Recommended Posts

Why are you so sure Utah would get smashed?  Utah has the second best offense and their defense isn't far behind.  I hate when people claim that a mid-major school will get romped on because they're mid-major for no reason.  The fact is, if Auburn wants to be a co-national champ, then Utah has to be one as well.  There's no way around it.

585234101[/snapback]

I'm not one of those people who think mid-majors are simply a waste of time. I live in Fresno so I've seen first-hand the type of talent that does come through the WAC and Mountain West. I've supported Boise State all year because I saw them dismantle a very good Fresno State team (which has beat some quality major conference teams over the past few years). I still think Boise State is better than the showing they had against Louisville, they played horribly for the first 1 1/2 quarters and still only lost by a handful.

But, I still contend that USC would destroy Utah both mentally and physically. Pitt's defense is nowhere close to SC's and look what SC did to an almost Heisman repeat player and the freshman player of the year. And I think Auburn has much, much better linebackers and DBs than Utah. It takes alot more than just the final record of a team to say they would do this or do that. Really, Utah needed to play Auburn, USC, or OU so college football fans could see for themselves whether they belong on the same field or not. 3 undefeated teams is a joke.

the +1 would make it a little better. and it's the only thing that the university presidents might consisder. think about it, the last time there were 3 undefeated teams was like 30 something years ago. it really doesn't happen that often. with the +1, if you could match up 4 undefeateds, and then have the 2 winners play. that would cover 99% of the scenarios.

oklahoma shouldn't be a top 5 team next year. they lose everybody but peterson.

next years top ten:

1. usc

2. michigan

3. texas

4. ohio state (whoever wins between texas/osu early next year has a good shot at going to the rose bowl)

5. louisville

6. iowa

7. utah

8. lsu

9. tennessee

10. vatech

oklahoma and auburn lose nearly every starter. auburn loses campbell, caddy, brown, and rogers. thats their entire team right there. they'll be lucky to finish top 25 next year...

haha, please. peterson wasn't enough to even scare USC. the only reason peterson was as good as he was was because of his o-line and the fact that he had a heisman qb with some good receivers to spread the field. I will guarantee you right now peterson will be lucky to get half the stats he had this year. he's losing pretty much his entire line, top receivers, and his qb.

it's not that far fetched, and i'm not the only one saying it ;). we return something like 14 starters, and our receiving corps is probably the deepest in the nation, so replacing edwards is not a problem. the only thing that worries me is our D, but carr promised to make changes in the offseason. but you really could but ohio st., texas, and mich anywhere in the top 5.

I'm not saying Michigan isn't a top preseason pick, but #2?  That is too far up.  I would rank them around 5th place.

585247000[/snapback]

give me your top ten so we can discuss ;)

do you think OU and auburn will be top 10?

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • The sweet release of death has never looked more appealing.
    • Meh, just another dongle-haven downgrade compared to my Surface Pro 7+. Whenever I decide to upgrade in the next decade or so, it certainly won't be another microslop Surface with this enshitification trend they've been having after the Surface Pro 7+. Hopefully a future generation of the Framework 12 will be a real upgrade...
    • This could exactly be how our Sun ends but it's not as simple by Sayan Sen Image by Drew Rae via Pexels An international team led by Université de Montréal (University of Montreal) PhD student Érika Le Bourdais has found that the ancient white dwarf star LSPM J0207+3331 is still pulling in planetary debris, even though it has been cooling for about three billion years. White dwarfs are dense, Earth-sized stellar remnants left behind when Sun-like stars exhaust their nuclear fuel and shed their outer layers. The star, located 145 light-years away in the constellation Triangulum, is the oldest and coldest white dwarf known to have a surrounding disk of dust. The star was first spotted in 2019 by a citizen scientist through the Backyard Worlds: Planet 9 project. Its cool temperature immediately suggested that it was very old, since white dwarfs gradually lose heat over time. Using the W. M. Keck telescopes in Hawaii, astronomers later confirmed that the star shows infrared signals consistent with dust rings formed by asteroids breaking apart under its strong gravity. Such infrared excesses occur when a star emits more infrared light than expected, often because warm dust surrounding it absorbs and re-radiates energy. “This discovery challenges our understanding of planetary system evolution,” said Le Bourdais. “The fact that we still see planetary debris being accreted three billion years after the star became a white dwarf suggests that asteroids, comets, and even planets can remain in orbit around these stars for a very long time.” Spectroscopic analysis—a technique that studies light to identify the chemical elements present in an object—revealed thirteen heavy elements in the star’s atmosphere: sodium, magnesium, aluminium, silicon, calcium, titanium, chromium, manganese, iron, cobalt, nickel, copper, and strontium. Normally, heavy elements sink quickly in hydrogen-rich white dwarfs, making them hard to detect. “We expected to see only a few elements, but we found dozens!” explained Le Bourdais. The research paper adds more detail. The absence of carbon features suggests the debris came from a carbon-volatile-depleted source. The abundance pattern shows slight deficits of magnesium and silicon compared to iron but otherwise resembles Earth-like material. This points to a differentiated rocky body—one whose materials have separated into distinct layers such as a metallic core and rocky mantle—with a metallic core fraction higher than Earth’s. In other words, the star is accreting the remains of a large rocky object, similar in structure to Earth or the asteroid Vesta. “White dwarfs offer one of the only ways we can directly measure the composition of exoplanets,” said Patrick Dufour, co-author and professor at Université de Montréal. “When planetary debris come too close, they are torn apart by the star’s gravity and end up polluting its atmosphere, leaving a detailed chemical fingerprint of its composition.” The team also detected weak Ca II H & K line core emission, making this only the second known isolated polluted white dwarf to show this feature. These are specific spectral signatures produced by ionised calcium and can indicate unusual physical activity in a star’s upper atmosphere. The finding suggests that extra physical processes may be happening in or above the star’s upper atmosphere. The study stresses the importance of including heavy elements in model atmosphere calculations, since leaving them out can distort the inferred structure and lead to inaccurate stellar parameters. Earlier work suggested the star’s infrared excess came from two dust rings. The new analysis shows that a single silicate dust disk—a ring composed largely of rock-forming minerals rich in silicon and oxygen—can explain the observed signal at 11.6 μm, simplifying the picture of the system’s structure. The question of how debris ended up falling into the star so late remains open. One idea is that giant planets in the system slowly destabilised smaller bodies over billions of years. Another possibility is that a passing star disturbed the orbits of debris. “Future observations with the James Webb Space Telescope or archival data found in the European Space Agency’s Gaia mission could help distinguish between a planetary rearrangement and the gravitational effect of a close stellar encounter,” said John Debes, co-author and researcher at the Space Telescope Science Institute. Dufour noted that hydrogen-rich white dwarfs are the most common type, and the coolest among them are the oldest stars in the galaxy. “We didn't have the habit of looking for signs of accretion in them. This unique case motivates us to expand our search to more of these stars.” The findings show that even after billions of years, planetary systems can remain active and complex. Substantial accretion events—the gradual accumulation of surrounding material onto a celestial object—can still occur long after a star’s death, offering a rare window into the composition and fate of distant worlds. Source: University of Montreal, IOPScience This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • Doesn't DDG mainly use Bing?
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      MadMung0 earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      jefred earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Apprentice
      JoeyNeo went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • Week One Done
      oliviaexpo earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      eurospharma62 earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      480
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      228
    3. 3
      Skyfrog
      67
    4. 4
      FloatingFatMan
      56
    5. 5
      monterxz
      55
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!