• 0

Want to test my prog. protection


Question

Recommended Posts

  • 0
Cut him some slack. He's obviously not that skilled, and has some serious misconceptions about the complexity of programming. So he's not totally in touch with reality, big deal. Acquaint him with facts, if you feel so inclined, but ignore him if you don't think you have something instructive to give. I sincerely don't see the need for sarcastic or malicious replies.

585270114[/snapback]

I'd tend to agree with you, but Elagizy has pretty much brought this on himself. He's very clearly a rank amateur with very little actual knowledge or experience coding and he's got an arrogant streak that has brought out the worst in people he could otherwise learn from.

  • 0
Nah actually weenur, we were like that initially, read the Steal EXE thread, he was being all arrogant with us, we were informing him and taking him seriously, but he decided not to listen, and believe whatever his method was, was he best.

585270241[/snapback]

I'd tend to agree with you, but Elagizy has pretty much brought this on himself. He's very clearly a rank amateur with very little actual knowledge or experience coding and he's got an arrogant streak that has brought out the worst in people he could otherwise learn from.

585270930[/snapback]

I agree that his arrogance is less than desirable, and amusing. However, I think it's a little like feeding a troll. If you ignore the attention ######, he goes away. But, who am I to say what you guys should or shouldn't do. Jebus knows that I've been biting my lip quite heavily. I just like this board when it's peaceful. Living in a big city, I tend to see more ugliness than I'd care to, so I really don't like to see it in a place I like to relax at.

  • 0

in his previous thread.. Stealing EXE, he started very nicely.. and we as well replied him nicely.. but then, we also explained him that no software is un-crackable.. because whole stuff of exe is with the user or cracker.. but he started saying that his encryption is good enough to defeat crackers.. so we even explained him how it goes.. but he replied arrogant and that just messed up a little bit..

see, as far as any person is trying to understand its good and great.. we also like to explain stuffs, but when person starts that no ur wrong and I am rite.. regardless the knowledge that person knows.. then it just f*ks up our mind..

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • If you don't care to read what I said, then you prove my point. Maybe written media is beyond your attention span. Titles are not summaries my friend.
    • Nobody asked... in fact, I said "I don't care about political leanings"  
    • TLDR. Here is a far better title (just a basic example): Windows 11 26H2 to allow disabling Web search results
    • Restore will get my vote, only if to see if things are any different, doubt it though but Labour and Conservatives too out of touch and same thing over and over and over…, Lib Dem who?
    • There is nothing wrong with this title. You have completely missed the plot when it comes to "clickbait." The issue was never that a title tries to entice you to click, that is how titles have worked for over 100 years. The issue is when the title subverts expectations, getting you to click expecting something that isn't there. The classic clickbait example is "Boyfriend caught cheating, what happens next will shock you," then what happened next is the girlfriend was upset...which is probably the least shocking outcome imaginable. If sounds like what you want is for the titles to be a collection of 10-word summaries that you can skim, get the just of the story, and only click if you want more details. That is not, never has been, and never will be what titles are. You can go all the way back to print newspapers during the great depression and see the same thing. The newspaper was locked in a vending machine, all you can see is the headline, you choose to put in 5¢ to buy the paper and read the rest if you want. Those headlines were written in a way to sell the paper, not just to provide a summery. Here are two actual headlines from that time, "Wall Street Lays an Egg," or "Stocks Hit Bottom?" Maybe you'd say something like "it was wrong then and it's still wrong now." Okay, fine opinion to have, but it isn't like Neowin is doing something unjurnalistic, they are just following the age-old standards for written media.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      tuben earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Week One Done
      mnsgroup earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Conversation Starter
      sumytbe earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Year In
      B4dM1k3 earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Year In
      DarkWun earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      525
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      199
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      94
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      82
    5. 5
      neufuse
      67
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!