Powerbooks... Are they really THAT Powerful?


Recommended Posts

Okay, I admit to not knowing much about processors and what not, but is a 1.5 GHz Powerbook, a little bit not powerful compared to todays standards? I see PC laptops from 2.5-3 Ghz

Dont flame me... I'd really like to know how a 1.5Ghz Powerbook compares in the PC world, as they must be half decent otherwise people wouldnt keep buying them :laugh:

So, if you guys could give me a quick explanation on comparisons, that'd be great, so I can truely shrug off my PC blues :rofl:

Cheers :)

Just because it has a lower megahertz rating, doesn't mean it is necessarily slower. Take a look at AMD, they have their Athlon 64 2800+ clocked at 1.8GHz, yet it will easily beat a Pentium 4 Prescott at 2.8GHz.

There are two ways a processor can gain speed, one is to increase the clock speed, the other is to increase the efficiency. The power book's processor is much more efficient than a standard P4.

I don't know if the 1.5GHz power book can stand up to a 3GHz Pentium 4 laptop, but one thing is for sure, it is much faster than a P4 laptop clocked at 1.5GHz.

While I am in no way a Mac user, I am a strong Windows enforcer, I just wanted to make it clear to you that the clock speed isn't the be all end all of performance factors.

Edited for grammar, spelling and clarity

Edited by Enrickey
Just because it has a lower megahurtz rating, doesn't mean it is necesarily slower. Take a look at AMD, they have their Athlon 64 2800+ clocked at 1.8GHz, yet it will easily beat a pentium 4 prescott at 2.8GHz.

There are two ways a processor can gain speed, one is two increase the clock speed, the other is to increase the effeciency. The powerbook's processor is much more powerfull than a standard P4.

I don't know if the 1.5GHz powerbook can stand up to a 3GHz pentium 4 labtop, but one thing is for sure, it is much faster than a P4 labtop clocked at 1.5GHz.

585243898[/snapback]

:yes: good point

i wouldnt be doing 3D animation (afaik), but i'd be doing say Photoshop, Flash, 2-3 Browsers, PHP editor, and Email all at once. My 3.2Ghz Athlon cries when I do this here.... could be my 512MB ram though....

585243887[/snapback]

No problem for an iBook or a PowerBook.

But be sure to get at least 512MB RAM ;)

i wouldnt be doing 3D animation (afaik), but i'd be doing say Photoshop, Flash, 2-3 Browsers, PHP editor, and Email all at once. My 3.2Ghz Athlon cries when I do this here.... could be my 512MB ram though....

585243887[/snapback]

OSX Loves Ram, get 256MB Ram with your system and then upgrade to 768MB by purchasing a 512MB Ram stick from Crucial.

That should just do the trick!

Just because it has a lower megahurtz rating, doesn't mean it is necesarily slower. Take a look at AMD, they have their Athlon 64 2800+ clocked at 1.8GHz, yet it will easily beat a pentium 4 prescott at 2.8GHz.

There are two ways a processor can gain speed, one is two increase the clock speed, the other is to increase the effeciency. The powerbook's processor is much more powerfull than a standard P4.

I don't know if the 1.5GHz powerbook can stand up to a 3GHz pentium 4 labtop, but one thing is for sure, it is much faster than a P4 labtop clocked at 1.5GHz.

585243898[/snapback]

Yupp, and this is why I wondered what the deal was... I really want nad will need a laptop, so I want to get the best I can, and I really want mac, but if Apple dont upgrade the PB somehow at the expo, then is it really worth going for at 1.5ghz? What do you think?

Obviously I want to get the best I can for the time, I dont want to buy an already dated machine if you see what I mean, seeing as technology moves so fast.... Pursuade me mac users, I want .. ahem NEED one :p

The G4 chip is a real dinosaur, and really shouldn't be in Apples Pro line laptops. A modern Pentium-M laptop would slaughter a Powebook G4, and I've seen laptops (specifically from Sony) that are much thinner than the Powerbooks. I would avoide these laptops if you're looking for a powerful system, and either buy a Pentium-M based laptop or wait for a G5/Freescale based laptop from Apple.

And yet, at the same mhz, the G5 is no better than a G4. It's not really THAT much of a dinosaur.

A 1.5 gig G4 will be plenty. Photoshop is altivec enabled, and I think Flash might be as well, so you'd be running those in 128bit. The G5 does horribly with Altivec apps at this point. that should change in future revisions.

Sorta offtopic, but why do people insist on saying LaBtop? The guy up there who compared the 2800+ and the 2.8 p4, seems to know his stuff pretty well, yet TWICE calls it a laBtop? why???

Processor ratings in herz is going away. I bet by this time next year, all processors will be rated by some measure of perfomance factor. At least, I hope so anyway.

My wife's laptop, (which i am typing on now), is a 17in powerbook. I have a PC for my main computer (a shuttle SFF), and I wouldn't trade it for the world. Well, ok, maybe the world. But, as far as a second computer goes, I am having a blast with the Mac laptop. In many ways, it has less issues than my PC does. (My PC likes to drop my WiFi on its convienence, the Mac stays strongly connected, refusing to let go. The little mac that could)

For apps such as Web, Music, Photo, etc, this laptop is great. The aluminium finish is outstanding. (Sony may be thinner, but I feel that this laptop is really I fine piece of machinery.)

Games: This is where the PC wins hands down. Now, I do have games on the Laptop, and they run fine. But, PC's just feel better suited for gaming. (Although, Warcraft III in widescreen is fun)

But, do some research on your own. Determine what type of apps you are using. if you are surfing the web, listening to music, writing word Docs etc, the Mac is a great choice. I am tired of removing spyware from my friends' PC's, so I have been telling them to get Macs. (there is some spyware for mac I guess, but, I haven't come across it.)

It really is impossible to accuratly do benchmarks between the two. No programs accurately run because all programs have built in optimizations.

I will say that a G4 is sluggish compared to a fast p4 processor... On a G5, the OSX box is snappy and very fast, but most of that is due to the faster bus speed and more cache. But to come back to your base question, yes they do compare and diffrent clock speeds.

I use my PowerBook to death, and giving it an extra 768MB of RAM (from 512MB to 1.25GB) really increased performance, by a large factor! Performance gains were very noticable. Once I get another $150 free, I'm definitely replacing the remaining 256MB with a 1GB. All of what you mentioned is possible and works great on my Mac.

hmmm, its really tough... Im thinking now that if apple dont announce something about the PB next week at the keynote, im gonna have to pass on it. It may be worth getting a G5 desktop with all that 1.25Ghz FSB action until the G5 or other improvement comes along on the PB. i really think that buying an existing one just wont have any longevity in it, and over here in the UK, they aint cheap!!! :)

To add aswell, I think its important to think not only about what I want to achieve on it now, but what I'll want to do on it in say 12 months, or 2 years down the line. I'd like to get some time out of it if at all possible

Okay, I admit to not knowing much about processors and what not, but is a 1.5 GHz Powerbook, a little bit not powerful compared to todays standards? I see PC laptops from 2.5-3 Ghz

Dont flame me... I'd really like to know how a 1.5Ghz Powerbook compares in the PC world, as they must be half decent otherwise people wouldnt keep buying them  :laugh:

So, if you guys could give me a quick explanation on comparisons, that'd be great, so I can truely shrug off my PC blues  :rofl:

Cheers :)

585243860[/snapback]

What woman's name goes with that picture under your username? Nice assets!

To add aswell, I think its important to think not only about what I want to achieve on it now, but what I'll want to do on it in say 12 months, or 2 years down the line. I'd like to get some time out of it if at all possible

585244682[/snapback]

Well technology is always changing and advancing, x86 PC's for the most part are easily upgradable and so are Mac's but if your looking for something you won't have to worry about much in the long run then I'd go with the Mac, it has all the features you want and if you get a G5 Desktop you won't be disappointed, unless of course your a big gamer also :p

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • I think there will be a 27H1 for actual users of 26H1 The 25h2 supports ARM too : Snapdragon X, Snapdragon X Plus and Snapdragon X Elite
    • Poll: Grand Theft Auto VI price predictions, cast your vote by Pulasthi Ariyasinghe After years of waiting, Rockstar will be solidifying the launch date of Grand Theft Auto VI with the launch of pre-orders next week. While the studio has confirmed a date for this occasion, it is yet to attach a price to the highly anticipated game. So let's see what our readers think it will cost at launch. The Grand Theft Auto VI pre-orders will kick off on June 25 for digital and physical editions. Unless some last-minute changes happen, the release date will be November 19, 2026, across Xbox Series X|S and PlayStation 5. Unfortunately, there's still no information about a PC version from the developer or the publisher Take-Two. Now the question becomes, how much will Grand Theft Auto VI cost at launch? The game is predicted by some analysts to be the biggest launch of an entertainment product ever. With the amount of hype that has been built behind it and with ballooning development costs, Take-Two may price this Grand Theft Auto entry differently from other AAA titles. The current price of a AAA game is $69.99. That norm almost rose to $79.99 before calming down. But with such a massive release, Grand Theft Auto VI may be the game that pushes the boundary again. It's also possible that Take-Two keeps the price relatively low to increase the number of players that jump in early and keep them hooked on Grand Theft Auto Online to spend on microtransactions for years to come. Keep in mind that the below poll is asking for a prediction of the standard edition price, not a deluxe or any other special edition that Take-Two will introduce for additional benefits. Also, there is the chance of the company splitting up the campaign and online portions. If you think that will happen, put your vote on what you think will be the total cost of the two. Poll Poll: How much will Grand Theft Auto VI cost? $59.99 $69.99 $79.99 $89.99 $100 or more Submit Vote If you have a very specific prediction in mind, sound off in the comments below.
    • Would you please fix your graphics. They are outdated and don't fit the article.
    • The Light of Life? We actually do glow till our Death, study finds by Sayan Sen Image by Rafael Rendon via Pexels A study by researchers at the University of Calgary has found that living organisms produce an extremely faint light known as ultraweak photon emission, and that this glow appears to drop significantly after death. The research was published in the Journal of Physical Chemistry in April 2025 and quickly drew widespread attention, leading to more than 200 news stories about the findings. Ultraweak photon emission (or UPE), sometimes called biophoton emission, refers to tiny amounts of light released by living cells as a result of normal biological activity. A photon is the basic particle of light, and researchers say every living system examined so far, including plants and animals, has been found to emit these photons. The glow is far too faint to be seen by the human eye. “I suppose it has a little to do with people being reminded of auras,” says Dr. Christoph Simon, PhD, one of the authors of the study and a professor in the Department of Physics and Astronomy in the Faculty of Science. “It is a fact that living beings glow. It’s a very weak glow, but it’s there and visible with very sensitive cameras.” According to the study, the light involved is extremely weak, ranging from 10 to 1,000 photons per square centimetre per second across a spectral range of 200 to 1,000 nanometres. For comparison, a nanometre is one-billionth of a metre and is commonly used to measure wavelengths of light. Detecting emissions at such low levels requires highly specialized equipment. To study the phenomenon, researchers used electron-multiplying charge-coupled device (EMCCD) and charge-coupled device (CCD) cameras. These imaging systems are designed to detect extremely small amounts of light, including individual photons, while minimizing background noise. The technology allowed researchers to capture signals that would otherwise be impossible to observe. The team worked with the Human Health Therapeutics Research Centre at the National Research Council of Canada (NRC) in Ottawa to examine photon emissions in mice. Researchers took two-hour exposure images of the animals before and after death and compared the results. “We saw that the level of light that they emit – this biophoton glow – is distinctly different between living and dead animals,” says Dr. Daniel Oblak, PhD, an associate professor in Physics and Astronomy and the corresponding author of the study. The images showed a clear decrease in photon emissions after death across the entire body of each mouse. According to the researchers, this provided direct evidence that living and dead tissue produce different levels of ultraweak photon emission. “It’s a very small amount and it’s, of course, very tricky to detect,” Oblak says. The study grew out of discussions between Simon, whose research interests include quantum biology, and Oblak, whose work focuses on detecting light for quantum communication experiments. Quantum biology is a field that explores whether processes described by quantum physics, which studies matter and energy at very small scales, may also play a role in living systems. “Since I work as a quantum physicist on light detection for quantum communication, I thought that experimentally we have a lot of the tools to be able to detect the light,” Oblak explains. The researchers also investigated UPE in plants and found that the light changed in response to stress. When plants were exposed to higher temperatures or physically injured, their photon emissions increased. Chemical treatments also affected the glow. Among the substances tested, the local anesthetic benzocaine produced the strongest emission response when applied to injured plant tissue. These findings suggest that ultraweak photon emission is closely linked to biochemical and metabolic activity inside living organisms. Metabolism refers to the chemical reactions that allow cells and organisms to stay alive and function. Because these reactions change when an organism experiences stress, injury or disease, researchers believe UPE may provide a way to monitor those changes. The researchers stress that the glow is a physical and biological phenomenon, not a metaphysical one. Oblak says more research is needed to understand exactly how the light is produced and what information it may reveal about the condition of living tissue. “We must understand what that is to figure out what’s happening,” he says. “If we can understand how that relates to certain influences on the body – stress, diseases – then that could be used as a diagnostic tool.” The researchers believe the technique could eventually help scientists study health and disease without invasive procedures. Because UPE can be measured without adding dyes, markers or labels, it may offer a way to monitor whether tissue is healthy, damaged or alive. In plants, it could help researchers better understand how organisms respond to injury, heat and other forms of stress. While the work is still in its early stages, the study demonstrates that ultraweak photon emission imaging can provide a non-invasive and label-free way to observe biological activity. Researchers say the approach could become a useful tool for studying vitality, stress responses and other important processes in both animals and plants. Source: University of Calgary, ACS publication This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      hhgygy earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Month Later
      AMV earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      AMV earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Collaborator
      ryansurfer98 went up a rank
      Collaborator
    • One Month Later
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      513
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      171
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      82
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      74
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      72
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!