Best alternative iPod software...


Recommended Posts

sorry, but what does that have to do with my question?

585262038[/snapback]

you asked about alternative ipod software and in your description you stated that you didnt want to use itunes. so in response i suggested wmp10 which you can use to organize your media, buy music and listen to your tracks on your device. now if i didnt answer your question, sorry, then may i advise that you word your question a little differently so others, such as myself, would understand what you are specifically looking for.

wmp10 is irrelevant because it doesn't support iPod ######; i'd use iTunes still if i wer u but its ephpod otherwise

585262420[/snapback]

in anyway was i being an ######? i think you need to lighten up a little bit there. excuse my ignorance but i didnt exactly know that ipods didnt work with wmp10. good job on being a prick.

you posted this in the wrong section...

585262367[/snapback]

My bad, I just thought the since the iPod was made by Apple and it is a piece of hardware, that is should located in the Apple Hardware Discussion...don't know why I would have thought that?

in anyway was i being an ######?  i think you need to lighten up a little bit there.  excuse my ignorance but i didnt exactly know that ipods didnt work with wmp10.  good job on being a prick.

585262476[/snapback]

the reason why people jumped on you is because you posted a solution for Zen Micro....... we don't care about zen micro in this post. only ipod

then you then you said that you "suggested wmp10" (which you didn't, you only posted what worked with zen micro) AND IT DOESN'T EVEN WORK WITH IPOD

so what you need to learn from this..........

1) adress the FULL question that was asked (don't opt out ipod just because.....)

2) don't suggest things unless you know they work

My bad, I just thought the since the iPod was made by Apple and it is a piece of hardware, that is should located in the Apple Hardware Discussion...don't know why I would have thought that?

585263238[/snapback]

Don't suppose you took the time to notice the parent forum is called...

Macintosh Customization & Support - So this forum is for All Apple Hardware, that is Macintosh related. Unfortunately you're beef has absolutely NOTHING to do with Macintosh computers, so this is infact in the wrong place, as StevoFC pointed out.

I don't suppose you happened to notice the stickied thread, posted by Chad, at the top of this thread too, did you? Well if not, now is as good a time as any...

https://www.neowin.net/forum/index.php?showtopic=262792

Here's one click i just saved you, i've quoted the content of that thread...

From now on, ALL Ipod discussion and/or support threads should be posted in the Mobile Devices forum. We realize the IPod can fit into both Apple Hardware and Mobile Devices, but the MD forum was made specifically for items such as the IPod. As well as for organizational purposes, it makes no sense to allow posting of the ipod in two different forums. The Apple Hardware forum, from now on, shall be used specifically for hardware support/discussion related to Apple computers.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • It is silly there is no simple way to check whether this profile has been activated. CFRs are normal, but trying to even hide the fact if it's on / off seems silly, especially for something so user-facing. Surely Microsoft is "proud" of their engineering efforts on this one and ought to display it somwhere in the GUI.
    • Many Linux distros are not known for excellent battery life, so I'm not sure that is the best example. A more apt example may be Apple, but Apple's CPUs are simply far more efficient than Intel & AMD at single-threaded tasks like these, so "boosting" is not as power-hungry and less heat-inducing. Not to mention Apple will hardly engage P-cores for basic UI tasks; they use a pretty complicated QoS scheme to only activate P-cores for more serious workloads like HTML / JS execution or decompression or application launch. Microsoft is (smartly) doing it for launch, but also for UI tasks, which is the more nonsensical part: why ... do Windows 11's UIs need modern CPUs to boost? It should load so quickly that there's not even time for the CPU to boost.
    • I've not seen any controlled testing and, judging by Microsoft's mentality, within a year, they'll have added so much more bloat, it'll undo any perceptible latency benefit and we'll have boosted the CPU clocks for nothing.
    • It depends: heat soak is a thing. Initially on cold boot-up, the heatsinks & heatpipes are at ambient temp. After heatsinks & heatpipes warm up (through normal usage), they don't immediately cool to ambient temp when the load goes away. So their baseline is higher and the trigger point for fans is much less stress. Add a few more CPU spikes → it's too hot to stay at the same fan RPM → fans get triggered to start up up much sooner / get triggered to ramp much more quickly.
    • Can LibreOffice just shut up and worry about themselves and stop comparing themselves? Do we see Microsoft complaining about euro office?
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      slackerzz earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Year In
      highriskpaym earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Month Later
      highriskpaym earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      highriskpaym earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      FBSPL earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      501
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      198
    3. 3
      +Edouard
      157
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      84
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      74
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!