Looking to buy a superbike...


Recommended Posts

Well, lately ive been thinking about purchasing a affordable super bike (Suzuki, Yamaha, Kawasaki, etc.), but I know nothing about them.

I dont have my motorcycle license or anything yet, so im just wondering everything I need to know/get about the bike.

I also have heard insurance is much cheaper on a bike (im only 17 though), is this true?

Thanks guys!

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/273018-looking-to-buy-a-superbike/
Share on other sites

as insanekiwi said, get a small bike first. Trust me, you wont want to jump onto a 1000cc bike if you don't even have your licence. Just stick to a 250cc. Honda makes some pretty 'sporty' looking 250s.

585313817[/snapback]

I tend to disagree. A Yamaha R6 would probably be best in his situation, as I have been in the exact same place, and made the accident of buying the smaller bike, which was recommended to me. It took me 2 weeks after certification, before I wanted/needed a larger cc bike, and I am still trying to sell the smaller bike, which I have been for 4 months and are going to lose money on.

In my opinion, if you have never been on a bike before, take an ABATE course. You get to ride (at least here) different CC bikes to get a feel for what you need, and will teach you all the rules of the road.

I made the accident of taking the abate course AFTER i purchased the bike...

It really depends on how quick your level of riding improves by. Like for example when I rode my friends Honda CBR250RR, I pretty much got bored of it after about 2hrs of riding it. Then I've tried out my other friends bikes which had a greater displacement than the one I first rode. Now I know what kind of bike I'm aiming for. I totally agree with pimpshiznid, try out bikes and then go for one you are most comfortable and most secure with unless ofcourse you're in Australia like me who unfortunately cannot ride a bike greater than 260cc unless you've had your license for more than 12 months. Just try not to get caught lol

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • I've been using MWB Premium for a number of years so that along with Windows updates and updated browser should be fine. Thanks for that.
    • For some reason I suddenly have the urge to go shopping at Sears.
    • So I did a quick test based on 3+ different public instances from the litany at searx.space ... and it spins everything rather differently. It seems that SearXNG is a meta-search engine (queries multiple search indexes rather than only Google's or Bing's or Wikipedia's or Reddit's) that operates in two modes: > public instances ... each instance opens itself to outside users who piggyback on its cached search history; this instance's own identity becomes known/tracked but end-users are hidden similar to an anonymization proxy; this instance's querying of major search indexes may be API based [rated limited, blocked, etc.]). > private instances ... your private install/instance that itself queries multiple (configurable) search indexes of crawled web content; every major Search Engine associates all traffic to your private instance (so your traffic is tracked via network usages) but client-side tracking (your own browser/computer specs) is flushed because it's a "server" doing the querying rather than your browser. My test asked the same 1 question to the 3+ engines and they all returned vastly different results: some had CAPTCHA failures against Google, some had failures against Wikipedia, and the actual results were also different -- some had auto-complete enabled, others returned a wikipedia highlighted excerpt despite the Wikipedia failure (hinting at results being cached from previous keyword matching), and others just gave an Are-You-Human non-CAPTCHA loop before returning random results. So this begs the caveat: Search query results will vary based on which instance is used because every instance queries the other search indexes separate (and thus its results are influenced on that instance's aggregate search history and index-access limitations). The major distinctions for SearXNG versus DDG or Brave: > The search UI is 'untracked' since no UI trackers are baked-in which would phone home or lay cookies into your browser (for DDG/Brave usage stats), > There is no 'crawler' that canvasses the Internet to discover fresh content (it leaves that to the major search indexes), > Queries multiple search indexes ("meta-search engine") based on the configurations and usage history of the server instance, > Privacy-friendly due to its ability to shield user tracking via standing up a non-local server instance connectable to major VPN providers: queries would all appear to come from general VPN/Proxy providers rather than your private instance (whether installed locally or on your own VPS in the cloud). PS: I've previously come across specialized search engines of this nature that indexes searches across media assets like YT, OF, etc. SearXNG seems to be a good backbone...if the rate-limiting/captcha/etc. issues were resolved.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Woland13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Woland13 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      bernmeister earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      490
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      225
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      147
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      74
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!