Sony Ericson K700i or Nokia 6230


Recommended Posts

gunna order a contract fone, and after lots of thought i was gunna choose the 6230, but last night i had a play on a friends K700i and now i'm torn again! the video and camera are v.good but so is the 6230 infact most of their features are similar except the k700i has a light on the camera!

are there any other features or things ppl know which make one fone better than the other?

help deciding appreciated :p

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/277901-sony-ericson-k700i-or-nokia-6230/
Share on other sites

i chose nokia cos i like nokia software more, and i liked the big middle button better on it

they are both very good phones, i think its just gonna come down to personal preference

go try them both out again

also, if you get one uve got 14 days to change your mind :D

i've always liked nokia myself cant beat the 3210 ;) but after playing with the K700i i kinda like its style and the advantage is that is has a light and has clearer video.s i have just been on the K700i site and come across the S700, this looks amazing the camera quality is really good... what about that phone is it better than the K700i and is it quite large?

i've always liked nokia myself cant beat the 3210 ;) but after playing with the K700i i kinda like its style and the advantage is that is has a light and has clearer video.s i have just been on the K700i site and come across the S700, this looks amazing the camera quality is really good... what about that phone is it better than the K700i and is it quite large?

585378101[/snapback]

When I played with the S700 i didnt like it (as a K700i user). It felt quite cheap, and the turny screen thing would really p?ss me off when I needed to answer it...

k700i, i got one. There GREAT! Go with orange.!

585378124[/snapback]

AMEN to that.

Best thing about the K700 is the MYRIAD of themese available.

I recommend when (or if) you get your K700i you get it on Orange, you get a DSS-25 sync station (around ?15) and you update to new firmware.

My syncstation's in the post. At last I can put 100s of themes and Java games on there!

K700i r0x0rs. Really, better than any Nokias I've ever used and they do actually update their firmware once in a while.

Maybe I'm biased since I have used nothing but Ericsson and Sony Ericsson all my life. I started out on the Ericsson T20, moved to a SE T100, then to a SE T610 and then finally to a SE K700i about 7-8 months ago.

I havent found a phone better than the K700i yet which has the same all -round performance that the K700i does. The only phones cooler than it are the ones which have 2 cameras and /or have video transmission built in.

Nokia may have market share, but nothing looks as good or feels as cool as a K700i. Trust me. You won't regret it. I never have.

Im using a K700i, have been using SE phones for a long time, mainly because of their innovations and features (colour screen with bluetooth anyone?) but it has its fault as well. One of the most annoyingest thinigs about the phone is the speed, its quite slow in comparision to a 6230 and the battery life isnt as good. But then saying that though the interface design is miles ahead of the competition!

In my opinion,the camera quality of Nokias have always been better looking and clearer, but then SE have always used higher resolution screens (view a picture taken on a 6230 on a k700 and ull see wat i mean). That said though, the 6230 is much faster because of its simple menu system (unlike the heavy graphics based, with transparency interface on thek700). Also the 6230s idea of theme support is a joke!

well..the K700 its a little more high end thatn the 6230, its has a better camera.But nokia software rocks..

Wait 45 days and get the 6230i, it has a 1.3 Mp Camera, better screen and new Interafce

585379477[/snapback]

This is true to a certain degree, the 6230i is to be released soon with a 1.3Mp camera, not sure about the screen improvements, from wat ive seen its the same with maybe a slightly higher resolution a for the new interface erm yes :D Think of safe mode in windows, u know how u get 16 colors instead of normal32-bitcolours? Thats wat it looks like, a safe mode version of the k700 interface

:dontgetit:

If u want a better camera, wait for the 6230i, for anything else and that wicked torch (comes in so useful i love it!!) get teh k700. There wont be a replacement for the k700 until summer i think.

Aww.. bad choice :p

I have the 6230, and my brother has the K700i. My cam is way better than his, the videos are also much better. They have a very good framerate compared to the K700i.

The only thing the Nokia doesn't have, is the light on the camera. But I don't care about that at all. I think the Nokia is better in a lot of ways. The biggest advantage still is the ability to have MMC cards in your phone. That's something the K700i doesn't have.

The K700i isn't a bad phone, but I just think the 6230 beats it in many ways. :yes:

i care about the light, so thats a good thing, but yeah the fone only has 41MB memory and not being upgradeable is a bit of a disapointment... saying that i have used the fone and he has ALOT of mp3's pictures and video stored and has quite a bit of free space left. i've also seen some videos on the 6230 and when it's moved (while recording) it bcomes somewhat pixelated, never taken a video with the k700i so i dunno wat its like... anyway al soon find out :)

I have the 6230, and my brother has the K700i. My cam is way better than his, the videos are also much better. They have a very good framerate compared to the K700i.

I've got to agree...

The difference is HUGE, the nokia camera is much better...

i care about the light, so thats a good thing, but yeah the fone only has 41MB memory and not being upgradeable is a bit of a disapointment... saying that i have used the fone and he has ALOT of mp3's pictures and video stored and has quite a bit of free space left. i've also seen some videos on the 6230 and when it's moved (while recording) it bcomes somewhat pixelated, never taken a video with the k700i so i dunno wat its like... anyway al soon find out :)

585383604[/snapback]

It does get pixelated, but that's the same with the K700i. My brother made a video of me, where I was drumming. Well I can say, I couldn't even see myself move properly when I saw the video. It was very slow.

Then I did the same thing with my phone, when my brother was drumming. You could see the difference very well. I could see everything he did very clearly, just because of the fast framerate of my phone. :)

why 6230 is better :

* EDGe phone

* better compactiblity

* smaller than SE k700i

* expandable memory

* hot swapping of memory cards

* Express on covers or changable covers

* also the night mode operation of K700i sucks

go for 6230 :mobile:

You chose the right phone... K700i > 6230. And to respond to people complaining about the limited space of 41MB, try putting a file greater than 6 MB on your 6230 ;)

585384301[/snapback]

Did that so many times. Not a problem at all :yes:

And compression is no good.. :no: It's better to have a 1GB MMC card in your phone. You won't have to compress anything then ;)

You made a good choice. I started off with Nokia phones many years ago but have been a dedicated SE user for the last 2 years. Lately I was wanting a new phone so I got the S700i which is an excellent camera/multimedia phone. If the S700i didn't exist, I would have surely gone for a K700i which is pretty much the same phone with a smaller camera and smaller screen size and expandable memory.

Nice choice :yes:

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • I grew up a Star Trek fan and never watched Star Wars movies. To this days I've not watched most Star Wras movies. As a result I rarely get these references, I have no idea what this post means. Given the popular reactions these get I have to accept I missed out.  
    • Spotify really have turned in to a butthole of a company. Assuming this isn't a bug then this is a low act for Premium users. Honestly, YT Premium which includes YT Music is a genuine alternative. In any event, the internet enshitification continues unabated...next up, the banning of VPN's.
    • This is why science is the only path to truth. It isn't rigid in its beliefs, rather it changes its views based on scientific discoveries.
    • A 13 billion year old secret about our Universe's origin was revealed by Sayan Sen Image by Pascal Küffer via Pexels Researchers at the Max-Planck-Institut für Kernphysik (MPIK) in Heidelberg had recreated a key chemical reaction from the early universe, producing results that could change scientists' understanding of how the first stars formed. The study focused on the helium hydride ion (HeH⁺), which is widely regarded as the first molecule to form in the universe. Scientists believe HeH⁺ appeared around 380,000 years after the Big Bang, when the universe had cooled enough for electrons and atomic nuclei to combine into neutral atoms in a period known as recombination. This marked the beginning of chemistry in the cosmos. Immediately after the Big Bang about 13.8 billion years ago, the universe was extremely hot and dense. As it expanded and cooled, hydrogen and helium became the dominant elements. Once neutral helium atoms formed, they could react with ionised hydrogen nuclei, or protons, to create helium hydride ions. Although simple in structure, HeH⁺ played an important role in the young universe. It was the first step in a chain of reactions that eventually produced molecular hydrogen (H₂), a molecule made up of two hydrogen atoms and now the most abundant molecule in the universe. Molecular hydrogen later became a key ingredient in the formation of the first stars. At the time, the universe had entered a phase often called the cosmological "dark age." Matter had become transparent to light following recombination, but there were still no stars or galaxies producing visible light. Several hundred million years would pass before the first stars appeared. For those first stars to form, large clouds of gas had to collapse under their own gravity. To do that, the gas needed to cool by releasing energy. While hydrogen atoms can help with this process at high temperatures, they become less effective below about 10,000 degrees Celsius. Molecules can continue the cooling process by releasing energy through rotational and vibrational motions. Scientists have long considered HeH⁺ a potentially important coolant because of its comparatively large dipole moment, a property that describes how electric charge is distributed within a molecule and allows it to release energy efficiently. The amount of helium hydride present in the early universe may therefore have influenced how easily the first stars could form. At the same time, HeH⁺ was constantly being destroyed. Under primordial conditions, its main destruction mechanisms were recombination with free electrons and chemical reactions with hydrogen atoms. These reactions ultimately helped produce molecular hydrogen, linking the formation and destruction of HeH⁺ to the chemistry that shaped the early universe. For many years, theoretical studies suggested that reactions between HeH⁺ and hydrogen atoms would become much slower at low temperatures. Scientists believed there was an energy barrier along the reaction pathway that reduced the chances of the reaction taking place in the cold conditions of the early universe. The new study suggests otherwise. To investigate the process, researchers recreated a closely related reaction using deuterium, a naturally occurring isotope of hydrogen that contains one proton and one neutron in its nucleus. When HeH⁺ collides with deuterium, it forms an HD⁺ ion and a neutral helium atom. This allows scientists to study the reaction in a controlled way while closely mimicking the behaviour of the original reaction involving hydrogen. The experiments were carried out at the Cryogenic Storage Ring (CSR) at MPIK, a specialised facility designed to recreate conditions similar to those found in space. Researchers stored HeH⁺ ions in the 35-metre storage ring for up to 60 seconds at temperatures just a few kelvins above absolute zero and merged them with a beam of neutral deuterium atoms. By adjusting the speeds of the two particle beams, the team measured how the reaction rate changed with collision energy, which is directly related to temperature. The researchers found that the reaction rate remains almost constant as temperatures decrease. In other words, the reaction does not slow down at low temperatures as earlier models predicted. “Previous theories predicted a significant decrease in the reaction probability at low temperatures, but we were unable to verify this in either the experiment or new theoretical calculations by our colleagues,” explained Dr Holger Kreckel of MPIK. “The reactions of HeH⁺ with neutral hydrogen and deuterium therefore appear to have been far more important for chemistry in the early universe than previously assumed,” he continued. According to the researchers, the reaction appears to be barrierless, meaning there is no energy obstacle preventing it from taking place efficiently even at very low temperatures. The findings support recent theoretical work led by physicist Yohann Scribano, whose group identified an error in a widely used potential energy surface, a mathematical model used to describe how the energy of a system changes during a chemical reaction. The error appears to have caused previous studies to significantly underestimate reaction rates under primordial conditions. The new calculations closely match the experimental results. Together, they suggest that helium chemistry in the early universe may need to be re-evaluated. Because molecules such as HeH⁺ and molecular hydrogen played an important role in cooling primordial gas clouds, the findings could help scientists build more accurate models of how the first stars formed. By showing that helium hydride was likely destroyed more efficiently than previously thought, the study offers new insight into the chemical processes that shaped the universe during its earliest stages and helped set the conditions for the emergence of the first stars. Source: Max-Planck Institute, EDP Sciences This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      DrWankel earned a badge
      First Post
    • Reacting Well
      DrWankel earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      Supreme Spray LV earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Genuinetonerink- Dubai earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      504
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      163
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      92
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      76
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      72
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!