Recommended Posts

autos aren't weak, they are designed for the engine they are mated to in the car they are installed in. If not how much money would manufacturers lose in fixing these things if they were "weak".

Autos are easier to drive, I'd love to have a manual in my chevelle but hte previous owner put in a th350 auto, its never given me an issue with over 420 lb/ft of torque running through it running up to 6500rpm. The fact is that if i wanted to put a manual in my car it would cost me around $2000.00 in parts, I dont have the money to do it.

Most used cars are autos, the kids buy whats availible, manuals tend to be on the low end cars because they are standard equipment, but commuting around here in NJ is rough. Rarely would you even see 3rd gear between the stop lights ands top signs on roads with no traffic, through traffic in the mix and you wont ever get out of 1st in the city or residentual area..

I guess its cause I'm far from a car person.

But why is manual so great...

I was never taught how to drive manual so I have no idea what its like, other than you have to shift gears and crap (I assume like video game ya!?).

But its worth having a discussion over. The car I want VW GOLF comes in both. Manual is cheaper :s

Since i commute around 200 clicks a day and especially on empty highways right times of day, A manual is a must you save alot more on gas cuz of lower rpm's in higher gears.

For example my 97 cavalier had a busted cyclinder master ring and for a fact at 100 kph it would do 3000rpm got that fixed and 2800. Well it can be flawed but in winter i see the manual shine cuz of the lower revs when heating up the bloody car.

m.t.s are called standards cause its standard equipment on most cars, thats why a.t.s are usually a few hundreds to a few thousand more expensive. i live in miam fl, and the traffic down here is pretty bad, but you do see many cars with manuals....gas is at $2.40 for 87 octane....

Personally, I like to be able to eat, drink, phone, or whatever while driving an Automatic. I also go long distances and it's very nice. I do know how to drive manual and they are more fun, but Automatic is way more practical in this country.

585574046[/snapback]

Well done, champ. Ever thought of something else to do, like, you know - Focusing on the road? :rolleyes:

? Manual transmission cars are lighter.

? For the most part they get better gas mileage (extra gear).

? They are easier, and cheaper to fix.

? Less moving parts (no torque converter).

? Transmissions usually last longer.

? New cars with a manual transmission options are cheaper.

? You can "engine brake" when you see a stop light a head to slow down, then pop it into neutral, and just lightly tap the brakes for less wear and tear on the brakes.

? You can "rev match" when you want to downshift for increased performance and smoother downshifts by pushing in the clutch, shifting to neutral, tapping the gas so the RPMs rise to the point (where the RPMs would be once the downshift has been completed), and moving the shift lever to the lower gear. Basically you?re doing this so the transmission doesn?t have to increase the RPMs for you. Instead that whole process of ?blipping the throttle? does it all simultaneously in that process .

? You feel "part of the car."

? You're more alert (this may not be totally true) -- I know I am though.

? The ability to stay in the powerband

? And it's just more fun.

Now I have been driving manual for about a year (got my license on 07/17/04), and despite the traffic, I would not trade any minute of my time in my car for an automatic. Reasons being for those listed above. And sometimes traffic isn't even that bad -- particularly when I am on a hill. I'll just pop her in neutral and roll while controlling the speed with the brakes. Then once everyone starts moving again I'll jus:laugh:ff the brakes and roll. :laugh: No shifting needed. That's why I love traffic on hills going downwards, but I don't get to experience that very often, thankfully.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • IBM reveals sub-1nm chip technology, production expected in another 5 years by Pradeep Viswanathan TSMC is now leading the chip manufacturing industry with its 2nm-class process node called N2. Samsung Foundry also has a 2nm-class process node called SF2. TSMC says N2 entered volume production in Q4 2025. Samsung says SF2 started mass production in 2025. Today, IBM announced the world’s first sub-1-nanometer chip technology, marking another major semiconductor research milestone. The new technology is based on a 0.7nm, or 7-angstrom, node and uses a new transistor architecture called “nanostack.” The new design vertically stacks and staggers nanosheet-based transistors so that more components can fit into the same chip area while also improving performance and power efficiency. IBM claims that this new sub-1nm chip can pack nearly 100 billion transistors onto a chip the size of a fingernail. This offers almost twice the density, up to 50 percent higher performance, or 70 percent better energy efficiency when compared to IBM's 2nm node design announced back in 2021. Also, IBM mentioned that this new architecture can deliver 40 percent SRAM scaling. It is important to consider that this announcement from IBM is a research milestone rather than a near-term process node launch. Back in 2021, IBM unveiled the world’s first 2nm chip design, claiming 50 billion transistors on a fingernail-sized chip and major performance and efficiency gains. Five years later, IBM’s 2nm technology has still not entered mainstream commercial production. That is because IBM is no longer a major commercial chip manufacturer. It sold its chip manufacturing business to GlobalFoundries years ago and has since then focused only on semiconductor research, IP development, and partnerships. To productize its 2-nm chip technology, IBM partnered with Japan’s Rapidus, but it has not resulted in anything shipping at scale. IBM says that its new sub-1nm technology can reach production as early as within the next five years. If that happens, it will likely depend on manufacturing partners, advanced EUV tooling, and years of yield improvements.
    • It's funny when thieves accuse other thieves of stealing. Ai companies just blatantly siphoned all the knowledge of the internet without consent and are now selling it with their service... so excuse me if I find this a bit ironic.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      Meta Plast earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • First Post
      kinowa earned a badge
      First Post
    • Rookie
      krychek57 went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Grand Master
      Jaybonaut went up a rank
      Grand Master
    • One Year In
      Philsl earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      454
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      170
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      135
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      78
    5. 5
      Xenon
      77
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!