Calculating Average Rate Of Change...


Recommended Posts

I'm sick of these maths papers... none of them have enough detail in them so that I understand what i'm doing!

I found this example online:

Average rate of change =

f(4) - f(2)/4 - 2 = 17 - 1/2 = 8

http://people.hofstra.edu/faculty/Stefan_W.../Calcsumm3.html

The examples on the right hand side of the page since the example above is a bit wierd.

I just need to know how they got 17-1 as the second part of the sum... then I'm away!

None of the sites or my books seem to tell me, they just do it!

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/295212-calculating-average-rate-of-change/
Share on other sites

The formula for average rate of change is

f(x1) - f(x2)

-------------

x1 - x2

That formula comes from the change in y over the change in x. Ya know, that formula you used to find the slope of a line.

mSec (slope of a line) formula:

y1 - y2

-------

x1 - x2

Do you see how they are exactly the same, only y has been replaced with f(x)? That is because y is merly a function of x and the average rate of change is merly the slope of the line.

I hope that explains it.

I've done all bar one - well I've done it, but I don't know if it's right:

the function f(x) = 2/x+1 over intervals:

[x , x + Delta x]

I worked this:

2 / [x + Delta x + 1] - 2 / (x)+1

= Delta X / (Delta X + x + 1)

Is that anywhere near right? I really got lost with all of the delta's!

X - X + deltaX = deltax, you can subtract the two X's.

The top is wrong. You probably made a mistake in following the rules of subtracting the two fractions. The two fractions do not have a common denominator. You need to find it, then subtract the two fractions on the top. Once that is done you will be able to reduce even further.

X - X + deltaX = deltax, you can subtract the two X's.

The top is wrong. You probably made a mistake in following the rules of subtracting the two fractions. The two fractions do not have a common denominator. You need to find it, then subtract the two fractions on the top. Once that is done you will be able to reduce even further.

585598536[/snapback]

Oh yer... i didn't see that bottom one!

As for the top, can I not simply take them away from each other? They are minus each other. I'm stumped!

- Oh! I need to make the bottom the same don't I on either side? - so do I times the first one by Delta X... which would give me the same fraction on either side?

Oh great you are learning average rate of change and you dont have a grasp on subtracting fractions. The denominators are different, so no you cant simply subtract them. The first thing you do is find the common denominator, then you subtract. How do you find the common denominator? Well look below.

post-38325-1110497458.gif

Yep they are both wrong. You're just going to have to review subtracting fractions, otherwise any function that has a fraction in it will give you difficulty.

Maybe giving you a simpler example will give you the ability to solve the top part correctly. In the attached image I made up two fractions that had to be added. Look at the steps closely.

post-38325-1110509470.gif

I got it as the whole thing = Delta X...

On the top I got 2(X + Delta X + 1) / X + Delta X + 1 (X + 1)

Then on the other fraction I got 2 (X + 1) / X + Delta X + 1 (X + 1)

That makes both of the bottom the same (like the example above).

I then canceled both of the 2's from the top, followed by 2 X's and 2 1's. Leaving me with Delta X.

Because both the bottom were the same, I could just remove it completely giving me Delta X.

Is this right? I'm sure someone else got Delta X!

I then canceled both of the 2's from the top, followed by 2 X's and 2 1's.  Leaving me with Delta X.

585600798[/snapback]

I think you got it. The top part does come out to be deltax/(x+1)(x+deltax+1). The whole fraction should be in the image I attached, which looks somewhat funny because it looks like a double fraction. That fraction can be reduced one more time. See if you can figure it out (hint: it is a fraction being divided by deltax)

post-38325-1110572034.jpg

Thats cool. Don't feel bad about having trouble with that problem, you'll get it. When you study just start with easy functions that don't have fractions.

Looking back I think I made a mistake somewhere, so I just redid the problem and post the answer so you have something to look at.

post-38325-1110741984_thumb.jpg

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Microsoft confirms Recycle Bin bug across all versions of Windows by Usama Jawad A couple of days ago, we reported that the latest Patch Tuesday update has seemingly resulted in a lot of issues for many users, including OneDrive and Dropbox access problems, BitLocker recovery lockouts, and BSODs. Although Microsoft is yet to acknowledge these bugs, it has confirmed another, relatively smaller issue across all supported versions of Windows. In an update on its Windows Release Health Dashboard, Microsoft has confirmed that after installing June's Patch Tuesday update (KB5094126), you'll experience unexpected behavior when leveraging Recycle Bin. Basically, when you attempt to delete an item from the Recycle Bin, the confirm dialog will show you the internal file name of that content rather than the actual name. For example, the file may be named abc.png, but the confirm dialog will ask if you're sure that you want to permanently delete $Rxxxxx.png from the Recycle Bin. This is pretty much it for the scope of the bug itself; it just displays the wrong name in the confirm dialog. The correct name will be shown in the list view of the Recycle Bin and if you restore the file, it will return with the correct name as well. This issue affects pretty much all supported versions of Windows client and server, including: Client: Windows 11, version 26H1; Windows 11, version 25H2; Windows 11, version 24H2; Windows 11, version 23H2; Windows 10, version 22H2; Windows 10 Enterprise LTSC 2021; Windows 10 Enterprise LTSC 2019; Windows 10 Enterprise LTSB 2016 Server: Windows Server 2025; Windows Server 2022; Windows Server 2019; Windows Server 2016; Windows Server 2012 R2; Windows Server 2012 As things currently stand, Microsoft is working on a concrete solution that will be released in a "future" Windows update. It remains to be seen if the firm will wait till the next Patch Tuesday or roll out an out-of-band (OOB) fix. The good news is that commercial customers can deploy a workaround right now, but they will have to reach out to Microsoft Support for Business for additional details.
    • They said by this time everyone will have flying cars. WELL...
    • A study by physicist Henry Tye of Cornell University suggests that the universe may not expand forever. Instead, it could eventually stop expanding, begin contracting and end in a "Big Crunch" roughly 20 billion years from now. Maybe not as we now know that time can flow backwards.
    • Of course. Simply reverse the polarity.
    • It is clear from this aricle that "Time Is On My Side" no matter which direction it is flowing., https://noai.duckduckgo.com/?i...m%2Fwatch%3Fv%3DsEj8lUx0gwY
  • Recent Achievements

    • Reacting Well
      BizSAR earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • First Post
      AndreaB earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      Huge Trailer earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Classifyskilleducation earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      eurospharma62 earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      579
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      183
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      75
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      73
    5. 5
      neufuse
      64
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!