June Desktops

By Steven P.
in General Discussion

 Share

Recommended Posts

Collaborator

AuRe

Posted
Posted

Maybe Im a drone cuz I use Chose theme and iPlatinum icons (both by KoL) and sure are thousand of ppl using similar or same combination, but....... My graphic talent, imagination is = 0, my time to sitdown and start all that stuff = 0, I work 10 h, study 5 or 6 h I cook for myself, I have a dog, my perfect day should have 48h and must be ppl with similar probs so that ppl as KoL which have that talent we are thankful because my windows is not going to be plain and bored anymore.

About the MetalX I like it, but I dont like WB, if some can export it to VS I'll be happy, maybe WB is powerful or have more options, I dont care, I just like how it looks like in VS, for me WB sucks, buggy and take a lot of resources in MY system.

About the original authors, they should be glad that ppl like their work and give permissions to ppl like unsanity, of course they are free to make what ever whit it, but then there is the difference.

I havent see KoL saying no or denying permission. That say a lot about a person.

That's my opinion.

;)

Experienced

-outcast-

Posted
Posted
Originally posted by [saint dark]

like the people who uses mac os based shinny themes over and over again?

or like the people who make and use metallic based themes?

think again, wher are the few original poeple here, the drones are others... :right:

outcast is just frustrated because my "failed cause" (my position against the metalx port) was supported by the neowin mods, and now hes trolling against me, I have proof of that, he was trolling in one of my wallpapers thread

So Im not gonna stand your attitude :right: I know how to make wars

btw, I have nothing against you unsanity, I respect you for your copyroght infrigtment theme and for your originality, but Im starting to hate this guy

Sorry [saint], I didn't mean to personally insult you, I didn't think you would take what I said seriously... we're taking about Desktop Wallpaper :) The reason I said that, is becuase you always seem to bash people who like Mac themes, just because they are popular. I understand why you might not like trendy things, I agree somewhat, but I just wanted to poke fun at you the same way you do to the Mac people, with your "Keep it simple" movement. :p As for being supported by the neowin mods, I dont really undertand/care what you meant, it dont have or ever did have the mods support on that and I don't care if I did. Take it easy

Experienced

correllium

Posted
Posted

I figured I should actually post mine atleast once, so here it is. Not that everyone doesn't already know about the stuff I'm using but anyways:

Wallpaper: revert by nada

Icons: iPlatinium from The Mac Day and converted by KoL

And QuickTime idea ripped from deadzombie without permission :D

small.jpg

Grand Master

DeathLace

Posted
Posted

Here's my latest.

Wallpaper: Ali Larter from here.

Icons: Metallic Glass Icons by DeathLace (me).

Trillian Skin: Milkian be DeathLace (me) - Unfinished.

Theme: Milk by KoL.

desktop.jpg

Click for full size (High-Res quality dropped to gif from png because png file was over 2 megs and gif image is around 320kb).

This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Posts

    • I restored the default settings to Secure Boot. Big mistake

      By +Warwagon · Posted

      In the boot options in the UEFI is set to legacy or CMS? It needs to be set to UEFI if it's not already.
    • Researchers claim Microsoft's quantum breakthrough is flawed by basic Python errors

      By Ccl Ncc · Posted

      Does sound like Microsoft
    • Researchers claim Microsoft's quantum breakthrough is flawed by basic Python errors

      By Co-ords · Posted

      That made me laugh! Thank you
    • Researchers claim Microsoft's quantum breakthrough is flawed by basic Python errors

      By Karthik Mudaliar · Posted

      Researchers claim Microsoft's quantum breakthrough is flawed by basic Python errors by Karthik Mudaliar Microsoft's aggressive roadmap to deliver a commercial quantum supercomputer by 2029 has now hit a bit of a snag, and it's not because of a complex sub-zero dilution refrigerator, but rather because of a few lines of basic Python code. A new critique published in the scientific journal Nature argues that simple software errors effectively manufactured the breakthrough that Microsoft's foundational research claimed back in 2025 into Majorana-based topological qubits. Topological quantum computing, the path that Microsoft chose for its research, relies on creating and controlling "Majorana zero modes." These are exotic quasiparticles that theoretically offer vastly superior error resistance compared to the highly sensitive superconducting qubits currently being championed by rivals like Google and IBM. However, physically proving you have created these particles requires sifting through massive amounts of complex electrical conductance data to isolate a specific "topological gap." Because of the sheer volume of data, physicists rely heavily on custom software pipelines to process the results. This is where the Python scripts come in. Now, according to the critique, Microsoft’s data processing software contained fundamental programming errors that ultimately skewed the published results. By mishandling data arrays or deploying incorrect logic within the Python script, the software supposedly discarded "noisy" or contradictory data. Which is why it only highlighted the specific electrical measurements that supported the topological-gap claim. The researchers behind the critique argued that this makes the findings invalid, suggesting the heralded "quantum leap" was actually a false positive generated by bad code and not a product of groundbreaking physics. However, Microsoft is pushing back hard against these allegations. The Redmond giant has formally rejected the criticism, saying that it's just a minor anomaly rather than a fatal flaw. According to the company, while there may have been a minor oversight in the data parsing scripts, it does not alter the fundamental reality of their physical experiment. Just weeks ago, Microsoft unveiled the Majorana 2 quantum processor, a milestone so significant that the company boldly accelerated its timeline for a commercial quantum supercomputer from 2035 down to 2029. But the new software allegations reopen an old wound. Microsoft's quantum division faced a remarkably similar crisis when a landmark 2018 paper on Majorana particles was famously retracted in 2021 after independent physicists discovered the data had been inappropriately cropped. That historical baggage makes the current Python-related allegations particularly sensitive. If the foundational math and data processing for the 2025 breakthrough are genuinely flawed, the highly anticipated 2029 commercial timeline could easily be delayed or, worse, cancelled.
    • OpenAI and Broadcom unveil Jalapeño, a new AI chip built for LLM inference

      By margrave · Posted

      Because of what they have done to VMware I will never buy anything Broadcom again.

  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      First Post
    • One Month Later
      D0nn13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Rookie
      +ChiefOfNeo went up a rank
      Rookie
    • One Year In
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      One Year In

  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      466
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      177
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      123
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      82
    5. 5
      Xenon
      76
    Show More

  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!