Recommended Posts

You may be interested in this option, when you right click on the tab bar and click customize (may look slightly different to you, this is a screenshot from Opera 8 Beta 2). This will make the tab bar hide if only one tab is open.

585549969[/snapback]

Yes, I found that using Beta8. Solved my tab problem! :)

lav, you are giving yourself way to much credit. Opera is very simple in design. Anyone could pick up Opera and run with it. The basic features of a browser are very evident in Opera. You actually have to look around to see how deep and flexible the browser is. The same people who would struggle with opera are the same ones who would struggle with Firefox and/or IE.

585548572[/snapback]

Maybe, maybe not.

Up until just recently, Opera's default configuration was really busy. They fixed this in Opera 8, but in previous versions Opera had all kinds of junk enabled by default that i think would completely confuse someone who wasn't already really familiar with the functions of a Web browser. The side bar alone would confuse people probably, never mind all these crazy buttons all over the place and the seventeen search bars. Firetruck, on the other hand, is almost exactly like Internet Explorer by default. Has a few less buttons, has an extra search box, but other than that it looks the same.

I mean, i don't know, maybe 'n00bs' would just be able to jump straight into Opera. I'm not a 'n00b', so i guess i wouldn't really know. But just looking at the default configurations, it's obvious who's putting out more effort to be 'n00b-friendly' (Firefox).

Maybe, maybe not.

Up until just recently, Opera's default configuration was really busy. They fixed this in Opera 8, but in previous versions Opera had all kinds of junk enabled by default that i think would completely confuse someone who wasn't already really familiar with the functions of a Web browser. The side bar alone would confuse people probably, never mind all these crazy buttons all over the place and the seventeen search bars. Firetruck, on the other hand, is almost exactly like Internet Explorer by default. Has a few less buttons, has an extra search box, but other than that it looks the same.

I mean, i don't know, maybe 'n00bs' would just be able to jump straight into Opera. I'm not a 'n00b', so i guess i wouldn't really know. But just looking at the default configurations, it's obvious who's putting out more effort to be 'n00b-friendly' (Firefox).

585550414[/snapback]

Point well taken. This could also explain the typical complaint formed agaist Opera. Feature bloat. Perhaps it could be because of the overlaod of buttons and toolbars on the default setup. I see that Opera8 has really done a great deal to grind down the default setup to look a bit more minimalistic. It could be Opera has taken notice of the success of Firefox and moved towards the same direction. I have no idea what the older versions of Opera loked like but from the general consensus it seems toolbar bloat was an issue. I know the first thing I did when I initially ran Opera7 was remove many toolbars along with 5 or 6 search bars.

I agree that Firefox is targeting users of IE more so then Opera is. Whether or not these less computer literate users could quickly grow comfortable with Opera... I don't know. I still stand on the fact that those who would be utterly confused with Opera is still the same bunch that would have problems figuring out such mundane tasks as clearing thier temporary internet files in IE.

I guess we'll never truly know until the day (if it ever happens) Opera removes the advertisement banner and the average user flocks to use it. By the way, that makes me wonder. How many people faithfully use Opera with the banners without paying?

Maybe, maybe not.

Up until just recently, Opera's default configuration was really busy. They fixed this in Opera 8, but in previous versions Opera had all kinds of junk enabled by default that i think would completely confuse someone who wasn't already really familiar with the functions of a Web browser. The side bar alone would confuse people probably, never mind all these crazy buttons all over the place and the seventeen search bars. Firetruck, on the other hand, is almost exactly like Internet Explorer by default. Has a few less buttons, has an extra search box, but other than that it looks the same.

I mean, i don't know, maybe 'n00bs' would just be able to jump straight into Opera. I'm not a 'n00b', so i guess i wouldn't really know. But just looking at the default configurations, it's obvious who's putting out more effort to be 'n00b-friendly' (Firefox).

585550414[/snapback]

Just because Firefox got a clean and uncluttered interface doesn't mean it's intended to be "noob friendly". A lot of Linux browsers have similar interface as Firefox, like Epiphany and Konqueror. And Epiphany&Konqueror are certainly NOT intended to be for noobs! So your argument of firefox being a noob browser doesn't make sense, it's more likely that the developers of firefox used this interface design to KISS.

I know the first thing I did when I initially ran Opera7 was remove many toolbars along with 5 or 6 search bars.

uh, i know that this is firefox territory and all, but let's at least try to stay factual :)

opera 7.5 has an address bar and a personal bar by default. you can also get a main bar if you enable generic ads. there's a google search field on the address bar (an opera invention!) and a couple of search fields on the personal bar.

that's not the same as '5 or 6 search bars' :)

A lot of Linux browsers have similar interface as Firefox, like Epiphany and Konqueror. And Epiphany&Konqueror are certainly NOT intended to be for noobs!

why not? are you saying that kde and gnome are not supposed to be used by newbies?

but you do have a point, konqueror doesn't exactly have a lack of toolbar buttons. actually, is a bit better in this regard.

but the fact remains that one of the outspoken goals of firefox is to make it easy to use for newbies. opera, too, is becoming increasingly easy to use, but at the same time increasingly powerful.

The point you are missing is that Firefox is the most flexible browser out there. As it is, it offers nice secure alternative for IE and if you're more experienced with computers you can easily cook up your own extensions or hack the browser itself to fit your browsing needs. I personalyl think that Opera's solution is more n00b friendly than Firefox's, it's a bit like express install option on some setup programs. You click it and everything gets installed automatically, with Firefox you just install the core, rest is up to you.

As for the roboform issue..

Opera does not support it because it didn't provide the RoboForm APIs necessary for its operation (DOM), though Opera's tech support says it's something they'll definitely add sometime next year.

That was 3 years ago or so. I don't know if Opera provided the information Roboform needed or if Roboform just said screw it. Obviously something went wrong.

And sorry for the off topic post :)

Allow me to digress from the original poster's content:

To me, it's not only the browser speed, memory management, price and performance that matters but also the philosophy (the way the browsers are designed in a way that appeals to the user).

By default, Opera:

- restores earlier sessions

- opens links that open in new windows in tabs

- lets you move tabs around

- has 'paste and go'

- double click on a word brings up context menu w/ useful options like google search

I am guessing once someone is used to these, they would quickly realize how valuable these are for day-to-day browsing. Opera recognizes the value of these and provides them by default. That's one of the reasons I like it. It's just more intelligent or so appears to me.

If only, they realize the usefulness of AdBlock.....

Edited by trigger_my_passion

Hey... thanks for the quick reply :)

Yep, I've set it all up properly (i guess) attaching my own screenie..

But it craps out on me :\

We have a proxy at work but I've entered the proxy settings properly in Opera's proxy config dialog... is there anything else I'm missing out on?

post-62770-1109761617_thumb.jpg

post-62770-1109761710_thumb.jpg

post-62770-1109761742.jpg

Java Green, does Gmail work in any other Email client? If no, then it is time to call your ISP and tell them about it. I heard somebody on the Opera Community board complaining about this.

I dont see the word plain text in your setting windows as opposed to mine and the one that was previously posted. Which version of Opera are you using?

see the attachement for details.

post-74703-1109763153_thumb.jpg

Edited by celestialspring

@celestialspring: I'm running Opera version 7.54u2 .. in there I see Auto and Plaintext listed seperately... no Auto(plaintext) though. I have not tested GMail with any other mail client ...i'll try to check up with my IT people if they've blocked pop3 or something.. I'm able to access gmail through FF and IE without any problems

So please do a test with some other email client and get back to us. You would also be able to login to the web interface of Gmail, once you upgrade from 7.54 to 7.6 preview, better to 8 Beta 2 or 1.

I also suggest that you try and put plaintext in the settings and see if that works.

Don't bother trying to convince them.

Firefox users apparently find customizing Opera's toolbar very difficult and complicated, not to mention time-consuming, yet they manage to install 5 or more Firefox extensions from a website that doesn't even have proper search function, everytime they re-install Firefox.

Oh my...  :rolleyes:

585542538[/snapback]

Reality Check

Anyways, even since I first installed Firefox (0.7 - Firebird), I have no problems of upgrading (while keeping my stuff) and I only had to reinstall firefox for the 1.0 upgrade, no biggie.

Some more than others.

The point is when Firefox users brag about all these features that they have as if they invented them, as if everybody else is just playing catch-up to Firefox. I don't care whether they invented them or not, what i care about is that they act like Firefox (or Mozilla) innovatively came up with all these fantastic features, and they didn't.

585542546[/snapback]

It's called advertising... and there is never enough of it.

Anyways... it's like calling Firefox, Firetruck... it does no harm.

Firefox IS for 'n00bs'. It is designed to work out of the box in a similar fashion to Internet Explorer, which is what the less-computer-savvy people of the world typically are used to. It LOOKS like Internet Explorer, and it's designed to be AS SIMPLE as Internet Explorer.

That isn't a bad thing -- i personally think Opera should go the same route, because it would encourage people to switch over. But that doesn't change the fact that it is designed with 'n00bs' in mind. As terribly offended as you might get to be grouped in with them.

585547372[/snapback]

Yes, Firefox is meant to look like Internet Explorer, but why is that labeled for noobs? What you see is only skin deep, it's what inside that matters. Have you considered that there are extensions available to Firefox, which means that Firefox is for advanced users too? I don?t understand what?s with the common perception that a program with a simple user interface means that it has less advanced functionality.

BTW, type ?about:config? in Firefox? that?s as advanced as a web browser can get.

using flip forward or forward mouse gesture to activate fast forward to log in using the wand, heck yeah! you can't do that with firefox. there are lots of similar time-savers that firefox just can't beat.

585549233[/snapback]

You know, (I don?t know what site you?re referring to), but I think that most webpages that has a login dialog has the default focus on the ?log in? / ?sign-in? button, meaning that clicking on the ?enter? / ?return? key will log you in.

Firefox and opera are both good browsers. Firefox comes in a minimal pack, where as opera comes in a feature rich pack. Opera has a lot of innovative features and some of them are avaliable for firefox via extensions (Firefox has it's own unique extensions that Opera doesn't have). In terms of efficiency, Opera in size and performance beats firefox. But I support firefox because it's open source, and the fact that it has extensions. Which allows me to personalize Firefox the way I want it in terms of the looks(themes) of it and functions that it has. (extensions) I like to think of it as a barebone system vs. a computer from a big manufacturer (e.g. Dell, Apple, Gateway..)

Edited by Help
Yes, Firefox is meant to look like Internet Explorer, but why is that labeled for noobs?

585561617[/snapback]

You are stuck on the use of the word 'noobs'. 'Noobs' means people who aren't computer experts. It's not meant to be offensive. At least, not the way i used it, i guess i can't speak for that first guy. They designed Firefox (which is a browser -- extensions are not Firefox, they are extensions) to be easy for non-experts ('noobs') to switch over to, therefore it is designed for noobs.

Think of it this way, maybe: Firetruck out of the box is like Windows. It comes idiot-proof, just like Windows does with all its huge buttons and help bubbles and animated search companions. If you want, you can go out and get a bunch of fancy advanced add-on stuff, but it isn't designed straight out of the package to be like that.

BTW, type ‘about:config’ in Firefox… that’s as advanced as a web browser can get.

585561617[/snapback]

Why do you think they hide those options in a barren pretty-much-undocumented config page that you have to have some expert tell you about in order to find?

If only, they realize the usefulness of AdBlock.....

Opera relies on ads. How do you think they would look to the world if they included something like AdBlock? They encourage people to block ads on web sites, while showing them their own ads? Heh.

Why not use one of the many options that are already available for ad blocking in Opera, such as CSS, proxies or URL filtering? Have a look at this:

http://www.monroeworld.com/operafilter/

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Apple raises MacBook and iPad prices as memory costs surge by Karthik Mudaliar Apple has raised the U.S. prices of several MacBook and iPad models, including the MacBook Neo, which it launched for $599 less than four months ago. The company’s cheapest laptop now starts at $699, while some MacBook Pro configurations have increased by $300. The changes affect the MacBook Neo, MacBook Air, MacBook Pro, iPad Air, and iPad Pro. Apple has not changed the hardware or storage included with these models, so customers are simply paying more for the same configurations. Here is how the new US pricing compares with the previous starting prices: Product Previous price New price Increase MacBook Neo $599 $699 $100 13-inch MacBook Air, 512GB $1,099 $1,299 $200 14-inch MacBook Pro, 1TB $1,699 $1,999 $300 16-inch MacBook Pro $2,699 $2,999 $300 11-inch iPad Air, 128GB $599 $749 $150 13-inch iPad Air, 128GB $799 $949 $150 11-inch iPad Pro, 256GB $999 $1,199 $200 13-inch iPad Pro, 256GB $1,299 $1,499 $200 The updated prices are already appearing on Apple’s U.S. online store. The MacBook Neo increase will probably attract the most attention. Apple introduced the laptop in March for $599, pitching it as a more affordable Mac for students and buyers considering Windows laptops or Chromebooks. It uses an A18 Pro processor and originally undercut Dell’s new $699 XPS 13 by $100. Following the increase, the two laptops now have the same starting price. The M5 MacBook Air has also lost the price Apple promoted when it launched in March. The 13-inch model arrived with 512GB of storage for $1,099, while Apple’s store now lists the MacBook Air range as starting at $1,299. The 14-inch MacBook Pro with an M5 chip and 1TB of storage has gone from $1,699 to $1,999. Apple has made similar changes to its iPads. The recently released M4 iPad Air, which launched at the same $599 starting price as its predecessor, now starts at $749 for the 11-inch version. The 13-inch version has risen from $799 to $949. The iPad Pro increases are larger in dollar terms. Apple’s 11-inch M5 iPad Pro now starts at $1,199, up from $999, while the 13-inch version has moved from $1,299 to $1,499. Both base models still include 256GB of storage. Apple blamed the increases on the rapidly rising cost of DRAM and NAND flash, which provide system memory and device storage. The company told Reuters that it had tried to shield customers from the increases but could no longer absorb them. “We have never seen a component price increase this much, this quickly,” Apple said. Tim Cook had already warned that price increases were coming. Cook said Apple’s existing component inventory had softened the immediate impact, but that higher memory costs would increasingly affect the company after the June quarter. Much of the pressure comes from the construction of AI data centers. Memory manufacturers are directing more production toward high-margin server products, leaving PC, tablet, and smartphone makers competing for the remaining supply. Apple has not said whether the new prices are temporary or whether further increases are planned. For now, the changes show that even Apple’s purchasing power has not been enough to keep the AI-driven memory shortage away from consumer devices.
    • Ventoy 1.1.16 is out.
    • This is a none story - these low volume Chinese models will always get new experimental features first because Apple and Samsung can't produce them in huge volume to meet demand.
    • Nvidia GeForce NOW gains support for Dark Scrolls, Empulse, and more by Pulasthi Ariyasinghe The final update of June for Nvidia's cloud gaming service GeForce NOW is now available, and it is touting support for six more games. The company is also drawing subscriber attention towards the summer sales kicking off across stores, so they can stock up on more cloud-supported titles. Of course, the Steam Summer Sale is the biggest promotion, which is kicking off later today. "Supported Steam games can be streamed across devices with GeForce NOW, making it easy to buy a game once, keep progress synced and pick up where the gameplay left off on PCs, Macs, handheld devices, phones, TVs and more," says the company. "In other words, the Steam Summer Sale brings the deals; GeForce NOW adds the flexibility." Don't forget that the GeForce NOW summer sale is still active as well. This limited-time offer drops the 12-month Performance membership from $99.99 to $64.99, saving members $35. At the same time, the 12-month Ultimate membership is currently going for $129.99, dropping the price by $70 from the original $199.99. Here are the games joining GeForce NOW's supported list this week: Dark Scrolls (New release on Steam, available June 22) SAND: Raiders of Sophie (New release on Steam, available June 22) Deer & Boy (New release on Steam, available June 23) EMPULSE (New release on Steam, available June 24) The Adventures of Elliot: The Millennium Tales (Steam) FATAL FURY: City of the Wolves (Steam) With the June expansions coming to an end, Nvidia should be announcing its July GeForce NOW plans next week. Keep in mind that, unlike subscription services like Game Pass or EA Play, a copy of a game must be owned by the GeForce NOW member (or at least have a license via PC Game Pass) to start playing via Nvidia's cloud servers. There is also a limit to how many hours subscribers can use the service per month.
    • Davinci Resolve 21.0.1 by Razvan Serea DaVinci Resolve is the world’s only solution that combines editing, color correction, visual effects, motion graphics and audio post production all in one software tool! Its elegant, modern interface is fast to learn and easy for new users, yet powerful for professionals. DaVinci Resolve lets you work faster and at a higher quality because you don’t have to learn multiple apps or switch software for different tasks. That means you can work with camera original quality images throughout the entire process. It’s like having your own post production studio in a single app! Best of all, by learning DaVinci Resolve, you’re learning how to use the exact same tools used by Hollywood professionals! DaVinci Resolve is the only post production software designed for true collaboration. Multiple editors, assistants, colorists, VFX artists and sound designers can all work on the same project at the same time! Whether you’re an individual artist, or part of a larger collaborative team, it’s easy to see why DaVinci Resolve is the standard for high end post production and is used for finishing more Hollywood feature films, episodic television programing and TV commercials than any other software. Davinci Resolve 21.0.1 release notes: Addressed multiple DNG and Apple ProRAW color issues. Addressed issue with automatic smart bins after deleting keywords. Addressed issue with multiple linked audio in media management. Addressed multiple Resolve FX issues in photo page. Addressed issue with key shortcut to switch viewer in photo page. More consistent creation of new photo albums. Addressed color thumbnail refresh for photo transform indicator. Transcription now honors project settings language. Improved face recognition in IntelliSearch. Addressed exported bins not retaining generator and title properties. Addressed ease control display and sensitivity issues. Addressed keyframe issue when copying clips with Fusion effects. Addressed keyframe refresh for Fusion effects in the edit page. Addressed issue with 3D renders in Linux with non-English locales. Addressed Fusion viewer color issue for some RCM settings. Addressed issue with saturation limits in Fusion gradient controls. Addressed Fusion display issues with dual screen layouts. Addressed issue with non-English character inputs in Linux. Disabling MultiMaster now disables trim blanking controls. Addressed crash in some scenarios with CineFocus. Addressed lag when toggling bypass grades and Fusion effects. Addressed occasional issue with Fairlight loudness meters. Addressed data burn display of good take tag in upgraded projects. Addressed project manager scroll lag for large project libraries. Support for Sony Alpha 7R VI ARW RAW stills. Support for decoding Affinity RGB 16-bit formats. Addressed a color issue with MainConcept H.265 HDR renders. Addressed a color issue with Windows native H.265 HDR renders. RemoveMotionBlur API now uses correct encode parameters. Addressed character limit consistency in GenerateSpeech API. General performance and stability improvements. Download page: Davinci Resolve 21.0.1 | 3300 MB (Free, paid upgrade available) Links: DaVinci Resolve Website | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
  • Recent Achievements

    • First Post
      kinowa earned a badge
      First Post
    • Rookie
      krychek57 went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Grand Master
      Jaybonaut went up a rank
      Grand Master
    • One Year In
      Philsl earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Dedicated
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Dedicated
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      463
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      171
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      134
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      77
    5. 5
      Xenon
      77
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!