Recommended Posts

  • 2 weeks later...

Just finished mine:

post-248347-0-70169400-1306732491.png

Using Stratiform 1.2b1 with some Stylish scripts provided by SoapyHamHocks, Seahorsepip, and myself.

In case anyone wants the script:

@namespace url(http://www.mozilla.org/keymaster/gatekeeper/there.is.only.xul);

#appmenu-button {
    background-clip: padding-box !important;
    margin-bottom: 1px !important;
    margin-top: 1px !important;
    border: 1px solid rgba(0,0,0,0.3) !important;
    border-bottom: 0 !important;
    border-radius: 0 !important;
    border-top-left-radius: 3px !important;
    text-shadow: 0 1px rgba(255,255,255,0.3) !important;
    box-shadow: 0 1px 0 0 rgba(255,255,255,0.2) inset, 1px 0 0 0 rgba(255,255,255,0.2) inset, -1px 0 0 0 rgba(255,255,255,0.2) inset !important;
}

#TabsToolbar {
    -moz-padding-start: 0 !important;
}

#nav-bar {
    border-radius: 0 !important;
}

.tab-close-button {
    display: none !important;
}

scrollbar {
    visibility: collapse !important;
}

Would love to know how you achieved this look please!

it's flow addon

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-us/firefox/addon/flow/

with some tweaks

Like Heartripper say it?s Flow addon with some tweaks:

- App Button Remove

- Stylish Style: Chrome-like Toolbars Buttons (for disable square button)

- Put nav arrows on default location of App Menu

- If you want a App Menu, you can install Toolbar Appmenu Button and change the icon...

It?s easy.

Enough already of these browser layouts that look best suited for public internet kiosks and/or mobile internet devices!

And now, a proper browser layout with standard GUI elements exactly where they should be. No dumbing down!

SM2-with-MostlyCrystalTheme--neowin.net--websafe.png

SeaMonkey 2.0.xx with Mostly Crystal theme.

The Title bar is where it should be, the Menu bar is where it should be, the standard Back/Forward/Reload/Stop/Home

buttons where they should be. The Personal (bookmarks) bar where it should be. The Tabs bar where it should be.

Aside from the extra buttons at the top alongside the Menu bar that are attributed to add-ons I regularly use, this is

pretty much how a standard browser GUI layout should be, with a place for everything, and everything in it's place,

but still with a decent level of customisation, so if you really want to hide anything, you still have that option.

Enough already of these browser layouts that look best suited for public internet kiosks and/or mobile internet devices!

And now, a proper browser layout with standard GUI elements exactly where they should be. No dumbing down!

SM2-with-MostlyCrystalTheme--neowin.net--websafe.png

SeaMonkey 2.0.xx with Mostly Crystal theme.

The Title bar is where it should be, the Menu bar is where it should be, the standard Back/Forward/Reload/Stop/Home

buttons where they should be. The Personal (bookmarks) bar where it should be. The Tabs bar where it should be.

Aside from the extra buttons at the top alongside the Menu bar that are attributed to add-ons I regularly use, this is

pretty much how a standard browser GUI layout should be, with a place for everything, and everything in it's place,

but still with a decent level of customisation, so if you really want to hide anything, you still have that option.

2005 called, they want their browser interface back.

Yes, some browser layouts in this thread are way over the top. That said, I consider the new default UI of, say, Firefox ? 4.0 a sane evolution of the traditional UI.

To each their own I suppose.

Enough already of these browser layouts that look best suited for public internet kiosks and/or mobile internet devices!

And now, a proper browser layout with standard GUI elements exactly where they should be. No dumbing down!

SeaMonkey 2.0.xx with Mostly Crystal theme.

The Title bar is where it should be, the Menu bar is where it should be, the standard Back/Forward/Reload/Stop/Home

buttons where they should be. The Personal (bookmarks) bar where it should be. The Tabs bar where it should be.

Aside from the extra buttons at the top alongside the Menu bar that are attributed to add-ons I regularly use, this is

pretty much how a standard browser GUI layout should be, with a place for everything, and everything in it's place,

but still with a decent level of customisation, so if you really want to hide anything, you still have that option.

Uh huh... the term "less is more applies here".

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Bluesky COO warns social media regulations could destroy competition from small startups by Paul Hill Fears that increasing government control of social media risks regulatory capture by the biggest social media firms were raised again recently. Bluesky’s chief operating officer said in an interview that social media bans for children and tighter regulations for social media firms risk creating a world where there are only a few social media platforms run by companies with the deepest pockets. Regulations on social media firms have been very lax since they appeared for mainstream users in the 2000’s. This gave Meta, Snapchat, and Google time to build up their user bases and get entrenched, with Meta being the most successful. Now that Meta has succeeded, it has been attempting regulatory capture. By pushing for more regulations of social media, Meta hopes to make it more difficult for rivals to challenge it. For its part, it doesn’t need to worry about the cost of regulation because it has a lot of money to spend, whereas startups do not. Speaking to CNBC, Rose Wang, Bluesky’s chief operating officer, said: “I support the protection and the safety of youth, the question that we have then is at what cost, because essentially what I’m scared of is in the long term, we’re headed to a world where there’s about three to five platforms, and extreme heavy regulation of those platforms, and basically the whole compliance teams of these platforms are 10 times the size of our entire team. So, basically, we’re living in a world where it’s almost impossible for smaller entrants to come in and build healthier spaces. These platforms have led to a place where the bottom line is the thing that drives what they do... so I understand why governments have to step in and regulate, because the platforms have done nothing right.” She said that while she is not against regulation, there needs to be more channels between the small to mid-sized players and regulators to help protect them. She says that big tech players, on the other hand, “who we know are circumventing regulation,” need to be regulated. Essentially, the Bluesky position is one of nuance, rather than absolutes. While Bluesky’s proposal may preserve competition in the social media space, it still doesn’t address the massive privacy implications these age verification measures introduce, such as handing over sensitive identity documents to access age-gated content. Source: CNBC
    • it dosnt support onprem exchange. it dosnt support mapi-calls. the views are all worse/limited. its slower. it cant see public folder calendars. we already have webmail. the list of other missing features is pretty huge but i only see it when customers call to say their email isnt working, and 9/10 times its cause they accidentality changed to outlooknew(new). Hold the line everyone!
    • yeah, this looks beautiful. Damn this winter's going to be great.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      DJC50PLUS earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      DJC50PLUS earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Proficient
      Eric Biran went up a rank
      Proficient
    • Dedicated
      Conjor earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Week One Done
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      493
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      249
    3. 3
      Steven P.
      71
    4. 4
      +Edouard
      70
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      69
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!