• 0

Want to test my prog. protection


Question

Recommended Posts

  • 0

what u mean by not a perfect crack?? isnt it enough to have that authorization window to by pass?? and anyways.. what u mean by working over 1 hour?? you arent paying me.. I have got lots of work to do.. not just this cracking your crap code..

  • 0

ILDASM and hexeditor - not sure how long it took, but it was less than a minute.

Just look in ILDASM for a couple of seconds - ah, just need the other form to display - so just nop out everything in between start and next form call.

You are crazy.

L1_cracked.zip

  • 0
ILDASM and hexeditor - not sure how long it took, but it was less than a minute.

Just look in ILDASM for a couple of seconds - ah, just need the other form to display - so just nop out everything in between start and next form call.

You are crazy.

L1_cracked.zip

585268162[/snapback]

(Y) perfect

any way i did that simple prog. in 15 min.

  • 0
(Y) perfect

any way i did that simple prog.  in 15 min.

585268229[/snapback]

haha lol.. 15mins..

and btwn if I remember in that Stealing EXE post... u said that this is the logic1 or I dont remember this is the logic2 that u did?? well, nvr mind.. I can get that.. this will be ur logic only..

  • 0
Man , i said i did the whole program from scratch in only 15 min . and i havn't got enough time to do more than 1 logic

585268285[/snapback]

ya thats what I am saying.. only 15mins :o that should be a whole lot of 15mins to do this small progy logy..

  • 0
Man , i said i did the whole program from scratch in only 15 min . and i havn't got enough time to do more than 1 logic

585268285[/snapback]

You should have left the form colours alone and spent a bit more time on the "protection". Just a strong name and another check would have slowed things down.

Anyway keep learning, but I wouldn't worry about protection until you can code something worth buying...and judging from this experience it'll be a while before that happens.

  • 0

here is my whole code .......

Public Class Main

Inherits System.Windows.Forms.Form

Public ReqCode As Object

Public ReqCode2 As String

Public WMI = GetObject("winmgmts:\\")

#Region " Windows Form Designer generated code "

Public Sub New()

MyBase.New()

'This call is required by the Windows Form Designer.

InitializeComponent()

'Add any initialization after the InitializeComponent() call

End Sub

'Form overrides dispose to clean up the component list.

Protected Overloads Overrides Sub Dispose(ByVal disposing As Boolean)

If disposing Then

If Not (components Is Nothing) Then

components.Dispose()

End If

End If

MyBase.Dispose(disposing)

End Sub

'Required by the Windows Form Designer

Private components As System.ComponentModel.IContainer

'NOTE: The following procedure is required by the Windows Form Designer

'It can be modified using the Windows Form Designer.

'Do not modify it using the code editor.

Friend WithEvents Button1 As System.Windows.Forms.Button

Friend WithEvents Button2 As System.Windows.Forms.Button

Friend WithEvents Label1 As System.Windows.Forms.Label

Friend WithEvents Label2 As System.Windows.Forms.Label

Friend WithEvents Text1 As System.Windows.Forms.TextBox

Friend WithEvents Text2 As System.Windows.Forms.TextBox

<System.Diagnostics.DebuggerStepThrough()> Private Sub InitializeComponent()

Me.Button1 = New System.Windows.Forms.Button

Me.Button2 = New System.Windows.Forms.Button

Me.Text1 = New System.Windows.Forms.TextBox

Me.Text2 = New System.Windows.Forms.TextBox

Me.Label1 = New System.Windows.Forms.Label

Me.Label2 = New System.Windows.Forms.Label

Me.SuspendLayout()

'

'Button1

'

Me.Button1.BackColor = System.Drawing.Color.Bisque

Me.Button1.FlatStyle = System.Windows.Forms.FlatStyle.Popup

Me.Button1.Location = New System.Drawing.Point(184, 72)

Me.Button1.Name = "Button1"

Me.Button1.Size = New System.Drawing.Size(96, 24)

Me.Button1.TabIndex = 0

Me.Button1.Text = "Exit"

'

'Button2

'

Me.Button2.BackColor = System.Drawing.Color.Bisque

Me.Button2.FlatStyle = System.Windows.Forms.FlatStyle.Popup

Me.Button2.Location = New System.Drawing.Point(64, 72)

Me.Button2.Name = "Button2"

Me.Button2.Size = New System.Drawing.Size(96, 24)

Me.Button2.TabIndex = 1

Me.Button2.Text = "OK"

'

'Text1

'

Me.Text1.BorderStyle = System.Windows.Forms.BorderStyle.FixedSingle

Me.Text1.Location = New System.Drawing.Point(136, 8)

Me.Text1.Name = "Text1"

Me.Text1.ReadOnly = True

Me.Text1.Size = New System.Drawing.Size(200, 20)

Me.Text1.TabIndex = 2

Me.Text1.Text = "Text1"

'

'Text2

'

Me.Text2.BorderStyle = System.Windows.Forms.BorderStyle.FixedSingle

Me.Text2.Location = New System.Drawing.Point(136, 40)

Me.Text2.Name = "Text2"

Me.Text2.Size = New System.Drawing.Size(200, 20)

Me.Text2.TabIndex = 3

Me.Text2.Text = ""

'

'Label1

'

Me.Label1.Font = New System.Drawing.Font("Tahoma", 8.25!, System.Drawing.FontStyle.Bold, System.Drawing.GraphicsUnit.Point, CType(178, Byte))

Me.Label1.Location = New System.Drawing.Point(8, 8)

Me.Label1.Name = "Label1"

Me.Label1.Size = New System.Drawing.Size(104, 23)

Me.Label1.TabIndex = 4

Me.Label1.Text = "Request Code :"

'

'Label2

'

Me.Label2.Font = New System.Drawing.Font("Tahoma", 8.25!, System.Drawing.FontStyle.Bold, System.Drawing.GraphicsUnit.Point, CType(178, Byte))

Me.Label2.Location = New System.Drawing.Point(8, 40)

Me.Label2.Name = "Label2"

Me.Label2.Size = New System.Drawing.Size(128, 23)

Me.Label2.TabIndex = 5

Me.Label2.Text = "Authorization Code :"

'

'Main

'

Me.AutoScaleBaseSize = New System.Drawing.Size(6, 13)

Me.BackColor = System.Drawing.Color.LightGoldenrodYellow

Me.ClientSize = New System.Drawing.Size(346, 104)

Me.Controls.Add(Me.Text2)

Me.Controls.Add(Me.Label2)

Me.Controls.Add(Me.Label1)

Me.Controls.Add(Me.Text1)

Me.Controls.Add(Me.Button2)

Me.Controls.Add(Me.Button1)

Me.Font = New System.Drawing.Font("Microsoft Sans Serif", 8.25!, System.Drawing.FontStyle.Bold, System.Drawing.GraphicsUnit.Point, CType(178, Byte))

Me.FormBorderStyle = System.Windows.Forms.FormBorderStyle.FixedToolWindow

Me.Name = "Main"

Me.StartPosition = System.Windows.Forms.FormStartPosition.CenterScreen

Me.Text = "El-agizy SecSysLog1"

Me.ResumeLayout(False)

End Sub

#End Region

#Region "Upgrade Support "

Private Shared m_vb6FormDefInstance As Main

Private Shared m_InitializingDefInstance As Boolean

Public Shared Property DefInstance() As Main

Get

If m_vb6FormDefInstance Is Nothing OrElse m_vb6FormDefInstance.IsDisposed Then

m_InitializingDefInstance = True

m_vb6FormDefInstance = New Main

m_InitializingDefInstance = False

End If

DefInstance = m_vb6FormDefInstance

End Get

Set(ByVal Value As Main)

m_vb6FormDefInstance = Value

End Set

End Property

#End Region

Private Sub Button1_Click(ByVal sender As System.Object, ByVal e As System.EventArgs) Handles Button1.Click

End

End Sub

Private Sub Main_Load(ByVal sender As System.Object, ByVal e As System.EventArgs) Handles MyBase.Load

Try

ReqCode = WMI.Get("Win32_PhysicalMedia.Tag='\\.\PHYSICALDRIVE0'")

CodeLoad()

' Program Code Logic ( PROG ID )

ReqCode2 = ReqCode.SerialNumber + "1998374"

EncryptCode()

EncryptCode()

Text1.Text = ReqCode2

FileGet(CodeNUM, Code, CodeCURRENTRECORD)

Text2.Text = Code.Code

DecryptCode()

If Trim(Text2.Text) = Trim(ReqCode2) Then

Success.DefInstance.Show()

Me.Opacity = 0

FileClose(CodeNUM)

Else

Text2.Text = ""

End If

Catch

MsgBox("Program Corrupted")

End

End Try

End Sub

#Region "Secure Me (Code Key : 25, 2 Encrypt - 1 Decrypt)"

Public Code As CodeINFO

Public CodeNUM As Short

Public CodeRECORDLEN As Integer

Public CodeCURRENTRECORD As Integer

Public CodeLASTRECORD As Integer

Structure CodeINFO

<VBFixedString(300), System.Runtime.InteropServices.MarshalAs(System.Runtime.InteropServices.UnmanagedType.ByValTStr, SizeConst:=300)> Public Code As String

End Structure

Public Sub CodeLoad()

CodeRECORDLEN = Len(Code)

CodeNUM = FreeFile()

FileOpen(CodeNUM, VB6.GetPath & "\Data\" & "STech.SEC", OpenMode.Random, , , CodeRECORDLEN)

CodeCURRENTRECORD = 1

CodeLASTRECORD = FileLen(VB6.GetPath & "\Data\" & "STech.SEC") / CodeRECORDLEN

If CodeLASTRECORD = 0 Then CodeLASTRECORD = 1

End Sub

Public Sub DecryptCode()

Dim NewLetter, String2, stringdec As String

Dim I, Inc As Short

Dim AscNum As Integer

Inc = 25

For I = 1 To Len(ReqCode2)

AscNum = Asc(Mid(ReqCode2, I, 1))

If AscNum - Inc <= 0 Then

AscNum = 255 + (AscNum - Inc)

NewLetter = Chr(AscNum)

Else

NewLetter = Chr(AscNum - Inc)

End If

String2 = String2 & NewLetter

Next I

stringdec = String2

ReqCode2 = stringdec

End Sub

Public Sub EncryptCode()

Dim NewLetter, String2, stringenc As String

Dim I, Inc As Short

Dim AscNum As Integer

Inc = 25

For I = 1 To Len(ReqCode2)

AscNum = Asc(Mid(ReqCode2, I, 1))

If AscNum + Inc > 255 Then

AscNum = (AscNum + Inc) - 255

NewLetter = Chr(AscNum)

Else

NewLetter = Chr(AscNum + Inc)

End If

String2 = String2 & NewLetter

Next I

stringenc = String2

ReqCode2 = stringenc

End Sub

#End Region

Private Sub Button2_Click(ByVal sender As System.Object, ByVal e As System.EventArgs) Handles Button2.Click

Text1.Text = ReqCode2

If Text2.Text = Text1.Text Then

Code.Code = Text2.Text

FilePut(CodeNUM, Code, CodeCURRENTRECORD)

MsgBox("Thank you for registeration")

Me.Hide()

Success.DefInstance.Show()

Else

EncryptCode()

Text1.Text = ReqCode2

DecryptCode()

MsgBox("Invalid Authorization Code", MsgBoxStyle.Critical, "Error")

End If

End Sub

End Class

  • 0
You're written English has sure improved in the past week.

As for reverse engineering or cracking your application, then nope, as I don't know if it is your property.

585267875[/snapback]

Its Your not You're. You are written English doesn't make any sense.

Dont bash on others if you make the same mistakes. haha

  • 0

I'm really not sure what the point of this thread is (or any of the OP's threads, to be honest). You've written a program, asked us to crack it. And people have done that. Consequently the program is now useless.

I ran it through Lutz Roeder's "Reflector" and it doesn't even look like you've run .NET obfuscator on the code. I can read all the method names, all the variable names and so on - it's not difficult to understand what's going on.

First you wanted to write an operating system. You're now writing a program that is supposedly protected from crackers. But which isn't. You're having to set your sights lower and lower, aren't you? What next? A "Hello World" program?

  • 0
I'm really not sure what the point of this thread is (or any of the OP's threads, to be honest).  You've written a program, asked us to crack it.  And people have done that.  Consequently the program is now useless.

I ran it through Lutz Roeder's "Reflector" and it doesn't even look like you've run .NET obfuscator on the code.  I can read all the method names, all the variable names and so on - it's not difficult to understand what's going on.

First you wanted to write an operating system.  You're now writing a program that is supposedly protected from crackers.  But which isn't.  You're having to set your sights lower and lower, aren't you?  What next?  A "Hello World" program?

585268378[/snapback]

You've got to admit though, his posts are usually funny to read because of his arrogance. He was trying to convince people in his last thread that he could make an uncrackable program, when only moments earlier he inquired why, when he modified an EXE in notepad, the program was corrupted. :laugh: He's probably in middle school and he is trying to impress his friend(s).

  • 0
You've got to admit though, his posts are usually funny to read because of his arrogance. He was trying to convince people in his last thread that he could make an uncrackable program, when only moments earlier he inquired why, when he modified an EXE in notepad, the program was corrupted.  :laugh:  He's probably in middle school and he is trying to impress his friend(s).

585268474[/snapback]

It was Elagizy's How to build an operating system thread that made me laugh the most...

  • 0

yeah Elagizy makes funny topics and posts up :D - maybe move to the Jokes section?

I suppose we should be a little bit more understanding on his english as it is not his native language. - well hopefully it isnt.

We can of course all laugh about how arrogant Elagizy appears to be.

  • 0

from the OS topic

Elagizy:

I will ask microsoft about that but i hope they give me their secrets , i think they will answer this mainly?

now, i think you all agreed that dos written in pure assembly so that mean assembly was programmed by machine language

Elagizy:

lol , look what i found in autoexec.bat

SET windir=D:\WINXP

SET winbootdir=D:\WINXP

(((((((( SET COMSPEC=D:\WINXP\COMMAND.COM ))))))))

SET PATH=D:\WINXP;D:\WINXP\COMMAND

SET PROMPT=$p$g

SET TEMP=D:\WINXP\TEMP

SET TMP=D:\WINXP\TEMP

what do you think now gameguy ?

hheheheh :DD

how old are you Elagizy? 8 maybe? seriously, I'm sure everyone here is wondering how old you are.

Edited by liykh001
  • 0

Cut him some slack. He's obviously not that skilled, and has some serious misconceptions about the complexity of programming. So he's not totally in touch with reality, big deal. Acquaint him with facts, if you feel so inclined, but ignore him if you don't think you have something instructive to give. I sincerely don't see the need for sarcastic or malicious replies.

  • 0
Cut him some slack. He's obviously not that skilled, and has some serious misconceptions about the complexity of programming. So he's not totally in touch with reality, big deal. Acquaint him with facts, if you feel so inclined, but ignore him if you don't think you have something instructive to give. I sincerely don't see the need for sarcastic or malicious replies.

585270114[/snapback]

Nah actually weenur, we were like that initially, read the Steal EXE thread, he was being all arrogant with us, we were informing him and taking him seriously, but he decided not to listen, and believe whatever his method was, was he best.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Qualcomm takes on NVIDIA with new Dragonfly CPU and AI chips by Pradeep Viswanathan Microsoft, Google, Amazon, AMD, Meta, Apple, OpenAI, and several others have been developing their own chips for AI infrastructure. However, NVIDIA still remains the dominant player in the market. Today, Qualcomm announced a major expansion of its data center infrastructure portfolio to better compete with NVIDIA. The new lineup includes the Qualcomm Dragonfly C1000 CPU, Qualcomm High Bandwidth Compute technology, the Dragonfly AI300 inference accelerator, new connectivity products, and custom silicon solutions. Qualcomm claims that this new lineup improves performance per watt, token throughput, and total cost of ownership for AI data centers. The Dragonfly C1000 is a new data center CPU built with Qualcomm’s custom Oryon cores. This chip will feature more than 250 cores, frequencies above 5GHz, and a chiplet-based design. Qualcomm claims that this new C1000 can deliver more than 2x better performance per watt compared to existing server CPU offerings based on specifications. The Dragonfly C1000 will support PCIe Gen 7 with more than 2TB/s of connectivity, along with CXL, advanced RAS features, and both air and liquid cooling. Qualcomm expects the Dragonfly C1000 to be commercially available in 2028. Additionally, Qualcomm and Meta announced a multi-year, multi-generation agreement under which Qualcomm will supply Dragonfly C1000 data center CPUs for Meta’s next-generation server fleet. Qualcomm also announced High Bandwidth Compute, a new near-memory computing architecture designed to address AI’s memory bandwidth bottleneck. HBC Gen 1 will debut with the Dragonfly AI250, which is expected to sample in mid-2027. The AI250 will deliver 133TB/s per card, an 18x increase in effective memory bandwidth compared to the AI200 with LPDDR5X. The new Dragonfly AI300 with HBC Gen 2 is a rack-level AI inference platform from Qualcomm. Qualcomm claims that the AI300 can deliver 4x to 8x better performance per watt compared to existing GPU-based architectures based on memory bandwidth per watt per card. The Dragonfly AI300 is expected to be available in 2028.
    • IBM reveals sub-1nm chip technology, production expected in another 5 years by Pradeep Viswanathan TSMC is now leading the chip manufacturing industry with its 2nm-class process node called N2. Samsung Foundry also has a 2nm-class process node called SF2. TSMC says N2 entered volume production in Q4 2025. Samsung says SF2 started mass production in 2025. Today, IBM announced the world’s first sub-1-nanometer chip technology, marking another major semiconductor research milestone. The new technology is based on a 0.7nm, or 7-angstrom, node and uses a new transistor architecture called “nanostack.” The new design vertically stacks and staggers nanosheet-based transistors so that more components can fit into the same chip area while also improving performance and power efficiency. IBM claims that this new sub-1nm chip can pack nearly 100 billion transistors onto a chip the size of a fingernail. This offers almost twice the density, up to 50 percent higher performance, or 70 percent better energy efficiency when compared to IBM's 2nm node design announced back in 2021. Also, IBM mentioned that this new architecture can deliver 40 percent SRAM scaling. It is important to consider that this announcement from IBM is a research milestone rather than a near-term process node launch. Back in 2021, IBM unveiled the world’s first 2nm chip design, claiming 50 billion transistors on a fingernail-sized chip and major performance and efficiency gains. Five years later, IBM’s 2nm technology has still not entered mainstream commercial production. That is because IBM is no longer a major commercial chip manufacturer. It sold its chip manufacturing business to GlobalFoundries years ago and has since then focused only on semiconductor research, IP development, and partnerships. To productize its 2-nm chip technology, IBM partnered with Japan’s Rapidus, but it has not resulted in anything shipping at scale. IBM says that its new sub-1nm technology can reach production as early as within the next five years. If that happens, it will likely depend on manufacturing partners, advanced EUV tooling, and years of yield improvements.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      Meta Plast earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • First Post
      kinowa earned a badge
      First Post
    • Rookie
      krychek57 went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Grand Master
      Jaybonaut went up a rank
      Grand Master
    • One Year In
      Philsl earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      455
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      170
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      135
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      78
    5. 5
      Xenon
      77
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!