win2003 login question


Recommended Posts

hey hello!

i read the guide about win2003.

the guide say: You should create a user account immediately. Leave the Administrator account in its default state and create your user name using these steps.

well my question is, what if i use the admin account by default? there is something bad? because i allready use my winxp as admin....

thanks for help!

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/303491-win2003-login-question/
Share on other sites

What does "Leave the Administrator account in its default state" mean? The admin account created at install is what is used. The "state" of the server is determined by its role within the Domain or Forest and, as such, its "state" is controlled by the Domain Controller and Active Directory.

You install W2K3, set its roles and thats it. There is no need to create other logins. When last did you, on a regular basis, log off the Admin account and on as another account, on a server? (not talking RDP).

In a Windows 2003 enviroment you are not at risk of using the Administrator account such as you would under a *nix enviroment with the root account. It's always a good idea to create multiple users for different enviroments\purposes, but realistically...if you are the admin, using the machine with the Admin account isnt that much of a risk...

Not so sure I agree with at view cultavix - it's a very bad habit to get into, using a FULL admin account to perform your day to day functions, surfing, email, etc...

Your day to day account should not be a FULL admin account! Be it in a domain or just on the local machine, be in the windows world or nix.. From a security standpoint - you should only use the min permissions required to perform the function.. You sure do not need the ability to wipe out any file on the system, or change any file, etc.. etc.. every minute your using the machine.. Running as a FULL admin account gives you this - and leaves the system open to mistakes (deleting something, changing something, etc..) Any exe that you run can run with YOUR permissions, so it would have FULL admin rights (be in on the local machine only - or the whole domain) too..

Do quite a few people do - sure they do, does not mean its a good idea! ;)

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Why should simply opening the Action Center ... require any significant amount of CPU cycles? Too many are ignoring the elephant in the room: today's CPUs may have similar clock frequencies to CPUs from a decade ago (~4 to 5 GHz), but they run with far higher performance per clock, even on the smallest E-cores. The Action Center is a static, minor desktop element. It ought to open instantly on any CPU made in the past 2.5 decades at even low clocks. Opening a program? Boost away. Unzipping a file? Boost to your heart's content. Right-clicking the notification area? This should be an ultra-efficient, low-impact event that opens instantly. Compare today's UI elements to Windows 7 UI elements. Today's UI elements hardly do anything more substantial or important or critical, yet now require modern-day processors to jump half a GHz to reduce their latency.
    • This is not an option lmao: it is part of the KB5094126 update, pushed to all users. There is no GUI to configure it. Reading the article should be required for commenting.
    • Can you recommend me a good Pixel 7 on eBay? Because some are saying Gen 1, and I don't think that's what I want, right?
    • Close, but it is for any application starting, not just during boot time. In fact, it probably will not improve boot time at all because during a boot, the CPU is already boosting, so a pre-boost wouldn't change anything. I agree that it isn't exciting (especially considering every other OS already does it), but it is a good thing, even if they are just playing catch up.
    • Any so called performance increase will be in milliseconds, which nobody will actually notice in real world usage.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      slackerzz earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Year In
      highriskpaym earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Month Later
      highriskpaym earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      highriskpaym earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      FBSPL earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      501
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      198
    3. 3
      +Edouard
      156
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      84
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!