Linksys wireless network cards


Recommended Posts

I've got a linksys wireless network card model WMP54G and there is no support from linksys for liinux. I'm running FC3 and i've been trying to get ndiswrapper working. Its some kind of emulator/ compiler for windows drivers. I'm noob so i'm not sure. I'm getting warnings about a 4k stack option and how i should have an 8k stack. I don't know how to do this. I think if i get that figured out, i can work through the rest learning as i go. if not i'll post again.

Also, if you have any other ideas about how to get this card working, they would be appreciated.

I'm getting pretty frustrated here.

thx

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/310543-linksys-wireless-network-cards/
Share on other sites

There a guid specfic to fedora and one that more genral @ https://www.neowin.net/forum/index.php?showtopic=292721 you use a few program called ndiswrapper good luck

EDIT: http://ndiswrapper.sourceforge.net/phpwiki/index.php/Fedora click on one of the links for a 8 stack kernel.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Why should simply opening the Action Center ... require any significant amount of CPU cycles? Too many are ignoring the elephant in the room: today's CPUs may have similar clock frequencies to CPUs from a decade ago (~4 to 5 GHz), but they run with far higher performance per clock, even on the smallest E-cores. The Action Center is a static, minor desktop element. It ought to open instantly on any CPU made in the past 2.5 decades at even low clocks. Opening a program? Boost away. Unzipping a file? Boost to your heart's content. Right-clicking the notification area? This should be an ultra-efficient, low-impact event that opens instantly. Compare today's UI elements to Windows 7 UI elements. Today's UI elements hardly do anything more substantial or important or critical, yet now require modern-day processors to jump half a GHz to reduce their latency.
    • This is not an option lmao: it is part of the KB5094126 update, pushed to all users. There is no GUI to configure it. Reading the article should be required for commenting.
    • Can you recommend me a good Pixel 7 on eBay? Because some are saying Gen 1, and I don't think that's what I want, right?
    • Close, but it is for any application starting, not just during boot time. In fact, it probably will not improve boot time at all because during a boot, the CPU is already boosting, so a pre-boost wouldn't change anything. I agree that it isn't exciting (especially considering every other OS already does it), but it is a good thing, even if they are just playing catch up.
    • Any so called performance increase will be in milliseconds, which nobody will actually notice in real world usage.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      slackerzz earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Year In
      highriskpaym earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Month Later
      highriskpaym earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      highriskpaym earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      FBSPL earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      501
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      198
    3. 3
      +Edouard
      156
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      84
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!