Linux is being sluggish


Recommended Posts

I've recently put Yellow Dog Linux in my iBook and have been running it for awhile and I've noticed that is a bit slower than the other mac OS's I use, is it normal for Linux to take longer opening applications and web pages? I've checked their webpage and my iBook is supported and I want to see if this is a problem I can solve.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/310710-linux-is-being-sluggish/
Share on other sites

Linux can be optimized, fellas.

The issue is, how much are you willing to screw up, and how much do you want to learn?

Some relatively easy fixes:

First, you can shut off unneeded services, such as Samba, and Apache, on a laptop. Also you might want to consider shutting off any networking by default, since we're talking laptops: it might not be always connected. You can restart it later via the console.

Second, you can recompile the kernel, removing support for anything you don't need. The kernel is getting big, and can run everything from a lappy 486 to a mainframe. You don't need everything loaded. Follow the directions to the letter though, or your system will get fubared.

Third, you can aggressively manage your memory. IF you are running KDE, and you have only 256MB, you've got a problem. Linux is, at it's heart, Unix like, which means real multitasking, which places a premium on RAM.

You can get around having low available ram by forcing the kernel to drop everything into the /swap partition, but since I've never done it, I don't know what sort of increase you can get from it. More RAM is generally better, and cheaper, so, get 512 or greater.

If you can't get more RAM, consider using another DE as a host for KDE apps. For example, XFCE is pleasant to look at, functional, but takes up less system resources than KDE. If you open KOffice, for example, while in XFCE, it's only going to use the processes it absolutely needs to support the app.

Finally, you can play around with the CFLAGS when you compile/recompile. A good link on this is:

http://linuxreviews.org/howtos/compiling/

Gentoo users are old hats at this. Consider this the advanced option. There is a link off that page which gives safe CFLAGS options by architecture.

Good luck.

Meh, the Gentoo speed increase is over-rated. The real power Gentoo has is portage and the "hands off" approach of installing/updating software.

And, the truth is, desktop applications do seem to start slower. You can get big speed increases by pre-linking your libraries, but I find it's annoying to have to constantly prelink them everytime you update your software.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Why should simply opening the Action Center ... require any significant amount of CPU cycles? Too many are ignoring the elephant in the room: today's CPUs may have similar clock frequencies to CPUs from a decade ago (~4 to 5 GHz), but they run with far higher performance per clock, even on the smallest E-cores. The Action Center is a static, minor desktop element. It ought to open instantly on any CPU made in the past 2.5 decades at even low clocks. Opening a program? Boost away. Unzipping a file? Boost to your heart's content. Right-clicking the notification area? This should be an ultra-efficient, low-impact event that opens instantly. Compare today's UI elements to Windows 7 UI elements. Today's UI elements hardly do anything more substantial or important or critical, yet now require modern-day processors to jump half a GHz to reduce their latency.
    • This is not an option lmao: it is part of the KB5094126 update, pushed to all users. There is no GUI to configure it. Reading the article should be required for commenting.
    • Can you recommend me a good Pixel 7 on eBay? Because some are saying Gen 1, and I don't think that's what I want, right?
    • Close, but it is for any application starting, not just during boot time. In fact, it probably will not improve boot time at all because during a boot, the CPU is already boosting, so a pre-boost wouldn't change anything. I agree that it isn't exciting (especially considering every other OS already does it), but it is a good thing, even if they are just playing catch up.
    • Any so called performance increase will be in milliseconds, which nobody will actually notice in real world usage.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      slackerzz earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Year In
      highriskpaym earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Month Later
      highriskpaym earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      highriskpaym earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      FBSPL earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      501
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      198
    3. 3
      +Edouard
      156
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      84
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!