• 0

Want to test my prog. protection


Question

Recommended Posts

  • 0

what u mean by not a perfect crack?? isnt it enough to have that authorization window to by pass?? and anyways.. what u mean by working over 1 hour?? you arent paying me.. I have got lots of work to do.. not just this cracking your crap code..

  • 0

ILDASM and hexeditor - not sure how long it took, but it was less than a minute.

Just look in ILDASM for a couple of seconds - ah, just need the other form to display - so just nop out everything in between start and next form call.

You are crazy.

L1_cracked.zip

  • 0
ILDASM and hexeditor - not sure how long it took, but it was less than a minute.

Just look in ILDASM for a couple of seconds - ah, just need the other form to display - so just nop out everything in between start and next form call.

You are crazy.

L1_cracked.zip

585268162[/snapback]

(Y) perfect

any way i did that simple prog. in 15 min.

  • 0
(Y) perfect

any way i did that simple prog.  in 15 min.

585268229[/snapback]

haha lol.. 15mins..

and btwn if I remember in that Stealing EXE post... u said that this is the logic1 or I dont remember this is the logic2 that u did?? well, nvr mind.. I can get that.. this will be ur logic only..

  • 0
Man , i said i did the whole program from scratch in only 15 min . and i havn't got enough time to do more than 1 logic

585268285[/snapback]

ya thats what I am saying.. only 15mins :o that should be a whole lot of 15mins to do this small progy logy..

  • 0
Man , i said i did the whole program from scratch in only 15 min . and i havn't got enough time to do more than 1 logic

585268285[/snapback]

You should have left the form colours alone and spent a bit more time on the "protection". Just a strong name and another check would have slowed things down.

Anyway keep learning, but I wouldn't worry about protection until you can code something worth buying...and judging from this experience it'll be a while before that happens.

  • 0

here is my whole code .......

Public Class Main

Inherits System.Windows.Forms.Form

Public ReqCode As Object

Public ReqCode2 As String

Public WMI = GetObject("winmgmts:\\")

#Region " Windows Form Designer generated code "

Public Sub New()

MyBase.New()

'This call is required by the Windows Form Designer.

InitializeComponent()

'Add any initialization after the InitializeComponent() call

End Sub

'Form overrides dispose to clean up the component list.

Protected Overloads Overrides Sub Dispose(ByVal disposing As Boolean)

If disposing Then

If Not (components Is Nothing) Then

components.Dispose()

End If

End If

MyBase.Dispose(disposing)

End Sub

'Required by the Windows Form Designer

Private components As System.ComponentModel.IContainer

'NOTE: The following procedure is required by the Windows Form Designer

'It can be modified using the Windows Form Designer.

'Do not modify it using the code editor.

Friend WithEvents Button1 As System.Windows.Forms.Button

Friend WithEvents Button2 As System.Windows.Forms.Button

Friend WithEvents Label1 As System.Windows.Forms.Label

Friend WithEvents Label2 As System.Windows.Forms.Label

Friend WithEvents Text1 As System.Windows.Forms.TextBox

Friend WithEvents Text2 As System.Windows.Forms.TextBox

<System.Diagnostics.DebuggerStepThrough()> Private Sub InitializeComponent()

Me.Button1 = New System.Windows.Forms.Button

Me.Button2 = New System.Windows.Forms.Button

Me.Text1 = New System.Windows.Forms.TextBox

Me.Text2 = New System.Windows.Forms.TextBox

Me.Label1 = New System.Windows.Forms.Label

Me.Label2 = New System.Windows.Forms.Label

Me.SuspendLayout()

'

'Button1

'

Me.Button1.BackColor = System.Drawing.Color.Bisque

Me.Button1.FlatStyle = System.Windows.Forms.FlatStyle.Popup

Me.Button1.Location = New System.Drawing.Point(184, 72)

Me.Button1.Name = "Button1"

Me.Button1.Size = New System.Drawing.Size(96, 24)

Me.Button1.TabIndex = 0

Me.Button1.Text = "Exit"

'

'Button2

'

Me.Button2.BackColor = System.Drawing.Color.Bisque

Me.Button2.FlatStyle = System.Windows.Forms.FlatStyle.Popup

Me.Button2.Location = New System.Drawing.Point(64, 72)

Me.Button2.Name = "Button2"

Me.Button2.Size = New System.Drawing.Size(96, 24)

Me.Button2.TabIndex = 1

Me.Button2.Text = "OK"

'

'Text1

'

Me.Text1.BorderStyle = System.Windows.Forms.BorderStyle.FixedSingle

Me.Text1.Location = New System.Drawing.Point(136, 8)

Me.Text1.Name = "Text1"

Me.Text1.ReadOnly = True

Me.Text1.Size = New System.Drawing.Size(200, 20)

Me.Text1.TabIndex = 2

Me.Text1.Text = "Text1"

'

'Text2

'

Me.Text2.BorderStyle = System.Windows.Forms.BorderStyle.FixedSingle

Me.Text2.Location = New System.Drawing.Point(136, 40)

Me.Text2.Name = "Text2"

Me.Text2.Size = New System.Drawing.Size(200, 20)

Me.Text2.TabIndex = 3

Me.Text2.Text = ""

'

'Label1

'

Me.Label1.Font = New System.Drawing.Font("Tahoma", 8.25!, System.Drawing.FontStyle.Bold, System.Drawing.GraphicsUnit.Point, CType(178, Byte))

Me.Label1.Location = New System.Drawing.Point(8, 8)

Me.Label1.Name = "Label1"

Me.Label1.Size = New System.Drawing.Size(104, 23)

Me.Label1.TabIndex = 4

Me.Label1.Text = "Request Code :"

'

'Label2

'

Me.Label2.Font = New System.Drawing.Font("Tahoma", 8.25!, System.Drawing.FontStyle.Bold, System.Drawing.GraphicsUnit.Point, CType(178, Byte))

Me.Label2.Location = New System.Drawing.Point(8, 40)

Me.Label2.Name = "Label2"

Me.Label2.Size = New System.Drawing.Size(128, 23)

Me.Label2.TabIndex = 5

Me.Label2.Text = "Authorization Code :"

'

'Main

'

Me.AutoScaleBaseSize = New System.Drawing.Size(6, 13)

Me.BackColor = System.Drawing.Color.LightGoldenrodYellow

Me.ClientSize = New System.Drawing.Size(346, 104)

Me.Controls.Add(Me.Text2)

Me.Controls.Add(Me.Label2)

Me.Controls.Add(Me.Label1)

Me.Controls.Add(Me.Text1)

Me.Controls.Add(Me.Button2)

Me.Controls.Add(Me.Button1)

Me.Font = New System.Drawing.Font("Microsoft Sans Serif", 8.25!, System.Drawing.FontStyle.Bold, System.Drawing.GraphicsUnit.Point, CType(178, Byte))

Me.FormBorderStyle = System.Windows.Forms.FormBorderStyle.FixedToolWindow

Me.Name = "Main"

Me.StartPosition = System.Windows.Forms.FormStartPosition.CenterScreen

Me.Text = "El-agizy SecSysLog1"

Me.ResumeLayout(False)

End Sub

#End Region

#Region "Upgrade Support "

Private Shared m_vb6FormDefInstance As Main

Private Shared m_InitializingDefInstance As Boolean

Public Shared Property DefInstance() As Main

Get

If m_vb6FormDefInstance Is Nothing OrElse m_vb6FormDefInstance.IsDisposed Then

m_InitializingDefInstance = True

m_vb6FormDefInstance = New Main

m_InitializingDefInstance = False

End If

DefInstance = m_vb6FormDefInstance

End Get

Set(ByVal Value As Main)

m_vb6FormDefInstance = Value

End Set

End Property

#End Region

Private Sub Button1_Click(ByVal sender As System.Object, ByVal e As System.EventArgs) Handles Button1.Click

End

End Sub

Private Sub Main_Load(ByVal sender As System.Object, ByVal e As System.EventArgs) Handles MyBase.Load

Try

ReqCode = WMI.Get("Win32_PhysicalMedia.Tag='\\.\PHYSICALDRIVE0'")

CodeLoad()

' Program Code Logic ( PROG ID )

ReqCode2 = ReqCode.SerialNumber + "1998374"

EncryptCode()

EncryptCode()

Text1.Text = ReqCode2

FileGet(CodeNUM, Code, CodeCURRENTRECORD)

Text2.Text = Code.Code

DecryptCode()

If Trim(Text2.Text) = Trim(ReqCode2) Then

Success.DefInstance.Show()

Me.Opacity = 0

FileClose(CodeNUM)

Else

Text2.Text = ""

End If

Catch

MsgBox("Program Corrupted")

End

End Try

End Sub

#Region "Secure Me (Code Key : 25, 2 Encrypt - 1 Decrypt)"

Public Code As CodeINFO

Public CodeNUM As Short

Public CodeRECORDLEN As Integer

Public CodeCURRENTRECORD As Integer

Public CodeLASTRECORD As Integer

Structure CodeINFO

<VBFixedString(300), System.Runtime.InteropServices.MarshalAs(System.Runtime.InteropServices.UnmanagedType.ByValTStr, SizeConst:=300)> Public Code As String

End Structure

Public Sub CodeLoad()

CodeRECORDLEN = Len(Code)

CodeNUM = FreeFile()

FileOpen(CodeNUM, VB6.GetPath & "\Data\" & "STech.SEC", OpenMode.Random, , , CodeRECORDLEN)

CodeCURRENTRECORD = 1

CodeLASTRECORD = FileLen(VB6.GetPath & "\Data\" & "STech.SEC") / CodeRECORDLEN

If CodeLASTRECORD = 0 Then CodeLASTRECORD = 1

End Sub

Public Sub DecryptCode()

Dim NewLetter, String2, stringdec As String

Dim I, Inc As Short

Dim AscNum As Integer

Inc = 25

For I = 1 To Len(ReqCode2)

AscNum = Asc(Mid(ReqCode2, I, 1))

If AscNum - Inc <= 0 Then

AscNum = 255 + (AscNum - Inc)

NewLetter = Chr(AscNum)

Else

NewLetter = Chr(AscNum - Inc)

End If

String2 = String2 & NewLetter

Next I

stringdec = String2

ReqCode2 = stringdec

End Sub

Public Sub EncryptCode()

Dim NewLetter, String2, stringenc As String

Dim I, Inc As Short

Dim AscNum As Integer

Inc = 25

For I = 1 To Len(ReqCode2)

AscNum = Asc(Mid(ReqCode2, I, 1))

If AscNum + Inc > 255 Then

AscNum = (AscNum + Inc) - 255

NewLetter = Chr(AscNum)

Else

NewLetter = Chr(AscNum + Inc)

End If

String2 = String2 & NewLetter

Next I

stringenc = String2

ReqCode2 = stringenc

End Sub

#End Region

Private Sub Button2_Click(ByVal sender As System.Object, ByVal e As System.EventArgs) Handles Button2.Click

Text1.Text = ReqCode2

If Text2.Text = Text1.Text Then

Code.Code = Text2.Text

FilePut(CodeNUM, Code, CodeCURRENTRECORD)

MsgBox("Thank you for registeration")

Me.Hide()

Success.DefInstance.Show()

Else

EncryptCode()

Text1.Text = ReqCode2

DecryptCode()

MsgBox("Invalid Authorization Code", MsgBoxStyle.Critical, "Error")

End If

End Sub

End Class

  • 0
You're written English has sure improved in the past week.

As for reverse engineering or cracking your application, then nope, as I don't know if it is your property.

585267875[/snapback]

Its Your not You're. You are written English doesn't make any sense.

Dont bash on others if you make the same mistakes. haha

  • 0

I'm really not sure what the point of this thread is (or any of the OP's threads, to be honest). You've written a program, asked us to crack it. And people have done that. Consequently the program is now useless.

I ran it through Lutz Roeder's "Reflector" and it doesn't even look like you've run .NET obfuscator on the code. I can read all the method names, all the variable names and so on - it's not difficult to understand what's going on.

First you wanted to write an operating system. You're now writing a program that is supposedly protected from crackers. But which isn't. You're having to set your sights lower and lower, aren't you? What next? A "Hello World" program?

  • 0
I'm really not sure what the point of this thread is (or any of the OP's threads, to be honest).  You've written a program, asked us to crack it.  And people have done that.  Consequently the program is now useless.

I ran it through Lutz Roeder's "Reflector" and it doesn't even look like you've run .NET obfuscator on the code.  I can read all the method names, all the variable names and so on - it's not difficult to understand what's going on.

First you wanted to write an operating system.  You're now writing a program that is supposedly protected from crackers.  But which isn't.  You're having to set your sights lower and lower, aren't you?  What next?  A "Hello World" program?

585268378[/snapback]

You've got to admit though, his posts are usually funny to read because of his arrogance. He was trying to convince people in his last thread that he could make an uncrackable program, when only moments earlier he inquired why, when he modified an EXE in notepad, the program was corrupted. :laugh: He's probably in middle school and he is trying to impress his friend(s).

  • 0
You've got to admit though, his posts are usually funny to read because of his arrogance. He was trying to convince people in his last thread that he could make an uncrackable program, when only moments earlier he inquired why, when he modified an EXE in notepad, the program was corrupted.  :laugh:  He's probably in middle school and he is trying to impress his friend(s).

585268474[/snapback]

It was Elagizy's How to build an operating system thread that made me laugh the most...

  • 0

yeah Elagizy makes funny topics and posts up :D - maybe move to the Jokes section?

I suppose we should be a little bit more understanding on his english as it is not his native language. - well hopefully it isnt.

We can of course all laugh about how arrogant Elagizy appears to be.

  • 0

from the OS topic

Elagizy:

I will ask microsoft about that but i hope they give me their secrets , i think they will answer this mainly?

now, i think you all agreed that dos written in pure assembly so that mean assembly was programmed by machine language

Elagizy:

lol , look what i found in autoexec.bat

SET windir=D:\WINXP

SET winbootdir=D:\WINXP

(((((((( SET COMSPEC=D:\WINXP\COMMAND.COM ))))))))

SET PATH=D:\WINXP;D:\WINXP\COMMAND

SET PROMPT=$p$g

SET TEMP=D:\WINXP\TEMP

SET TMP=D:\WINXP\TEMP

what do you think now gameguy ?

hheheheh :DD

how old are you Elagizy? 8 maybe? seriously, I'm sure everyone here is wondering how old you are.

Edited by liykh001
  • 0

Cut him some slack. He's obviously not that skilled, and has some serious misconceptions about the complexity of programming. So he's not totally in touch with reality, big deal. Acquaint him with facts, if you feel so inclined, but ignore him if you don't think you have something instructive to give. I sincerely don't see the need for sarcastic or malicious replies.

  • 0
Cut him some slack. He's obviously not that skilled, and has some serious misconceptions about the complexity of programming. So he's not totally in touch with reality, big deal. Acquaint him with facts, if you feel so inclined, but ignore him if you don't think you have something instructive to give. I sincerely don't see the need for sarcastic or malicious replies.

585270114[/snapback]

Nah actually weenur, we were like that initially, read the Steal EXE thread, he was being all arrogant with us, we were informing him and taking him seriously, but he decided not to listen, and believe whatever his method was, was he best.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Ford execs say they made a mistake when they replaced human engineers with AI by David Uzondu Ford recently announced that over the last three years, it's had to rehire about 350 "gray beard" engineers to mentor younger staff and reprogram diagnostic systems and AI tools that were failing to meet up to quality expectations. The company's VP of vehicle hardware engineering, Charles **** said that leaders overlooked the deep experience of veterans who survived many product cycles. **** admitted that simply replacing them with AI was a huge mistake, and that while AI is "a fantastic tool," it remains "only as good as the information you use to train it." The rehired engineers now run mandatory meetings to troubleshoot vehicles and reprogram automated engineering software and AI tools to prevent glitches before production. These technical specialists hunt for failure points before parts ever reach the plant floor, helping prevent the massive recalls and defects that previously cost the company billions as it aims to cut one billion dollars in expenses this year. In last year's JD Power Quality Survey, an annual study that measures the quality of a car during the first three months of ownership, Ford finished 10th among mainstream brands and scored below the industry average. But this year, JD Power ranked the automaker as the top mainstream brand, placing it above the likes of Toyota Motor Corp. and Honda Motor Co. Ford attributed this massive improvement directly to the expertise of these returned engineers. Ford's realization that AI cannot magically design and test quality vehicles without senior human oversight is just the tip of the iceberg. When Careerminds looked at companies that conducted AI-driven layoffs, researchers found out that 35.6% of those companies had to rehire more than half of the employees they previously fired. Another 32.7% had to rehire between 25% and 50% of them. In 2024, Sebastian Siemiatkowski, CEO of Klarna, proudly announced that its new chatbot was doing the work of 700 full-time customer service agents. As a result, the fintech company froze hiring and cut hundreds of positions. But by mid 2025, and into 2026, Klarna was scrambling to recruit human agents again because customer satisfaction had plummeted. It turns out, while AI is very good at answering basic questions like how to check an account balance, when faced with complex customer issues that require nuance, the thing usually resorts to the unhelpful, robotic corporate jargon we all know and love.
    • Free AI in IDEs is shifting to paid models Or you know, you could just learn to actually design and code apps, use frameworks to handle the repetitive parts and not use AI at all - and voila... free for life!
    • In a sane world US antitrust laws wouldn't even allow these companies to be in the position to be subjected to EU directives. As you say, better than oligarch nothing.
    • Apple reportedly has a second-generation iPhone Fold planned for 2027 Good grief, Apple hasn't even released a first folding phone and the Apple faithful is already obsessing over the sequel? Seriously people, go out and touch grass... because this level of obsession is borderline stalkery/neurotic.
    • I checked on the IPs associated with every login and they're all mine... And whenever I get a new prompt, there is no activity to show for it. 
  • Recent Achievements

    • Enthusiast
      Xonos went up a rank
      Enthusiast
    • Conversation Starter
      Admir earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • First Post
      The_Focal_Point earned a badge
      First Post
    • Apprentice
      daryld went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • Contributor
      Carltonbar went up a rank
      Contributor
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      405
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      169
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      129
    4. 4
      neufuse
      69
    5. 5
      Xenon
      68
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!