Calculating Average Rate Of Change...


Recommended Posts

I'm sick of these maths papers... none of them have enough detail in them so that I understand what i'm doing!

I found this example online:

Average rate of change =

f(4) - f(2)/4 - 2 = 17 - 1/2 = 8

http://people.hofstra.edu/faculty/Stefan_W.../Calcsumm3.html

The examples on the right hand side of the page since the example above is a bit wierd.

I just need to know how they got 17-1 as the second part of the sum... then I'm away!

None of the sites or my books seem to tell me, they just do it!

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/295212-calculating-average-rate-of-change/
Share on other sites

The formula for average rate of change is

f(x1) - f(x2)

-------------

x1 - x2

That formula comes from the change in y over the change in x. Ya know, that formula you used to find the slope of a line.

mSec (slope of a line) formula:

y1 - y2

-------

x1 - x2

Do you see how they are exactly the same, only y has been replaced with f(x)? That is because y is merly a function of x and the average rate of change is merly the slope of the line.

I hope that explains it.

I've done all bar one - well I've done it, but I don't know if it's right:

the function f(x) = 2/x+1 over intervals:

[x , x + Delta x]

I worked this:

2 / [x + Delta x + 1] - 2 / (x)+1

= Delta X / (Delta X + x + 1)

Is that anywhere near right? I really got lost with all of the delta's!

X - X + deltaX = deltax, you can subtract the two X's.

The top is wrong. You probably made a mistake in following the rules of subtracting the two fractions. The two fractions do not have a common denominator. You need to find it, then subtract the two fractions on the top. Once that is done you will be able to reduce even further.

X - X + deltaX = deltax, you can subtract the two X's.

The top is wrong. You probably made a mistake in following the rules of subtracting the two fractions. The two fractions do not have a common denominator. You need to find it, then subtract the two fractions on the top. Once that is done you will be able to reduce even further.

585598536[/snapback]

Oh yer... i didn't see that bottom one!

As for the top, can I not simply take them away from each other? They are minus each other. I'm stumped!

- Oh! I need to make the bottom the same don't I on either side? - so do I times the first one by Delta X... which would give me the same fraction on either side?

Oh great you are learning average rate of change and you dont have a grasp on subtracting fractions. The denominators are different, so no you cant simply subtract them. The first thing you do is find the common denominator, then you subtract. How do you find the common denominator? Well look below.

post-38325-1110497458.gif

Yep they are both wrong. You're just going to have to review subtracting fractions, otherwise any function that has a fraction in it will give you difficulty.

Maybe giving you a simpler example will give you the ability to solve the top part correctly. In the attached image I made up two fractions that had to be added. Look at the steps closely.

post-38325-1110509470.gif

I got it as the whole thing = Delta X...

On the top I got 2(X + Delta X + 1) / X + Delta X + 1 (X + 1)

Then on the other fraction I got 2 (X + 1) / X + Delta X + 1 (X + 1)

That makes both of the bottom the same (like the example above).

I then canceled both of the 2's from the top, followed by 2 X's and 2 1's. Leaving me with Delta X.

Because both the bottom were the same, I could just remove it completely giving me Delta X.

Is this right? I'm sure someone else got Delta X!

I then canceled both of the 2's from the top, followed by 2 X's and 2 1's.  Leaving me with Delta X.

585600798[/snapback]

I think you got it. The top part does come out to be deltax/(x+1)(x+deltax+1). The whole fraction should be in the image I attached, which looks somewhat funny because it looks like a double fraction. That fraction can be reduced one more time. See if you can figure it out (hint: it is a fraction being divided by deltax)

post-38325-1110572034.jpg

Thats cool. Don't feel bad about having trouble with that problem, you'll get it. When you study just start with easy functions that don't have fractions.

Looking back I think I made a mistake somewhere, so I just redid the problem and post the answer so you have something to look at.

post-38325-1110741984_thumb.jpg

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • lots of people us facebook for stuff, threads though no
    • Can you read? I've said I'm willing to pay more for a notchless (no notch) 3:2 screen.
    • Not even an OLED display on the laptops. Also it seems that the laptop design isn't the same as the Surface Ultra model. Looks like bargain bin at high prices.
    • make your own notch - it's not that hard
    • VirtualBox 7.2.10 by Razvan Serea VirtualBox is a powerful x86 and AMD64/Intel64 virtualization product for enterprise as well as home use. Targeted at server, desktop and embedded use, it is now the only professional-quality virtualization solution that is also Open Source Software. Presently, VirtualBox runs on Windows, Linux, macOS, and Solaris hosts and supports a large number of guest operating systems including but not limited to Windows (NT 4.0, 2000, XP, Server 2003, Vista, 7, 8, Windows 10 and Windows 11), DOS/Windows 3.x, Linux (2.4, 2.6, 3.x, 4.x, 5.x and 6.x), Solaris and OpenSolaris, OS/2, OpenBSD, NetBSD and FreeBSD. Some of the features of VirtualBox are: Modularity. VirtualBox has an extremely modular design with well-defined internal programming interfaces and a client/server design. This makes it easy to control it from several interfaces at once: for example, you can start a virtual machine in a typical virtual machine GUI and then control that machine from the command line, or possibly remotely. VirtualBox also comes with a full Software Development Kit: even though it is Open Source Software, you don't have to hack the source to write a new interface for VirtualBox. Virtual machine descriptions in XML. The configuration settings of virtual machines are stored entirely in XML and are independent of the local machines. Virtual machine definitions can therefore easily be ported to other computers. VirtualBox 7.2.10 changelog: VMM: Fixed issue when CentOS 10 VM was not booting due to the message "Fatal glibc error: CPU does not support x86-64-v3" (​github:gh-642) Devices/EFI: Fixed booting issue when ARM VM had less than 1024 MiB of RAM assigned (​github:gh-679) USB: Fixed issue when it was not possible to attach USB device to headless VM on Apple Silicon/macOS 26.4.1 (​github:gh-631) Storage: Fixed issue when VIRTIO-SCSI device was not recognized as SSD device by guest system (​github:gh-634) Network: Fixed issue in E1000 emulation code which triggered debug log creation (​github:gh-645) Network: Fixed issue in E1000 emulation code which prevented OS/2 guest from booting (​github:gh-683) Linux Host: Fixed issue when VMs could not be started due to kernel oops (​github:gh-639) Linux Host and Guest: Fixed issue when kernel modules were failing to build with openSUSE 16.0 kernel Linux Host and Guest: Added initial support for kernel 7.1 Linux Host and Guest: Added extra fixes for RHEL 9.8 kernel (​github:gh-676) Linux Host and Guest: Added possibility to build source code using NASM instead of YASM as the assembler (​github:gh-520) Linux Guest Additions: Added initial support for Extended Data Control Protocol for clipboard sharing with Plasma on Wayland guests (​github:gh-33) Linux Guest Additions: Added extra fixes for preventing vboxvideo kernel module build with kernel version 7.0 and newer (​github:gh-655) OS/2 Guest Additions: Fixed issue when Shared Folders automount and clipboard sharing stopped working (​github:gh-551) Download: VirtualBox 7.2.10 | 170.0 MB (Open Source) Download: VirtualBox 7.2.10 Extension Pack | 19.1 MB View: VirtualBox Home Page | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      suprememobiles48 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      Prasann earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Prasann earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • First Post
      Dys Topia earned a badge
      First Post
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      510
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      174
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      100
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      87
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      70
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!