Recommended Posts

I think you just proved that you're an ignorant person who really doesn't have a clue what he's talking about.  First of all, generalizing Americans as bad drivers is a stupid comment.
There is a death caused by a motor vehicle crash every 12 minutes; there is a disabling injury every 14 seconds.

Motor vehicle crashes are the leading cause of death for people ages 1 to 33.

Yeah, we totally rock at driving :laugh:

In stop and go traffic that really won't even be much of an issue because the speeds are too slow and the space in between cars isn't big enough to avoid using the brakes.  If the traffic is moving slow, but at a steady pace then you could use it, but I can also just have my automatic "idle" ahead without using the gas pedal.  I see that you're in love with manual transmissions and there is no way to get you to realize the facts.  Just realize that both transmissions have their pros and cons.  As I said before, I prefer the automatic for daily driving and the manual for sport, performance, and the fun of driving.

585586701[/snapback]

Where do you think stop and go traffic comes from? It's because everyone drives automatics, and everytime there's a slight gap, they let off the brakes and idle forward. They do it at red lights too.

Get this straight, I drive both types of cars. I drove a automatic into work today. There are pros to some automatics ... if I had a high powered, close geared drag car, I'd rather have an automatic then a manual I could blow through. For the average driver, there's no advantage to learning only how to drive automatic. You know what one of the original campaigns was for automatic cars? So women, particularly in high heels, could drive. :happy:

For the most part, Americans are hard working people, but I honestly think that we drive Automatic because we're lazy drivers.

I learned to drive on a stick, and I know it's not any more difficult to drive in traffic with manual transmission. I think it's just that most Americans don't like the idea of having to worry about changing gears.

For the most part, Americans are hard working people, but I honestly think that we drive Automatic because we're lazy drivers.

I learned to drive on a stick, and I know it's not any more difficult to drive in traffic with manual transmission.  I think it's just that most Americans don't like the idea of having to worry about changing gears.

585586933[/snapback]

i dont know.. i've never met one person here that feels that way.. just like me, they prefer automatic simply because it is easier.

back home i have a 1987 Land Cruiser and a 89 Fiat (Turbo Diesel) waiting for me this summer. :happy:

Being that I first learned how to drive in a '88 civic MT, and that my car (1970 nova 307 3 speed manual transmission) I like MT, especially for gas mileage and complete control over the engine(shift later, really loud! =] hehe). There is actually an automatic transmission ive read about that is supposedly just as good as a manual transmission, but eh, I dont like to argue.

I would never want to drive a manual.  Yes, I know how to, it is what I learned on, but it is such an inconvenience and makes eating or holding my dog down in the passenger seat impossible to do.

585581632[/snapback]

I can see the headline now! "Hungry american causes fatal crash wrestling with hotdog and dog."

lol^

what about the manumatics/auto stick/auto clutch/whatever you wanna call it.

how are those.. i've never driven a car that has it yet. do you really have control over shifting?

cuz i was thinking.. instead of having the clutch at your feet, why not move it up to the stick,.. so when you're ready to shift, there is a button on the knob, hold it, which is the same as pressing down on the clutch, shift was you would normally and you're done.

The reason the USA has Automatic over Manual so much is because of the sheer traffic and size of the United States. How many UK's can fit inside the USA?

US land: 9,161,923 sq km

UK land: 241,590 sq km

Also, you say London traffic is bad, and that may be true, but you have to remember that the USA has about 75 cities that are HUGE compared to just a few in the UK. We also have 300 million people. Therefore there are WAY more people stuck in traffic in the USA than the UK, thus the need for Automatics more.

US Pop: 293,027,571 (July 2004 est.)

UK Pop: 60,270,708 (July 2004 est.)

US Highway roads total: 6,406,296 km

UK Highway roads total: 371,913 km

Your figures just go to show that British roads have, on average, much heavier usage than US ones - the complete opposite of what you seem to believe they show.

Divide the population (which I will assume is proportional to the number of drivers) by the length of roads, and it becomes clear that British roads are more heavily used than American ones.

USA 293,027,571 / 6,406,296 = 45.74 people/km

UK 60,270,708 / 371,913 = 162.06 people/km

Your figures just go to show that British roads have, on average, much heavier usage than US ones - the complete opposite of what you seem to believe they show.

Divide the population (which I will assume is proportional to the number of drivers) by the length of roads, and it becomes clear that British roads are more heavily used than American ones.

USA 293,027,571 / 6,406,296 = 45.74 people/km

UK  60,270,708  /  371,913 = 162.06 people/km

585587226[/snapback]

Your forgetting to factor in public transportation. Population densities in areas also. The US has a ton of land that isn't even occupied. I am under the impression that many cities in the UK use tracks for public trans.

Plus UK cars are much smaller than in the US. jk.

lol^

what about the manumatics/auto stick/auto clutch/whatever you wanna call it.

how are those.. i've never driven a car that has it yet. do you really have control over shifting?

cuz i was thinking.. instead of having the clutch at your feet, why not move it up to the stick,.. so when you're ready to shift, there is a button on the knob, hold it, which is the same as pressing down on the clutch, shift was you would normally and you're done.

585587160[/snapback]

They kind of make what you're talking about. Manumatics just allow you to control the shift point, they're still a viscous resistance transmission. Not a bad compromise, but also not as smooth as a full manual.

An electronic transmission uses a clutch system that is control by a computer. Some race cars have these, they're massively expensive, but it's basically a full manual setup that you shift with push buttons. Faster and more acurate than a human, although most still have a clutch pedal for getting out of first.

IMO, if people want automatics, more companies should just make CVTs. That's something a manual transmission can never do.

IMO, if people want automatics, more companies should just make CVTs. That's something a manual transmission can never do.

585588523[/snapback]

Agreed. CVT trannies are very nice and beneficial. I'm not sure how the failure rate is on them though. I'd imagine hydrostatic cvt's are going to last longer though. Still it's the best automatic system, and possibly the best system, period.

Agreed. CVT trannies are very nice and beneficial. I'm not sure how the failure rate is on them though. I'd imagine hydrostatic cvt's are going to last longer though. Still it's the best automatic system, and possibly the best system, period.

585588606[/snapback]

The only thing I ever heard bad about them was the complaint that most drivers thought they were "weird". Most of the ones around here were sold in Toyotas and other Japanese cars, so I'd assume their reliability was on par for those companies.

I think as more people buy fuel economic cars, more will adopt CVT transmissions.

well, they definitely are more fuel efficient. I can see them being pretty weird though. I haven't personally seen any that weren't just cut out models, so I find the fact they're starting to be introduced very good.

I'd also like to see radial squish flow come to be more popular. For those who don't know about it, you can read about it here: http://www.findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_...115/ai_98901449

i'll tell you all something though... Nothing is more infuriating than driving an OLD AT car after living with manuals your whole driving career. Those boxes are so out of sync and continually my friend and i would find ourselves shouting "SHIFT, F*KING SHIFT!" at no-one in particular.. :) Self inflicted road rage is not psychologically healthy! lol.

http://cvt.com.sapo.pt/toc_en.htm

there ya go

585589945[/snapback]

cvt transmission

585589948[/snapback]

is this the same transmission Buggati and VW are working on?

where one gear is in place and a second gear is ready to engage, so pretty much you can't feel it when gears change.. i think VW has "perfected" it, they have it controlled so that the gear engages in a hundredth of a second. then the gear that was originally in gear will move and get ready to engage for the next gear. something like that.

is this the same transmission Buggati and VW are working on?

where one gear is in place and a second gear is ready to engage, so pretty much you can't feel it when gears change.. i think VW has "perfected" it, they have it controlled so that the gear engages in a hundredth of a second. then the gear that was originally in gear will move and get ready to engage for the next gear. something like that.

585591174[/snapback]

No.

CVT is even smoother because there is no gear change. The system is constantly is changing the transmission ratio and from what I understand, there is only 1 gear.

"C.V.T. (Continuously Variable Transmission) is a system that makes it possible to vary progressively the transmission ratio. So it allows selection of a infinite number of ratios, (between a minimum and a maximum value)."

"They allow the engine to operate always in it's optimum R.P.M., whatever the vehicle's speed."

Edited by Jstphish

Yup. The reason people find CVTs odd is because the engine speed never changes. Basically, the engine always runs at a peak power/fuel point, and the transmission constantly changes to keep it at that point given any speed. So imagine if you got in your car, and it drove at 3000 RPMs everywhere you went.

i'll tell you all something though... Nothing is more infuriating than driving an OLD AT car after living with manuals your whole driving career. Those boxes are so out of sync and continually my friend and i would find ourselves shouting "SHIFT, F*KING SHIFT!" at no-one in particular.. :) Self inflicted road rage is not psychologically healthy! lol.

585591098[/snapback]

Depends on the transmission. The 727 Transmission that was introduced in 1956 (as the 488, revamped and called the 727 in 1962) is STILL considered the best automatic transmission of all time. Both Ford and Chevy bought a licence to the technology. Ford was so impressed with the Torqueflite that it attempted to quietly buy the rights to manufacture a sort of "copycat." The story, however, was quickly picked up by the automotive magazines. Ford reportedly had paid Chrysler $7.5 million, which was a big chunk of change in 1957! The direct result was the 1958 Ford built "Cruise-O-Matic" that was available on all standard Ford engines. It was not, however, a Torqueflite, but a Ford automatic built around the Simpson gear set. It was heavier, with more parts, keeping the Ford derived clutch band controls. Early models, especially those put behind "performance" engines liked to split the case, right down the middle! It was a problem that plagued Ford for a couple of years until the redesign incorporated into the 1961 models. In all fairness, however, in fleet applications, for the most part, the Cruise-O-Matic was reliable, and gave little trouble with regular maintenance. It certainly outshone Chevrolet's 1957 "Turboglide."

  • 4 months later...

one thing is not clear to me. is CVT better or not. i mean if you cannot get into lower gear for brink acceleration then it is not as fast? or is it set up to be stuch at the high enouhg rpm to be fast accelerating? or it varies all the time but not around the same rpms and rpms change according to how hard you press the gas pedal?

i am confused on this one.

one thing is not clear to me. is CVT better or not.  i mean if you cannot get into lower gear for brink acceleration then it is not as fast?  or is it set up to be stuch at the high enouhg rpm to be fast accelerating?  or it varies all the time but not around the same rpms and rpms change according to how hard you press the gas pedal?

i am confused on this one.

586216278[/snapback]

That is not a concern. Snowmobiles and some ATVs have something that could be considered a CVT. Granted they work by centrifugal force, but it is the same idea.
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Go for a Echo Dot or Pop instead. These Echo shows just advertise to you.
    • NetSpeedTray 1.3.3 by Razvan Serea NetSpeedTray is a lightweight, open-source Windows network monitor that shows live upload and download speeds directly on the Taskbar. Designed for efficiency, it quietly sits in the system tray, conserving CPU and battery with dynamic updates. It blends seamlessly with Windows 10/11, adapts to light/dark themes, and auto-positions to avoid overlaps. Features include accurate interface detection, customizable display, optional mini-graph, color coding, granular font and unit control, detailed per-interface history graphs, safe data management, and easy CSV export—bringing the network monitoring Windows forgot. NetSpeedTray key features: Lightweight & Efficient Runs quietly in your system tray without consuming resources. Features a "Dynamic Update Rate" that lowers refresh frequency when the network is idle to save CPU and battery life. Native Look & Feel Blends seamlessly with Windows 10/11 UI. Smart detection for light and dark taskbar themes ensures text is always visible. Intelligent & Adaptive Positioning Automatically finds empty space next to your system tray and shifts to make room for new icons, preventing overlaps. Seamless OS Integration Behaves like a native Windows component. Hides instantly with auto-hiding taskbar Hides when a fullscreen app is active Smart Network Monitoring Accurate by Default: Auto mode identifies your main internet connection and ignores noise from VPNs or virtual adapters. Easy Interface Selection: Switch effortlessly between Auto, All, or Selected network interfaces via intuitive radio buttons. Total Visual Customization Free Move Mode: Unlock and place the widget anywhere on your screen. Optional Mini-Graph: Real-time graph of recent network activity with adjustable opacity. Color Coding: Customize colors and speed thresholds to quickly see network status. Granular Display Control Text & Font: Adjust font family, size, weight, and alignment. Units: Automatic (B/s, KB/s, MB/s) or fixed Mbps display. Precision: Set decimal places and always show them for uniform appearance. Detailed & Intelligent History Graph Smart Scale: Logarithmic scale shows low-level traffic and large spikes clearly. Per-Interface Filtering: View speed history for specific adapters (Wi-Fi, Ethernet, VPN). Safe & Efficient Data Management: Adjustable retention, automatic cleanup, optimized database. Easy Data Export: Export raw data to .csv or save high-quality graphs for reports. NetSpeedTray v1.3.3: The Updater Fix A stabilization release that repairs a critical regression in v1.3.2: the app shipped without OpenSSL, which silently broke every HTTPS request — including the built-in update checker (the "Could not check for updates" error many of you hit). This release restores it, hardens the build so it can't happen again, and fixes a startup crash plus four other reported bugs. Changes: Fixed update checking — Resolved a critical issue that prevented the app from checking for updates ("Could not check for updates"). Fixed startup crash with Auto-Cycling — The app no longer crashes on launch after enabling Cycle display mode. Fixed incorrect network speeds on 10GbE adapters — Multi-gigabit network cards now display speeds correctly instead of being stuck at 0. Improved color coding — Default color is shown when idle, and color/threshold changes now apply immediately without restarting. Fullscreen visibility fix — The widget now correctly stays visible over fullscreen apps when Keep Visible is enabled. Improved AMD Ryzen temperature detection — More reliable CPU temperature monitoring for Ryzen processors. Cleaner upgrades — Installer now removes outdated application files during upgrades, preventing DLL/version conflicts while preserving user settings. Improved stability — Fixed potential DLL loading issues by excluding critical OpenSSL and NumPy components from UPX compression. Better settings window — Scrollbars removed and layout improved for a cleaner experience. Localization improvements — Updated translations and completed missing UI text across all supported languages. More reliable releases — Added regression tests covering recent critical fixes, bringing the test suite to 196 passing tests. [full release notes] Download: NetSpeedTray 1.3.3 | 87.9 MB (Open Source) Download: NetSpeedTray Portable | 101.0 MB View: NetSpeedTray Home Page | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Why Delta Chat is the best decentralized messenger you have probably never tried by Paul Hill There is no shortage of messaging apps out there; we have WhatsApp, Messenger, and Telegram, just to name a few. While Meta has taken steps to incorporate encryption into Messenger and WhatsApp, they still leave a lot to be desired. If you are in the market for a messaging app that promotes security, privacy, and optional anonymity, you'll want to read what I have to say about Delta Chat. For those not familiar with Delta Chat, rather than relying on centralized servers as you do with Facebook Messenger, it relies on email. Essentially, it is a chat interface that feels like a messaging app, but secretly in the background, it is firing off emails. In the past, you used to have to sign in with your email account. When you sent messages to people, it would just be sending encrypted messages to their inbox, which their Delta Chat client would decrypt. When I first learned about Delta Chat, it required users to sign in with an email account, but I was pleasantly surprised upon trying it in 2026 that this is no longer a requirement, or the preferred method was to use the app. Recently, I’ve tried UAD-ng on my old Nokia 3.4 to disable most of the Google apps because the bootloader is locked, and this is the next best option. While finding replacement apps in F-Droid, I came across Delta Chat again, and it has undergone quite a big change since I last used it, with its new chatmail relays, which no longer require you to sign in to your own email account, providing anonymity, and they offer greater security. Android and Desktop Delta Chat apps. Not only does it run on my de-googled phone, but it also works on desktop computers and iOS, making it truly ubiquitous. For me, Delta Chat is a wonderful alternative messenger because it gives you more control. It supports switching between different profiles, which you can set up super quickly; you don’t register a username, you don’t register a password. The only thing you do have is a random string email address on a chatmail relay (which you don’t have to memorize). To maintain access to your profile, you just need to add a second device to your account via QR code or make a backup of your account, which you can restore later. Fail to do these, your account is gone - as it should be if you don’t want to leave accounts that could get hacked later on. My decision to block Google stuff on my Nokia was done for practical reasons; the device sucked when it launched, and it sucks even more now. The nice thing about F-Droid and the apps within is that they’re usually lightweight, free of bloat, and work well on that device. What was inconvenient for me was that it was hard to send messages from that device, say if I wanted to copy a code over to my main phone or send family members a link from that device. That’s when I decided to look at the available chat apps and saw Delta Chat. Another nice thing about Delta Chat is its notifications. Some messaging apps rely on Google’s ecosystem for notification transport on Android; however, with Delta Chat, it can use Google’s solutions if you have Play Services or MicroG installed. Otherwise, it is able to keep a background connection to the chatmail relay server so that you can get notified when you receive a message. As free software, the code of Delta Chat is open for all who want to take it and build upon it. In the future, if the developers of Delta Chat make a catastrophically bad decision and take the app in an undesirable direction, users can take the code and fork the project. This contrasts with closed-source apps from corporations that can take their products in any direction they like. By relying on free software instead of closed-source programs, you actually control your computing. I’ve spoken at length about how running this type of software is like owning your own home rather than renting it. The same applies here; if you use Delta Chat, you don’t need to worry about it going away in the future. Whether it is Telegram, WhatsApp, or Messenger, you are required to register a username and password to use these services. A major flaw in this design is that anyone can try various passwords and potentially break into your account with your complete chat history intact. Sure, there is encryption in Messenger, where you need a second PIN and two-factor authentication in Telegram, but breaches happen all the time. Unlike before, when you used to sign in to your email account to send and receive messages, the primary way to do it now is to create an account on a chatmail relay. The resulting email address is a random string followed by the name of the relay you pick. This means you can start and begin adding contacts Without a username and password, you either need to ensure you have a backup or at least one device running your Delta Chat profile. The primary way to log in on another device is to go to the settings and add a second device. Then, you’ll just scan a QR code with your new device, and it’ll log in to your account and sync all your chat history and contacts. To end users, Delta Chat just looks like any instant messenger; however, it is really sending your messages as encrypted emails to your contact. This is pretty cool from a censorship perspective, as it makes the service more difficult to block. Previously, the main way to use the app was by logging in with email, but nowadays, it’s recommended that you use chatmail relays. Chatmail relays temporarily hold messages in case your device is offline. They are cheap, simple servers that don’t store data as group states. Other information, like your name and avatar, only exists on your device and the devices of those you share your contact information with. The relays are also decentralized and operated by various groups and individuals. It is even possible to set up your own chatmail relay, but most people will want to use one hosted elsewhere. To keep your messages secure, Delta Chat uses a secure subset of the OpenPGP standard that gives you automatic end-to-end encryption. It also uses Secure-Join to exchange encryption setup information through QR-code scanning or invite links. Autocrypt is also used to automatically establish end-to-end encryption between contacts and all members of group chat, but sometime this year Autocrypt v2 will be rolled out, bringing post-quantum resistant encryption and forward secrecy. The Delta Chat FAQ is an interesting read that explains many more details about the app. Credit: Pexels Delta Chat is unique among messaging apps because it is built on email, a technology that’s decades old and isn’t going anywhere soon. What’s more is that email is not centralized either, so it’s far more difficult for any authoritarian regime to disrupt the Delta Chat app. I haven’t spoken too much about features yet, so I will do that now. Delta Chat allows you to do one-on-one chats, group chats, and create channels. It also supports file sharing and making audio and video calls when chatting one-to-one, but it’s not available for group chats right now. At the time of writing, the calling functionality is disabled and can be enabled in Settings > Advanced > Debug Calls. I have used the video calling feature, and the quality is excellent. It works over WebRTC, another open standard. The app also lets you send voice notes, enables disappearing messages, and has its own app ecosystem. I did try playing chess one time there, but it was a bit spotty; though, we did manage to complete the game with a victory for me. To add people to Delta Chat, you can either give them your Delta Chat link or your QR code to scan. These are the only ways to add users, so you won't have any spam bots bothering you. If the people you want to chat with don't have the app yet, just send them your link, and it will take them to a webpage where they can install the app and then add you. It's really quick for them to install it and get started, which is nice. Credit: Microsoft. The Majorana 2 quantum chip unveiled in 2026. I do not think quantum computers are too far out now, and I do hope that Delta Chat is able to push out Autocrypt v2 sooner, rather than later, so bad actors do not attempt to collect encrypted communications and then decrypt them in the future using quantum computers. By getting people’s messages post-quantum-safe now, users won’t have to worry when quantum computers start cracking legacy encryption. Overall, I would recommend this app to people who are already past WhatsApp and Messenger and have perhaps begun using apps like Telegram or Session. It shares a lot of characteristics with these apps and goes a lot further than Telegram in terms of security. By being based on email, it is also resistant to censorship, and the lack of a username and password makes you anonymous (if you want to be) and safe from brute force password cracking attempts. Let me know in the comments if you’ve tried Delta Chat recently. Do you think it's a good bulwark against governments that are tightening their grip on the internet?
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      bernmeister earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      tuben earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • First Post
      OffsetAbs earned a badge
      First Post
    • Reacting Well
      OffsetAbs earned a badge
      Reacting Well
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      474
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      220
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      156
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      73
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!