iRiver H10. About to buy one, have a few q's


Recommended Posts

Ok, just to clear things up for anyone else who might find the info useful:

I have my H10 now (it rocks :D), and here's how song orders works:

In the 'Music' Section, where you can browse songs by artist, album, genre, etc., songs are ordered alphabetically by the 'Song Name' tag.

In the 'Browser' Section, where you browse through the folder hierarchy, songs are ordered alphabetically by filename.

So, if your song filenames have the track number in front (which most people do now), then they will show up in the correct track order in the 'Browser' view. If you want them to show up correctly in the 'Music' view, you have to alter the ID3 tags to include the track number at the start of the 'Song name'.

Other than that, this is one sweet little player. I was truly surprised by the quality of the FM reception, and by the overall sound quality. I've made arguments that only a freaky audiophile would be able to tell the difference between an iPod and an iRiver (given the same file and same headphones), but the first thing out of my mouth when I played the first song was, 'wow'.

What version firmware do you have?

585447343[/snapback]

Right now, v1.00 is all the US customers have. v1.10 for the UK version came out about two weeks ago, and iRiver says they're working "frantically" on the US firmware update to fix these issues, so we're keeping our fingers crossed for a firmware update by month's end.

OK. I put V1.10 on mine a few days back and it fixed a few problems like the screen not turning off properly etc, but no fix for the alphabetical tracks yet. I seem to be having trouble with the database on it, the other day it became completely corrupt and wouldnt show any songs at all, I had to use browser mode :s Only fix was to delete the database from iRiver+. Oh, and random tracks are still disappearing from the menu. So let's hope what they're working on will be released soon!

  • 1 month later...

This was extremely useful to me, as this issue has been driving me crazy - I really think the H10 is so cool, an since I prefer it to the Ipod for my own personal reasons, not dsaying one is better than the other - but a radio, more space, and I think its just a cool looking - but this fundamental inability to play an album in order is a show stopper for me. I realize that a lot of folks don't seem to care what order they get their music in, or they are OK with the inconvieience of creating everything as a play list, but as a musucian I fine this lack of attention to the order of an album to be very depressing - I am just an old fart I guess, but I remember when an album really meant somthing. For that matter, if you are listening to classical (not my main thing), your MP3s will be per movement of a particular piece, so it really matters. ENOUGH of my PREMABLE being said (this is my first post) - here is my humble thanks for your clear and accurate explainantion - I did not even bother to check in Browser mode. The instruction for this unit are a joke, so forgive me for asking what may seem like obvious questions on basic funtionality, but I do not understand the featue of Browser mode - seems like I clicked on one song and it played the whole album (yes - in order, I renamed my file names as per the Iriver site recomendation, pretty easy in Musicmatch) - played the whole album - this is whatI wanted, but what if you jsut want one song? I hope they fix the software so that you can do this from the Album view as this would make it easier to navigate the system by album - duh. Meanwhile, your assitqance may be just enough to keep me from retruning this otherwise perfect little gem. :D

Ok, just to clear things up for anyone else who might find the info useful:

I have my H10 now (it rocks :D), and here's how song orders works:

In the 'Music' Section, where you can browse songs by artist, album, genre, etc., songs are ordered alphabetically by the 'Song Name' tag.

In the 'Browser' Section, where you browse through the folder hierarchy, songs are ordered alphabetically by filename.

So, if your song filenames have the track number in front (which most people do now), then they will show up in the correct track order in the 'Browser' view.  If you want them to show up correctly in the 'Music' view, you have to alter the ID3 tags to include the track number at the start of the 'Song name'.

Other than that, this is one sweet little player.  I was truly surprised by the quality of the FM reception, and by the overall sound quality.  I've made arguments that only a freaky audiophile would be able to tell the difference between an iPod and an iRiver (given the same file and same headphones), but the first thing out of my mouth when I played the first song was, 'wow'.

585447051[/snapback]

Ow shhh  :D

get back on topic  :p

no you are right I'm brainwashed by iPod ...

@smapdi you are richt Creative was the first one. sorry for the mistake. But you have to admit that almost every mp3 player is based on the iPod.

Just look at the name iPod iRiver, iRiver even copied the name ! (I know that apple hasn't a patent on the "i")

[Make peace no war, and get back on topic]

585434822[/snapback]

Aaaaactually, iRiver has been around for longer than Apple has been making the iPod, iRiver used to OEM the RioVolt line of MP3 CD Players back in the day, and that was a considerable while before the 1G iPod was released. :)

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Didn’t Dbrand once complain that Casetify was ripping off their designs a well? seems pretty bad of them to try and get around Valve’s copyright this way with that in mind.
    • Dbrand thought they could get away with this Steam Machine case, Valve disagreed by David Uzondu Image via Dbrand Dbrand has cancelled its highly anticipated Companion Cube enclosure for the Valve Steam Machine, which it teased back in November of last year with a concept render and sign-up page, because it did not ask Valve for permission first before manufacturing the case. According to Dbrand, it took the "backwards approach" of building the product first before asking for permission from the copyright holder. Seven months of work went into the project, requiring over a thousand engineering hours from the design team. Workers developed forty-four sets of injection molding tools, making a unique mold for each sub-component of the crate. When the Companion Cube went live on Monday last week, it, according to Dbrand, quickly became the second-fastest-selling product in the company's fifteen-year history, racking up orders for hundreds of thousands of units. Customers eagerly bought the $129.95 deluxe edition or the bare-bones $99.95 version, which the manufacturer cheekily branded as the "Poverty Cube". It was around this time that the legal eagles at Valve descended on the accessory maker with a formal demand. The developer pointed out that the iconic block design remains protected intellectual property from the game Portal, so unlicensed sales had to stop. Dbrand said that all its pleas to salvage the project with the Valve team, including proposals to run a properly licensed release under official terms "with their blessing", fell on deaf ears, so it had no choice but to obey and remove every trace of the product from the internet. If you bought the enclosure, the company said that banks will process your refund by the end of this week, but if it still hasn't arrived in your account by then, you should not hesitate to contact support. The Steam Machine itself is a high-performance console that Valve designed directly to bring PC gaming into the living room. It was announced on 12th November 2025 (the same day Dbrand announced the Cube) and runs on the Linux-based SteamOS, the same OS that powers the Steam Deck. As for the price, due to the shortage of memory and storage chips, the hardware cost landed much higher than people were expecting, starting at $1,049 for the 512 model (without a controller) or $1,128 with the new gamepad. The premium 2 TB model pushes those prices even higher, selling at $1,349 for the standalone console and hitting $1,428 if you want the bundle.
    • It's listed #399.99 on Amazon, per your link. It's not $299.99.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Rookie
      Almohandis went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Apprentice
      jahara21 went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • Reacting Well
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      BA the Curmudgeon earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      534
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      263
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      148
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      97
    5. 5
      macoman
      59
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!