Recommended Posts

I wrote this to get some feelings out, that I have held, about the Firefox community, especially the branch of it that lurks around Neowin. I'm hoping that the small foot I have into the community will help to start spread this message of tolerance and respect:

Common sense, in the computing world, tells you to use whatever program you feel best accomplishes the goal you are trying to obtain. No one tool is perfect for everyone on any single goal, but they all manage to come together and cover a vast majority of users out there. Those who still feel jilted, usually program their own stuff, as I am still slowly doing with NexPad. It's a nice idea, but it's being trampled on by the immature, unable minds of extremist Firefox fan boys who do nothing but fly that icon in your face over and over until you feel bad for using anything else.

It's no secret that I use Firefox. I have a decently popular optimized build that I, myself, release daily. In general, I really like Firefox. It does what I need and that's all I ask. Sure, I have even recommended it to other people and have downloaded it to their machines for use in some pretty severe cases of corruption of their browser of choice. I let them know what I am using, tell them I use it and like it, and that's it. I let them make the choice because, after all, I want them to be able to accomplish the goals they want. I haven't converted many people, but my mom and dad now use the Fox and they like it. It works, simple as that.

My sisters use another browser and I don't seem to mind, even if it is slightly outdated (MSN 7). It does what they need and I respect that. However, ask yourself something: If they were to go to a "tech forum" and ask a question about their browser of choice, how likely do you think it is that someone will tell them to use Firefox? The problem is, it is WAY too likely to happen. At the site I work for, Neowin.net, it became a large enough problem that a thread had to be created, in our dedicated Web Browser Support Forum, just to warn users of the complete lack of tolerance we have for such behavior. In extreme circumstances, an account could be completely disabled for such offenses.

Some readers, right now, may not understand what the big deal is. However, imagine it in a different light. Imagine you owned a 1998 Ford and you needed to bring it to the mechanic. Upon bringing the car in to the shop, the mechanic ignores you as you speak and simply yells out, in your face, to ?get a Dodge?. He may even call you a ?n00b? or, in more actual wording, an ?idiot? for driving a Ford and not the Dodge. So, now, instead of walking out with a problem corrected and a, once again, peaceful experience with your Ford, you now go home, after being insulted, with the problem still in existence. The world just doesn?t work that way.

What can we do? Education is the answer. I can?t possibly sit here and expect anyone?s attitude to completely change because of my words. It is simply an improbable and silly thought. However, with that said, we need to start spreading the concept of mature product selection and respect. Firefox is a great product, without a doubt, but it doesn?t suit everyone?s needs and that?s perfectly okay. Internet Explorer, Opera, Safari, K-Meleon, etc, are all perfectly fine choices for a user if they feel their browsing needs will be met. So please, fellow Firefox users and lovers, try to keep these thoughts in mind. We need to be here to show how powerful this community can be, though; we need to be gentle with that power. We all need to show respect towards the choices people make, from their hair color to their Web Browser. You may not like it, but it?s their web experience and not yours. Please remember this. Let?s prove, together, that we are all better than this.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/277380-brief-essay-on-fanboyism/
Share on other sites

I couldn't agree with you more. It takes a certain level of maturity to understand and respect another person's opinion, though.

Not too many people have learnt that patience and tolerance are virtues. What the article says is restricted to the Firefox community, but I think largely I have observed this kind of immature behaviour in other fan clubs on the net too.

I couldn't agree with you more.  It takes a certain level of maturity to understand and respect another person's opinion, though. 

Not too many people have learnt that patience and tolerance are virtues.  What the article says is restricted to the Firefox community, but I think largely I have observed this kind of immature behaviour in other fan clubs on the net too.

585371913[/snapback]

Yes, I could have gone a lot broader, but this is something personal to me, so I thought I would just vent a little. I love using Firefox, but as I have said, when the fanboyism makes me want to stop using and building it, there is an issue.

Good points and should give lots of people something to think about.

However, I don't understand why anyone would stop using a product they like because some of the users act like immature spammers. Like you said, it's not a Firefox problem. Pretty much all successful products have similar sects, Microsoft, Lunix, Apple, IE, Opera, ATI, NVIDIA, etc. etc. With that ideology the only solution I see is becoming a hermit and living off berries, though I know couple very pesty vegans too...

I agree with you on that... however, one point I'd like to raise is this: how can one tell the difference between when another is using a browser because they choose to, and when they are using a browser because they feel that they have to? This question is mainly directed at IE users, of course, but it can apply to other browsers too if someone forced them to use a different browser. It is good to at least have the suggestion to switch browsers in case they are in the latter category; if they are using their browser because they choose to, then there's no harm done.

That said, the overly zealous attitude that many Firefox users have assumed is going too far. Suggesting that a user tries Firefox, and telling a user to use Firefox are two very different things.

--

Edited for formatting.

I agree with you on that... however, one point I'd like to raise is this: how can one tell the difference between when another is using a browser because they choose to, and when they are using a browser because they feel that they have to?

585372172[/snapback]

If they come to you with a problem, point them in the direction of the solution. As a side note, tell them that similar problems could be avoided by a relatively painless application change, and that [insert product here] is your recomendation. Ask if your fix worked, and then ask them to contact you if they're interested in switching applications.

It respects peoples' right to choice, informs them of your solution, and at the same time it provides them with the solution they were looking for.

This sends a clear message: You haven't called them ignorant by telling them they've made a mistake by using the application they do, instead you've informed them that there's a better way. You'll be respected for it, especially if they go through with the application swap and enjoy an improvement.

My two (Canadian) cents.

If they come to you with a problem, point them in the direction of the solution.  As a side note, tell them that similar problems could be avoided by a relatively painless application change, and that [insert product here] is your recomendation.  Ask if your fix worked, and then ask them to contact you if they're interested in switching applications.

It respects peoples' right to choice, informs them of your solution, and at the same time it provides them with the solution they were looking for.

This sends a clear message:  You haven't called them ignorant by telling them they've made a mistake by using the application they do, instead you've informed them that there's a better way.  You'll be respected for it, especially if they go through with the application swap and enjoy an improvement.

My two (Canadian) cents.

585376134[/snapback]

I couldn't have said it better myself. Thank you.

Fanaticism is fine as long as it's respectful. As long as Opera fans respect that Firefox has its strengths and Firefox fans respect that Opera has its strengths and everybody respects that everybody else has different needs, everything is great. Put up as many advertisements for Firetruck as you can possibly fit in your sig and avatar and title and posts, but don't be a big jerk about it.

What i think is more annoying than fanaticism is people whining about other people arguing, though. Some of us like to debate the merits of our favourite software, you know. It usually gets us no-where, but then again so does everything else we do on the Internet. So... let the Firetruck vs Opera people have their fun, as long as they aren't being jerks about it. Let them argue for months on end. You don't help anybody by coming in every three posts and going 'GOD JESE LETS ALL JUST AGREE TO DISGAREE', because nobody wants to do that and nobody's listening to you anyway.... <_<

If they come to you with a problem, point them in the direction of the solution.  As a side note, tell them that similar problems could be avoided by a relatively painless application change, and that [insert product here] is your recomendation.  Ask if your fix worked, and then ask them to contact you if they're interested in switching applications.

It respects peoples' right to choice, informs them of your solution, and at the same time it provides them with the solution they were looking for.

This sends a clear message:  You haven't called them ignorant by telling them they've made a mistake by using the application they do, instead you've informed them that there's a better way.  You'll be respected for it, especially if they go through with the application swap and enjoy an improvement.

My two (Canadian) cents.

585376134[/snapback]

Well said dude,I've learnt quite a lot over the last 2 days. :)

Nice post Bangbang. I have maybe done a little of this myself, not calling names or anything to that degree, but being over zealous at times. I think it's just because you like the product (ie. Firefox) so much and want others to enjoy it as much as you have. I think most don't mean to be jerks about it, I know I didn't. So, I'm sure your post will have results. The problem will not go away but it will have results. Thanks for the prospective.

I also agree with you Lav. A good debate can be educational to the readers.. as the sides talk about what one product can do that the other can't. I have found some of these threads useful, because I can see what the pros and cons are of a product before I try it. Although not always accurate they are helpful. And give you a place to start.

  • 4 months later...

Why are you surprised that in a tech forum, you'd have replies saying "go for firefox?"

Seriously. Tech people in a tech forum will look at tech specs, compare them (not necessarly showing it) and tell you which will do the job you want to do at its best.

For the average joe, the risks of screwing up anything is lower with Firefox or Opera than with IE and don't try to bs me with the "shut up FF fanboy" because it's not because of fanboys that Firefox is an increasingly popular browser, admit that. It does a good job at doing what IE also does.

There's a difference between "good" and "better". You want to avoid problems/headaches? They will reccomend you firefox and there's a reason why.

A lot of tech guys are fedup of cleaning the computers of their friends and family members because of the crap that installed via IE's activex and its default settings. At the risk of going through that, they'll avoid the problems by reccomending and/or installing a browser that does a better job at doing what they want to do.

I agree the zealots will say one line "get firefox" without any ****ing helpful information. Those kind of posts shouldn't even get tolerated if you ask me.

But, can you blame them for blindly reccomending something they know its better?

Maybe if the average user tried to be less lazy and know how to navigate, maybe then we'd (yes, we) be more willing to put effort into explaining.

my sqrt(2*2) cents

Why are you surprised that in a tech forum, you'd have replies saying "go for firefox?"

Seriously. Tech people in a tech forum will look at tech specs, compare them (not necessarly showing it) and tell you which will do the job you want to do at its best.

For the average joe, the risks of screwing up anything is lower with Firefox or Opera than with IE and don't try to bs me with the "shut up FF fanboy" because it's not because of fanboys that Firefox is an increasingly popular browser, admit that. It does a good job at doing what IE also does.

There's a difference between "good" and "better". You want to avoid problems/headaches? They will reccomend you firefox and there's a reason why.

A lot of tech guys are fedup of cleaning the computers of their friends and family members because of the crap that installed via IE's activex and its default settings. At the risk of going through that, they'll avoid the problems by reccomending and/or installing a browser that does a better job at doing what they want to do.

I agree the zealots will say one line "get firefox" without any ****ing helpful information. Those kind of posts shouldn't even get tolerated if you ask me.

But, can you blame them for blindly reccomending something they know its better?

Maybe if the average user tried to be less lazy and know how to navigate, maybe then we'd (yes, we) be more willing to put effort into explaining.

my sqrt(2*2) cents

586130736[/snapback]

I think that's what he meant by that essay. :) Bravo, bangbang! That's exactly what I've been thinking. I think I'll switch to Firefox again tonight.. :p

[...]

586130736[/snapback]

you have to remember that not everyone that browses the web has the same set of requirements for a browser. my mother for instance would get confused as hell if tabbed browsing was shoved in her face. she gets worried when she doesn't see the big blue 'e,' because that's all she knows. I'm not going to argue that firefox would probably result in fewer security problems vs IE, both being at default security settings because at the present time it's probably true.

however, setting her up with antivirus, several antispyware applications, higher security settings, and automatic updates will result in just as rich a experience in IE as she would get with anything else. actually probably better, since she doesn't have to worry about patching.

so just don't forget there is probably more of my mom's out there then there is me's. IE is all that the mom's of the world need at the moment.

Fanaticism is fine as long as it's respectful. As long as Opera fans respect that Firefox has its strengths and Firefox fans respect that Opera has its strengths and everybody respects that everybody else has different needs, everything is great.

585376264[/snapback]

Very true, and if things were as they should be, that would happen. But since it isn't and they aren't, the more pressing question seems to be, how to remedy the situation, taking for granted that certain people are always going to be rude about it?

Education through example? I don't know.

As for the main issue, good article. I'm a Firefox user, but not to any fanatical extent. Most of my friends use IE, and unless I hear something along the lines of, "wow, I wish I could open all my pages in one window" (wherein a suggestion/recommendation might be appropriate), my philosophy is to live and let live on the matter. ;)

I think Firefox fanatism has seen its peak in Nov04 to 1st.Qtr.05 People are getting rational now and starting to realize that its just another browser. You like it you use it, and let others do what they want. Its what Apple-MS, Win-Lin debaters realized (hoping they did :D) sometime back.

This will happen with every new product coming to market, people get emotionally attached :blink: to "products" which are no more than simple tools to achieve means.

Just wait for IE7 beta to come out and there will be another round of this. :whistle:

Just wait for IE7 beta to come out and there will be another round of this.  :whistle:

586131256[/snapback]

Oh geez, please no! LOL but I'm sure your right. I for one am going to give it a try. I like Firefox, but I learned my lesson, with being to loyal, a long time ago. Netscape taught me that one. I was very loyal so they rewarded me by selling out to AOL.. that's when I dropped them and started using IE. Granted they might not have had a choice, but to sell.

Looking forward to what IE7 has to offer, and maybe push others to do more too. Like Firefox and Opera. I have said it before, the more browsers the more chance to have one the way you want it. I think it's a good thing to have Opera and IE and whoever else. GOOD!

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • We now know when and how the Universe may truly end by Sayan Sen Image by Marek Pavlík via Pexels| Not representative A study by physicist Henry Tye of Cornell University suggests that the universe may not expand forever. Instead, it could eventually stop expanding, begin contracting and end in a "Big Crunch" roughly 20 billion years from now. The research, published in the Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics, was conducted by Tye, Horace White Professor of Physics Emeritus at Cornell University. Using recent observations from major dark-energy surveys, Tye and his collaborators developed a cosmological model that predicts the universe could have a total lifespan of about 33 billion years. Since the universe is currently estimated to be 13.8 billion years old, the model places it near the midpoint of its existence. According to Cornell University's summary of the research, the study centers on the cosmological constant, a term introduced by Albert Einstein in his theory of general relativity. In modern cosmology, the cosmological constant is commonly used to describe the simplest form of dark energy, the unknown phenomenon believed to be driving the accelerating expansion of the universe. "For the last 20 years, people believed that the cosmological constant is positive, and the universe will expand forever," Tye said in a Cornell University news release. "The new data seem to indicate that the cosmological constant is negative, and that the universe will end in a big crunch." The study draws on data from the Dark Energy Survey (DES) and the Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument (DESI), two major projects designed to investigate the nature of dark energy. According to Tye, recent observations suggest that dark energy may not behave exactly like a simple cosmological constant. To account for those observations, Tye and his collaborators proposed a model involving an extremely light hypothetical particle that evolves over time. In their calculations, this produces a negative cosmological constant and leads to a future collapse of the universe. The model predicts that cosmic expansion would continue for approximately another 11 billion years before reaching a maximum size, after which the universe would begin contracting and eventually collapse. Scientists have long debated how the universe might end. As explained in an article published in The Conversation by Stephen DiKerby of Michigan State University, several possibilities have been proposed. If dark energy remains constant and positive, the universe could continue expanding indefinitely, gradually becoming colder, darker and more diffuse in a scenario often called the "heat death" of the universe. Other theoretical possibilities include a Big Rip, in which cosmic expansion accelerates so dramatically that galaxies, stars and even atoms are torn apart, or a Big Crunch, in which expansion reverses and the universe collapses back into an extremely dense state. DiKerby notes that the Big Crunch idea itself is not new. What distinguishes Tye's work is that it attempts to use current observational data to estimate when such a collapse might occur and how it could unfold. Much of the universe's long-term evolution remains uncertain. According to current astrophysical understanding, stars will continue to form and die for billions of years. The Sun, for example, is about halfway through its expected lifespan. Galaxies are also expected to continue merging; the Milky Way and Andromeda galaxies are projected to collide several billion years from now. At the same time, the nature of dark energy remains one of the biggest unanswered questions in cosmology. While observations indicate that the universe's expansion is accelerating, scientists still do not know what is causing that acceleration. Future observations may therefore alter current predictions about the cosmos's ultimate fate. Tye emphasized that additional evidence will be needed before firm conclusions can be drawn. DESI continues to collect data, while upcoming observations from missions and observatories including Euclid, SPHEREx and the Vera C. Rubin Observatory are expected to provide more precise measurements of dark energy. "People have said before that if the cosmological constant is negative, then the universe will collapse eventually. That's not new," Tye said. "However, here the model tells you when the universe collapses and how it collapses." For now, the study presents one possible future for the cosmos rather than a settled prediction. Whether the universe ultimately ends in a Big Crunch, expands forever, or follows another path entirely remains an open question that future observations will help answer. Source: Cornell University, The Conversation This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • If you look around on Amazon, some of these are available for $9
    • I’m still using an Xbox One S, so time for an upgrade to play this but as much as I hate Sony, I think I’ll get the ps5 pro
    • I bought this game. Played it for an hour, and then got a refund from Steam. Not a fun game at all.
    • Nothing Ear buds with active noise cancellation are at their lowest price ever with 51% off by Fiza Ali Amazon is currently offering the Nothing Ear wireless earbuds at their lowest price ever with 51% off limited prime deal. The earbuds feature an 11mm dynamic drivers with a ceramic diaphragm, and support high-resolution audio codecs including AAC, SBC, LDAC, and LHDC 5.0. They support active noise cancellation of up to 45dB across a frequency range of up to 5000Hz, and include a smart ANC algorithm, adaptive noise cancellation, and a transparency mode that allows surrounding sounds to be heard when needed. Connectivity is provided via Bluetooth 5.3, with support for multiple profiles including HFP, A2DP, AVRCP, and others. The earbuds also support dual connection, allowing them to be paired with two devices at the same time. Additional features include IP54 water and dust resistance for the earbuds and IP55 for the charging case, in-ear detection, pinch controls, low-latency mode, Google Fast Pair, Microsoft Swift Pair, and a three-microphone system per earbud for clearer voice calls. The Nothing X app, available on Android and iOS, provides access to custom EQ settings, bass enhancement, personal sound profiles, ear tip fit testing, firmware updates, customisable controls, dual-device management, and a find-my-earbuds feature. In terms of battery performance, each earbud has a 46mAh battery and the charging case has a 500mAh capacity. With active noise cancellation (ANC) turned off, the earbuds should offer up to 8.5 hours of playback on a single charge and up to 40.5 hours in total with the charging case. With ANC enabled, playback should last up to 5.2 hours on the earbuds and up to 24 hours with the case. For calls, talk time should reach up to 5 hours on the earbuds and 23 hours with the case when ANC is off, while ANC on should provide up to 4 hours on the earbuds and 18 hours with the case. Finally, fast charging should deliver up to 10 hours of playback from 10 minutes of charging when ANC is disabled. Nothing Ear Wireless Earbuds Bluetooth: $73.15 (Amazon US) - 51% off Good to know This Amazon deal is U.S. specific, and not available in other regions unless specified. We only use first-party seller links (at the time of article publishing); ensure that you purchase from a first-party seller link only. Check out Today's Deals on Amazon | or our recent tech deals. Become a Prime member (for Students or SNAP) via Neowin Get Prime Access - Prime for half price (for qualifying Medicaid, EBT, SNAP) Subscribe to Prime Video, Audible Plus, Music Unlimited or Kindle Unlimited via Neowin As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
  • Recent Achievements

    • First Post
      AndreaB earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      Huge Trailer earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Classifyskilleducation earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      eurospharma62 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      With What earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      572
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      173
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      73
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      68
    5. 5
      neufuse
      64
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!