Recommended Posts

I think it's in the Security Center somewhere...anyway, it's called Data Execution Protection (DEP). I know it can be adjusted, but I can't remember how to get to it...

585754475[/snapback]

You can disable DEP but you still get the warnings...

Disable Data Execution Prevention (DEP)

WARNING: Microsoft recommends that you do NOT disable DEP globally.

To do this would make your computer less secure.

In cases where DEP causes application failures, Microsoft strongly recommends that you contact the application vendor to determine if a DEP-compatible update is available.

Installing such an update is the preferred solution for application compatibility issues with DEP.

Disabling DEP system-wide using boot.ini

1. Click Start, and then click ControlPanel.

2. Under Pickacategory, click PerformanceandMaintenance.

3. Under or Pick a Control Panel icon, click System.

4. Click the Advanced tab, and in the Startup and Recovery area, click Settings.

5. In the SystemStartup area, click Edit.

6. In Notepad, click Edit and then click Find.

7. In the Findwhat field, type /noexecute and then click FindNext.

8. In the Find dialog box click Cancel.

9. Replace the policy_level (for example, "OptIn" default) with "AlwaysOff? (without the quotes).WARNINGb>: Be sure to enter the text carefully.

Note: Your boot.ini file switch should now read:

/noexecute=AlwaysOff

10.b> In Notepad, click File and then click Save.

11.b> Click OK to close StartupandRecovery.

12.b> Click OK to close SystemProperties and then restart your computer.

This setting does not provide any DEP coverage for any part of the system, regardless of hardware DEP support.

Verifying DEP is Disabledb>1.b> Click Start, and then click ControlPanel.

2.b> Under Pickacategory, click PerformanceandMaintenance.

3.b> Under or Pick a Control Panel icon, click System.

4.b> Click the Advanced tab.

5.b> In the Performance area, click Settings and then click DataExecutionPrevention.

6.b> Verify that the DEP settings are unavailable and then click OK to close PerformanceSettings.

7.b> Click OK to close SystemProperties then close PerformanceandMaintenance.

More info: http://support.microsoft.com/kb/875352

http://www.microsoft.com/technet/security/...p/depcnfxp.mspx

Found it! :D

Inside the attached zip are three reg files:

- Disable Digital Signature Checking for all files.reg

- Disable Digital Signature Checking for exe files.reg

- Enable Digital Signature Checking.reg (default)

Merge the reg file that you want to use and Restart your Computer.

Digital_Signature_Checking.zip

Found it!  :D

Inside the attached zip are three reg files:

- Disable Digital Signature Checking for all files.reg

- Disable Digital Signature Checking for exe files.reg

- Enable Digital Signature Checking.reg (default)

Merge the reg file that you want to use and Restart your Computer.

585759948[/snapback]

thanks guys

also found this...

http://reviews.cnet.com/4520-10168_7-5543540-1.html?tag=nav

  • 2 weeks later...

Cool Reg Files.

I too bumped into that site with that information, too. I also followed the advice given there.

I was wondering, though, if after following the advice on that site, if it makes the "Default" reg file that Herby gave us invalid for me?

I mean, did my making those settings changes as prescribed on that site already make a couple of changes to the registry in the same locations Herby's reg files point to.

Herby's UNDO (Default) reg file looks like this:

Windows Registry Editor Version 5.00

;Enable Digital Signature Checking (Open File - Security Warning)

[HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\Microsoft\Internet Explorer\Download]

"CheckExeSignatures"="yes"

"RunInvalidSignatures"=dword:00000000

[-HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Policies\Associations]

[-HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Policies\Attachments]

But my registry shows in that location:

"CheckExeSignatures"="no" already.

So did the settings I made according to that site already make this one change for me?

And if I choose to UNDO (set to default...at least back to how the registry entries appear for me before using Herby's reg files), should I change Herby's entry " CheckExeSignatures"="yes" to " CheckExeSignatures"="no"

(By the way, Herby, I think you're the cat's pajamas. You give a lot of great advice here at NeoWin.)

  • 1 month later...
  • 8 months later...

Sorry to drag this up again, I get the annoying Open File - Security Warning when trying to run an .bat file I use everyday. I can't open the .zip attached by Herby, corrupt or missing error, can someone email it to me or re attach it to this thread so I can get rid of this annoying message.

Thank you for your time.

K

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Hello, I have used a few TEAM Group SSDs, USB flash drives, and Micro SDXC cards in the past. They all seemed to work fine. Regards, Aryeh Goretsky
    • "just $100 per TB"? Just? Are we trying to make this seem like the new normal? Kinda weird to make it sound like that is not a ridiculously expensive asking price.
    • The reviews you refer to mean nothing. Where there is no journalism there is no reason to call the gaming media's opinion pieces "reviews". For GP games there is indeed a metric for success - increasing subscriptions. Which turns in revenue. The only circumstance in which subs do not rise when great is being released is a Game Pass system where the company is close to fully saturated with customers in a subscription. However, in that case as the theory goes you spend aplenty in all kind of games - from shady live service cash cows and customer offending agitprop crap in purple colours to robust and entertaining single player games. And keep a solid level of profitability. Ignoring the simply innocuous but mid games MGS has released primarily of the second kind.
    • Report: Microsoft to use AWS to help GitHub deal with a major surge in demand by Pradeep Viswanathan Thanks to the surge of coding AI agents, GitHub's usage has skyrocketed over the past 12 months. To meet this demand, GitHub started with a plan in October 2025 to increase capacity by 10x. However, by early this year, the company realized that it needed 30x scale. This rapid growth has caused severe strain on the platform's reliability, resulting in several small outages over the past few months. In April, GitHub published a long blog post explaining the steps it is taking to resolve these reliability issues. In the post, the company also confirmed that it is working toward a multi-cloud architecture for better resilience. Today, Business Insider reported that GitHub is turning to Amazon Web Services to help deal with a major surge in AI-driven coding activity. It is important to note that GitHub is still in the process of moving completely to the Azure cloud. The current plan is to move the platform fully to Azure by 2027 so that it can scale better as per developer demand. Therefore, the current decision to utilize AWS might be part of a short-term plan to meet immediate demand. A Microsoft spokesperson confirmed that GitHub is using multiple cloud providers with the following statement: For Microsoft, the decision highlights the operational pressure behind the AI boom. GitHub has to stay reliable for developers at a time when rivals such as Codex, Cursor, Claude Code, and other AI coding tools are gaining attention. And the decision to use AWS for computing capacity seems practical given the circumstances.
    • It's growing on me, however, your right, it make better usability sense if the tabs were bellow the address bar.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Collaborator
      vjlex earned a badge
      Collaborator
    • Reacting Well
      Dys Topia earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Conversation Starter
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Year In
      Console General earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      Twozo Technologies earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      517
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      182
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      106
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      88
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      68
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!