• 0

Want to test my prog. protection

Asked by Elagizy,

 Share

Question

56 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • 0
Mentor

Elagizy

Posted
  • Author
Posted (edited)
download the file.. and check it.. its cracked :)

took about 10mins for me to crack it.. :)

585267659[/snapback]

LOOOOOOOOOOOL , no u lose........

check this , this message must appear if it works ...... :no:

EDIT : and also after cracking , this msgbox must not appear every time ( you know which msgbox i'm talking about )....... thats a really bad crack :laugh:

post-58074-1105376948.jpg

Edited by Elagizy
  • 0
Mentor

Elagizy

Posted
  • Author
Posted
okay.. here is my one more try.. this time it took just 2 mins for me to crack it.. :) it works check it out.. and well, no one worries about that message box, when they see software working :)

585267805[/snapback]

man , wats ur problem !!!!!!! i said that on the secound run of the program , the form "working" appears without any msgboxs and also the form of authorization code mustn't appear :no: and i said that was very simple protection so you must do it in a perfect way .......

Tip : u must think about Stech.sec ;)

  • 0
Rising Star

dhavalhirdhav

Posted
Posted
man , wats ur problem !!!!!!! i said that on the secound run of the program , the form "working" appears without any msgboxs and also the form of authorization code mustn't appear  :no:  and i said that was very simble protection so you must do it in a perfect way .......

Tip : u must think about Stech.sec  ;)

585267846[/snapback]

well, I just made software working.. isnt it enough to crack it??? well, okay if you want that .SEC file stuff and also u dont want to see that thing again.. I will do it.. what if I just directly open that second form and just remove that authorization box?

well, u know what.. as far as you ask anyone.. I have succesfully cracked it.. but for ur sake.. I will crack it for u in few mins..

  • 0
Grand Master

leesmithg

Posted
Posted
i swear its not a virus ...... beside if you found that its a virus , call MODs to see that file then they will ban me , simple

u didn't got anti virus !!!!!

585267487[/snapback]

You're written English has sure improved in the past week.

As for reverse engineering or cracking your application, then nope, as I don't know if it is your property.

  • 0
Veteran

dotRoot

Posted
Posted

Well as I don't have any .NET compilers, because I don't program, I did decompile your program showing that someone who does could easily crack your program.

You can try this .NET decompiler's demo here: http://www.remotesoft.com/salamander/

Guess I win. Yay.

  • 0
Veteran

dotRoot

Posted
Posted

Mine took 3 seconds for the google search and 3 seconds to upload and I guess 2 seconds to decompile. I guess that means that I seen you source code in 8 seconds. Time to take to recompile without the protection, I'll give you 5 minutes to add to that. Time to take to just use your encryption for a keygen if I didn't just take out your protection I'll give you 5 minutes.

So that's 5 minutes, 8 seconds.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share
Go to question listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Posts

    • Politically funny images of the World

      By +Edouard · Posted

    • Anyone Here With Turbo Pascal Experience?

      By Almohandis · Posted

      Turbo Pascal was my first real programming experience more than 30 years ago at university. I mostly taught myself from the included examples and help documentation, because the university only taught the basic syntax and philosophy of Pascal, without going deeply into Turbo Pascal’s advanced features. I still remember when I discovered that I could embed assembly language directly into Pascal code, call BIOS functions, manipulate screen memory, use mouse interrupts, and control peripherals from my programs. That opened huge doors for me. Programming back then felt really fun, direct, and close to the machine. What I loved about Pascal was its readability and the almost instant compile time. Turbo Pascal was an amazing environment, but unfortunately Turbo Pascal for Windows 3 did not feel like it fully carried that legacy forward. Later, Delphi got things back on the right track after the messy transition to TP for Windows. Sadly, Delphi suffered from years of uncertainty as it moved from Borland to CodeGear and then to Embarcadero. That instability made many developers lose confidence in it, even though Delphi itself remained a powerful and productive tool. I still work with Delphi from time to time, but I definitely miss the old days of Turbo Pascal.
    • Qualcomm reportedly in talks to build custom video chips for TikTok parent ByteDance

      By spaceship9876 · Posted

      I hope this encodes in to AV1 or AV2 as currently tiktok uses h265 and h264.
    • Qualcomm reportedly in talks to build custom video chips for TikTok parent ByteDance

      By Karthik Mudaliar · Posted

      Qualcomm reportedly in talks to build custom video chips for TikTok parent ByteDance by Karthik Mudaliar Qualcomm is reportedly in advanced discussions to provide custom chip-design services to Chinese tech giant ByteDance, the same company behind TikTok. According to a report from Reuters, Qualcomm could be involved in designing custom silicon tailored for ByteDance's massive data-center workloads. If it goes through, the deal would make ByteDance one of Qualcomm's early anchor customers for its fastly growing custom chip-design division, For years, Qualcomm was the king of making smartphone processors and modems. The company has also been moving into the PC ecosystem and other formats such as on-device AI for Android XR headsets. However, this particular deal is about Qualcomm's custom Application-Specific Integrated Circuits (ASICs). For a platform like TikTok, ByteDance needs hardware that can help it ingest, process, and serve billions of short-form videos daily. Generalised hardware is no longer the most cost-effective and efficient route, which is why ByteDance is trying to develop custom Video Processing Units (VPUs). VPUs designed specifically for ByteDance’s algorithmic needs could drastically reduce data-center power consumption and improve encoding speeds at an unprecedented scale. The underlying tech behind these processors is actually from Qualcomm's recent acquisition of AlphaWave Semi, a high-speed connectivity specialist company. By combining AlphaWave’s high-bandwidth IP with Qualcomm’s architectural expertise, the company could begin mass production by the end of 2026, if the talks go through. All this also comes at a time when U.S.-China tech relations have dwindled. Escalating trade frictions between Washington and Beijing have severely impacted the export of high-end AI chips from U.S. firms like Nvidia, AMD, and Lam Research. Yet, the Qualcomm-ByteDance discussions show that U.S. tech companies are still actively seeking growth avenues and are open to doing business with China, where regulators still permit. Reuters notes that the outcome of this deal could be uncertain, and ByteDance might also seek partners other than Qualcomm. via Reuters | Image via DepositPhotos.com
    • Creative Sound Blaster AE-X PCIe review: your headphones will love it

      By Jaybonaut · Posted

      Same.

  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      OHI Accounting earned a badge
      One Year In
    • First Post
      Almohandis earned a badge
      First Post
    • Rookie
      DaviKar went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Dedicated
      HidekoYamamoto94 earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • One Month Later
      timbobit earned a badge
      One Month Later

  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      461
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      169
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      119
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      82
    5. 5
      Xenon
      69
    Show More

  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!