Recommended Posts

I live in Texas and use AT&T Wireless GSM. My current phone is a tri-band 850/1800/1900. I want to get a Motorola MPx200, but it says its only dual band 1800/1900. I know this phone was sold here in Texas and across the US. Will this MPx200 work here? I heard that most of the GSM phones here in the US use the 850 (800) band. Could someone please clarify this?

Edited by RangerLG
Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/311692-im-confused/
Share on other sites

Well, I know here in the US, the bands for GSM are 850 and 1900 MHz. What I am not sure of is if this phone will get a signal where I am at. I do not want to purchase a phone with poor or no coverage. Also, what I have learned is that AT&T requested Motorola remove the 900 band from their phones so even if you do unlock the 900 MHz band in the software, it is still not present on the hardware. These are US phones with AT&T branding.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/311692-im-confused/#findComment-585814308
Share on other sites

AT&T requested Motorola remove the 900 band from their phones so even if you do unlock the 900 MHz band in the software, it is still not present on the hardware.? These are US phones with AT&T branding.

585814308[/snapback]

at&t did not ask moto to remove 900 (thats absurd)... simple untrue. most new moto models are quad band. (see 400-v3 850/900/1800/1900).

anwyays the dual band will work. northamerica runs on 1900/850. euro, asian, pacific use 900/1800. although having 4 bands is better than 3 and having two bands supported is better than 1. you'll be fine, otherwise, why would they sell it.

Edited by linsook
Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/311692-im-confused/#findComment-585816457
Share on other sites

at&t did not ask moto to remove 900 (thats absurd)... simple untrue. most new moto models are quad band. (see 400-v3 850/900/1800/1900).

anwyays the dual band will work. northamerica runs on 1900/850.  euro, asian, pacific use 900/1800. although having 4 bands is better than 3 and having two bands supported is better than 1. you'll be fine, otherwise, why would they sell it.

585816457[/snapback]

did you not read my post? First of all, the 900 band was removed from the phone, but was added back in with software hacks. Secondly, getting an ATT phone that doesn't support 850 is a poor decision, as of now. The reception quality is not that great and will not get better since they are only puuting up 850 towers now.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/311692-im-confused/#findComment-585817946
Share on other sites

:laugh: :shifty:

did you not read my post? First of all, the 900 band was removed from the phone, but was added back in with software hacks. Secondly, getting an ATT phone that doesn't support 850 is a poor decision, as of now. The reception quality is not that great and will not get better since they are only puuting up 850 towers now.

585817946[/snapback]

YOU TELL HIM CHRIS! YOU GOT DA POWER! :laugh:

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/311692-im-confused/#findComment-585817962
Share on other sites

incorrect info? of course having 850 is good. and yes they be only putting up new 850 and not expanding on 1900. but 1900 worked. telling him haveing a phone that jsut supported 1900 is a bad choice is incorrect. you could say havign 850 is bette but you cant sit there and tell me getting only 1900 is bad.

edit: before 850 was introduced there was 1900... it worked. and its still there. so a dualband that only has 1900/1800 supported is fine. but with 850 its just better. we have the same phones, the v551. before this i had the e715. it was triband. and 1900 only for northamerica. was it a bad choice in a phone? no. do i still use it yes? why? cause this motorola battery sux ass. do i like the 850 on the v551? yes. i get reception in the vault where my e715 wouldnt. so is having only 1900 supported bad? no. with 1900 and 850... its jsut better.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/311692-im-confused/#findComment-585817980
Share on other sites

This is what I read on a forum:

Posted Apr 20, 2005, 3:46 PM ET

To MOTO200 and other owners of AT&T

There are figures - 1.8/1.9 under the battery on a label that means 1800/1900 GSM. Check up. If it is true - it's useless to try to fix it. Tribands were in the first deliveries of MPx200 to the USA, then under the order AT&T - twobands . Now, because of this trick with a network there's a hell of MPx200 from AT&T on eBay.

What is blocking 900 - no one told officially! But the thing is that AT&T asked Motorola to make changes in transceiver of the telephone (on the hardware level). So it's not possible to solve the problem on the software level. Condolences to all who bought the telephones from AT&T on eBay

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/311692-im-confused/#findComment-585825168
Share on other sites

This is what I read on a forum:

Posted Apr 20, 2005, 3:46 PM ET

To MOTO200 and other owners of AT&T

There are figures - 1.8/1.9 under the battery on a label that means 1800/1900 GSM. Check up. If it is true - it's useless to try to fix it. Tribands were in the first deliveries of MPx200 to the USA, then under the order AT&T - twobands . Now, because of this trick with a network there's a hell of MPx200 from AT&T on eBay.

What is blocking 900 - no one told officially! But the thing is that AT&T asked Motorola to make changes in transceiver of the telephone (on the hardware level). So it's not possible to solve the problem on the software level. Condolences to all who bought the telephones from AT&T on eBay

585825168[/snapback]

i c. well it doesnt matter really. we dont use 900 in north america.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/311692-im-confused/#findComment-585826417
Share on other sites

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Glad these prices are starting to come down, but that is still crazy. I bought the 2TB 9100 Pro (slightly more expensive version with PCIe 5.0) last year for $240.
    • The 2TB Samsung 990 PRO NVMe SSD hits lowest price in over three months by Sayan Sen Yesterday, we covered a really good deal wherein you can get a 4TB TeamGroup T-FORCE G50 NVMe PCIe Gen4 SSD for a low price of just $400 with a special discount coupon. That's just $100 per TB, making it a very good offer during these hard times. The deal is still live, so you can check it out in its dedicated article here if you do not want to miss out. Meanwhile, if you don't have that kind of budget but still wish to buy an SSD for a good price, the 2TB variant of the TeamGroup SSD at $280 its lowest price in over three months. Meanwhile, those seeking 2TB but faster performance can check out Samsung's 990 PRO, which has hit the lowest price also in the last quarter or so, as it's on sale for $370 (purchase links under the specs table down below). Thus, you want a faster drive, get the 990 Pro, or you want more capacity, grab the TeamGroup 4TB linked in the first para. The 990 PRO is a PCIe Gen4 NVMe SSD and still one of the fastest drives available today for under $500. Speaking of fast, sequential reads and writes are rated at 7450 MB/s and 6900 MB/s, respectively. The random throughputs for reads and writes are 1400K IOPS and 1550K IOPS, respectively. The 990 PRO is based on Samsung's 7th Gen V-NAND flash, and it too is TLC. It packs 2 gigs of LPDDR4 DRAM cache, which helps the random performance. The endurance rating for this is 1200 TBW (terabytes written), which should be sufficient for most users. The Samsung 990 PRO is compatible with the PlayStation 5, but if you are going to use the 990 PRO on a PC, check out the Samsung Magician app that lets you track your drive's health, update its firmware, customize various settings, and more. The tech specs are given below: Specification TeamGroup T-FORCE G50 2TB Samsung 990 PRO 2TB Interface PCIe 4.0 x4, NVMe 1.4 PCIe Gen 4.0 x4, NVMe 2.0 Form Factor M.2 2280 M.2 2280 Controller InnoGrit Controller Samsung In-house Controller NAND Flash 3D TLC 3D TLC DRAM Cache None (HMB supported) 2GB LPDDR4 Sequential Read (Max) 5,000 MB/s 7,450 MB/s Sequential Write (Max) 4,500 MB/s 6,900 MB/s Random Read (4K) Up to 600,000 IOPS Up to 1,400,000 IOPS Random Write (4K) Up to 700,000 IOPS Up to 1,550,000 IOPS TBW (Endurance) 1,300 TBW 1,200 TBW MTBF 3,000,000 hours 1,500,000 hours Operating Temperature 0°C to 70°C 0°C to 70°C Storage Temperature -40°C to 85°C -40°C to 85°C Shock Resistance 1,500G / 0.5ms 1,500G / 0.5ms Heatsink Patented Graphene Heat Spreader No Get them at the links below: Samsung 990 PRO SSD 2TB (MZ-V9P2T0B/AM): $369.99 (Sold and Shipped by Amazon US) TEAMGROUP T-Force G50 2TB SSD (TM8FFE002T0C129): $279.99 (Sold by TeamGroup, Shipped by Amazon US) Good to know This Amazon deal is U.S. specific, and not available in other regions unless specified. We only use first-party seller links (at the time of article publishing); ensure that you purchase from a first-party seller link only. Check out Today's Deals on Amazon | or our recent tech deals. Become a Prime member (for Students or SNAP) via Neowin Get Prime Access - Prime for half price (for qualifying Medicaid, EBT, SNAP) Subscribe to Prime Video, Audible Plus, Music Unlimited or Kindle Unlimited via Neowin As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • If you can't spell a simple word that 2nd graders learn, your entire argument is suspect.
    • And here goes the "Won't someone think of the children" brigade. Get stuffed mate. This has NOTHING to do with making the internet safe. It's about tracking adults, spying on your online activity, and sending the boys around when they don't like something you post. Also, again, parliament have voted TWICE against this, and Starmer is going ahead anyway. THAT is anti-democratic bullsh**. They will use this law to track you, they will use this law to control you, and they will use this law to punish you if they don't like what you do, even if it's legal. And your data? Say bye bye to that. It'll be on the darkweb in weeks. I'm not some rando online. I've been an IT professional for 40 years, many of it in security. I know exactly what this means and what will happen to your data. I do not consent and I will not comply.
    • "...but it may not be Microsoft's fault" seems like a reasonable way to tease what is going on without leaving the user with a false impression that an update is the problem. A title isn't a summery, it is meant to entice the user to read the article. It should not contain a misleading premise; which this title does not. You could maybe complain that the first paragraph should have included that detail. The writing style popularized over 100 years ago in newspapers will cover the most important information as soon as possible with details and nuance added later; the idea being that with each new paragraph you have less of the reader's focus.
  • Recent Achievements

    • First Post
      Jocimo earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      suprememobiles48 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      Prasann earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Prasann earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      520
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      174
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      90
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      81
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      70
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!