 for Aluminum, but you're still getting the lower spec screen. :no:

Apple screen still overpriced (20") and still a poorer screen

12ms Dell, vs. 16ms Apple. and Dell is brighter too

so now you're only paying 200 for Aluminum, but you're still getting the lower spec screen.  :no:

585246699[/snapback]

Yeah...imagine paying 200 bucks for a couple garbage bags of melted down Pepsi cans. jk.

btw.. just saw where samsung has a 21" wide OLED at CES. Now that is a sweet display. 5000:1.

http://www.engadget.com/entry/1234000270025865/

Are you guys kidding? WHo the hell seriously can see a 4ms difference in their screen? How many of the dell supports have gone to an apple store and actually used a computer hooked up to one of the displays. I've yet to see a screen match the picture on the 30inch cinema, and if its because i can't see 4ms or a 1000th of a difference in contrast well i guess its just my loss than. Seriously the people bringing numbers into this game is like comparing 1.2ghz to 1.25ghz, whoppee.....

Well, in this case, you won't notice the difference because the Dell is a 16ms panel. The same 16ms LG panel as is in the Apple.

The only real differences between the two are: the extra inputs on the Dell (a bonus for me); the 2xUSB & 2xFirewire hub of the Apple vs the 4xUSB hub in the Dell; the styling of the case/stand; and, of course, the price.

When the price cuts were announced, I seriously considered returning my Dell and ordering the Apple 20". The only thing stopping me was those extra inputs: being able to switch between my Mac and PC easily, and being able to use my VCR for the first time in over a year :)

Suffice it to say, I'll be keeping a hold of my Dell for a long time yet.

Roll on OLED :D

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • My father still uses a programme written in dbase3. Still manages to work with a little help from dosbox. 
    • Microsoft hides these secret Windows 11 performance boost settings available on every PC by Sayan Sen Windows enthusiasts often look for ways to extract as much performance out of their systems as possible, and it's often the case that they try and do so while trying to minimize the heat and power consumption. This is especially relevant in the case of mobile Windows PCs since laptops and notebooks tend to get hot and management of that heat and power is harder in such a form factor. As such users often turn to techniques like under-volting which can be used to squeeze out the maximum capabilities of a chip while also maintaining lowered power levels. There are official apps from AMD and Intel with the likes of Ryzen Master and XTU (Extreme Tuning Utility). While these are quite handy, most enthusiasts probably prefer to dig into the BIOS and play around with settings there like Curve Optimizer on Ryzen, which lets users set various frequency-voltage scaling values. These are essentially called P-States. If you are not familiar with them, Processor Power Management is done through Advanced Configuration and Power Interface (ACPI) P-states and C-states. While P-states or performance pwoer states handle CPU voltage-frequency scaling, C-states deal with CPU sleep states so that some of the CPU functions, which are not necessary at that moment, can be disabled. The P-states and C-states work together to make the processor run more efficiently. It helps the OS and apps determine which cores can be parked and which should be boosted. Of course not every user is an enthusiast or knows the technicalities and integrities of how things like overclocking or undervolting work. Thankfully for them Windows itself offers something pretty cool, though it is hidden by default on all systems. By default, Windows only has two P-States, "Minimum Processor State" and "Maximum Processor State." However, this can be changed with a Registry trick to expand the options under a secret "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown. This essentially enables the HWP or hardware P-States available on a device, and these are not controlled just by the OS itself as the underlying hardware gets involved too. In total there are five Processor Performance Boost Mode profiles that control how Windows requests and allows CPU turbo/boost behavior under the different power policies. They are: Disabled: In this mode, processor boosting is effectively turned off. The CPU will avoid entering turbo or boost frequencies and instead operate closer to its base frequency ceiling. This can significantly reduce power consumption and heat output, but at the cost of reduced burst performance and responsiveness in short workloads. Enabled: This is the standard behavior where boost functionality is allowed under normal conditions. The processor can opportunistically increase frequency when workload demands it, balancing performance gains with power and thermal constraints as managed by the system. Aggressive: Aggressive mode favors performance more heavily, allowing the CPU to enter higher boost states more readily and sustain them longer. This should in theory improve responsiveness under bursty or heavy workloads but increases power draw and thermal output compared to the default enabled behavior. Efficient Enabled: This mode still allows boosting, but with a stronger bias toward energy efficiency. The system attempts to use boost more selectively, avoiding unnecessary frequency spikes when the performance gain is marginal. Efficient Aggressive: This is a hybrid approach where boost is still performance-responsive, but the system continuously weighs efficiency more heavily than in Aggressive mode. It aims to deliver noticeable performance improvements while reducing wasted power in less demanding scenarios. Here's how to enable the Processor performance boost mode: Open Registry Editor: Press Win+R, type regedit, and click OK. Go to: HKLM\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\Power\PowerSettings\54533251-82be-4824-96c1-47b60b740d00\be337238-0d82-4146-a960-4f3749d470c7 (where HKLM stands for HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE_) Modify the value of Attributes from 1 to 2 (you can find modify option by right-clicking) After that, exit Registry, you should now be able to see the new "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown menu: As you can see there are now five new P-States or CPPC states or power profile available that help define the boost mode processor setting on your PC. Wrapping it up here's a quick run-down of the settings as defined by Microsoft itself. Setting Description Disabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is disabled. Collaborative Processor Performance Control (CPPC) behaviour is disabled. Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Efficient Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Efficient Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows calculates the desired extra performance above the guaranteed performance level, and asks the processor to deliver that specific performance level. Efficient Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows always asks the processor to deliver the highest possible performance above the guaranteed performance level. In the next part we shall be comparing these settings to explore how much of a benefit or regression they can provide in terms of performance and power efficiency. If you decide to change the values on your system and are experiencing problems like crashes or an overheating PC, make sure to revert the steps back to the original state.
    • I think he means you haven't reviewed previous UFC games. Of course it doesn't matter... Every time you just report on something that involves the President even if just simply what happened you guys usually get accused of being anti-Trump. We live in fun times.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      Leroy Jethro Gibbs earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Conversation Starter
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Month Later
      AndreaB earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      agatameier earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      agatameier earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      518
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      198
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      147
    4. 4
      ATLien_0
      93
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      77
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!