[soccer]Should video replays be brought in...


Should Videos be used to assist referees in football?  

24 members have voted

  1. 1. Should Videos be used to assist referees in football?

    • Yes
      16
    • No
      6
    • Unsure
      2


Recommended Posts

Tottenham Hotspur were denied a clear goal today when Manchester United goalkeeper Roy Carrol fumbled Pedro Mendes' shot over the line. The ball bounced a clear two feet behind the line, but the goal was not given. Full story here

Is this now enough to force the FA to consider allowing video replays to assist referees in games?

I used to be an avid believer that this would spoil football, but now I am not so sure. It would make the game a lot fairer and would stop mistakes and cheating (such as diving) from ruining the game.

Your views please :)

( We were robbed! )

As soon as i read the first two or so lines, i knew you supported Spurs! - Before your sig had loaded. :p

IMO it doesn't happen often, so no i don't think it should be implemented. Well unless you are talking for any kind of incident. Even then though, i think if they did that, the game could become very stop start. Whatever next? Hotdogs, Cheer leaders and Time-Outs?? No thanks, lets keep this game, true to it's roots.

Oh, and please don't call Football, Soccer, it's embarrasing. Next you'll be dropping the U in colour, or spending Centre wrongly. You're British, Football is Football to 95% of the world, Americans shouldn't dictate the name of a sport we embraced.

Okay, sports like Hockey and football have video reviews. I don't watch much soccer but i can tell you that it's worked in those sports. The only problems are constant reviews so there must be a cost to it if a team requests one. Eg: costing them a timeout,, delay of game penalty if the call stands.

It may 'slow the game down', but at least you will get the true result.

And maybe if they started bringing in replays every time some idiot takes a dive...they might stop trying to get free kicks..and the game may actually finish earlier.

...Oh, and please don't call Football, Soccer, it's embarrasing. Next you'll be dropping the U in colour, or spending Centre wrongly. You're British, Football is Football to 95% of the world, Americans shouldn't dictate the name of a sport we embraced.

585233162[/snapback]

Yeah I know, but BOOG has a go everytime you call it 'Football' in a thread name :p

Here is what the FA are thinking of doing about it. A compramise between full video assistance and none at all. They want to introduce goal-line technology to stop this kind of thing happening in future, but also not ruining the pace of the game. The game will not need to be stopped if this technology comes into place, thus allowing the game to have a fair outcome withough ruining the nature of the game.

Your thoughts please :)

Wasn't there a thread about this subject already?

585235679[/snapback]

Yes, and mine was first (judging by the time each thread was started) :p

Mine also asks a sensible question. Should have made it a poll, really...

Poll Added

No, replays should not be allowed.  Soccer is too fast paced to stop every 5 minutes because teams and refs argue a call.  Keep the game the way it is, it has been like this since the late 1800's.

585233855[/snapback]

i concur.

still goal line tech is something that sould be looked into as i cant see that being something that would slow the game down, simple inn or out .

go liverpool

gerrard1bd.png

Why not just have guys in a booth watching the goals at all times? Something gets clearly missed, they can call for an override.

It's not like soccer has a lot of complicated things going on at once. Offsides, but that's not terrible if it's missed (unless they score from it), intentional penalties/falling are still ref calls, but goals should be watched.

Yeah I know, but BOOG has a go everytime you call it 'Football' in a thread name :p

Here is what the FA are thinking of doing about it.  A compramise between full video assistance and none at all.  They want to introduce goal-line technology to stop this kind of thing happening in future, but also not ruining the pace of the game.  The game will not need to be stopped if this technology comes into place, thus allowing the game to have a fair outcome withough ruining the nature of the game.

Your thoughts please :)

585235666[/snapback]

They have this in hockey yet they still have to stop the game to check to see if it went in or not.

Well just by looking at my avatar you'll know my response to this. :D

I agree with what Fergie has been saying about the 30second limit. If no decision can be made... play on.

Its normally pretty obvious one way or the other in less then 30secs.

Goal line video is a must in my book, anything that could or could not be a penalty should also be considered. Not only for defenders handballing in their areas, but also the divers that try their luck.

Maybe each team should be allowed one chance to go to a replay per game, so they dont get silly with it.

But the Goal Line and Penalty area should be monitored IMO.

Anyway Farsightxc2, a point at Old Trafford... not too bad. (Y)

I was saying before the game if we take a point from Man U I'll sleep very well. So I can't rant too much. :whistle:

Damn annoying still! :argh:

:laugh:

<snip>

...Anyway Farsightxc2, a point at Old Trafford... not too bad.?(Y))

I was saying before the game if we take a point from Man U I'll sleep very well. So I can't rant too much.?:whistle:e:

Damn annoying still!:argh:gh:

585238865[/snapback]

Yeah, I was saying a simalar thing before the game - I thought a point would be perfect. Hope we will get a bit of luck at the Bridge after that bad luck at Old Trafford. We are due a bit of luck, I think! It's been a hard old life being a spurs fan the last decade or :laugh:gh:

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Someone forgot to mention EDR in the title ? I think I will not click anymore on the articles written by this author. All are click bait.
    • Browser vendors including Chrome, Firefox, Brave, and Vivaldi have jointly written an open letter to Microsoft saying enough is enough regarding Edge being pushed on Windows users without consent. Microsoft makes it difficult to change the default browser, promotes Edge throughout Windows 11, and has made the uninstall process unnecessarily complicated compared to other apps. Does anyone have more details on what exactly the open letter demands and whether any regulatory action is being considered? Also curious whether this could lead to antitrust investigations similar to what happened with Internet Explorer back in the day. Would love to hear from anyone following this closely.
    • The best-selling all-rounder GEEKOM A6 mini PC is now 20% off and cheaper than Prime Day by Steven Parker GEEKOM is having a sale on the A6. It comes from its "A series" of mini PCs, which are supposed to support AI natively; however, although others in the series include an NPU, this A6 variant does not. Below is a quote from the buyer's guide from the official website: Mini PCs that include a dedicated NPU are still quite expensive, which explains the low price of this A6 variant. Below are its full specifications. GEEKOM A6 Dimensions 112.4 mm x 112.4 mm x 37 mm Weight 450g CPU Ryzen 7 6800H (Base 3.2GHz, Turbo 4.7GHz 8C, 16T, 16MB L3 Cache) TDP: 45W Graphics AMD Radeon™ 680M Graphics 12 RDNA 3 Graphics Cores @ 2200MHz (Boost) 768 shading units/stream processors (12 CUs), 48 texture mapping units and 32 ROPs NPU No Memory 32GB Dual-channel Crucial DDR5-4800MT/s SODIMM (up to 64GB) Storage 1x Kingston 1TB NVMe M.2 (PCIe Gen 4.0 x4) Operating System Windows 11 Pro Bluetooth Bluetooth v5.4 Wireless LAN Wi-Fi 6E Kensington Lock No SD Card reader Yes (left side) Adapter 120W, 6.32A, 19V Power Adapter Front I/O Ports 2 x USB 3.2 Gen 2 Type-A 1 x 3.5mm front stereo headset jack Rear I/O Ports 1 x USB 3.2 Gen 2 Type-A 1 x USB 4 Gen 3 Type-C with Power delivery up to 15W (5V 3A) 1 x USB 3.2 Gen 2 Type-C 1 x USB 2.0 Type-A 2 x HDMI 2.0b 1 x 2.5G RJ45 LAN 1 x DC-in Price $599/$649 Here are the key features and dimensions (in inches) of the GEEKOM A6: We reviewed the A6 back in February and rated it highly. Below is a summary from that review: If you want to know more about my findings, do check out the above-linked review. GEEKOM offers three years of warranty on its products, and if needed, you can RMA or return them locally, relative to your region (the U.S. has a U.S. warehouse, and the E.U. has a Germany warehouse). Buy the GEEKOM A6 (16+512) for $479 (was $599) at GEEKOM U.S. Buy the GEEKOM A6 (16+1TB) for $519 (was $649) at GEEKOM U.S. Buy the GEEKOM A6 (16+1TB) for $519 (was $649) at Amazon U.S. When checking out, use the 20% off NWGKA620 coupon code. Best of all, the shipping is quick and free.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      DJC50PLUS earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      DJC50PLUS earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Proficient
      Eric Biran went up a rank
      Proficient
    • Dedicated
      Conjor earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Week One Done
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      493
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      241
    3. 3
      ATLien_0
      74
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      73
    5. 5
      +Edouard
      67
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!