Calculating Average Rate Of Change...


Recommended Posts

I'm sick of these maths papers... none of them have enough detail in them so that I understand what i'm doing!

I found this example online:

Average rate of change =

f(4) - f(2)/4 - 2 = 17 - 1/2 = 8

http://people.hofstra.edu/faculty/Stefan_W.../Calcsumm3.html

The examples on the right hand side of the page since the example above is a bit wierd.

I just need to know how they got 17-1 as the second part of the sum... then I'm away!

None of the sites or my books seem to tell me, they just do it!

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/295212-calculating-average-rate-of-change/
Share on other sites

The formula for average rate of change is

f(x1) - f(x2)

-------------

x1 - x2

That formula comes from the change in y over the change in x. Ya know, that formula you used to find the slope of a line.

mSec (slope of a line) formula:

y1 - y2

-------

x1 - x2

Do you see how they are exactly the same, only y has been replaced with f(x)? That is because y is merly a function of x and the average rate of change is merly the slope of the line.

I hope that explains it.

I've done all bar one - well I've done it, but I don't know if it's right:

the function f(x) = 2/x+1 over intervals:

[x , x + Delta x]

I worked this:

2 / [x + Delta x + 1] - 2 / (x)+1

= Delta X / (Delta X + x + 1)

Is that anywhere near right? I really got lost with all of the delta's!

X - X + deltaX = deltax, you can subtract the two X's.

The top is wrong. You probably made a mistake in following the rules of subtracting the two fractions. The two fractions do not have a common denominator. You need to find it, then subtract the two fractions on the top. Once that is done you will be able to reduce even further.

X - X + deltaX = deltax, you can subtract the two X's.

The top is wrong. You probably made a mistake in following the rules of subtracting the two fractions. The two fractions do not have a common denominator. You need to find it, then subtract the two fractions on the top. Once that is done you will be able to reduce even further.

585598536[/snapback]

Oh yer... i didn't see that bottom one!

As for the top, can I not simply take them away from each other? They are minus each other. I'm stumped!

- Oh! I need to make the bottom the same don't I on either side? - so do I times the first one by Delta X... which would give me the same fraction on either side?

Oh great you are learning average rate of change and you dont have a grasp on subtracting fractions. The denominators are different, so no you cant simply subtract them. The first thing you do is find the common denominator, then you subtract. How do you find the common denominator? Well look below.

post-38325-1110497458.gif

Yep they are both wrong. You're just going to have to review subtracting fractions, otherwise any function that has a fraction in it will give you difficulty.

Maybe giving you a simpler example will give you the ability to solve the top part correctly. In the attached image I made up two fractions that had to be added. Look at the steps closely.

post-38325-1110509470.gif

I got it as the whole thing = Delta X...

On the top I got 2(X + Delta X + 1) / X + Delta X + 1 (X + 1)

Then on the other fraction I got 2 (X + 1) / X + Delta X + 1 (X + 1)

That makes both of the bottom the same (like the example above).

I then canceled both of the 2's from the top, followed by 2 X's and 2 1's. Leaving me with Delta X.

Because both the bottom were the same, I could just remove it completely giving me Delta X.

Is this right? I'm sure someone else got Delta X!

I then canceled both of the 2's from the top, followed by 2 X's and 2 1's.  Leaving me with Delta X.

585600798[/snapback]

I think you got it. The top part does come out to be deltax/(x+1)(x+deltax+1). The whole fraction should be in the image I attached, which looks somewhat funny because it looks like a double fraction. That fraction can be reduced one more time. See if you can figure it out (hint: it is a fraction being divided by deltax)

post-38325-1110572034.jpg

Thats cool. Don't feel bad about having trouble with that problem, you'll get it. When you study just start with easy functions that don't have fractions.

Looking back I think I made a mistake somewhere, so I just redid the problem and post the answer so you have something to look at.

post-38325-1110741984_thumb.jpg

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Mp3tag 3.35 by Razvan Serea Mp3tag is a powerful and yet easy-to-use tool to edit metadata (ID3, Vorbis Comments and APE) of common audio formats. It can rename files based on the tag information, replace characters or words from tags and filenames, import/export tag information, create playlists and more. The program supports online freedb database lookups for selected files, allowing you to automatically gather proper tag information for select files or CDs. Mp3tag supports the following audio formats: Advanced Audio Coding (aac) Free Lossless Audio Codec (flac) Monkeys Audio (ape) Mpeg Layer 3 (mp3) MPEG-4 (mp4 / m4a / m4b / iTunes compatible) Musepack (mpc) Ogg Vorbis (ogg) OptimFROG (ofr) OptimFROG DualStream (ofs) Speex (spx) Toms Audio Kompressor (tak) True Audio (tta) Windows Media Audio (wma) WavPack (wv) Mp3tag 3.35 changelog: This version introduces a new Files options page, enhanced toolbar customization, support for RF64 WAV files, improved Discogs and MusicBrainz tag sources, and many other improvements and fixes. See the Release Notes for more details. Download: Mp3tag 64-bit | 5.7 MB (Freeware) Download: Mp3tag 32-bit | 5.2 MB Link: Mp3tag Homepage | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • The FIFA World Cup is not US centric.
    • It’s amusing how Microsoft is pushing IT admins as if this was a major, game-changing update. In reality, it’s just an enablement package that bumps the build number, which is disappointing compared to the more substantial 22H2 and 24H2 releases. Technically, 25H2, 26H1, and the upcoming 26H2 are essentially the same, differing only in support schedules. They could have included the Windows K2 improvements here, but chose not to. The era of Windows being in the backburner continues, and this 26H2 release feels like an afterthought. Shame, Nadella, shame.
    • Microsoft, totally not confusing /s 25H2 - Current for non-Arm based Windows 26H1 - Current for Arm based Windows 26H2 - Only for non Arm Windows
    • After I installed those, my older but capable Win 11 laptop (16GB RAM) reported it as 26H2 26300.8697. Then I installed it on my big laptop (128GB RAM! Hehe sorry), it reported it as 25H2 26220.8690. Ugh. Do I have to switch Insiders channels from Release to Beta?
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      AMV earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      AMV earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Collaborator
      ryansurfer98 went up a rank
      Collaborator
    • One Month Later
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      523
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      172
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      78
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      72
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!