Recommended Posts

im an aeronautics engineer and i have a powerbook. it really depends on what you need. matlab and mathematica both run (although matlab kinda sucks on mac). if you need stuff like ansys, solidworks, or other CAD or finite element stuff, you can always use virtual pc even though it will be a bit sluggish.

As an undergrad engineering student I'm curious if any engineers have found powerbooks as a good fit for them.  I've always though apple were bad for engineers since all the major apps are windows based (besides matlab which I think will run on a mac).

585766715[/snapback]

if you want to use engineering apps forget mac, get windows based anything. My iBook is useless when it comes to my RA work.

in my opinion it is a shame that some of these softwares are not available for Macs, I mean can you imagin running CAD 2005 on a Dual G5?...that would be pretty crazy...but at the moment, there is not enough software for people to be happy with, so yeah...in this case, forget about Macs...but if it was graphic designing...it would be a different ball game in a different ball park...:happy:

I think it's funny that the companies who make these engineering programs haven't at least thought of releasing a version for the G5. Considering it's outstanding FPU and VPU, you'd think it would be the ideal platform for these types of apps (hey, it's good enough for supercomputer clusters).

The only problem I have is running Quartus, which only supports Windows. Other than that, I'd say Macs are well suited for engineering applications. Currently, the engineering apps I use most are Matlab 7 and Maple 9. I also have Mathematica (free download from school) installed but I prefer Maple.

X11 is also much better than any X-windows programs I've used on my XP (when I still had it). You'll probably need to use it a lot, if your school allows you to work remotely.

Of course, there're all the other perks of Unix. A lot of nice little programs are available at your finger tip: XMGR, Xfig, Espresso... the list goes on. And for writing reports, TexShop will really spoil you.

I am majoring in computer science and do most of programming on my powerbook.

585777919[/snapback]

there is a difference, you use it because you write sotware, he needs existing software to work on OS X, and a large number of the most useful apps (for engineering) is simply not available for OSX atm.

(p.s. I'm a CS student too :) , hey there buddy! )

Windows has a plethora of Engineering programs. I would recommend sticking to the Windows platform for what you have to do as an engineer. Virtual PC sounds dreadful when it comes to some of that stuff. I think there is a lot of push for cross-platform programming, so I think it is coming. But for now, only get a Mac if you want a toy.

IMO.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Why should simply opening the Action Center ... require any significant amount of CPU cycles? Too many are ignoring the elephant in the room: today's CPUs may have similar clock frequencies to CPUs from a decade ago (~4 to 5 GHz), but they run with far higher performance per clock, even on the smallest E-cores. The Action Center is a static, minor desktop element. It ought to open instantly on any CPU made in the past 2.5 decades at even low clocks. Opening a program? Boost away. Unzipping a file? Boost to your heart's content. Right-clicking the notification area? This should be an ultra-efficient, low-impact event that opens instantly. Compare today's UI elements to Windows 7 UI elements. Today's UI elements hardly do anything more substantial or important or critical, yet now require modern-day processors to jump half a GHz to reduce their latency.
    • This is not an option lmao: it is part of the KB5094126 update, pushed to all users. There is no GUI to configure it. Reading the article should be required for commenting.
    • Can you recommend me a good Pixel 7 on eBay? Because some are saying Gen 1, and I don't think that's what I want, right?
    • Close, but it is for any application starting, not just during boot time. In fact, it probably will not improve boot time at all because during a boot, the CPU is already boosting, so a pre-boost wouldn't change anything. I agree that it isn't exciting (especially considering every other OS already does it), but it is a good thing, even if they are just playing catch up.
    • Any so called performance increase will be in milliseconds, which nobody will actually notice in real world usage.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      slackerzz earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Year In
      highriskpaym earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Month Later
      highriskpaym earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      highriskpaym earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      FBSPL earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      501
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      198
    3. 3
      +Edouard
      156
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      84
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!