• 0

Want to test my prog. protection


Question

Recommended Posts

  • 0

what u mean by not a perfect crack?? isnt it enough to have that authorization window to by pass?? and anyways.. what u mean by working over 1 hour?? you arent paying me.. I have got lots of work to do.. not just this cracking your crap code..

  • 0

ILDASM and hexeditor - not sure how long it took, but it was less than a minute.

Just look in ILDASM for a couple of seconds - ah, just need the other form to display - so just nop out everything in between start and next form call.

You are crazy.

L1_cracked.zip

  • 0
ILDASM and hexeditor - not sure how long it took, but it was less than a minute.

Just look in ILDASM for a couple of seconds - ah, just need the other form to display - so just nop out everything in between start and next form call.

You are crazy.

L1_cracked.zip

585268162[/snapback]

(Y) perfect

any way i did that simple prog. in 15 min.

  • 0
(Y) perfect

any way i did that simple prog.  in 15 min.

585268229[/snapback]

haha lol.. 15mins..

and btwn if I remember in that Stealing EXE post... u said that this is the logic1 or I dont remember this is the logic2 that u did?? well, nvr mind.. I can get that.. this will be ur logic only..

  • 0
Man , i said i did the whole program from scratch in only 15 min . and i havn't got enough time to do more than 1 logic

585268285[/snapback]

ya thats what I am saying.. only 15mins :o that should be a whole lot of 15mins to do this small progy logy..

  • 0
Man , i said i did the whole program from scratch in only 15 min . and i havn't got enough time to do more than 1 logic

585268285[/snapback]

You should have left the form colours alone and spent a bit more time on the "protection". Just a strong name and another check would have slowed things down.

Anyway keep learning, but I wouldn't worry about protection until you can code something worth buying...and judging from this experience it'll be a while before that happens.

  • 0

here is my whole code .......

Public Class Main

Inherits System.Windows.Forms.Form

Public ReqCode As Object

Public ReqCode2 As String

Public WMI = GetObject("winmgmts:\\")

#Region " Windows Form Designer generated code "

Public Sub New()

MyBase.New()

'This call is required by the Windows Form Designer.

InitializeComponent()

'Add any initialization after the InitializeComponent() call

End Sub

'Form overrides dispose to clean up the component list.

Protected Overloads Overrides Sub Dispose(ByVal disposing As Boolean)

If disposing Then

If Not (components Is Nothing) Then

components.Dispose()

End If

End If

MyBase.Dispose(disposing)

End Sub

'Required by the Windows Form Designer

Private components As System.ComponentModel.IContainer

'NOTE: The following procedure is required by the Windows Form Designer

'It can be modified using the Windows Form Designer.

'Do not modify it using the code editor.

Friend WithEvents Button1 As System.Windows.Forms.Button

Friend WithEvents Button2 As System.Windows.Forms.Button

Friend WithEvents Label1 As System.Windows.Forms.Label

Friend WithEvents Label2 As System.Windows.Forms.Label

Friend WithEvents Text1 As System.Windows.Forms.TextBox

Friend WithEvents Text2 As System.Windows.Forms.TextBox

<System.Diagnostics.DebuggerStepThrough()> Private Sub InitializeComponent()

Me.Button1 = New System.Windows.Forms.Button

Me.Button2 = New System.Windows.Forms.Button

Me.Text1 = New System.Windows.Forms.TextBox

Me.Text2 = New System.Windows.Forms.TextBox

Me.Label1 = New System.Windows.Forms.Label

Me.Label2 = New System.Windows.Forms.Label

Me.SuspendLayout()

'

'Button1

'

Me.Button1.BackColor = System.Drawing.Color.Bisque

Me.Button1.FlatStyle = System.Windows.Forms.FlatStyle.Popup

Me.Button1.Location = New System.Drawing.Point(184, 72)

Me.Button1.Name = "Button1"

Me.Button1.Size = New System.Drawing.Size(96, 24)

Me.Button1.TabIndex = 0

Me.Button1.Text = "Exit"

'

'Button2

'

Me.Button2.BackColor = System.Drawing.Color.Bisque

Me.Button2.FlatStyle = System.Windows.Forms.FlatStyle.Popup

Me.Button2.Location = New System.Drawing.Point(64, 72)

Me.Button2.Name = "Button2"

Me.Button2.Size = New System.Drawing.Size(96, 24)

Me.Button2.TabIndex = 1

Me.Button2.Text = "OK"

'

'Text1

'

Me.Text1.BorderStyle = System.Windows.Forms.BorderStyle.FixedSingle

Me.Text1.Location = New System.Drawing.Point(136, 8)

Me.Text1.Name = "Text1"

Me.Text1.ReadOnly = True

Me.Text1.Size = New System.Drawing.Size(200, 20)

Me.Text1.TabIndex = 2

Me.Text1.Text = "Text1"

'

'Text2

'

Me.Text2.BorderStyle = System.Windows.Forms.BorderStyle.FixedSingle

Me.Text2.Location = New System.Drawing.Point(136, 40)

Me.Text2.Name = "Text2"

Me.Text2.Size = New System.Drawing.Size(200, 20)

Me.Text2.TabIndex = 3

Me.Text2.Text = ""

'

'Label1

'

Me.Label1.Font = New System.Drawing.Font("Tahoma", 8.25!, System.Drawing.FontStyle.Bold, System.Drawing.GraphicsUnit.Point, CType(178, Byte))

Me.Label1.Location = New System.Drawing.Point(8, 8)

Me.Label1.Name = "Label1"

Me.Label1.Size = New System.Drawing.Size(104, 23)

Me.Label1.TabIndex = 4

Me.Label1.Text = "Request Code :"

'

'Label2

'

Me.Label2.Font = New System.Drawing.Font("Tahoma", 8.25!, System.Drawing.FontStyle.Bold, System.Drawing.GraphicsUnit.Point, CType(178, Byte))

Me.Label2.Location = New System.Drawing.Point(8, 40)

Me.Label2.Name = "Label2"

Me.Label2.Size = New System.Drawing.Size(128, 23)

Me.Label2.TabIndex = 5

Me.Label2.Text = "Authorization Code :"

'

'Main

'

Me.AutoScaleBaseSize = New System.Drawing.Size(6, 13)

Me.BackColor = System.Drawing.Color.LightGoldenrodYellow

Me.ClientSize = New System.Drawing.Size(346, 104)

Me.Controls.Add(Me.Text2)

Me.Controls.Add(Me.Label2)

Me.Controls.Add(Me.Label1)

Me.Controls.Add(Me.Text1)

Me.Controls.Add(Me.Button2)

Me.Controls.Add(Me.Button1)

Me.Font = New System.Drawing.Font("Microsoft Sans Serif", 8.25!, System.Drawing.FontStyle.Bold, System.Drawing.GraphicsUnit.Point, CType(178, Byte))

Me.FormBorderStyle = System.Windows.Forms.FormBorderStyle.FixedToolWindow

Me.Name = "Main"

Me.StartPosition = System.Windows.Forms.FormStartPosition.CenterScreen

Me.Text = "El-agizy SecSysLog1"

Me.ResumeLayout(False)

End Sub

#End Region

#Region "Upgrade Support "

Private Shared m_vb6FormDefInstance As Main

Private Shared m_InitializingDefInstance As Boolean

Public Shared Property DefInstance() As Main

Get

If m_vb6FormDefInstance Is Nothing OrElse m_vb6FormDefInstance.IsDisposed Then

m_InitializingDefInstance = True

m_vb6FormDefInstance = New Main

m_InitializingDefInstance = False

End If

DefInstance = m_vb6FormDefInstance

End Get

Set(ByVal Value As Main)

m_vb6FormDefInstance = Value

End Set

End Property

#End Region

Private Sub Button1_Click(ByVal sender As System.Object, ByVal e As System.EventArgs) Handles Button1.Click

End

End Sub

Private Sub Main_Load(ByVal sender As System.Object, ByVal e As System.EventArgs) Handles MyBase.Load

Try

ReqCode = WMI.Get("Win32_PhysicalMedia.Tag='\\.\PHYSICALDRIVE0'")

CodeLoad()

' Program Code Logic ( PROG ID )

ReqCode2 = ReqCode.SerialNumber + "1998374"

EncryptCode()

EncryptCode()

Text1.Text = ReqCode2

FileGet(CodeNUM, Code, CodeCURRENTRECORD)

Text2.Text = Code.Code

DecryptCode()

If Trim(Text2.Text) = Trim(ReqCode2) Then

Success.DefInstance.Show()

Me.Opacity = 0

FileClose(CodeNUM)

Else

Text2.Text = ""

End If

Catch

MsgBox("Program Corrupted")

End

End Try

End Sub

#Region "Secure Me (Code Key : 25, 2 Encrypt - 1 Decrypt)"

Public Code As CodeINFO

Public CodeNUM As Short

Public CodeRECORDLEN As Integer

Public CodeCURRENTRECORD As Integer

Public CodeLASTRECORD As Integer

Structure CodeINFO

<VBFixedString(300), System.Runtime.InteropServices.MarshalAs(System.Runtime.InteropServices.UnmanagedType.ByValTStr, SizeConst:=300)> Public Code As String

End Structure

Public Sub CodeLoad()

CodeRECORDLEN = Len(Code)

CodeNUM = FreeFile()

FileOpen(CodeNUM, VB6.GetPath & "\Data\" & "STech.SEC", OpenMode.Random, , , CodeRECORDLEN)

CodeCURRENTRECORD = 1

CodeLASTRECORD = FileLen(VB6.GetPath & "\Data\" & "STech.SEC") / CodeRECORDLEN

If CodeLASTRECORD = 0 Then CodeLASTRECORD = 1

End Sub

Public Sub DecryptCode()

Dim NewLetter, String2, stringdec As String

Dim I, Inc As Short

Dim AscNum As Integer

Inc = 25

For I = 1 To Len(ReqCode2)

AscNum = Asc(Mid(ReqCode2, I, 1))

If AscNum - Inc <= 0 Then

AscNum = 255 + (AscNum - Inc)

NewLetter = Chr(AscNum)

Else

NewLetter = Chr(AscNum - Inc)

End If

String2 = String2 & NewLetter

Next I

stringdec = String2

ReqCode2 = stringdec

End Sub

Public Sub EncryptCode()

Dim NewLetter, String2, stringenc As String

Dim I, Inc As Short

Dim AscNum As Integer

Inc = 25

For I = 1 To Len(ReqCode2)

AscNum = Asc(Mid(ReqCode2, I, 1))

If AscNum + Inc > 255 Then

AscNum = (AscNum + Inc) - 255

NewLetter = Chr(AscNum)

Else

NewLetter = Chr(AscNum + Inc)

End If

String2 = String2 & NewLetter

Next I

stringenc = String2

ReqCode2 = stringenc

End Sub

#End Region

Private Sub Button2_Click(ByVal sender As System.Object, ByVal e As System.EventArgs) Handles Button2.Click

Text1.Text = ReqCode2

If Text2.Text = Text1.Text Then

Code.Code = Text2.Text

FilePut(CodeNUM, Code, CodeCURRENTRECORD)

MsgBox("Thank you for registeration")

Me.Hide()

Success.DefInstance.Show()

Else

EncryptCode()

Text1.Text = ReqCode2

DecryptCode()

MsgBox("Invalid Authorization Code", MsgBoxStyle.Critical, "Error")

End If

End Sub

End Class

  • 0
You're written English has sure improved in the past week.

As for reverse engineering or cracking your application, then nope, as I don't know if it is your property.

585267875[/snapback]

Its Your not You're. You are written English doesn't make any sense.

Dont bash on others if you make the same mistakes. haha

  • 0

I'm really not sure what the point of this thread is (or any of the OP's threads, to be honest). You've written a program, asked us to crack it. And people have done that. Consequently the program is now useless.

I ran it through Lutz Roeder's "Reflector" and it doesn't even look like you've run .NET obfuscator on the code. I can read all the method names, all the variable names and so on - it's not difficult to understand what's going on.

First you wanted to write an operating system. You're now writing a program that is supposedly protected from crackers. But which isn't. You're having to set your sights lower and lower, aren't you? What next? A "Hello World" program?

  • 0
I'm really not sure what the point of this thread is (or any of the OP's threads, to be honest).  You've written a program, asked us to crack it.  And people have done that.  Consequently the program is now useless.

I ran it through Lutz Roeder's "Reflector" and it doesn't even look like you've run .NET obfuscator on the code.  I can read all the method names, all the variable names and so on - it's not difficult to understand what's going on.

First you wanted to write an operating system.  You're now writing a program that is supposedly protected from crackers.  But which isn't.  You're having to set your sights lower and lower, aren't you?  What next?  A "Hello World" program?

585268378[/snapback]

You've got to admit though, his posts are usually funny to read because of his arrogance. He was trying to convince people in his last thread that he could make an uncrackable program, when only moments earlier he inquired why, when he modified an EXE in notepad, the program was corrupted. :laugh: He's probably in middle school and he is trying to impress his friend(s).

  • 0
You've got to admit though, his posts are usually funny to read because of his arrogance. He was trying to convince people in his last thread that he could make an uncrackable program, when only moments earlier he inquired why, when he modified an EXE in notepad, the program was corrupted.  :laugh:  He's probably in middle school and he is trying to impress his friend(s).

585268474[/snapback]

It was Elagizy's How to build an operating system thread that made me laugh the most...

  • 0

yeah Elagizy makes funny topics and posts up :D - maybe move to the Jokes section?

I suppose we should be a little bit more understanding on his english as it is not his native language. - well hopefully it isnt.

We can of course all laugh about how arrogant Elagizy appears to be.

  • 0

from the OS topic

Elagizy:

I will ask microsoft about that but i hope they give me their secrets , i think they will answer this mainly?

now, i think you all agreed that dos written in pure assembly so that mean assembly was programmed by machine language

Elagizy:

lol , look what i found in autoexec.bat

SET windir=D:\WINXP

SET winbootdir=D:\WINXP

(((((((( SET COMSPEC=D:\WINXP\COMMAND.COM ))))))))

SET PATH=D:\WINXP;D:\WINXP\COMMAND

SET PROMPT=$p$g

SET TEMP=D:\WINXP\TEMP

SET TMP=D:\WINXP\TEMP

what do you think now gameguy ?

hheheheh :DD

how old are you Elagizy? 8 maybe? seriously, I'm sure everyone here is wondering how old you are.

Edited by liykh001
  • 0

Cut him some slack. He's obviously not that skilled, and has some serious misconceptions about the complexity of programming. So he's not totally in touch with reality, big deal. Acquaint him with facts, if you feel so inclined, but ignore him if you don't think you have something instructive to give. I sincerely don't see the need for sarcastic or malicious replies.

  • 0
Cut him some slack. He's obviously not that skilled, and has some serious misconceptions about the complexity of programming. So he's not totally in touch with reality, big deal. Acquaint him with facts, if you feel so inclined, but ignore him if you don't think you have something instructive to give. I sincerely don't see the need for sarcastic or malicious replies.

585270114[/snapback]

Nah actually weenur, we were like that initially, read the Steal EXE thread, he was being all arrogant with us, we were informing him and taking him seriously, but he decided not to listen, and believe whatever his method was, was he best.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • GitHub removes manual model selection from Copilot free and student plans by Karthik Mudaliar GitHub is removing the ability to manually select an AI model from its Copilot Free and Student plans, making its automatic routing system the default and only way to choose a model. This means users on these tiers will no longer be able to deliberately select a particular OpenAI, Anthropic, Google, or Microsoft model for a task. In its announcement, GitHub said Copilot Auto will dynamically choose what it considers the best model for each request. Free and Student accounts will retain access to models from multiple families, although the available selection will continue to depend on the restrictions attached to each plan. GitHub did not identify a fixed pool of models that Auto will always use, and its documentation warns that model availability can change over time. GitHub describes Auto as more than a random fallback system. On supported surfaces, its task-optimization technology evaluates the complexity of a request alongside real-time information about model health and availability. Straightforward prompts can be routed to faster and less expensive models, while more demanding coding tasks may be sent to higher-cost reasoning models. The company says this approach should reduce rate limiting, latency, and failed requests. Auto generally selects one model along natural prompt-caching boundaries rather than repeatedly switching models during a session, as GitHub found that mid-session changes increased costs without producing sufficient improvements in output quality. Users can still check which model generated a response. In Copilot Chat, the information appears when hovering over an answer, while Copilot CLI and the Copilot cloud agent display the selected model alongside their output. Auto is available in Copilot Chat, Copilot CLI, and the cloud agent, with the exact implementation and release status varying between supported development environments. The latest restriction follows several months of adjustments to Copilot’s individual plans. GitHub temporarily halted new Pro, Pro+, and Student subscriptions in April as it sought to manage demand and service reliability. It later introduced token-based billing and began gradually reopening individual-plan registrations on June 17. Alongside the picker change, GitHub is retiring the “Preview” label from Microsoft-developed models. It argues that the label is no longer necessary because Auto handles model routing and models are continuously updated behind the scenes.
    • Look up 'inflation' kid. Ask an AI for the numbers between both games.
    • Google reportedly set to lose two key Gemini and DeepMind researchers to Anthropic by Karthik Mudaliar Google is reportedly preparing to lose two more prominent artificial intelligence researchers, with Gemini contributors Jonas Adler and Alexander Pritzel planning to join rival AI developer Anthropic. According to a report from Bloomberg, both researchers are viewed internally as important contributors to Google’s flagship Gemini model family. Adler worked on Google’s AI coding efforts, while Pritzel was involved in the process used to train AI systems. Neither company has publicly confirmed the moves. The report also does not say when the researchers will formally leave Google or what positions they will hold at Anthropic. Training a large AI model requires decisions covering its architecture, data preparation, distributed computing infrastructure, and post-training methods that shape how the finished system behaves. Researchers with experience operating at the scale of Gemini are consequently difficult to replace quickly. Both Adler and Pritzel have previously contributed to Google DeepMind’s scientific research as well. They are listed among the authors of the company’s work on expanding AlphaFold protein-structure predictions across entire proteomes, alongside AlphaFold researchers including John Jumper. The reported departures arrive shortly after another important change within Google’s Gemini organization. Gemini co-lead Noam Shazeer is leaving Google for OpenAI, after returning to the search company in 2024 through its deal with Character.AI. Shazeer is particularly well known as one of the authors of the Transformer paper, whose architecture became the foundation for most modern large language models. Anthropic, meanwhile, has been recruiting recognizable figures from other leading laboratories. OpenAI co-founder and former Tesla AI director Andrej Karpathy joined Anthropic’s pre-training team in May. His move, followed by the reported recruitment of several Google researchers, suggests Anthropic is strengthening the research teams responsible for the core capabilities of future Claude models rather than concentrating solely on product and enterprise sales. The competition is complicated by the companies’ extensive commercial relationships. Anthropic competes directly with Google’s Gemini models, but it also relies on Google as an infrastructure partner. In April, Anthropic announced an expanded agreement with Google and Broadcom covering multiple gigawatts of next-generation Tensor Processing Unit capacity. TPUs are Google-designed accelerators used to train and run large AI models. via Bloomberg
    • This article makes my head hurt. Lots of confusing words
    • Google adds built-in computer control to Gemini 3.5 flash by Karthik Mudaliar Google has added Computer Use as a built-in tool in Gemini 3.5 Flash, giving developers a single model that can reason about a task and operate graphical interfaces across browsers, mobile devices, and desktop environments. The feature is available through the Gemini API and Google’s Gemini Enterprise Agent Platform, although it remains a preview feature for now. Computer Use enables an AI agent to examine screenshots and return actions such as mouse clicks, scrolling, and keyboard input. A developer’s application must execute those actions, capture the resulting screen, and send it back to Gemini, creating a continuous loop until the task is completed. Google says the integration can be used for activities including repetitive form filling, application testing, research across multiple websites, and longer enterprise workflows. Gemini 3.5 Flash can work with browser, mobile, and desktop environments, whereas Google’s earlier standalone Computer Use model was primarily positioned around browser interaction. The main change is consolidation. Computer control was previously offered through the separate Gemini 2.5 Computer Use preview model. As Neowin reported when that model was introduced, it was designed to interpret a visual interface and generate actions without requiring a website-specific API. Google later brought Computer Use to preview versions of Gemini 3 Pro and Gemini 3 Flash in January 2026. The latest release now incorporates the tool into the stable Gemini 3.5 Flash model rather than requiring developers to select a specialized model solely for interface automation. Gemini 3.5 Flash itself was announced in May as Google’s latest fast model for coding and multi-step agent workflows. It supports a one-million-token input context window and up to 65,000 output tokens, along with adjustable thinking levels that let developers trade additional reasoning for lower latency and cost. Google also added that Gemini 3.5 Flash received targeted adversarial training for computer-use scenarios. The company is also offering safeguards that can require user confirmation before sensitive or irreversible actions and automatically stop a workflow when suspected prompt injection is detected. Its developer documentation describes configurable protections for areas such as financial transactions and changes to sensitive records. Google isn't the first to bring Computer Use to its platform. Anthropic has made computer control available through Claude, while OpenAI has continued improving computer-use performance in its recent models. Microsoft has also applied the concept to business workflows, including a Computer Use capability for the Researcher agent in Microsoft 365 Copilot.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      First Post
    • One Month Later
      D0nn13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Rookie
      +ChiefOfNeo went up a rank
      Rookie
    • One Year In
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      463
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      177
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      124
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      79
    5. 5
      Xenon
      76
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!