Recommended Posts

im an aeronautics engineer and i have a powerbook. it really depends on what you need. matlab and mathematica both run (although matlab kinda sucks on mac). if you need stuff like ansys, solidworks, or other CAD or finite element stuff, you can always use virtual pc even though it will be a bit sluggish.

As an undergrad engineering student I'm curious if any engineers have found powerbooks as a good fit for them.  I've always though apple were bad for engineers since all the major apps are windows based (besides matlab which I think will run on a mac).

585766715[/snapback]

if you want to use engineering apps forget mac, get windows based anything. My iBook is useless when it comes to my RA work.

in my opinion it is a shame that some of these softwares are not available for Macs, I mean can you imagin running CAD 2005 on a Dual G5?...that would be pretty crazy...but at the moment, there is not enough software for people to be happy with, so yeah...in this case, forget about Macs...but if it was graphic designing...it would be a different ball game in a different ball park...:happy:

I think it's funny that the companies who make these engineering programs haven't at least thought of releasing a version for the G5. Considering it's outstanding FPU and VPU, you'd think it would be the ideal platform for these types of apps (hey, it's good enough for supercomputer clusters).

The only problem I have is running Quartus, which only supports Windows. Other than that, I'd say Macs are well suited for engineering applications. Currently, the engineering apps I use most are Matlab 7 and Maple 9. I also have Mathematica (free download from school) installed but I prefer Maple.

X11 is also much better than any X-windows programs I've used on my XP (when I still had it). You'll probably need to use it a lot, if your school allows you to work remotely.

Of course, there're all the other perks of Unix. A lot of nice little programs are available at your finger tip: XMGR, Xfig, Espresso... the list goes on. And for writing reports, TexShop will really spoil you.

I am majoring in computer science and do most of programming on my powerbook.

585777919[/snapback]

there is a difference, you use it because you write sotware, he needs existing software to work on OS X, and a large number of the most useful apps (for engineering) is simply not available for OSX atm.

(p.s. I'm a CS student too :) , hey there buddy! )

Windows has a plethora of Engineering programs. I would recommend sticking to the Windows platform for what you have to do as an engineer. Virtual PC sounds dreadful when it comes to some of that stuff. I think there is a lot of push for cross-platform programming, so I think it is coming. But for now, only get a Mac if you want a toy.

IMO.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Google's next-gen Tensor AI chips might be produced by Samsung, report says by Hamid Ganji Image via Google Google’s Tensor Processing Unit (TPU) is produced in collaboration with companies such as Broadcom and TSMC, but a recent report suggests that the search giant is in talks with Samsung to hand over part of the production to the Korean tech company. According to a report by The Information, citing people familiar with the matter, Google has begun talks with Samsung about using its chip manufacturing capacity for the next generation of Tensor AI chips. Google’s upcoming TPUs are reportedly codenamed “Icefish” and will be produced using Samsung's 2-nanometer process technology. Meanwhile, Samsung is expected to produce only a portion of the next-generation Tensor chips, with most of the production remaining at TSMC. The Information says the new Tensor chips are currently in the design stage and are scheduled to enter mass production in 2028. TSMC is generally considered one of the most reliable chip manufacturing partners and is trusted by tech giants such as Apple and Google. However, the growing demand for TSMC’s AI chips, combined with the company’s focus on meeting demand from AI data centers, has reportedly prompted Google to seek additional manufacturing partners for its next-generation TPUs. Besides Samsung and TSMC, Intel could also be assigned part of the production. The Information reported this week is that Google has begun talks with Intel to produce up to three million TPUs in 2028. However, this is not the first time Google has partnered with Samsung on chip production, as Samsung has previously manufactured Tensor chips for Pixel smartphones. Google’s Tensor Processing Unit is used in cloud data centers and competes with NVIDIA’s chips, which currently dominate the market. By relying on in-house chips, Google can not only reduce its dependence on third-party providers but also create new revenue opportunities. The company has already supplied its TPUs to the AI firm Anthropic.
    • Reminder that the Premium and Ultimate plans already come with a 100 hour per month limit, which you then have to pay more to increase in 15 hour blocks.
    • It does invite Linux because MS should have been improving their products all along these years instead chose to ignore the users now this year they’re making all of these improvements to their products where as Linux doesn’t have this kind of problems in fact it has gotten so good I can even play Windows games in Steam that I no longer ever needed Windows to carry on with my life, unlike you still use Windows and chose to try beat down down those who don't use Windows because they love their LG TV. (Surprisingly I actually own a 55” LED LG TV and it has been going strong for almost 14 years, longer than any Sony TV”)
    • As much as I love owning my own hardware, it's hard to argue with the value. I'm not a huge gamer, I'd actually be interested in a cheaper plan with limited monthly hours, or even a pay-by-the-hour plan.
    • Well, they (LibreOffice/The Document Foundation) are bitchy and whiny, yes, but they're right, at least this time. It doesn't make sense to market something as "free and open source to thwart dependency on foreign companies' software" but at the same time, using the formats of said companies (Microsoft) by default. That way, you are changing nothing, essentially, you're just using another UI. We all know that users just use the defaults and almost never change them. I'm not saying they should drop other formats altogether, but they shouldn't default to the thing they're trying to run away from in the first place. If you're gonna do something, just go all the way in, don't stop in the middle, IMO. Otherwise, shut up and move along.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      FBSPL earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      Jim Dugan earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Month Later
      Tommi118 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      sjbousquet earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      sjbousquet earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      487
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      196
    3. 3
      +Edouard
      155
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      84
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      69
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!