Recommended Posts

You may be interested in this option, when you right click on the tab bar and click customize (may look slightly different to you, this is a screenshot from Opera 8 Beta 2). This will make the tab bar hide if only one tab is open.

585549969[/snapback]

Yes, I found that using Beta8. Solved my tab problem! :)

lav, you are giving yourself way to much credit. Opera is very simple in design. Anyone could pick up Opera and run with it. The basic features of a browser are very evident in Opera. You actually have to look around to see how deep and flexible the browser is. The same people who would struggle with opera are the same ones who would struggle with Firefox and/or IE.

585548572[/snapback]

Maybe, maybe not.

Up until just recently, Opera's default configuration was really busy. They fixed this in Opera 8, but in previous versions Opera had all kinds of junk enabled by default that i think would completely confuse someone who wasn't already really familiar with the functions of a Web browser. The side bar alone would confuse people probably, never mind all these crazy buttons all over the place and the seventeen search bars. Firetruck, on the other hand, is almost exactly like Internet Explorer by default. Has a few less buttons, has an extra search box, but other than that it looks the same.

I mean, i don't know, maybe 'n00bs' would just be able to jump straight into Opera. I'm not a 'n00b', so i guess i wouldn't really know. But just looking at the default configurations, it's obvious who's putting out more effort to be 'n00b-friendly' (Firefox).

Maybe, maybe not.

Up until just recently, Opera's default configuration was really busy. They fixed this in Opera 8, but in previous versions Opera had all kinds of junk enabled by default that i think would completely confuse someone who wasn't already really familiar with the functions of a Web browser. The side bar alone would confuse people probably, never mind all these crazy buttons all over the place and the seventeen search bars. Firetruck, on the other hand, is almost exactly like Internet Explorer by default. Has a few less buttons, has an extra search box, but other than that it looks the same.

I mean, i don't know, maybe 'n00bs' would just be able to jump straight into Opera. I'm not a 'n00b', so i guess i wouldn't really know. But just looking at the default configurations, it's obvious who's putting out more effort to be 'n00b-friendly' (Firefox).

585550414[/snapback]

Point well taken. This could also explain the typical complaint formed agaist Opera. Feature bloat. Perhaps it could be because of the overlaod of buttons and toolbars on the default setup. I see that Opera8 has really done a great deal to grind down the default setup to look a bit more minimalistic. It could be Opera has taken notice of the success of Firefox and moved towards the same direction. I have no idea what the older versions of Opera loked like but from the general consensus it seems toolbar bloat was an issue. I know the first thing I did when I initially ran Opera7 was remove many toolbars along with 5 or 6 search bars.

I agree that Firefox is targeting users of IE more so then Opera is. Whether or not these less computer literate users could quickly grow comfortable with Opera... I don't know. I still stand on the fact that those who would be utterly confused with Opera is still the same bunch that would have problems figuring out such mundane tasks as clearing thier temporary internet files in IE.

I guess we'll never truly know until the day (if it ever happens) Opera removes the advertisement banner and the average user flocks to use it. By the way, that makes me wonder. How many people faithfully use Opera with the banners without paying?

Maybe, maybe not.

Up until just recently, Opera's default configuration was really busy. They fixed this in Opera 8, but in previous versions Opera had all kinds of junk enabled by default that i think would completely confuse someone who wasn't already really familiar with the functions of a Web browser. The side bar alone would confuse people probably, never mind all these crazy buttons all over the place and the seventeen search bars. Firetruck, on the other hand, is almost exactly like Internet Explorer by default. Has a few less buttons, has an extra search box, but other than that it looks the same.

I mean, i don't know, maybe 'n00bs' would just be able to jump straight into Opera. I'm not a 'n00b', so i guess i wouldn't really know. But just looking at the default configurations, it's obvious who's putting out more effort to be 'n00b-friendly' (Firefox).

585550414[/snapback]

Just because Firefox got a clean and uncluttered interface doesn't mean it's intended to be "noob friendly". A lot of Linux browsers have similar interface as Firefox, like Epiphany and Konqueror. And Epiphany&Konqueror are certainly NOT intended to be for noobs! So your argument of firefox being a noob browser doesn't make sense, it's more likely that the developers of firefox used this interface design to KISS.

I know the first thing I did when I initially ran Opera7 was remove many toolbars along with 5 or 6 search bars.

uh, i know that this is firefox territory and all, but let's at least try to stay factual :)

opera 7.5 has an address bar and a personal bar by default. you can also get a main bar if you enable generic ads. there's a google search field on the address bar (an opera invention!) and a couple of search fields on the personal bar.

that's not the same as '5 or 6 search bars' :)

A lot of Linux browsers have similar interface as Firefox, like Epiphany and Konqueror. And Epiphany&Konqueror are certainly NOT intended to be for noobs!

why not? are you saying that kde and gnome are not supposed to be used by newbies?

but you do have a point, konqueror doesn't exactly have a lack of toolbar buttons. actually, is a bit better in this regard.

but the fact remains that one of the outspoken goals of firefox is to make it easy to use for newbies. opera, too, is becoming increasingly easy to use, but at the same time increasingly powerful.

The point you are missing is that Firefox is the most flexible browser out there. As it is, it offers nice secure alternative for IE and if you're more experienced with computers you can easily cook up your own extensions or hack the browser itself to fit your browsing needs. I personalyl think that Opera's solution is more n00b friendly than Firefox's, it's a bit like express install option on some setup programs. You click it and everything gets installed automatically, with Firefox you just install the core, rest is up to you.

As for the roboform issue..

Opera does not support it because it didn't provide the RoboForm APIs necessary for its operation (DOM), though Opera's tech support says it's something they'll definitely add sometime next year.

That was 3 years ago or so. I don't know if Opera provided the information Roboform needed or if Roboform just said screw it. Obviously something went wrong.

And sorry for the off topic post :)

Allow me to digress from the original poster's content:

To me, it's not only the browser speed, memory management, price and performance that matters but also the philosophy (the way the browsers are designed in a way that appeals to the user).

By default, Opera:

- restores earlier sessions

- opens links that open in new windows in tabs

- lets you move tabs around

- has 'paste and go'

- double click on a word brings up context menu w/ useful options like google search

I am guessing once someone is used to these, they would quickly realize how valuable these are for day-to-day browsing. Opera recognizes the value of these and provides them by default. That's one of the reasons I like it. It's just more intelligent or so appears to me.

If only, they realize the usefulness of AdBlock.....

Edited by trigger_my_passion

Hey... thanks for the quick reply :)

Yep, I've set it all up properly (i guess) attaching my own screenie..

But it craps out on me :\

We have a proxy at work but I've entered the proxy settings properly in Opera's proxy config dialog... is there anything else I'm missing out on?

post-62770-1109761617_thumb.jpg

post-62770-1109761710_thumb.jpg

post-62770-1109761742.jpg

Java Green, does Gmail work in any other Email client? If no, then it is time to call your ISP and tell them about it. I heard somebody on the Opera Community board complaining about this.

I dont see the word plain text in your setting windows as opposed to mine and the one that was previously posted. Which version of Opera are you using?

see the attachement for details.

post-74703-1109763153_thumb.jpg

Edited by celestialspring

@celestialspring: I'm running Opera version 7.54u2 .. in there I see Auto and Plaintext listed seperately... no Auto(plaintext) though. I have not tested GMail with any other mail client ...i'll try to check up with my IT people if they've blocked pop3 or something.. I'm able to access gmail through FF and IE without any problems

So please do a test with some other email client and get back to us. You would also be able to login to the web interface of Gmail, once you upgrade from 7.54 to 7.6 preview, better to 8 Beta 2 or 1.

I also suggest that you try and put plaintext in the settings and see if that works.

Don't bother trying to convince them.

Firefox users apparently find customizing Opera's toolbar very difficult and complicated, not to mention time-consuming, yet they manage to install 5 or more Firefox extensions from a website that doesn't even have proper search function, everytime they re-install Firefox.

Oh my...  :rolleyes:

585542538[/snapback]

Reality Check

Anyways, even since I first installed Firefox (0.7 - Firebird), I have no problems of upgrading (while keeping my stuff) and I only had to reinstall firefox for the 1.0 upgrade, no biggie.

Some more than others.

The point is when Firefox users brag about all these features that they have as if they invented them, as if everybody else is just playing catch-up to Firefox. I don't care whether they invented them or not, what i care about is that they act like Firefox (or Mozilla) innovatively came up with all these fantastic features, and they didn't.

585542546[/snapback]

It's called advertising... and there is never enough of it.

Anyways... it's like calling Firefox, Firetruck... it does no harm.

Firefox IS for 'n00bs'. It is designed to work out of the box in a similar fashion to Internet Explorer, which is what the less-computer-savvy people of the world typically are used to. It LOOKS like Internet Explorer, and it's designed to be AS SIMPLE as Internet Explorer.

That isn't a bad thing -- i personally think Opera should go the same route, because it would encourage people to switch over. But that doesn't change the fact that it is designed with 'n00bs' in mind. As terribly offended as you might get to be grouped in with them.

585547372[/snapback]

Yes, Firefox is meant to look like Internet Explorer, but why is that labeled for noobs? What you see is only skin deep, it's what inside that matters. Have you considered that there are extensions available to Firefox, which means that Firefox is for advanced users too? I don?t understand what?s with the common perception that a program with a simple user interface means that it has less advanced functionality.

BTW, type ?about:config? in Firefox? that?s as advanced as a web browser can get.

using flip forward or forward mouse gesture to activate fast forward to log in using the wand, heck yeah! you can't do that with firefox. there are lots of similar time-savers that firefox just can't beat.

585549233[/snapback]

You know, (I don?t know what site you?re referring to), but I think that most webpages that has a login dialog has the default focus on the ?log in? / ?sign-in? button, meaning that clicking on the ?enter? / ?return? key will log you in.

Firefox and opera are both good browsers. Firefox comes in a minimal pack, where as opera comes in a feature rich pack. Opera has a lot of innovative features and some of them are avaliable for firefox via extensions (Firefox has it's own unique extensions that Opera doesn't have). In terms of efficiency, Opera in size and performance beats firefox. But I support firefox because it's open source, and the fact that it has extensions. Which allows me to personalize Firefox the way I want it in terms of the looks(themes) of it and functions that it has. (extensions) I like to think of it as a barebone system vs. a computer from a big manufacturer (e.g. Dell, Apple, Gateway..)

Edited by Help
Yes, Firefox is meant to look like Internet Explorer, but why is that labeled for noobs?

585561617[/snapback]

You are stuck on the use of the word 'noobs'. 'Noobs' means people who aren't computer experts. It's not meant to be offensive. At least, not the way i used it, i guess i can't speak for that first guy. They designed Firefox (which is a browser -- extensions are not Firefox, they are extensions) to be easy for non-experts ('noobs') to switch over to, therefore it is designed for noobs.

Think of it this way, maybe: Firetruck out of the box is like Windows. It comes idiot-proof, just like Windows does with all its huge buttons and help bubbles and animated search companions. If you want, you can go out and get a bunch of fancy advanced add-on stuff, but it isn't designed straight out of the package to be like that.

BTW, type ‘about:config’ in Firefox… that’s as advanced as a web browser can get.

585561617[/snapback]

Why do you think they hide those options in a barren pretty-much-undocumented config page that you have to have some expert tell you about in order to find?

If only, they realize the usefulness of AdBlock.....

Opera relies on ads. How do you think they would look to the world if they included something like AdBlock? They encourage people to block ads on web sites, while showing them their own ads? Heh.

Why not use one of the many options that are already available for ad blocking in Opera, such as CSS, proxies or URL filtering? Have a look at this:

http://www.monroeworld.com/operafilter/

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Qualcomm takes on NVIDIA with new Dragonfly CPU and AI chips by Pradeep Viswanathan Microsoft, Google, Amazon, AMD, Meta, Apple, OpenAI, and several others have been developing their own chips for AI infrastructure. However, NVIDIA still remains the dominant player in the market. Today, Qualcomm announced a major expansion of its data center infrastructure portfolio to better compete with NVIDIA. The new lineup includes the Qualcomm Dragonfly C1000 CPU, Qualcomm High Bandwidth Compute technology, the Dragonfly AI300 inference accelerator, new connectivity products, and custom silicon solutions. Qualcomm claims that this new lineup improves performance per watt, token throughput, and total cost of ownership for AI data centers. The Dragonfly C1000 is a new data center CPU built with Qualcomm’s custom Oryon cores. This chip will feature more than 250 cores, frequencies above 5GHz, and a chiplet-based design. Qualcomm claims that this new C1000 can deliver more than 2x better performance per watt compared to existing server CPU offerings based on specifications. The Dragonfly C1000 will support PCIe Gen 7 with more than 2TB/s of connectivity, along with CXL, advanced RAS features, and both air and liquid cooling. Qualcomm expects the Dragonfly C1000 to be commercially available in 2028. Additionally, Qualcomm and Meta announced a multi-year, multi-generation agreement under which Qualcomm will supply Dragonfly C1000 data center CPUs for Meta’s next-generation server fleet. Qualcomm also announced High Bandwidth Compute, a new near-memory computing architecture designed to address AI’s memory bandwidth bottleneck. HBC Gen 1 will debut with the Dragonfly AI250, which is expected to sample in mid-2027. The AI250 will deliver 133TB/s per card, an 18x increase in effective memory bandwidth compared to the AI200 with LPDDR5X. The new Dragonfly AI300 with HBC Gen 2 is a rack-level AI inference platform from Qualcomm. Qualcomm claims that the AI300 can deliver 4x to 8x better performance per watt compared to existing GPU-based architectures based on memory bandwidth per watt per card. The Dragonfly AI300 is expected to be available in 2028.
    • IBM reveals sub-1nm chip technology, production expected in another 5 years by Pradeep Viswanathan TSMC is now leading the chip manufacturing industry with its 2nm-class process node called N2. Samsung Foundry also has a 2nm-class process node called SF2. TSMC says N2 entered volume production in Q4 2025. Samsung says SF2 started mass production in 2025. Today, IBM announced the world’s first sub-1-nanometer chip technology, marking another major semiconductor research milestone. The new technology is based on a 0.7nm, or 7-angstrom, node and uses a new transistor architecture called “nanostack.” The new design vertically stacks and staggers nanosheet-based transistors so that more components can fit into the same chip area while also improving performance and power efficiency. IBM claims that this new sub-1nm chip can pack nearly 100 billion transistors onto a chip the size of a fingernail. This offers almost twice the density, up to 50 percent higher performance, or 70 percent better energy efficiency when compared to IBM's 2nm node design announced back in 2021. Also, IBM mentioned that this new architecture can deliver 40 percent SRAM scaling. It is important to consider that this announcement from IBM is a research milestone rather than a near-term process node launch. Back in 2021, IBM unveiled the world’s first 2nm chip design, claiming 50 billion transistors on a fingernail-sized chip and major performance and efficiency gains. Five years later, IBM’s 2nm technology has still not entered mainstream commercial production. That is because IBM is no longer a major commercial chip manufacturer. It sold its chip manufacturing business to GlobalFoundries years ago and has since then focused only on semiconductor research, IP development, and partnerships. To productize its 2-nm chip technology, IBM partnered with Japan’s Rapidus, but it has not resulted in anything shipping at scale. IBM says that its new sub-1nm technology can reach production as early as within the next five years. If that happens, it will likely depend on manufacturing partners, advanced EUV tooling, and years of yield improvements.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      Meta Plast earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • First Post
      kinowa earned a badge
      First Post
    • Rookie
      krychek57 went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Grand Master
      Jaybonaut went up a rank
      Grand Master
    • One Year In
      Philsl earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      461
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      171
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      136
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      78
    5. 5
      Xenon
      77
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!