Schuled task will not run unless user is logged in


Recommended Posts

Well, I recently got a new job which requires Windows Server Boxen Wrangler skills. While I am knowledgable about Active Directory and its dirty little secrets, this is my first actual experience in a production environement on something other than NT4.

And well, second week, and I run into something that baffles my logic. Perhaps one of you less Unix-driven Windows admins might be able to help me there.

You see, we have a batch file that does some checking upon the workstations of the domain, which has to be ran on a few servers as a Task Scheduler job.

The task runs as DOMAIN\SomeUser (which exists for this very purpose).

The job was created on a member server, and the job will not run and fail. It lists a generic failure in the "logs".

Now now, I thought permissions were at cause, but we have an identically set-up server over here which works flawlessly.

Now here is the part that baffles my mind:

The job fails to run. I login as the said DOMAIN\SomeUser somewhere via Terminal Services, the job actually runs.

If I logout, it fails.

And no, before you ask, the batch file posseses not something such as popup dialogs or anything requiring input.

If I run the job as the Administrator (in the job properties) it work.

So, it works with elevated privileges, it works when the user is logged on somwhere, else it fails.

...

No, sorry, I know not what the hell is happening.

I have never encountered this before at All.

As I stated I have another server with an identical set-up which works flawlessly.

Anyone?

(NOTE TO SELF: We will now proceed to test once more if I asked something that nobody is able to figure out. I have asked six questions maybe on neowin since I joined -- none were answered :p)

It needs to be something that runs are a service in order for it to run while logged off.

It may be something that already runs as a service. If so, you can ignore the following. You can actually make anything run as a service, these instruction set "Second Copy" to run as a service, but you can adapt it for anything:

Running Second Copy as an NT Service

You can configure Second Copy to run as an NT Service if you have the SrvAny.exe utility that comes with Microsoft NT Resource kit.

1. Install Second Copy using defaults

2. Configure any profiles as necessary. Also, edit the options and uncheck the box "show progress" in the performance tab, and "show message box....." in the copy tab

3. Copy INSTSRV.EXE and SRVANY.EXE from the NT Resource Kit to C:\WinNT

4. Run "INSTSRV SecondCopy c:\WinNT\srvany.exe"

5. Using REGEDT32 find the following key:- HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\

SYSTEM

\CurrentControlSet

\Services

\SecondCopy

6. Create a new key called "Parameters"

7. Create a new REG_SZ value under it called "Application" and give it the value c:\Program Files\Second Copy 97\sc97.exe

(For Second Copy 2000 use c:\Program Files\SecCopy\SecCopy.exe)

8. Run Control Panel, Services, find the SecondCopy service and change the Startup settings for the service to log on as an account that has the relevant read/write permission for what you want SecondCopy to do (usually a member of the Backup Operators group should be okay).

9. Start the service.

Note: To run Second Copy interactively (to add/change profiles etc), you must stop/pause the service.

Well uhm... it's a scheduled task, not a service -- it is set up using the task scheduler...

And as far as I know, you don't need to do that.

And how would a service make something run every X hour every Y day...

Unless of course it is something new from 2003, because we have a 2k box that works fine...

Anyone?

mr_da3m0n -- here's the answer that you're looking for:

Check which GPOs are being applied to the server (is this a member server or a DC?)

Check the value(s) of: Computer Configuration--Windows Settings--Security Settings--Local Policies/User Rights Assignment--"Log on as batch job"

You'll need the username that the scheduled tasks are running under added.

Cheers :)

Edit part: If you're uncomfortable/unfamiliar with Group Policy (I see you're a prior NT4 admin) the you should really check out the Group Policy Management Console. It installs on an XP SP1 (or newer) workstation and lets you easily manage your GPOs (with Active Directory Users and Computers --ADUC-- as well).

It's a free download from Microsoft.

Edited by Z3romus
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Not even an OLED display on the laptops. Also it seems that the laptop design isn't the same as the Surface Ultra model. Looks like bargain bin at high prices.
    • VirtualBox 7.2.10 by Razvan Serea VirtualBox is a powerful x86 and AMD64/Intel64 virtualization product for enterprise as well as home use. Targeted at server, desktop and embedded use, it is now the only professional-quality virtualization solution that is also Open Source Software. Presently, VirtualBox runs on Windows, Linux, macOS, and Solaris hosts and supports a large number of guest operating systems including but not limited to Windows (NT 4.0, 2000, XP, Server 2003, Vista, 7, 8, Windows 10 and Windows 11), DOS/Windows 3.x, Linux (2.4, 2.6, 3.x, 4.x, 5.x and 6.x), Solaris and OpenSolaris, OS/2, OpenBSD, NetBSD and FreeBSD. Some of the features of VirtualBox are: Modularity. VirtualBox has an extremely modular design with well-defined internal programming interfaces and a client/server design. This makes it easy to control it from several interfaces at once: for example, you can start a virtual machine in a typical virtual machine GUI and then control that machine from the command line, or possibly remotely. VirtualBox also comes with a full Software Development Kit: even though it is Open Source Software, you don't have to hack the source to write a new interface for VirtualBox. Virtual machine descriptions in XML. The configuration settings of virtual machines are stored entirely in XML and are independent of the local machines. Virtual machine definitions can therefore easily be ported to other computers. VirtualBox 7.2.10 changelog: VMM: Fixed issue when CentOS 10 VM was not booting due to the message "Fatal glibc error: CPU does not support x86-64-v3" (​github:gh-642) Devices/EFI: Fixed booting issue when ARM VM had less than 1024 MiB of RAM assigned (​github:gh-679) USB: Fixed issue when it was not possible to attach USB device to headless VM on Apple Silicon/macOS 26.4.1 (​github:gh-631) Storage: Fixed issue when VIRTIO-SCSI device was not recognized as SSD device by guest system (​github:gh-634) Network: Fixed issue in E1000 emulation code which triggered debug log creation (​github:gh-645) Network: Fixed issue in E1000 emulation code which prevented OS/2 guest from booting (​github:gh-683) Linux Host: Fixed issue when VMs could not be started due to kernel oops (​github:gh-639) Linux Host and Guest: Fixed issue when kernel modules were failing to build with openSUSE 16.0 kernel Linux Host and Guest: Added initial support for kernel 7.1 Linux Host and Guest: Added extra fixes for RHEL 9.8 kernel (​github:gh-676) Linux Host and Guest: Added possibility to build source code using NASM instead of YASM as the assembler (​github:gh-520) Linux Guest Additions: Added initial support for Extended Data Control Protocol for clipboard sharing with Plasma on Wayland guests (​github:gh-33) Linux Guest Additions: Added extra fixes for preventing vboxvideo kernel module build with kernel version 7.0 and newer (​github:gh-655) OS/2 Guest Additions: Fixed issue when Shared Folders automount and clipboard sharing stopped working (​github:gh-551) Download: VirtualBox 7.2.10 | 170.0 MB (Open Source) Download: VirtualBox 7.2.10 Extension Pack | 19.1 MB View: VirtualBox Home Page | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • OK, now ask yourself how are they going to enforce that law? By requiring every single adult to prove their age and provide their legal identity documents to an UNREGULATED 3rd party company that already has a long track record of multiple data breaches. Not to mention, parliament have voted AGAINST this ban, twice, and Starmer is going ahead anyway. So, where's the democracy here, because that looks like dictatorship to me. The solution here is parental responsibility, not government control. Run some public service announcements on TV and UK social media teaching parents how to setup parental controls. That's already been proven to actually work. But the, this is not and has NEVER been about keeping kids safe. It's about control and monitoring. Watching what you're doing online and controlling what you can see and what you can say.
    • Interesting read. I knew the adware was quite controversial at the time, however never realised to the point The Guardian wrote an article about Patchou. I just said no and enjoyed his creation, I’d probably be a lot more wary of something like that today though.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      Prasann earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Prasann earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • First Post
      Dys Topia earned a badge
      First Post
    • Collaborator
      vjlex earned a badge
      Collaborator
    • Reacting Well
      Dys Topia earned a badge
      Reacting Well
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      525
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      180
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      105
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      88
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      69
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!