• 0

Visual C++ .Net vs Borland C++ Builder


Question

17 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • 0
  OfF3nSiV3 said:
are there any differences between the languages?

i mean, it's C++, but i've seen some books like 'Learn Borland C++'

585429028[/snapback]

Between the languages, no difference. Between focus, certainly. Builder X is really targeted at developers that want to do cross-OS development for the enterprise(using CORBA). C++.NET is specifically for Windows development and all that comes with it.

I'd recommend C++.NET simply because Borland is moving towards supporting MS's technologies instead of developing their own. It used to be that Borland's framework for building Window's apps was superior to Microsoft's. Borland had the Visual Component Library(VCL) and it was all C++ code, visual development. It was way ahead of MS. They've abandoned it, pretty much, in favor of .NET and building tools for cross-OS dev.

You can still get the earlier version of C++ Builder that supports the VCL.

http://www.borland.com/cbuilder/

  • 0

Borland has a much richer API base to work with than Visual C++. But it can be tricky to port code over from one to the other sometimes, as the compilers are quite different. Try Visual C++ Express and the trial of Borland C++ Builder and see what you like better.

  • 0

C++ .NET is actually quite a bit different from normal C++. It's like VB or C# where you can design a form, double click a button, and have the event auto-generated for you. It's much simpler than writing real Windows code and at the same time you still get most of the advantages of C++. I don't know if it's better than the new Borland C++ though, since I have yet to try it.

  • 0

Visual C++ is probably the most popular most most favored compiler, because of it's history (i.e. Visual C++ 6.0) of quality and stablity.

Borland C++ is a less popular, but is a much more powerful and robust compiler. The IDE is also a lot more powerful than MSVC.

  • 0
  Cephas said:
C++ .NET is actually quite a bit different from normal C++. It's like VB or C# where you can design a form, double click a button, and have the event auto-generated for you. It's much simpler than writing real Windows code and at the same time you still get most of the advantages of C++. I don't know if it's better than the new Borland C++ though, since I have yet to try it.

585430799[/snapback]

Well you have to understand that Visual C++ .NET can compile Managed C++ apps that run on the .NET Framework, and Win32 apps that run on Windows - not the .NET Framework. AFAIK, Borland's compiler only builds Win32 apps.

  • 0
  gameguy said:
Well you have to understand that Visual C++ .NET can compile Managed C++ apps that run on the .NET Framework, and Win32 apps that run on Windows - not the .NET Framework. AFAIK, Borland's compiler only builds Win32 apps.

585434114[/snapback]

Builder X builds for Windows, Linux, or Solaris. It doesn't have any RAD tools with it, so if you program win32 gui stuff, you'll be doing it the old-fashioned way.

  Cephas said:
No, C++ .NET is not what's used to compile normal C++ code. Visual Studio/Visual C++ .NET comes with two seperate implementations of C++, one that's managed (.NET) and a classic one.

585434147[/snapback]

I think you're confusing C++.NET and managed C++. One's a product name, and one's a technology. You can compile standard C++ with C++.NET. It's the same compiler, cl.exe, that is used for managed C++. You only need to add the /clr to your command-line to enable the managed extensions.

Edited by weenur
  • 0
  OfF3nSiV3 said:
thanks for the replies..i

i only know ansi c++ (the one you use with devc++) so which one of these is most indicated for a newbie like me?

585435588[/snapback]

For a newb, I'd recommend something free. Either Eclipse with the CDT, or Dev-C++.

http://www.eclipse.org/cdt/

http://www.bloodshed.net/devcpp.html

If you really feel compelled to go with a commercial app, you can get a Personal Edition of Borland C++ Builder X for $10 for the CD.

http://shop.borland.com/dr/v2/ec_MAIN.Entr...RP=0&CACHE_ID=0

Also, Microsoft has a Visual C++.NET Standard for $99($93 at http://www.programmersparadise.com).

Link fixed

Edited by gameguy
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • "Can" is fine. I want the ability for it to "not." Actually, I would prefer vice versa. But it has to be optional, otherwise companies wouldn't be too happy.
    • ChatGPT can now connect to Outlook, Teams, Gmail, Google Drive, and other services by Pradeep Viswanathan Apart from regular consumers, ChatGPT is also growing fast among business users. In fact, OpenAI now has 3 million paying (Enterprise, Team, and Edu) business users, up from 2 million in February. During a live stream today targeted toward business users, OpenAI announced that ChatGPT can now connect to more external services to pull in real-time context and provide more useful responses for users. The following are some of the external connectors available in ChatGPT Deep Research for Plus, Pro, Team, Enterprise, and Edu users: Microsoft Outlook Microsoft Teams Microsoft SharePoint Dropbox Box Google Drive Gmail Liner In addition to the above, IT admins in organizations can now build custom ChatGPT connectors using the popular Model Context Protocol (MCP). These custom connectors will allow organizations to make use of the data available inside their proprietary systems and other apps within ChatGPT, alongside pre-built connectors. Today, the ChatGPT team also announced a new feature called record mode for ChatGPT Team users on macOS. The record mode feature will allow users to capture meeting audio and get meeting transcriptions, meeting action items, summaries, etc. ChatGPT record mode will also be available to Plus, Pro, Enterprise, and Edu users in the future. Kevin Weil, Chief Product Officer at OpenAI, tweeted the following regarding today’s launch: While ChatGPT's new connectors and features mark significant progress, it faces a formidable challenge in the enterprise market against Microsoft 365 Copilot, which enjoys native integration within the Microsoft 365 ecosystem.
    • I decided to give this a try and, wow. I like it. One of the most customizable browsers I've ever used I think, and it even has the classic menu bar. That's one of the reasons I've stuck with Firefox for so long. Not sure if I'll make this my main browser yet but it's looking good so far.
    • No messaging app from a large commercial entity is really encrypted to a point they are actually unable to access your content. If you trust whatsapp and friends to do this either you are a fool.
    • From my point of view this seems like a good thing? Option to pay as you go in an otherwise Subscription app? Yes Please! Free Windsurf + BYOK = Now I have a reason to try Windsurf.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Apprentice
      DarkShrunken went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • Dedicated
      CHUNWEI earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Collaborator
      DarkShrunken earned a badge
      Collaborator
    • Rookie
      Pat-Garrett went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Week One Done
      Outdoor Saunaio earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      331
    2. 2
      snowy owl
      165
    3. 3
      +FloatingFatMan
      158
    4. 4
      ATLien_0
      154
    5. 5
      Xenon
      127
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!