Default User Profile


Recommended Posts

I have taken over someone elses mess, so don't blame me for it.

What I have:

I have a W2K3 Server (Std) with about 70 clients.

The clients are a mix of W2K and WXPP.

There is a default profile set up using W2K.

All new pc's will be WXPP, but rebuilds may be W2K.

I create new users on a regular basis.

All users have roaming profiles.

What is wrong:

Some of the settings are wrong (ie shortcuts to apps I no longer install, Startup items, name of server in Outlook settings ......)

Confilcts between W2K and WXPP settings (sometimes)

They put Office settings in it too, which is realy wrong.

What I want to do:

Create a W2K profile and archive it.

Create a WXPP profile and archive it.

When setting up a new user I know what OS they will be on. I then put the correct profile into %LOGONSERVER\NETLOGON\Default User befor logging on as the new user.

I will have to systematically change all the user accounts because previous guy made a shambles of the roaming profiles paths (he didn't seperate "Profile" from "Home", that kind of thing.) so I want to get it right.

Here is how I create a default user:

1. Create a standard user in the domain and create a basic Windows client installation with standard applications on a computer
2. Log into the computer with the new user account
3. Set your required profile settings
4. Logoff and back onto the computer with a domain administrative account
5. Copy the profile to "%LOGONSERVER\NETLOGON\Default User" via the following

- System Properties / Advanced / User Profiles
- Select the new profile created in steps 2 and 3
- click Copy To
- copy to %LOGONSERVER\NETLOGON\Default User
- Allow the Everyone group to use

6. And you're done. This default profile will now take effect for any user who logs onto any machine in the domain without a pre-existing profile

So, in short, can I change the files in "%LOGONSERVER\NETLOGON\Default User as I need?

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/290716-default-user-profile/
Share on other sites

Yes. You can modify any file in the default profile as you want. To modify the registry use the following process:

Create a user account in the domain dedicated to the role, without a roaming profile of any sort. (disable when not in use). I usually create some 'clean' machines in VMware - Windows 2000 Professional and Windows XP Professional. Create the profile first in Windows 2000 and copy to the NETLOGON share then do the same in Windows XP. Whenever you need to modify, logon to a clean machine with the dedicated user account, it then gets the current default profile, modify and then copy back.

No, one default profile in %LOGONSERVER%\NETLOGON\Defaul User. You need to use the following process so that it suits both Windows 2000 and Windows XP

1. Log into the Windows 2000 computer with the a user account

2. Set your required profile settings

3. Logoff and back onto the computer with a domain administrative account

4. Copy the profile to "%LOGONSERVER\NETLOGON\Default User" via the system properties

5. Log into the Windows XP computer with the a user account

6. Set your required profile settings

7. Logoff and back onto the computer with a domain administrative account

8. Copy the profile to "%LOGONSERVER\NETLOGON\Default User" via the system properties

Then I'm stuck with a WXP Profile. What I wanted to know was, once I have created the W2K profile, can I make a copy of that. Then create the WXP profile and also make a copy of that. Then, depending on what version of Windows I am going to log on with, I put that profile in Default Users

If you use the method I've posted you can create one profile that will suit both operating systems. You can't configure Windows to use a specified path for the default profile, it will check %LOGONSERVER%\NETLOGON\Default User first then fall back to %ALLUSERSPROFILE%\Default User.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • A 10% IPC boost is underwhelming for what is supposed to be a major generational leap. Unless it's accompanied by higher clock speeds, or the IPC boost is greater than 10% in games, I'm not sure that it will be enough to compete with Zen 5 X3D, let alone Zen 6 X3D for gaming. Single-core performance is super important and cannot be compensated with more cores, whereas the reverse is true, you can compensate for fewer cores with better single-core performance.
    • Been happy with Windows 11 myself even since first release in 2021, sure it hasn't always been perfect, but nothing is per say.. Issues i did have was minor ones, which is normal with any OS really. I still use Windows 10 at times on my unsupported Gaming Laptop, and i find myself using the Windows 11 Desktop more. Eventually replacing Gaming Laptop with a Windows 11 Compatible one somehow, someway this year or possibly next year at the latest, but its gonna happen--(May save all my Bing reward points except the 1000 to have extended support for 10) then work on getting quality Replacement hard)
    • Geez, this is dumb. I use my laptop sometimes in the dark when doing astrophotography to control my astro-PC... this explains why I have to keep entering my PIN when logging back in. So stupid. I can't see the keyboard in the dark, and I can't have lights everywhere to light it up because everything is very light sensitive (including my eyes!).
    • Naturally. I don't care about brand loyalty at all as it's all about price/performance/reliability etc (even what RejZoR said below is a great point to). basically bang-for-the-buck. because at the end of the day... one wants the cheapest possible price to maintain a certain minimum level of performance (or thereabouts). because generally after a certain point with CPU and GPU's the price starts to sky rocket without that much difference in performance where it really matters. p.s. historically I have bought more Intel CPU's and NVIDIA GPU's but I have had some AMD CPU's and one AMD GPU.
    • Both of these companies as well as Qualcomm and Apple need competition. Otherwise, they just coast. I don't prefer macOS, though I like some of Apple's hardware, but if anyone needs competition, it is Apple. Their prices are already outrageous and they need to have a reason to produce good hardware and at least keep prices remotely reasonable. (It is criminal what they charge for RAM upgrades especially.) Qualcomm needs to push AMD and Intel not to be so sloppy with the performance/efficiency aspect. Granted, AMD has been doing quite well in this respect considering they are not an ARM architecture. I personally want to have more options that truly compete with Macbook Air and Macbook Pro's on the Windows side. It is difficult to achieve what Apple does since they control the entire stack and that is fundamentally different for Windows PCs other than maybe Microsoft Surface PCs.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      Hartej earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      TsunadeMama earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      shaheen earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Dedicated
      Cole Multipass earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Week One Done
      Alexander 001 earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      565
    2. 2
      +FloatingFatMan
      182
    3. 3
      ATLien_0
      175
    4. 4
      Skyfrog
      111
    5. 5
      Som
      106
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!