iBook 14" G3 800 hard drive has died


Recommended Posts

Hello all,

Was noticing some oddness with my ibook over the last few days. It'd freeze up and come with the 'disk space low - please close some applications or free up hard drive space' warning once or twice. I thought this was odd because I had over 11GB of free space (plus 640MB RAM in it).

This morning it was much more dire, every 3 minutes it'd freeze up with this screen and take more than 5 to recover. It was basically unusable.

I managed to get activity monitor open and it had 4GB of virtual RAM used. I thought something had went wrong with the virtual memory subroutines and it was going over a file size limit, causing major problems. I thought the good old restart trick would work.

Before that however I tried to get into system profiler to see the SMART status of the HDD and it was obvious that something wasn't right at all - it wasn't coming up with the disk space warning, just sittin there for minutes at a time, and then having a second or two of hard drive accessing before sitting there again.

I restarted it, and it's taken over 1 hour to start up again, with the '3 minutes nothing, 2 seconds reading' routine. The hard drive is making a noise like it's reading a file, failing, reading it again, failing etc until eventually it manages to read it and move on.

The iBook is made in 2002 and it's under the logic board replacement program apart from it doesn't show any of the issues that it should to 'qualify' for it.

Any ideas? I'm not going to get applecare, because it's way too expensive (?200!). I could attempt to replace it myself but it does look quite involved and I'd rather not risk it. Any chance apple would repair it as an 'act of goodwill'?

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/271849-ibook-14-g3-800-hard-drive-has-died/
Share on other sites

Apple isn't going to be reparing it certainly, and the nearest 'apple authorised support centre' is over 60 miles away from me and they will charge a ****load to repair the harddrive.

The main problem is that I have about ?300 worth of batteries, RAM, and airport stuff that I'll need to replace if i got a new ibook, so that's out of the picture.

I'm currently installing OSX again and it seems to be working, as in the hard drive is constantly accessing and the progress bar is moving fine. Maybe I'll be granted a miricle and it was just a b0rked install of OSX or something that's killed it.

  • 2 weeks later...

Are you sure it's a failing hard-drive? The freezing, hard-drive, and unreseponsive SMART analysis would make it seem so but the 4 GB of used swap would suggest that all of those symptons are caused by a software issue. It could be that you have a buggy piece of sofware and that it has a memory leak or something like that which is causing heavy RAM/swap usage and consequently lots of hard-disk activity which could be causing the lock-ups and poor hard-disk performance.

You get it to work dude?

If you physically have to replace the drive yourself it is a bit of a guddle, but a lot cheaper than getting apple to do it!!

Dougal.

585345430[/snapback]

Yes, in the end it did turn out to be an OSX problem. Wierdest one I've ever seen though.

<rant>

Guess what. It's ****** again. Yay. Same error, 'out of disk space', when I have 13.3GB on a 27GB drive left.

Apple won't even help me work out if this is a hardware or software fault. I'm guessing it's hardware, but frankly I just can't be arsed.

I mean, ok, I can understand them not covering the hard drive fault. But for a 'premium product' it's a joke, I wonder if you'd get the same service off them if you bought a ?2500 Powermac (no sir, I can't help you fix it. But why don't you buy a brand new one!).

Basically, it sucks. Especially when they offer such a short warranty. I don't know of any 'sell-to-public' computer company that offers a 1yr warranty these days, not to mention Apple only offers 90 days of tech support.

</rant>

Edit: ok, I calmed down. Something is majorly wrong here, the dock is using up 1.7GB of VM. And Apple has the cheek to call Microsoft software bloated!

Jesus, I don't know what the hell is going on here. iCalAlarmScheduler using 150MB of VM, and 15MB (!) of physical memory. I don't even use iCal.

I've also got 400MB worth of Apache processes. So much for trusting OSX to handle all this sort of stuff. Another 50MB of VM used up with the 'bugreporter' tool (5MB real ram).

How Apple plans to sell Mac Mini's with 256MB of RAM and expect them to perform decently is beyond me. OSX is the worlds most bloated operating system.

Basically, it sucks. Especially when they offer such a short warranty. I don't know of any 'sell-to-public' computer company that offers a 1yr warranty these days, not to mention Apple only offers 90 days of tech support.

585380955[/snapback]

A lot of computer are sold though with one year warrenties, and they aren't apples. Most of your computers that a lot of people buy from places like walmart carry only a one year warrenty with them...now places like Dell that you order online from are different, but if a person can just walk into walmart and buy a computer, they will do it.

A lot of computer are sold though with one year warrenties, and they aren't apples.  Most of your computers that a lot of people buy from places like walmart carry only a one year warrenty with them...now places like Dell that you order online from are different, but if a person can just walk into walmart and buy a computer, they will do it.

585381365[/snapback]

But Walmart computers are much, much cheaper than Apple's computers. I wouldn't buy a computer from walmart, but my point stands: for a supposed 'premium' pricepoint, 1yr warranty isn't enough.

Anyone got any ideas here? It's totally died this evening, won't even boot up. I haven't got the time to keep reinstalling OSX plus all the software updates ever 2 weeks.

Does anyone know what a cause of this could be? I don't want to take the sucker apart and replace the hDD to find out it is a logic board problem.

Here's what I would do. Buy an external firewire enclosed hard drive, install OS X on it and use that as you boot drive. May not be the prettiest solution, but it works. You'll also get a performance boost if you get a faster drive than the iBooks 4200rpm drive.

Yea, I've thought of that. I don't know if it'll work though, because I'm not convinced there is any problem with the HDD. And it would also mean I couldn't use my laptop as a laptop.. which would be a _slight_ problem :). But if it meant having a working laptop vs not, I'd take it.

I just reinstalled OSX again, and all is fine. This is what makes me confused. If the HDD was dying I wouldn't expect it to go for 10-14days+ and then die again. (I have turned it off in this time, so it's unlikely to be heat).

A few suggestions for you. (I work for apple btw).

1) Run Open Disk Utility from the install disk 1 (Installer menu screen after u select the language). Does it show errors that it can't recover from?

2) Are you erase and installing or archive and installing Mac OS X? Big difference if disk utility says there are errors that cannot be fixed, sometimes a clean format does the trick.

3) Run Apple Hardware Test (the disk you got with your powerbook) by inserting the CD and holding the ALT button down and then clicking on the forward arrow. Run the extended test to see if any hardware faults are detected.

Good Luck!

  • 2 months later...

Ok, about a week after this thread it was obvious that the logic board was at fault - faulty display etc. I sent it into Apple and all was fixed, got it back 3 days or so after. Wonderful I thought. Obviously the bad logic board was causing all sorts of issues, including busting the ATA controller.

Now today (about 2-3months after this thread was made), EXACT SAME ISSUES!

I bet in about 3 days time it'll fail to boot up. A couple days after that it'll start showing a scrambled display.

This is, in a word, pathetic. Less than 3 months after a so-called 'logic board repair', it's showing the exact same issues. Obviously what Apple is doing here is a cost-benefit ratio and working out that it's cheaper to throw bad logic boards back in than actually design a new one, get it milled, assemble it. So millions(?) probably are going to be seriously inconviencied because it's not worth producing a working product by Apple.

Is it possible I could get a replacement iBook G4 (or basically, one that doesn't have this design problem?) instead? If it's going to be useless if have to lose a good few weeks of productivity every couple of months while I wait for the issue to arise as on the website, get it repaired, restore backups etc.

Frankly this is ****ty. Don't buy a used iBook G3. They will break, and if you're lucky you'll get a warranty replacement.

Ok, I just ran the Apple Hardware Test (just found the CD today -- so haven't run it before) and when I run it I get all sorts of colors and distortion, similar to the ones I had when my iBook totally failed coming up on the screen. Is this normal? It passes the VRAM and all other tests, but I'm guessing it wouldn't know if it was outputing crap, and it's still passing it.

So my super-simple question is: When I run the Extended Hardware Test, should my display go off the 'progress bar' screen at all?

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Researchers claim Microsoft's quantum breakthrough is flawed by basic Python errors by Karthik Mudaliar Microsoft's aggressive roadmap to deliver a commercial quantum supercomputer by 2029 has now hit a bit of a snag, and it's not because of a complex sub-zero dilution refrigerator, but rather because of a few lines of basic Python code. A new critique published in the scientific journal Nature argues that simple software errors effectively manufactured the breakthrough that Microsoft's foundational research claimed back in 2025 into Majorana-based topological qubits. Topological quantum computing, the path that Microsoft chose for its research, relies on creating and controlling "Majorana zero modes." These are exotic quasiparticles that theoretically offer vastly superior error resistance compared to the highly sensitive superconducting qubits currently being championed by rivals like Google and IBM. However, physically proving you have created these particles requires sifting through massive amounts of complex electrical conductance data to isolate a specific "topological gap." Because of the sheer volume of data, physicists rely heavily on custom software pipelines to process the results. This is where the Python scripts come in. Now, according to the critique, Microsoft’s data processing software contained fundamental programming errors that ultimately skewed the published results. By mishandling data arrays or deploying incorrect logic within the Python script, the software supposedly discarded "noisy" or contradictory data. Which is why it only highlighted the specific electrical measurements that supported the topological-gap claim. The researchers behind the critique argued that this makes the findings invalid, suggesting the heralded "quantum leap" was actually a false positive generated by bad code and not a product of groundbreaking physics. However, Microsoft is pushing back hard against these allegations. The Redmond giant has formally rejected the criticism, saying that it's just a minor anomaly rather than a fatal flaw. According to the company, while there may have been a minor oversight in the data parsing scripts, it does not alter the fundamental reality of their physical experiment. Just weeks ago, Microsoft unveiled the Majorana 2 quantum processor, a milestone so significant that the company boldly accelerated its timeline for a commercial quantum supercomputer from 2035 down to 2029. But the new software allegations reopen an old wound. Microsoft's quantum division faced a remarkably similar crisis when a landmark 2018 paper on Majorana particles was famously retracted in 2021 after independent physicists discovered the data had been inappropriately cropped. That historical baggage makes the current Python-related allegations particularly sensitive. If the foundational math and data processing for the 2025 breakthrough are genuinely flawed, the highly anticipated 2029 commercial timeline could easily be delayed or, worse, cancelled.
    • Because of what they have done to VMware I will never buy anything Broadcom again.
    • AMD releases hotfix for driver install issues on Windows 10 PCs by Taras Buria Earlier this week, AMD released an important graphics driver update. Version 26.6.2 brought AMD FSR 4.1 support to the previous-gen Radeon lineup, the RX 7000 series, giving users better upscaling tech that was previously locked to the newest GPUs. However, the driver turned out to be a little buggy, with users reporting installation issues on systems still running Windows 10. AMD quickly acknowledged the bug and today released a hotfix to resolve the problem. The AMD 26.6.3 Hotfix update is now available for download from the official website. Given that it is a hotfix release, it has only one change in its release notes: AMD announced the update on its official X account and added that a WHQL driver update with the necessary fixes would be released next week. Meanwhile, users can apply the hotfix or roll back to the previous driver using the official AMD Cleanup Utility. You can download AMD Software: Adrenalin Edition 26.6.3 Hotfix Preview Driver from the official website here. It is compatible with all currently supported graphics cards and 64-bit Windows 10 and 11. Full release notes are available on the same page.
    • With Microsoft now listening to its core audience and acting upon received feedback, fans can finally expect a much better version of Windows 11 than what was available five years ago. Here is to five more years, Windows 11! I guess we all need a good laugh now and again...
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      First Post
    • One Month Later
      D0nn13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Rookie
      +ChiefOfNeo went up a rank
      Rookie
    • One Year In
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      466
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      177
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      123
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      82
    5. 5
      Xenon
      76
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!