Window Clients connecting to RedHat server?


Recommended Posts

Hi there,

I know nothing about Linux so sorry if this is a dumb question. I am working on a Uni project, we have a budget and have to make up a network plan for a fake company.

To help save costs someone said we could use RedHat as our server. But I am wondering, is it possible for clients using Windows XP to connect to the RedHat server? The server will just be used for sharing files, internet filter and print & mail server.

Thanks.

  • 2 weeks later...

You can also use Linux w/ Samba to setup something similar to an NT4 domain controller (with quite a bit more features). Not quite like a MS AD, but it will help you centralize your user and group policies and allow you do have roaming profiles. Be prepared to be grilled by your professor/instructor on TCO (total cost of ownership), as a lot of people would argue that the added burdon of supporting a Linux based domain controller out weight the cost of just buying Windows Server. But I think that is total rubbish.

If all that you need is file sharing, and centralized security setting control: samba is the way to go. If you have to have SQL Server and Exchange then you will need to go to Windows Server (but it doesn't sound like you need these).

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • If only Windows would have a toggle switch named "Get the latest updates as soon as possible" inside Windows Update settings... But nah, let's hide the new stuff inside a controlled feature rollout, even if the user is explicitly asking for the new stuff as soon as possible.
    • After watching the Apple event earlier this week it is quite the contrast. Apple is going back and tweaking the code to make things more efficient in many areas of MacOS. Windows is boosting your electric build to hide their issues.
    • It is silly there is no simple way to check whether this profile has been activated. CFRs are normal, but trying to even hide the fact if it's on / off seems silly, especially for something so user-facing. Surely Microsoft is "proud" of their engineering efforts on this one and ought to display it somwhere in the GUI.
    • Many Linux distros are not known for excellent battery life, so I'm not sure that is the best example. A more apt example may be Apple, but Apple's CPUs are simply far more efficient than Intel & AMD at single-threaded tasks like these, so "boosting" is not as power-hungry and less heat-inducing. Not to mention Apple will hardly engage P-cores for basic UI tasks; they use a pretty complicated QoS scheme to only activate P-cores for more serious workloads like HTML / JS execution or decompression or application launch. Microsoft is (smartly) doing it for launch, but also for UI tasks, which is the more nonsensical part: why ... do Windows 11's UIs need modern CPUs to boost? It should load so quickly that there's not even time for the CPU to boost.
    • I've not seen any controlled testing and, judging by Microsoft's mentality, within a year, they'll have added so much more bloat, it'll undo any perceptible latency benefit and we'll have boosted the CPU clocks for nothing.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      slackerzz earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Year In
      highriskpaym earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Month Later
      highriskpaym earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      highriskpaym earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      FBSPL earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      499
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      198
    3. 3
      +Edouard
      157
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      84
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      74
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!