Recommended Posts

Its only against the rules to revive an old thread such as this if no useful discussion takes place as a result. Seeing as this

add-on is still used by Firefox users, and is still relevant, I decided to revive it to continue the discussion.

I've been using the EasyList/Element combo for a couple months, I was just curious if someone has something more concise

or if that list is the best combination of blocking and lack of repeats.

  • 1 month later...
  • 5 months later...
Try to actually give a link to the source instead of whoring other peoples work. It will save you having a million people asking how to import it too since there are instructions on the website.

This adblock list is called Filterset.G and information can be found here:

http://www.geocities.com/pierceive/adblock/

If you go to the adblock plus site, they specifically say to NOT USE FILTERSET G. filterset G is poorly maintained, if maintained at all and on top of that the easy list subscription will do a better job if you go to their main web site and install both easy list and easy privacy.

EasyList Filters

Java ads are kinda hard to block :/

and even more annoying cause they take longer to load

Repeat after me.

NOSCRIPT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

If you want to stop Java script cold in it's track, this is the best extension in the world because all js is blocked until you allow it.

NoScript Page

Still a pain if you visit a lot of websites.

Have you ever even used it? All my main sites are white listed and it only takes 2 clicks to allow any site you visit. The peace of mind that controlling scripting gives you is far better than just letting any script, including the malware writers to run unobstructed.

Most sites run just fine without scripting enabled and it is a lot easier to use NS than to block all scripting in the browser and then go through the pain of white listing using the browsers built in tools. Pages load far faster and all those advertising and tracking cookies are blocked by default ensuring your privacy on the web.

Meh, I just don't care that much I guess. I have tried NoScript, but fact of the matter is that there aren't many malicious JS scripts that run in modern, up to date browsers (especially on OS X, so I'm even less at risk), and I'm not that concerned about tracking cookies. Load time difference is miniscule, particularly on Firefox and Webkit nightlies, and if it isn't it's probably because there's enough JS on the page that it's useful.

But if you're dedicated enough to click 'enable JavaScript' on each site you visit, go ahead. I just prefer a richer web experience. You can't go through life paranoid, it's a waste of time.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Turbo Pascal was my first real programming experience more than 30 years ago at university. I mostly taught myself from the included examples and help documentation, because the university only taught the basic syntax and philosophy of Pascal, without going deeply into Turbo Pascal’s advanced features. I still remember when I discovered that I could embed assembly language directly into Pascal code, call BIOS functions, manipulate screen memory, use mouse interrupts, and control peripherals from my programs. That opened huge doors for me. Programming back then felt really fun, direct, and close to the machine. What I loved about Pascal was its readability and the almost instant compile time. Turbo Pascal was an amazing environment, but unfortunately Turbo Pascal for Windows 3 did not feel like it fully carried that legacy forward. Later, Delphi got things back on the right track after the messy transition to TP for Windows. Sadly, Delphi suffered from years of uncertainty as it moved from Borland to CodeGear and then to Embarcadero. That instability made many developers lose confidence in it, even though Delphi itself remained a powerful and productive tool. I still work with Delphi from time to time, but I definitely miss the old days of Turbo Pascal.
    • I hope this encodes in to AV1 or AV2 as currently tiktok uses h265 and h264.
    • Qualcomm reportedly in talks to build custom video chips for TikTok parent ByteDance by Karthik Mudaliar Qualcomm is reportedly in advanced discussions to provide custom chip-design services to Chinese tech giant ByteDance, the same company behind TikTok. According to a report from Reuters, Qualcomm could be involved in designing custom silicon tailored for ByteDance's massive data-center workloads. If it goes through, the deal would make ByteDance one of Qualcomm's early anchor customers for its fastly growing custom chip-design division, For years, Qualcomm was the king of making smartphone processors and modems. The company has also been moving into the PC ecosystem and other formats such as on-device AI for Android XR headsets. However, this particular deal is about Qualcomm's custom Application-Specific Integrated Circuits (ASICs). For a platform like TikTok, ByteDance needs hardware that can help it ingest, process, and serve billions of short-form videos daily. Generalised hardware is no longer the most cost-effective and efficient route, which is why ByteDance is trying to develop custom Video Processing Units (VPUs). VPUs designed specifically for ByteDance’s algorithmic needs could drastically reduce data-center power consumption and improve encoding speeds at an unprecedented scale. The underlying tech behind these processors is actually from Qualcomm's recent acquisition of AlphaWave Semi, a high-speed connectivity specialist company. By combining AlphaWave’s high-bandwidth IP with Qualcomm’s architectural expertise, the company could begin mass production by the end of 2026, if the talks go through. All this also comes at a time when U.S.-China tech relations have dwindled. Escalating trade frictions between Washington and Beijing have severely impacted the export of high-end AI chips from U.S. firms like Nvidia, AMD, and Lam Research. Yet, the Qualcomm-ByteDance discussions show that U.S. tech companies are still actively seeking growth avenues and are open to doing business with China, where regulators still permit. Reuters notes that the outcome of this deal could be uncertain, and ByteDance might also seek partners other than Qualcomm. via Reuters | Image via DepositPhotos.com
  • Recent Achievements

    • First Post
      Almohandis earned a badge
      First Post
    • Rookie
      DaviKar went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Dedicated
      HidekoYamamoto94 earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • One Month Later
      timbobit earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      nates earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      456
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      164
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      117
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      83
    5. 5
      Xenon
      69
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!