Sony Cybetshot DSC-T3 (pics inc.)


Recommended Posts

(If you're a mod, correct the title please!! (Cybetshot -> Cybershot) )

Hi, I bought this camera a month ago, and I thought I would share my experience with it.

This is my first review ever, so don't be cruel. :p

Sony Cybershot DSC-T3

Brief Spec

5.2 Mega Pixels CCD

Carl Zeiss "Vario-Tessar" Lens

3x Optical Zoom

2.5" LCD

MPEG - 30fs - up to 640 x 420

How and why I got this

Until last December, our family was using huge Sony digital camera with 1 mega pixel CCD, or our digital camcorder, which was also Sony.

Our family was at Hong Kong airport, going to New York, and I decided to convince my father that we needed at least some decent digital camera!

Well, I ended up falling with love with this slim and stylish one, and all our families liked it too. We bought it!!!

The reason I chose Sony one again was partly because I had too much memory sticks DUO for camcorder, and I couldn't just throw them away. :cry:

Form Factor

It's how it looks front and back, to give you overall image.

joseph0324-T301.JPG

joseph0324-T303.JPG

joseph0324-T302.JPG

Yes, it's very slim. period.

There's similar one from Casio that is as slim, but it has only 3 mega pixel CCD, whereas DSC T3 has 5 mega pixels.

It's one of examples showing that Sony is really good at stuffing things into small form.

Here's comparison picture with my iPod.

joseph0324-T306.JPG

My iPod is 3G 15gb, which is one of the thinnest iPod model, so DSC T3 would be as thin as iPod Photo.

However, the best part is its SCREEN.

I would be still surprised if 2.5" screen was featured in other bigger digicams, but this slim camera has this huge screen attached to it, and it makes photo viewing and navigating much easier.

Also, it's not reflective at all, so you can see them clearly when you're out in the bright spot.

Here's comparison pics with my iPod and iPaq h2210 (which has it rubber handle detached :angry: ).

joseph0324-T305.JPG

joseph0324-T304.JPG

What Comes with it?

First of all, I'm sorry I don't have picture of the box, because I threw it them away right after I bought them at the airport.

It has A/V cable and USB cable.

It has software CD that has "Image Mixer" or Mac and "Picture Package?" for Windows.

Of course it includes a cradle, which is very minimalistic, yet functional.

The camera has USB port built in, but you have to use this cradle to use A/V cable.

joseph0324-T308.JPG

joseph0324-T309.JPG

Unlike most of others, the back side with screen will face you if you put it in the dock.

I think it's just to emphasize its beauty of screen.

32mb Memory Stick Duo comes with it, but I bought 512 Memory Stick Pro Duo, and it was very pricey.:pinch:h:

joseph0324-T307.JPG

Notice how slim its battery is, yes, as you guessed, it stinks.

It has relatively short battery life, about 4~5 hours straight on.

Performance as a Camerab>

With 5 mega pixel, you can take picture resolution upto 2592 x 1944 pixels.

It's clear, crisp, and nice overall.

However, I noticed that most of the pictures were taken very dark.

Indoor performance was disappointing too.

Especially when you're indoor, it's very hard to capture moving object, because its shutter goes slow when it's darker.

Flash is strong enough, and it has AF illuminator, so it's easy to take picture at night. (outdoor)

Other drawback would be its lack of viewfinder, but I didn't really find it annoying as it has big and clear screen.

Follow the link below, you'll see pictures that I took.

I'm no professional photographer, so don't expect something nice.:p:p

Sample Picture 1

Sample Picture 2

Sample Picture 3

Sample Picture 4

Sample Picture 5

They've been resized to 1024 x 768.

It has decent 3x optical zoom, which is actually amazing for this slim camera.

Its video ability is amazing too.

It takes very good looking 640 x 480 mpeg video, and it still looked good when I burned them to DVD!

Summarizeb>I recommend this to:i>

style/trend ######

who don't want to bother looking at viewfinder

casual shootersIt's not recommended to:i>

professional

indoor-lover

money-saving guys

I'll try to update them as time goes by.

Please give your feedback, opinion or question about this camera or review.

Thank you.

edit/ I noticed sample pictures were gone, so I replaced them.

They will never be gone because it's on paid account.:p:p

Edited by joseph0324
Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/279714-sony-cybetshot-dsc-t3-pics-inc/
Share on other sites

Have they fixed the problem with poor picture quality from the T1?

585400951[/snapback]

I don't know what specific problem you're referring to, but it's alright overall.

I have some issues with dark lens, but it doesn't affect outdoor pictures too much.

(If you're a mod, correct the title please!! (Cybetshot -> Cybershot) )

Hi, I bought this camera a month ago, and I thought I would share my experience with it.

This is my first review ever, so don't be cruel.  :p

Sony Cybershot DSC-T3

Brief Spec

5.2 Mega Pixels CCD

Carl Zeiss "Vario-Tessar" Lens

3x Optical Zoom

2.5" LCD

MPEG - 30fs - up to 640 x 420

How and why I got this

Until last December, our family was using huge Sony digital camera with 1 mega pixel CCD, or our digital camcorder, which was also Sony.

Our family was at Hong Kong airport, going to New York, and I decided to convince my father that we needed at least some decent digital camera!

Well, I ended up falling with love with this slim and stylish one, and all our families liked it too. We bought it!!!

The reason I chose Sony one again was partly because I had too much memory sticks DUO for camcorder, and I couldn't just throw them away.  :cry:

Form Factor

It's how it looks front and back, to give you overall image.

joseph0324-T301.JPG

joseph0324-T303.JPG

joseph0324-T302.JPG

Yes, it's very slim. period.

There's similar one from Casio that is as slim, but it has only 3 mega pixel CCD, whereas DSC T3 has 5 mega pixels.

It's one of examples showing that Sony is really good at stuffing things into small form.

Here's comparison picture with my iPod.

joseph0324-T306.JPG

My iPod is 3G 15gb, which is one of the thinnest iPod model, so DSC T3 would be as thin as iPod Photo.

However, the best part is its SCREEN.

I would be still surprised if 2.5" screen was featured in other bigger digicams, but this slim camera has this huge screen attached to it, and it makes photo viewing and navigating much easier.

Also, it's not reflective at all, so you can see them clearly when you're out in the bright spot.

Here's comparison pics with my iPod and iPaq h2210 (which has it rubber handle detached :angry: ).

joseph0324-T305.JPG

joseph0324-T304.JPG

What Comes with it?

First of all, I'm sorry I don't have picture of the box, because I threw it them away right after I bought them at the airport.

It has A/V cable and USB cable.

It has software CD that has "Image Mixer" or Mac and "Picture Package?" for Windows.

Of course it includes a cradle, which is very minimalistic, yet functional.

The camera has USB port built in, but you have to use this cradle to use A/V cable.

joseph0324-T308.JPG

joseph0324-T309.JPG

Unlike most of others, the back side with screen will face you if you put it in the dock.

I think it's just to emphasize its beauty of screen.

32mb Memory Stick Duo comes with it, but I bought 512 Memory Stick Pro Duo, and it was very pricey.&nbsp:pinch:h:

joseph0324-T307.JPG

Notice how slim its battery is, yes, as you guessed, it stinks.

It has relatively short battery life, about 4~5 hours straight onPerformance as a Camerab>

With 5 mega pixel, you can take picture resolution upto 2592 x 1944 pixels.

It's clear, crisp, and nice overall.

However, I noticed that most of the pictures were taken very dark.

Indoor performance was disappointing too.

Especially when you're indoor, it's very hard to capture moving object, because its shutter goes slow when it's darker.

Flash is strong enough, and it has AF illuminator, so it's easy to take picture at night. (outdoor)

Other drawback would be its lack of viewfinder, but I didn't really find it annoying as it has big and clear screen.

Follow the link below, you'll see pictures that I took.

I'm no professional photographer, so don't expect something nice.&nbsp:p:p

http://www.pixya.com/images/54c6ce02683288...e09f837cdb6.jpg

http://www.pixya.com/images/6e227d3d6be4c6...1b3d75e3769.jpg

http://www.pixya.com/images/642b5fe372839a...96e1c05ef6a.jpg

They've been resized to 1024 x 768

It has decent 3x optical zoom, which is actually amazing for this slim camera.

Its video ability is amazing too.

It takes very good looking 640 x 480 mpeg video, and it still looked good when I burned them to DVD!Summarizeb>I recommend this to:i>

style/trend ######

who don't want to bother looking at viewfinder

casual shootersIt's not recommended to:i>

professional

indoor-lover

money-saving guys

I'll try to update them as time goes by.

Please give your feedback, opinion or question about this camera or review.

Thank you.

585400750[/snapback]

Why, oh wh:(:( did you take and show me that picture of that foo:(:( Remember their are thous who have not eaten in a few days, who post on these fourms, who currently don't have jobs and have no food, your just making my mouth water, and my tummy hungry,


Nice review btw, once I start making some molah again, I might buy one (stylist frea:p:p)

how do you find hong kong?

and thats a very nice camera. grads. but i think sony upgraded it to t33 already. similar specs, so i dotn know wht the diff is.

585401274[/snapback]

Hong Kong .... it's like city from the future, really.

I've never seen a city more shining than New York, until now. (I moved to Hong Kong about 2 years ago actually) :p

Also, restaurants in Hong Kong are fabulous! (Y)

T33 is more of a sequel of T11, and T3 is a sequel of T1.

T33 is thicker, and fatter than T3. I don't find it too attractive.

I think T33 is supposed to have better screen than T3 though. (Same in size, but different in resolution)

Hong Kong .... it's like city from the future, really.

I've never seen a city more shining than New York, until now. (I moved to Hong Kong about 2 years ago actually)  :p

Also, restaurants in Hong Kong are fabulous! (Y)

T33 is more of a sequel of T11, and T3 is a sequel of T1.

T33 is thicker, and fatter than T3. I don't find it too attractive.

I think T33 is supposed to have better screen than T3 though. (Same in size, but different in resolution)

585401356[/snapback]

Ahh... comunisume, and the Great Firewall of China!

Why, oh why :( did you take and show me that picture of that food :( Remember their are thous who have not eaten in a few days, who post on these fourms, who currently don't have jobs and have no food, your just making my mouth water, and my tummy hungry,

:p What I said is the truth hopefully friends lend me some money tmw for food, but what was said above is ment in a jokeful way :p either way I've gotten over/usedto the feeling of hungar after yesterday anyways :p

Nice review btw, once I start making some molah again, I might buy one (stylist freak :p)

585401296[/snapback]

why oh why did you quote that huge post

I dislike that digital camera as it has no optical view finder... have fun taking photos in a sunny environment :/

Is the pre-flash metering still triggered by applying pressure to the shutter button on the newer models like the DSC-T3?

585405778[/snapback]

I'm not entirely sure what you mean, but you half-press shutter button to enable AF illuminator.

It has relatively short battery life, about 4~5 hours straight on

That aint too bad, not bad at all for a point and shoot, especially one with a large LCD screen. One con about the small size, the cam can't be attached to a standard tripod :(

Edited by Techo
That aint too bad, not bad at all for a point and shoot, especially one with a large LCD screen. One con about the small size, the cam can't be attached 

o a standard tripod :(

585408615[/snapback]

Oh, that's one of things that I forgot to mention.

You can use tripod with it, with its cradle that has a hole on the bottom. :cool:

There's a little accessary that comes with the camera, that holds T3 and cradle tightly when they're attached to tripod.

I'm not entirely sure what you mean, but you half-press shutter button to enable AF illuminator.

585408540[/snapback]

As it does on my DSC-P92, just heard from a few people that pre-flash metering could be toggled in the same fashion on newer models but I suppose it was just nonsense.

Red beam of ****in' death. :laugh:

Why, oh why :( did you take and show me that picture of that food :( Remember their are thous who have not eaten in a few days, who post on these fourms, who currently don't have jobs and have no food, your just making my mouth water, and my tummy hungry,

:p What I said is the truth hopefully friends lend me some money tmw for food, but what was said above is ment in a jokeful way :p either way I've gotten over/usedto the feeling of hungar after yesterday anyways :p

Nice review btw, once I start making some molah again, I might buy one (stylist freak :p)

585401296[/snapback]

why don't you get a job then instead of bsing around on your computer.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Dude, im talking about simply disable it from settings app. Because of the eu regulation, you could disable it here for years.
    • One big question about Mars was answered thanks to Einstein's 100 year old theory by Sayan Sen Image via DepositPhotos Scientists at the U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) have calculated how time passes on Mars compared with Earth, adding detail to how timekeeping would need to work beyond Earth’s orbit. The study, published in The Astronomical Journal, found that clocks on Mars run an average of 477 microseconds, or millionths of a second, faster per day than clocks on Earth. A microsecond is one millionth of a second, a very small unit used in precise scientific timing systems such as atomic clocks, which measure time using consistent atomic behavior. This difference is not constant. Because Mars moves around the Sun in a non-circular path (an eccentric orbit, meaning its distance from the Sun changes over time instead of staying fixed) and is affected by gravity from other bodies, the daily difference can vary by as much as 226 microseconds over a Martian year. The study also identifies smaller repeating changes of about 40 microseconds per day linked to synodic cycles (repeating periods that describe how planets line up with each other as they orbit the Sun from different positions). These longer patterns affect how time differences slowly rise and fall. To make these estimates, researchers compared Mars with Earth and the Moon. The work looks at relativistic proper time (the time actually measured by a clock depending on its speed and the strength of gravity where it is located, as described in Einstein’s relativity). This shows that each world has its own slightly different “rate” of time. This becomes more important as space missions expand into cislunar space (the region between Earth and the Moon) and toward Mars. On Earth, time systems rely on atomic clocks and satellites, which stay closely synchronized for navigation and communication. The study is based on Albert Einstein’s theory of relativity, which shows that time is affected by gravity and motion. Stronger gravity makes clocks run slower, while weaker gravity makes them run faster. “The time is just right for the Moon and Mars,” said NIST physicist Bijunath Patla. “This is the closest we have been to realizing the science fiction vision of expanding across the solar system.” A day on Mars is about 40 minutes longer than on Earth, and a Martian year lasts 687 Earth days. But the main question is not just about days and years, but how fast time itself passes. An atomic clock placed on Mars would function normally, but compared with one on Earth, the two would slowly drift apart due to differences in gravity and motion. This requires careful calculation of what is similar to a time-zone difference across planets. Researchers modeled Mars using a reference surface and included gravitational effects from the Sun, Earth, the Moon, and other planets. This includes a multi-body gravitational system (often described as a three-body or four-body problem, where predicting motion becomes difficult because multiple large objects all pull on each other at the same time through gravity). Mars also follows a Keplerian orbit (an idealized elliptical orbit based on simple gravitational laws that assume smooth motion, before adding real-world disturbances from other bodies). In addition, the researchers accounted for solar tides (small changes in gravitational force caused by the Sun that slightly distort planetary motion and timing, especially in systems involving Earth and the Moon). These combined effects are described as relativistic proper-time offsets (small but measurable differences in elapsed time between locations caused by gravity and motion), which must be included when comparing clocks across planets. “But for Mars, that’s not the case. Its distance from the Sun and its eccentric orbit make the variations in time larger. A three-body problem is extremely complicated. Now we’re dealing with four: the Sun, Earth, the Moon and Mars,” Patla explained. “The heavy lifting was more challenging than I initially thought.” Although the differences are extremely small, they matter for navigation and communication systems that depend on precise timing. Even modern networks on Earth, such as mobile systems, rely on timing accuracy at very small fractions of a second. Communication between Earth and Mars currently takes about four to 24 minutes or more depending on planetary positions, meaning signals are not real-time. A shared and accurate time system could help future missions reduce confusion in navigation and data exchange. “If you get synchronization, it will be almost like real-time communication without any loss of information. You don’t have to wait to see what happens,” Patla said. Researchers note that fully developed interplanetary communication networks are still far in the future. However, understanding how time behaves across planets helps prepare for those systems. “It may be decades before the surface of Mars is covered by the tracks of wandering rovers, but it is useful now to study the issues involved in establishing navigation systems on other planets and moons,” said Neil Ashby. “Like current global navigation systems like GPS, these systems will depend on accurate clocks, and the effects on clock rates can be analyzed with the help of Einstein’s general theory of relativity.” Patla added that the results also help improve understanding of time itself under relativity. “It's good to know for the first time what is happening on Mars timewise. Nobody knew that before. It improves our knowledge of the theory itself, the theory of how clocks tick and relativity,” he said. Source: NIST, IOPscience This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • TeraCopy 4.0 Build 26 by Razvan Serea TeraCopy is a compact program designed to copy and move files at the maximum possible speed, also providing you with a lot of features. Copy files faster. TeraCopy uses dynamically adjusted buffers to reduce seek times. Asynchronous copy speeds up file transfer between two physical hard drives. Pause and resume transfers. Pause copy process at any time to free up system resources and continue with a single click. Error recovery. In case of copy error, TeraCopy will try several times and in the worse case just skips the file, not terminating the entire transfer. Interactive file list. TeraCopy shows failed file transfers and lets you fix the problem and recopy only problem files. Shell integration. TeraCopy can completely replace Explorer copy and move functions, allowing you work with files as usual. TeraCopy is free for non-commercial use only. For commercial use you need to buy a license. The paid version of the program includes the following features: Copy/move to your favorite folders. Save reports as HTML and CSV files. Select files with the same extension/folder. Remove the selected files from the copy queue. TeraCopy 4.0 Build 26 changelog: Added support for receiving files via the LocalSend protocol. Improved exception handling and automated bug report upload. Fixed several minor bugs and small memory leaks. Build 26 (June 24) Fixed a rare exception when a transfer completed. Features added since version 3.17: Enhanced speed graph. New multi-threaded copy engine. Support for copying to multiple targets. Queue system for managing multiple copy operations. Support for receiving files via the LocalSend protocol. TeraCopy entry in the modern Windows Explorer context menu. Integrated toolbar in the title bar. Why receive LocalSend transfers with TeraCopy? Handle file conflicts: Skip, overwrite, or rename files when a file with the same name already exists. LocalSend always creates another copy, which can waste time and disk space, especially when resuming an interrupted transfer. Filter unwanted files: Apply ignore lists or remove files manually before accepting a transfer, so unnecessary files are not downloaded. Better performance on fast networks: In tests over a 10 Gbps connection, TeraCopy received files several times faster than the standard LocalSend app on Windows. Download: TeraCopy 4.0 Build 26 | 14.5 MB (Freeware, paid upgrade available) View: TeraCopy Website | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Briefly used Turbo Pascal (and Turbo C++) in 97 and soon after that I bought PC magazine that included a full version of Delphi 2. I still use Delphi today, some 29 years later.
    • Age of Empires Mobile comes to PC, here's how to carry over progress from your phone by Ivan Jenic Image: YouTube/Microsoft Microsoft just released Age of Empires Mobile for PC. The game, officially called Age of Empires Mobile: PC Edition, is available for free on Steam and Microsoft Store, almost two years after its initial release for handheld devices. Age of Empires is one of those franchises that entire generations grew up with. The original came out in 1997, and immediately got people hooked to building civilizations and crushing their enemies on the battlefield. However, the franchise today is a far cry from its roots, as Age of Empires Mobile is, well, a game optimized for handheld devices, and not a classic RTS title we’ve all loved for years. And, of course, it includes in-game purchases. The PC version is still a mobile game at its core, but it’s been optimized for desktop play. There’s mouse control, full keyboard compatibility, and a refined UI. Microsoft also refreshed the visuals with some 4k textures, so the game should look better on larger screens. The game supports Crossplay, so you can switch between your phone, tablet, and PC without losing anything. But linked progress doesn’t come out of the box, as you have to enable it first. Here’s how to link your progress: On your mobile device, open Age of Empires Mobile. Go to Settings (Gear icon) > Account. Select Bind Account and choose a sign-in option. Once you enable account binding, sign in on PC using the same method, and your progress will be accessible across all your devices. Xbox Game Pass subscribers also get a bonus reward pack on PC, which includes: 1 Monthly Pass Token 1 Custom Resource Chest 10 Universal 60-Minute Speed-Ups 1,000 Empire Coins Exclusive Player Portrait Frame You can find more info about Age of Empires Mobile: PC Edition, as well as download links, on the Age of Empires official website.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      Philsl earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Dedicated
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      First Post
    • One Month Later
      D0nn13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Rookie
      +ChiefOfNeo went up a rank
      Rookie
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      458
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      177
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      124
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      79
    5. 5
      Xenon
      76
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!