• 0

Want to test my prog. protection


Question

Recommended Posts

  • 0
download the file.. and check it.. its cracked :)

took about 10mins for me to crack it.. :)

585267659[/snapback]

LOOOOOOOOOOOL , no u lose........

check this , this message must appear if it works ...... :no:

EDIT : and also after cracking , this msgbox must not appear every time ( you know which msgbox i'm talking about )....... thats a really bad crack :laugh:

post-58074-1105376948.jpg

Edited by Elagizy
  • 0
okay.. here is my one more try.. this time it took just 2 mins for me to crack it.. :) it works check it out.. and well, no one worries about that message box, when they see software working :)

585267805[/snapback]

man , wats ur problem !!!!!!! i said that on the secound run of the program , the form "working" appears without any msgboxs and also the form of authorization code mustn't appear :no: and i said that was very simple protection so you must do it in a perfect way .......

Tip : u must think about Stech.sec ;)

  • 0
man , wats ur problem !!!!!!! i said that on the secound run of the program , the form "working" appears without any msgboxs and also the form of authorization code mustn't appear  :no:  and i said that was very simble protection so you must do it in a perfect way .......

Tip : u must think about Stech.sec  ;)

585267846[/snapback]

well, I just made software working.. isnt it enough to crack it??? well, okay if you want that .SEC file stuff and also u dont want to see that thing again.. I will do it.. what if I just directly open that second form and just remove that authorization box?

well, u know what.. as far as you ask anyone.. I have succesfully cracked it.. but for ur sake.. I will crack it for u in few mins..

  • 0
i swear its not a virus ...... beside if you found that its a virus , call MODs to see that file then they will ban me , simple

u didn't got anti virus !!!!!

585267487[/snapback]

You're written English has sure improved in the past week.

As for reverse engineering or cracking your application, then nope, as I don't know if it is your property.

  • 0

Well as I don't have any .NET compilers, because I don't program, I did decompile your program showing that someone who does could easily crack your program.

You can try this .NET decompiler's demo here: http://www.remotesoft.com/salamander/

Guess I win. Yay.

  • 0

Mine took 3 seconds for the google search and 3 seconds to upload and I guess 2 seconds to decompile. I guess that means that I seen you source code in 8 seconds. Time to take to recompile without the protection, I'll give you 5 minutes to add to that. Time to take to just use your encryption for a keygen if I didn't just take out your protection I'll give you 5 minutes.

So that's 5 minutes, 8 seconds.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • I have a Motorola, one of the lower end ones, it works fine. It is possible to get rid of the Gemini app and also to disable googles assistant , but A.i is still apps. I try to avoid all LLM A.I, is i can, I use no Ai duck duck go.
    • Free Software Foundation Europe pushes EU to force Google to allow AI uninstalls on Android by Paul Hill Credit: Pexels Users should be able to fully uninstall AI-based features from Android devices and be able to access interoperability functions, free from Google’s verification requirements, the European Commission has heard as part of an Android interoperability consultation under the Digital Markets Act. These measures were proposed by the Free Software Foundation Europe (FSFE) last week when it submitted its documentation. The FSFE noted that Google had started silently installing AI models without telling users. It noted that the EU’s DMA requires companies like Google to allow users to uninstall pre-loaded software from their devices, but in the case of the AI models Google is installing, they reinstall if you delete them, contravening the DMA. To get Google back under control, the FSFE has told the European Commission that there needs to be improvements within the Android Open Source Project (AOSP). First, it said that users should be able to fully remove pre-loaded AI components from their devices, with companies being prohibited from silently reinstalling or reactivating them. Second, access to Android interoperability features should not be contingent on registration, authorization, or contractual relationships with Google. This pertains to Google’s attempt to force developers to register with Google, even to publish apps to alternative app stores like F-Droid. Discussing its submission, Lucas Lasota, FSFE Legal Programme Manager, said: Google is planning to roll out its Android Developer Certification in September 2026. This will force every Android app developer to register with Google before their software can be installed on certified Android devices, but it should affect those who have removed Google Apps from their device. The program is controversial because it entails the signing of contracts and payment of account fees to Google, as well as the handing over of the identities of developers. It said: The FSFE said that if the Commission’s draft measures remain unchanged, then Google will be allowed to make developers verify their identity. The FSFE believes that asking developers to register is contrary to the text and spirit of the law. In summary, the FSFE has told the Commission that no developer should need a Google account, a Play Store presence, or any agreement with Google to access Android’s interoperability features.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      sumytbe earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Year In
      B4dM1k3 earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Year In
      DarkWun earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Dedicated
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Dedicated
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Dedicated
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      519
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      188
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      87
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      81
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      72
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!