67 year old Gives birth


Right or wrong, let the masses decide!  

156 members have voted

  1. 1. Right or wrong, let the masses decide!

    • Right?
      24
    • Wrong?
      132


Recommended Posts

This is a tug-o-war between pro-choice and morality. I am 20 and have relatively young parents (both 41) so the age gap has always been quite small. My parents remember what it was like to be my age all the way through childhood and adolescence and that helps a lot.

The main problem I see here is that the poor kid isn't going to be guaranteed a mother much beyond its teens. But then again, who is? I could have a kid now, but my hectic lifestyle could dictate my absence before it's even born. Life is all down to chance.

The main reason we are here in this evolutionary 'goo' is to pro-create (replace yourself and your partner) before you die. I say congratulations. It's getting easier and easier to conceive later in life (although us blokes pretty much pop 'til we drop).

It's her decision and maybe her overall life experience will postively dominate her parenting. As long as she does her best with the kid, I'm sure it'll work out fine.

Congratulations to the woman who is older than my grandmother!

If you were raised by your great-great grandparents, you'd have a different opinion. It's not about what is best for the woman; news flash, only bad parents bring children in to the world for their own benefit. A child is an independent life and should only be brought in the this world for it's own benefit. Your argument is like two people in a bad marriage that have a kid to save their marriage!

OMG! I've just had a thought!

The old granny might share the same diaper brand with her kid!

585305992[/snapback]

Nope, you got my point wrong. I am saying that If there was something wrong, could be anything. It could have been a godsend to them. People get their signs every day.

To be honest i wouldn't support this, like seriously think about the kid, the mother and father would be that old, and touch wood, they wouldn't stay alive for too long, and lets say they are lucky enough for another 10 yrs, the kid will be 10 yrs old, and if they go, who will look after them? Relatives, but what if they don't have any? then they'll be an orphan, and also it does impact childhood life.

Living in a country where they have an enormous number of orphans (romania), you would think that this woman might have considered adopting maybe 4 or 5 children instead of spending so much money on such a selfish pursuit.

the egg wasn't hers. she doesn't have a partner - so the sperm was donor. the baby was born prematurely - bringing with it many health risks. born without her twin - in which case she may always feel some sort of loss even though she never met her twin.

and by the time she is 20, it's very possible that her only family member, her mother, will have died.

i can't imagine an existance like that.

i'm very fortunate that i still have both my parents, but to have no family in your early 20's is just sad :(

these were selfish actions, by a selfish woman.

everyone keeps saying "she's an intelligent woman - she must have thought it through properly!"

some of the smartest people i've met have very little common sense, and sense of social and moral resposibility.

:no:

Living in a country where they have an enormous number of orphans (romania), you would think that this woman might have considered adopting maybe 4 or 5 children instead of spending so much money on such a selfish pursuit.

the egg wasn't hers. she doesn't have a partner - so the sperm was donor. the baby was born prematurely - bringing with it many health risks. born without her twin - in which case she may always feel some sort of loss even though she never met her twin.

and by the time she is 20, it's very possible that her only family member, her mother, will have died.

i can't imagine an existance like that.

i'm very fortunate that i still have both my parents, but to have no family in your early 20's is just sad :(

these were selfish actions, by a selfish woman.

everyone keeps saying "she's an intelligent woman - she must have thought it through properly!"

some of the smartest people i've met have very little common sense, and  sense of social and moral resposibility.

  :no:

585325887[/snapback]

I agree with you. So many places have orphanages in Romania, years ago (In England) lots of them got adopted, lots of toys and money was sent to help the ones not adopted.

When my two grow up and leave home, we hope to adopt a couple of children from kent that need a family.

Very sad this women spat on her own people.

It is her choice. If she can do it then that's fine with her.

Anyone can do what they want at any age they want. Age does not stop you from doing what you actually can do.

Congrats to her for a new family member. I grief for one of the twins who died during birth.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • If you don't care to read what I said, then you prove my point. Maybe written media is beyond your attention span. Titles are not summaries my friend.
    • Nobody asked... in fact, I said "I don't care about political leanings"  
    • TLDR. Here is a far better title (just a basic example): Windows 11 26H2 to allow disabling Web search results
    • Restore will get my vote, only if to see if things are any different, doubt it though but Labour and Conservatives too out of touch and same thing over and over and over…, Lib Dem who?
    • There is nothing wrong with this title. You have completely missed the plot when it comes to "clickbait." The issue was never that a title tries to entice you to click, that is how titles have worked for over 100 years. The issue is when the title subverts expectations, getting you to click expecting something that isn't there. The classic clickbait example is "Boyfriend caught cheating, what happens next will shock you," then what happened next is the girlfriend was upset...which is probably the least shocking outcome imaginable. If sounds like what you want is for the titles to be a collection of 10-word summaries that you can skim, get the just of the story, and only click if you want more details. That is not, never has been, and never will be what titles are. You can go all the way back to print newspapers during the great depression and see the same thing. The newspaper was locked in a vending machine, all you can see is the headline, you choose to put in 5¢ to buy the paper and read the rest if you want. Those headlines were written in a way to sell the paper, not just to provide a summery. Here are two actual headlines from that time, "Wall Street Lays an Egg," or "Stocks Hit Bottom?" Maybe you'd say something like "it was wrong then and it's still wrong now." Okay, fine opinion to have, but it isn't like Neowin is doing something unjurnalistic, they are just following the age-old standards for written media.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      tuben earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Week One Done
      mnsgroup earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Conversation Starter
      sumytbe earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Year In
      B4dM1k3 earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Year In
      DarkWun earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      525
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      199
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      94
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      82
    5. 5
      neufuse
      67
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!