• 0

Invision Power Board 2.1 Road Map


Question

Well it looks like Matt and all the guys working on IPB 2.1 are working hard because the last time I checked this it was mostly all showing black and now most of it's in green...

Invision Power Board 2.1 Road Map

NEW FEATURES / MAJOR ENHANCEMENTS:

Updated core structure to IPS Kernel level 2.1

ACP: Abstract hard coded HTML to template files

Rename and re-organize library and class files

Rich Text Editor (WYSIWYG) (Per user option)

User email validation then admin approval

RSS / SSI overhaul

Library Functions and Pre-made response templates

Multiple Option Polls

ACP: Templates: Export each bit to HTML (in folder structure)

ACP: Templates: Template link function to link DB templates to text files in filesyste or URL.

ACP: Task manager, task lock

ACP: Localized language packs

ACP: Per admin section permissions

ACP: Improved Language tools (write to DB, cache to PHP aka templates)

ACP: CSS interface improvement (reduce # classes, sep. areas)

ACP: Rebuild member's rank information

ACP: Task Manager / Forum Prune functionality

ACP: Register Modules Framework

ACP: IP match (change to first 3 octets only)

ACP: Templates: Search and Replace makes new templates if matches found in default templates

ACP: Option: Quote embed limit

ACP: Skin infinite inheritence / recursion

Multiple Calendars

Forum Marking

IPB Portal overhaul

Post Parsing overhaul

Topic open and close times

Option to defer topic view counter incrementation

FRONT END IMPROVEMENTS:

De-clutter some ACP components with DHTML

De-clutter some front facing components

INTERNAL IMPROVEMENTS:

Post Parser

Rewrite, clean up code, make more efficient

Emailing Class Re-write

Two classes: One email class and one IPB wrapper

Option to load other language files.

Ability to "hold" an item in the mail queue for later processing

Session Location Integration

Make it easier for modules to update session location

User Control Panel Modularization

Separate out the menu generation

Log in Abstraction

Separate out log in methods to independent classes

Subscription Manager Overhaul

Write glue layer between gateway modules and SM

Send emails to member confirming new subscription and shortly before subscription anniversary/expiration

Easy install new gateway from ACP

Caching

Make option to cache to hard disk

Reduce overhead on forum cache

Comment Spamming

Option to add rel="nofollow" into all posted links (group option?)

Green: Finished Items

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/310047-invision-power-board-21-road-map/
Share on other sites

23 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • 0
Thats pretty awesome.

although I have NO plans of upgrading again. I'm still having too much fun with 2.0.3 :p

585795844[/snapback]

you'll have even more fun with 2.1 then.. lol

btw.. just curious. how many clients have u made a skin for up to date? :p

  • 0

@acido00, you can find the page here: http://www.invisionboard.com/?ipb21roadmap

@fat tony, you should of made the post purty like this: lol was bored. :(

NEW FEATURES / MAJOR ENHANCEMENTS:

  • Updated core structure to IPS Kernel level 2.1
  • ACP: Abstract hard coded HTML to template files
  • Rename and re-organize library and class files
  • Rich Text Editor (WYSIWYG) (Per user option)
  • User email validation then admin approval
  • RSS / SSI overhaul
  • Library Functions and Pre-made response templates
  • Multiple Option Polls
  • ACP: Templates: Export each bit to HTML (in folder structure)
  • ACP: Templates: Template link function to link DB templates to text files in filesyste or URL.
  • ACP: Task manager, task lock
  • ACP: Localized language packs
  • ACP: Per admin section permissions
  • ACP: Improved Language tools (write to DB, cache to PHP aka templates)
  • ACP: CSS interface improvement (reduce # classes, sep. areas)
  • ACP: Rebuild member's rank information
  • ACP: Task Manager / Forum Prune functionality
  • ACP: Register Modules Framework
  • ACP: IP match (change to first 3 octets only)
  • ACP: Templates: Search and Replace makes new templates if matches found in default templates
  • ACP: Option: Quote embed limit
  • ACP: Skin infinite inheritence / recursion
  • Multiple Calendars
  • Forum Marking
  • IPB Portal overhaul
  • Post Parsing overhaul
  • Topic open and close times
  • Option to defer topic view counter incrementation
  • Topic rating (per forum and per group)

FRONT END IMPROVEMENTS:

  • De-clutter some ACP components with DHTML
  • De-clutter some front facing components

INTERNAL IMPROVEMENTS:

  • Post Parser
    • Rewrite, clean up code, make more efficient

    [*]Emailing Class Re-write

    • Two classes: One email class and one IPB wrapper
    • Option to load other language files.
    • Ability to "hold" an item in the mail queue for later processing

    [*]Session Location Integration

    • Make it easier for modules to update session location

    [*]User Control Panel Modularization

    • Separate out the menu generation

    [*]Log in Abstraction

    • Separate out log in methods to independent classes

    [*]Subscription Manager Overhaul

    • Write glue layer between gateway modules and SM
    • Send emails to member confirming new subscription and shortly before subscription anniversary/expiration
    • Easy install new gateway from ACP

    [*]Caching

    • Make option to cache to hard disk
    • Reduce overhead on forum cache

    [*]Comment Spamming

    • Option to add rel="nofollow" into all posted links (group option?)

Looks a lot sexier now, haha.

Green: Finished Items ? Black: Unfinished Items ? Gray: Delayed for future release

  • 0

Yes Timdorr I believe Matt has a lot of work on at the moment and I have seen IP Dyanamic and it looks pretty good... I am not one for shouting my mouth off (well some times) but, I think this could take over some of the products like PHNuke and Virtuanews... Although both of these products are first class IP Dynamic is a sound product and you will be able to produce a front-end site with ease.

Actually, Matt's the only one that codes it. And he's doing both IPB 2.1 and IPDynamic 1.0 at the same time :o

585793134[/snapback]

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • My father still uses a programme written in dbase3. Still manages to work with a little help from dosbox. 
    • Microsoft hides these secret Windows 11 performance boost settings available on every PC by Sayan Sen Windows enthusiasts often look for ways to extract as much performance out of their systems as possible, and it's often the case that they try and do so while trying to minimize the heat and power consumption. This is especially relevant in the case of mobile Windows PCs since laptops and notebooks tend to get hot and management of that heat and power is harder in such a form factor. As such users often turn to techniques like under-volting which can be used to squeeze out the maximum capabilities of a chip while also maintaining lowered power levels. There are official apps from AMD and Intel with the likes of Ryzen Master and XTU (Extreme Tuning Utility). While these are quite handy, most enthusiasts probably prefer to dig into the BIOS and play around with settings there like Curve Optimizer on Ryzen, which lets users set various frequency-voltage scaling values. These are essentially called P-States. If you are not familiar with them, Processor Power Management is done through Advanced Configuration and Power Interface (ACPI) P-states and C-states. While P-states or performance pwoer states handle CPU voltage-frequency scaling, C-states deal with CPU sleep states so that some of the CPU functions, which are not necessary at that moment, can be disabled. The P-states and C-states work together to make the processor run more efficiently. It helps the OS and apps determine which cores can be parked and which should be boosted. Of course not every user is an enthusiast or knows the technicalities and integrities of how things like overclocking or undervolting work. Thankfully for them Windows itself offers something pretty cool, though it is hidden by default on all systems. By default, Windows only has two P-States, "Minimum Processor State" and "Maximum Processor State." However, this can be changed with a Registry trick to expand the options under a secret "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown. This essentially enables the HWP or hardware P-States available on a device, and these are not controlled just by the OS itself as the underlying hardware gets involved too. In total there are five Processor Performance Boost Mode profiles that control how Windows requests and allows CPU turbo/boost behavior under the different power policies. They are: Disabled: In this mode, processor boosting is effectively turned off. The CPU will avoid entering turbo or boost frequencies and instead operate closer to its base frequency ceiling. This can significantly reduce power consumption and heat output, but at the cost of reduced burst performance and responsiveness in short workloads. Enabled: This is the standard behavior where boost functionality is allowed under normal conditions. The processor can opportunistically increase frequency when workload demands it, balancing performance gains with power and thermal constraints as managed by the system. Aggressive: Aggressive mode favors performance more heavily, allowing the CPU to enter higher boost states more readily and sustain them longer. This should in theory improve responsiveness under bursty or heavy workloads but increases power draw and thermal output compared to the default enabled behavior. Efficient Enabled: This mode still allows boosting, but with a stronger bias toward energy efficiency. The system attempts to use boost more selectively, avoiding unnecessary frequency spikes when the performance gain is marginal. Efficient Aggressive: This is a hybrid approach where boost is still performance-responsive, but the system continuously weighs efficiency more heavily than in Aggressive mode. It aims to deliver noticeable performance improvements while reducing wasted power in less demanding scenarios. Here's how to enable the Processor performance boost mode: Open Registry Editor: Press Win+R, type regedit, and click OK. Go to: HKLM\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\Power\PowerSettings\54533251-82be-4824-96c1-47b60b740d00\be337238-0d82-4146-a960-4f3749d470c7 (where HKLM stands for HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE_) Modify the value of Attributes from 1 to 2 (you can find modify option by right-clicking) After that, exit Registry, you should now be able to see the new "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown menu: As you can see there are now five new P-States or CPPC states or power profile available that help define the boost mode processor setting on your PC. Wrapping it up here's a quick run-down of the settings as defined by Microsoft itself. Setting Description Disabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is disabled. Collaborative Processor Performance Control (CPPC) behaviour is disabled. Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Efficient Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Efficient Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows calculates the desired extra performance above the guaranteed performance level, and asks the processor to deliver that specific performance level. Efficient Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows always asks the processor to deliver the highest possible performance above the guaranteed performance level. In the next part we shall be comparing these settings to explore how much of a benefit or regression they can provide in terms of performance and power efficiency. If you decide to change the values on your system and are experiencing problems like crashes or an overheating PC, make sure to revert the steps back to the original state.
    • I think he means you haven't reviewed previous UFC games. Of course it doesn't matter... Every time you just report on something that involves the President even if just simply what happened you guys usually get accused of being anti-Trump. We live in fun times.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      Leroy Jethro Gibbs earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Conversation Starter
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Month Later
      AndreaB earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      agatameier earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      agatameier earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      518
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      198
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      147
    4. 4
      ATLien_0
      93
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      77
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!