Recommended Posts

arhra,

i think its quite unfair to have to cater to everyone's requests. go with your gut.. if you want a start button, put a start button. if you think a logo fits better, add a logo. Afterall, this theme is your vision and your decision will be respected. :) great work man.. keep it up. :D

Originally posted by lazydesert

arhra,

i think its quite unfair to have to cater to everyone's requests. go with your gut.. if you want a start button, put a start button. if you think a logo fits better, add a logo. Afterall, this theme is your vision and your decision will be respected. :) great work man.. keep it up. :D

Arhra...of course. I was just saying because I respect themes that go without the 'start' it's very, i don't know, unsophisticated. Apple logos are even worse (let's not get into that)

Themes like Platinum Mist for example , where the start button becomes like an actual BUTTON that could really be pressed to swing down the start menu, I think that's really cool. I love Rhodium Edge, and I'd really like you to forgo the Start Text. You got rid of the fugly logo already, you're almost there :cheeky:

Anyway, whatever you decide, I will run. I love this theme, when the shell style is finished and Windowfx 2 is released, XP will finally be what I want it to look like.

i think arhra should make the theme how ever he feels it would look better. and then we just post the bugs (i haven't seen one yet) and after the final realease people can just tweak what ever they want to make it look how ever you want, i mean is that like arhra is going to make a different version just for one person.

i tweaked mine a few times to make it look how i want it :ponder:

i wanted a more true blue, i colorized it with style builder, i wanted a different start button, i changed it. if you give it a try you would notice that is not as hard as people make it to be.

anyway i would show you the changes i made but i don't got hosting, and plus dont' want people making arhra change things in the theme

*note i'm not directing this to anyone, i just felt like pointing it out

I have two problems:

1) how come the cursor replacements dont work?

2) how come my Start Menu button doesnt look the same as the one seen in the pic under the download link in this thread? All i see is the word "START" in bold black text. Is it suppose to be like this since its still a beta?

Originally posted by KidSharp

I have two problems:

1) how come the cursor replacements dont work?

how do they not work? you'll have to set up a cursor theme for yourself, since writing an auto-installing thing is a pain in the arse and i can't be bothered. if you're having problems with them once you've selected them, let me know, since i did manage to create an animated cursor that would lock my machine hard at one point... (no, i haven't a clue what was going on with that, probably a video driver issue).

2) how come my Start Menu button doesnt look the same as the one seen in the pic under the download link in this thread? All i see is the word "START" in bold black text. Is it suppose to be like this since its still a beta?

i changed it but didn't update the screenshot. i'm still not sure whether i'm going to keep the start button as it is, or replace the letters with a logo of some kind...

arhra is still working on finishing it as I believe, as well as the orange color scheme, please next time post at the rhodium edge thread: https://www.neowin.net/bboard/showthread.ph...&threadid=30884

also mods, merge the thread if ya want ;x

Originally posted by mojomonkee

what do you mean next version? i'm sure (or at least hope) that he's going to move on to a new theme.

well, you're wrong unless he has changed his mind in the past 2/3 weeks.

Originally posted by arhra

as i've said before, the orange is barely started atm, i'm waiting until i've finalised the design of everything before i start doing colour variations. the blue is nearly finished now, and when it is, i'll start finishing off the orange (which shouldn't take too long, since i only have to recolour things in photoshop, rather than actually thinking about the design).

stuckwithme247:

no, that's what were waiting on :) or atleast myself...

Originally posted by eurofunk

can someone tell me why after modifying my shell32.dll. the folder icons doesnt change... does it take sometime for the change to take place or anything like that?? im talkin abt the files folder.

i don't see how that has nothing to do with the theme, but try using tweakUI and repair the icons, that would reload your iconchache

(speliing)

i'm still working on it, most of the non-explorer specific stuff is done now, so if you're using litestep, it looks pretty much complete (except for a few minor things here and there).

trouble is, since i never see the taskbar and stuff, i've not got much incentive to finish them ;)

don't worry though, it's still progressing steadily... i'll probably upload an updated version once i've got a few more things done (the remaining non-explorer bits), then knuckle down and get to work on the taskbar and stuff.

Originally posted by arhra

i'm still working on it, most of the non-explorer specific stuff is done now, so if you're using litestep, it looks pretty much complete (except for a few minor things here and there).

trouble is, since i never see the taskbar and stuff, i've not got much incentive to finish them ;)

don't worry though, it's still progressing steadily... i'll probably upload an updated version once i've got a few more things done (the remaining non-explorer bits), then knuckle down and get to work on the taskbar and stuff.

YAY! =) Keep up the good work though, I'll be waiting for that upload :D

I hope the final version of the msstyle(s) comes out soon! :)

I went back to the explorer shell after using Litestep for a few days - I miss my start button! */me hugs explorer.exe"

LOL, I recently designed a new version of my website, and realised that I'd been subconsciously influenced by this theme! :p

http://dumbdirector.co.uk/elephant

hehehe

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • My father still uses a programme written in dbase3. Still manages to work with a little help from dosbox. 
    • Microsoft hides these secret Windows 11 performance boost settings available on every PC by Sayan Sen Windows enthusiasts often look for ways to extract as much performance out of their systems as possible, and it's often the case that they try and do so while trying to minimize the heat and power consumption. This is especially relevant in the case of mobile Windows PCs since laptops and notebooks tend to get hot and management of that heat and power is harder in such a form factor. As such users often turn to techniques like under-volting which can be used to squeeze out the maximum capabilities of a chip while also maintaining lowered power levels. There are official apps from AMD and Intel with the likes of Ryzen Master and XTU (Extreme Tuning Utility). While these are quite handy, most enthusiasts probably prefer to dig into the BIOS and play around with settings there like Curve Optimizer on Ryzen, which lets users set various frequency-voltage scaling values. These are essentially called P-States. If you are not familiar with them, Processor Power Management is done through Advanced Configuration and Power Interface (ACPI) P-states and C-states. While P-states or performance pwoer states handle CPU voltage-frequency scaling, C-states deal with CPU sleep states so that some of the CPU functions, which are not necessary at that moment, can be disabled. The P-states and C-states work together to make the processor run more efficiently. It helps the OS and apps determine which cores can be parked and which should be boosted. Of course not every user is an enthusiast or knows the technicalities and integrities of how things like overclocking or undervolting work. Thankfully for them Windows itself offers something pretty cool, though it is hidden by default on all systems. By default, Windows only has two P-States, "Minimum Processor State" and "Maximum Processor State." However, this can be changed with a Registry trick to expand the options under a secret "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown. This essentially enables the HWP or hardware P-States available on a device, and these are not controlled just by the OS itself as the underlying hardware gets involved too. In total there are five Processor Performance Boost Mode profiles that control how Windows requests and allows CPU turbo/boost behavior under the different power policies. They are: Disabled: In this mode, processor boosting is effectively turned off. The CPU will avoid entering turbo or boost frequencies and instead operate closer to its base frequency ceiling. This can significantly reduce power consumption and heat output, but at the cost of reduced burst performance and responsiveness in short workloads. Enabled: This is the standard behavior where boost functionality is allowed under normal conditions. The processor can opportunistically increase frequency when workload demands it, balancing performance gains with power and thermal constraints as managed by the system. Aggressive: Aggressive mode favors performance more heavily, allowing the CPU to enter higher boost states more readily and sustain them longer. This should in theory improve responsiveness under bursty or heavy workloads but increases power draw and thermal output compared to the default enabled behavior. Efficient Enabled: This mode still allows boosting, but with a stronger bias toward energy efficiency. The system attempts to use boost more selectively, avoiding unnecessary frequency spikes when the performance gain is marginal. Efficient Aggressive: This is a hybrid approach where boost is still performance-responsive, but the system continuously weighs efficiency more heavily than in Aggressive mode. It aims to deliver noticeable performance improvements while reducing wasted power in less demanding scenarios. Here's how to enable the Processor performance boost mode: Open Registry Editor: Press Win+R, type regedit, and click OK. Go to: HKLM\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\Power\PowerSettings\54533251-82be-4824-96c1-47b60b740d00\be337238-0d82-4146-a960-4f3749d470c7 (where HKLM stands for HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE_) Modify the value of Attributes from 1 to 2 (you can find modify option by right-clicking) After that, exit Registry, you should now be able to see the new "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown menu: As you can see there are now five new P-States or CPPC states or power profile available that help define the boost mode processor setting on your PC. Wrapping it up here's a quick run-down of the settings as defined by Microsoft itself. Setting Description Disabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is disabled. Collaborative Processor Performance Control (CPPC) behaviour is disabled. Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Efficient Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Efficient Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows calculates the desired extra performance above the guaranteed performance level, and asks the processor to deliver that specific performance level. Efficient Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows always asks the processor to deliver the highest possible performance above the guaranteed performance level. In the next part we shall be comparing these settings to explore how much of a benefit or regression they can provide in terms of performance and power efficiency. If you decide to change the values on your system and are experiencing problems like crashes or an overheating PC, make sure to revert the steps back to the original state.
    • I think he means you haven't reviewed previous UFC games. Of course it doesn't matter... Every time you just report on something that involves the President even if just simply what happened you guys usually get accused of being anti-Trump. We live in fun times.
    • So how did you solve the problem? Disabling Secure Boot isn’t a solution.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      Leroy Jethro Gibbs earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Conversation Starter
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Month Later
      AndreaB earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      agatameier earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      agatameier earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      518
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      198
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      147
    4. 4
      ATLien_0
      93
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      77
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!