You've tweaked your Firefox but have you ...


Recommended Posts

Ok, so you've tweaked your Firefox and many of you have seen some good results. But have you tweaked your Internet settings? Windows only loads the standard default setting durning installation. These of course can be tweaked to also improve speed dramatically.

First test your Internet speed by going to one of the following sites:

http://www.bandwidthplace.com/speedtest/

http://www.pcpitstop.com/internet/Bandwidth.asp

After testing your speed download Dr. TCP which will allow you to easily tweak your Interneting settings. After adjusting your seeting you have to REBOOT and then go back to either of the above site and you'll see an improvement in speed.

Dr. TCP: http://www.dslreports.com/drtcp

I use Road Runner and my speed increaced a whopping 1.1 megs.

Here are the setting I used to acheive the increase:

Tcp Receive Window = 37500 Path MTU Discovery = Yes

Window Scaling = Yes Black Hole Detection = No

Time Stamping = No Max. Duplicate ACKs = 3

Selective Acks = Yes TTL = 64

Alternative TCP Receive Window = 256960

474280

Enjoy the speed!

That would only be possible if your settings were extremely fubared to begin with...

99.9% of people will get a negligible difference..

anyways.. you can run the tweak test at dslr and it basically tells you what to do.

http://www.dslreports.com/tweaks

Not at all my friend. I went from 3.6 to 4.7. I just ran the test again and here are the results:

http://www.pcpitstop.com/internet/BandwidthResults.asp

Download Bandwidth Test Results

Download speed: 4604 kilobits per second

Test details: 3354 kilobytes downloaded in 5.828 seconds.

Receive buffer size: Not available

Believe!!!

lol... both sites told me my connection was < 3mbps... and I most definitely can download at speeds of 512kB/s (I DO have a 4mbps downstream and it works for sure, tested it many times using local sites and servers :yes:)

so for 1 I don't trust the results of those tests... then comes the part that you just know what your downstream is, your ISP gives you a certain connection and you can't surpass those speads legally as far as I know...

Speed

1.5 megabits per second

Communications 1.5 megabits per second

Storage 183.9 kilobytes per second

1MB file download 5.6 seconds

Subjective rating Great

Explain results

Info

Date & time Sunday, February 27, 10:28AM*

Test type IDT4 Free

Connection type ADSL

Region New Jersey

Data size 1024KB

IP address 138.89.113.50

Provider Verizon Online

:p i dont need to tweak ****

Edit: Tweak Test said i got some perfect stuff (no reccomendatins

Already tweaked.

speed5gp.th.png

Would be faster if I were not listen to 128kbps music, playing urban terror online (quake 3), downloading from irc at 103kbps atm and uploading at 20kbps. A third of my max upload btw.

That and its wireless and who knows what my brother is doing on his pc right now. Sure he is at least listen to music at 128kbps and playing urban terror. Sures hes in a few irc channel on enterthegame as well.

  • 3 weeks later...

Here's mine...though they are default settings. These sites are very inaccurate. Most of the bandwidth testers are that I've came across. You'd have to factor in server load times at the time being and then factor in the computer you are using's activity.

Really the "TCP tweaks" don't do too much for anything. And even if you think so, then you'd have to find the balance between the internet and network speed you want, since it will effect both.

post-46936-1112613718_thumb.jpg

post-46936-1112613771_thumb.jpg

Edited by dotRoot
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Guess it's one of those things best used by devs to thoroughly test stuff.
    • is it all upside down there? traffic lights reverted too?
    • Bluesky COO warns social media regulations could destroy competition from small startups by Paul Hill Fears that increasing government control of social media risks regulatory capture by the biggest social media firms were raised again recently. Bluesky’s chief operating officer said in an interview that social media bans for children and tighter regulations for social media firms risk creating a world where there are only a few social media platforms run by companies with the deepest pockets. Regulations on social media firms have been very lax since they appeared for mainstream users in the 2000’s. This gave Meta, Snapchat, and Google time to build up their user bases and get entrenched, with Meta being the most successful. Now that Meta has succeeded, it has been attempting regulatory capture. By pushing for more regulations of social media, Meta hopes to make it more difficult for rivals to challenge it. For its part, it doesn’t need to worry about the cost of regulation because it has a lot of money to spend, whereas startups do not. Speaking to CNBC, Rose Wang, Bluesky’s chief operating officer, said: “I support the protection and the safety of youth, the question that we have then is at what cost, because essentially what I’m scared of is in the long term, we’re headed to a world where there’s about three to five platforms, and extreme heavy regulation of those platforms, and basically the whole compliance teams of these platforms are 10 times the size of our entire team. So, basically, we’re living in a world where it’s almost impossible for smaller entrants to come in and build healthier spaces. These platforms have led to a place where the bottom line is the thing that drives what they do... so I understand why governments have to step in and regulate, because the platforms have done nothing right.” She said that while she is not against regulation, there needs to be more channels between the small to mid-sized players and regulators to help protect them. She says that big tech players, on the other hand, “who we know are circumventing regulation,” need to be regulated. Essentially, the Bluesky position is one of nuance, rather than absolutes. While Bluesky’s proposal may preserve competition in the social media space, it still doesn’t address the massive privacy implications these age verification measures introduce, such as handing over sensitive identity documents to access age-gated content. Source: CNBC
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      DJC50PLUS earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      DJC50PLUS earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Proficient
      Eric Biran went up a rank
      Proficient
    • Dedicated
      Conjor earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Week One Done
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      493
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      249
    3. 3
      Steven P.
      71
    4. 4
      +Edouard
      70
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      69
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!