Recommended Posts

hi all,

i'm a graphic designer focused on web/multimedia designs for the last 3 yrs or so and have been working on intel PCs, but now moving towards print publishing and the intel cant handle the large HI RES files. therefore looking to buy a new pc now most of the industry ppl suggested go with MAC.

BUT most of the people said that the AMD 64bit athlon 55 fx is faster than a MAC, price aint the issue i just want to buy a PC soley for design work not for gaming purposes so can you ppl help me decide which to go for AMD or a MAC and with what configuration. The application i'll be using would ofcourse the ADOBE suite (photoshop, indesign, illustrator) so will these run faster on MAC or AMD handling file size from 700mb to 1gig. (typically posters, billboards n all)

your help would be highly appreciative.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/312353-mac-or-amd/
Share on other sites

the comparison is of MAC system (with ofcourse Mac OS + G5 processor) and AMD system (winXp) since both are 64 bit, i wanna know which would be best for print publishing work. I've had a bad experience with intel so now that im willing to spend money i want to get a faster machine, dont like to spend big bucks only to find that it wasnt worth it.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/312353-mac-or-amd/#findComment-585820736
Share on other sites

hmmmm........I dont think my opinion would be to good of input cause the only mac i have used was in the public libraries in my high school. they were fast at the time, but in todays time, to me nothing beats an AMD, no matter what the benchmarks say. I have a 3500+ and its awesome, video rendering and photoshop and what not are really fast.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/312353-mac-or-amd/#findComment-585820765
Share on other sites

personally when having many windows open at the same time, OSX handles them way nicer. expose and the fact that each window is its own seperate entity...

with windows xp, photoshop images are limited to within the "photoshop application" where in os x you can do whatever you want with all the windows...

i don't know if that makes sense, but if you have used both systems i think you would understand...

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/312353-mac-or-amd/#findComment-585820780
Share on other sites

ADOBE suite (photoshop, indesign, illustrator)

None of these apps are 64-bit yet on either platform.

i wanna know which would be best for print publishing work.

A PowerPC based PC will be faster than an x86-64 based PC at multimedia work because PowerPC CPUs have faster vector execution units than x86 CPUs.

AMD or a MAC

That should be "AMD or a Mac". you really make yourself look ignorant when you call it a "MAC".

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/312353-mac-or-amd/#findComment-585820788
Share on other sites

this is POWER MAC config im aiming at i dont know about the display, APPLE display are just too expensive can anyone suggest a better alternative:

? Dual 2.5GHz PowerPC G5

? 1GB DDR400 SDRAM (PC3200) - 2x512

? 160GB Serial ATA - 7200rpm

? ATI Radeon 9600 XT w/128MB DDR SDRAM

? 8x SuperDrive (DVD-R/CD-RW)

? Apple Keyboard & Apple Mouse - U.S. English

? Mac OS X - U.S. English

I dont know about the AMD config, still need help on that

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/312353-mac-or-amd/#findComment-585820802
Share on other sites

Either AMD or Mac would be a good choice, but do tell about the bad experience with Intel... ;)

I do the same kind of work that you're planning to do, and to be totally honest, either platform would be fine. It depends on what you're comfortable with, and with what your clients use the most.

Both platforms have the same software, and as far as 64bit goes... forget it, I seriously doubt that Adobe will release 64bit versions of their software (in the near future) for either platform, when 32bit versions would run faster in either environment. Even Apple has said that their 64bit environment in Tiger is for command prompt apps and that even though Tiger is 64bit, the UI is still part of the 32bit system. The same with XP, you might find a performance degredation using 64bit XP with 32bit apps.

I'd concentrate on a fast processor, great video card, FAST hard drives and lots of ram. Btw... what kind of files would be 700mb to a gig?... getting them run out to film would be a nighmare and costly...

Hope my 2 cents worth helps :)

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/312353-mac-or-amd/#findComment-585821011
Share on other sites

hmm get either samsung or viewsonic and 20inch or more. well crts have better colour accuracy and are able to display mulitple resolutions. but they have greater eye strain and consume more power. lcds have dvi, perfect geometry, take up less space. so its up to you to decide which you prefer. a good crt would be the LaCie ElectronBlue

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/312353-mac-or-amd/#findComment-585821067
Share on other sites

If you use adobe suite, I really suggest you get a Mac, in my studio, we used have two powermac, with adobe, it runs really much faster on mac, and mac is much easier to operate.

Then my stupid manager wanted avid, then we changed to one intel xeon and one athlon fx, ye, the avid seems better then final cut, but photoshop runs much slower.

My home computer is a powerbook, compare to my flatmate's centrino adobe runs faster, colour is more correct, but macromedia doesn't run well on mac.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/312353-mac-or-amd/#findComment-585821335
Share on other sites

I use my iBook for lots of photoshop and illustrator work. It runs them perfectly. Only complaint is that I could do with more memory.

Am considering getting a powermac, but would need to take on more work than I can at the moment due to Uni. Is over in a few weeks, so we'll see how things are going then. :)

In reply to what Hanxu said about macromedia apps, I would say they run just as well on the mac. In fact, I get extremely annoyed with them running slowly on the 3.4Ghz P4 one of my clients has!!

Dougal.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/312353-mac-or-amd/#findComment-585835088
Share on other sites

My vote really really really goes for the Mac in this case. I've been working in and out of some major blueprint restoration in which Im dealing with massive, high res, uncompressed images. While the "old" Macs I have will open these files with ease, it took several resolution-drops to get the images to even open on my AthXP machine. Maybe it was just an isolated, odd event and had I played with it more things would have worked. But I think that for really big files, the Mac is gonna have an edge, just because of the way it handles memory.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/312353-mac-or-amd/#findComment-585835577
Share on other sites

Consider it carefully. Try out OS X and see if you like it more than Windows.

For me, I have an Athlon 64 3000+ w/ 1 GIG of RAM. Its supposed to make me 'more' productive, but I find Windows holds me back. The software isn't as powerful in some cases (iCal kicks Outlook), the Unix stuff kicks the DOS shell..... I find I'll be more productive with OS X.

Its a purchase I regret making and will be selling my PC.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/312353-mac-or-amd/#findComment-585835684
Share on other sites

At my current job I'm using a Dual Xeon 2.8 with 2GB of RAM. It belonged to one of the other designers who switched for a powerbook. At my last job I used a dual 1.42 GHz G4 with 1.5 GB of RAM (or maybe it was 2 GB?I can't remember anymore). My current system has some sort of flashy SATA 10k RPM hard disks in it, my old one ran SCSI drives. The machine on my desk is woefully inadequate but that's another thread.

The faster computer?and in terms of raw number crunching power my PC is much quicker than my old Powermac in most circumstances?has made me less productive. Part of it has to do with the software I take for granted on a mac not being available on a Windows PC (skedit, the command line environment, applescripts), and part of it has to do with the general clunkiness (IMO) of the Windows GUI. "Business Instant Messenger" is completely unintuitive compared to Adium or in the case of 10.4 iChat. Photoshop's stupid MDI interface is a pain. Zend Studio seems crappier on Windows than on any other platform, but then it's always been a pig. Task management is nightmarish: I find the taskbar completely lacking for multi-monitor window management, etc. etc. etc.

For all the "problems' I have with the PC I use, the one thing that has never really been an issue is the performance. When I'm working the slowest part of the equation is almost always me. If you gave me a 10,000 GHz system I wouldn't be able to work any faster: creative work goes at it's own speed and for me a dual 1.25 is capable of getting the job done.

If you work is paying for your machine then use whatever you enjoy using. I'll be switching over to a powermac reasonably soon - not because it's faster but because it means I'll get more work done in a day. Most of the other people on my team will be moving to macs over the next year, so will the systems department but there's only 3 of them. Developers still prefer the Dell workstations they've been on: I'm not sure what their reasoning is - but they're smart people so I'm sure they know what they're doing.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/312353-mac-or-amd/#findComment-585835737
Share on other sites

Guys, we need people with experience with top-of-the line Macs AND top of line PCs with AMD processors.

585840511[/snapback]

If you really want I'll go over to one of the developers and ask to borrow their machine (they use HP 9300s) but it's not going to matter one bit. As long as the computer doesn't run OS X I'm not going to be as productive as I am on a Mac. Likewise, if you sat one of those guys in-front of a powermac or sun workstation they'll get less done than if you gave them a Windows XP machine.

Once you pass a certain point?a point that varies from person to person & job to job?creative work stops being hardware bound. The software is what really makes the difference, so when money is not a concern you should always use what you like.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/312353-mac-or-amd/#findComment-585840785
Share on other sites

I'm using only a dual Opteron myself - a friend of mine is into pre-press and design, he has a dual G5 at work. He prefers to work at my machine for it's way faster compared to the Mac (according to him - makes sense, the Opteron is faster according to most benchmarks), and he currently tries to convince the company he works at to replace all Macs with Athlon64 and Opteron systems (depending on the workload). He mostly uses Mirage instead of Photoshop (which is available for Windows and OSX), and the Mirage OSX port is somewhat premature, but he also tells me all the time how crappy Adobe software like Illustrator and Indesign performs on the Mac compared to the Opteron. He's not really into PC's, just wants to get his work done, and he doesn't like OSX for it's 'toyish' look and feel. He doesn't really like Windows, too, used to use Linux-based workstations where he worked before, but that's a different issue - at least, on an AMD64 system, you'll have the ability to use Windows _and_ Linux (with Xen and future CPUs even at the same time, without a performance penalty - and yes, I know that it's possible to use Linux on a Mac, but there's no commercial software - like VivaDesigner, Softimage|XSI or Apples very own Shake - for Linux/ PPC)...

One thing also to consider is that Adobe officially stated that Windows is the platform of choice for their software, and due to the recent Macromedia deal, there might be no other alternative soon!

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/312353-mac-or-amd/#findComment-585856485
Share on other sites

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Louis Rossmann suing Samsung over "990 Pro SSD warranty scam" by Sayan Sen Back in 2023, if you recall, Neowin reviewer Robbie Khan had a dispute with Samsung over his 990 Pro SSD, which was rapidly losing its health. After significant back and forth, the tech giant had finally released firmware to "stop" the issue. Interestingly, its previous flagship at the time, the 980 Pro was also facing problems leading to two consecutive sets of firmware fixes. Three years later, it looks like a similar conflict has now broken out between tech repair entrepreneur YouTuber Louis Rossmann and Samsung, as it has escalated into a threatened lawsuit after the company allegedly refused to appropriately replace a failing 990 Pro SSD that remained under warranty. According to Rossmann, a 4TB Samsung 990 Pro NVMe SSD purchased for approximately $330 less than two years ago, began experiencing major hiccups and issues, even though he claims it had been operated under ideal cooling conditions. It was installed in a RAID 1 array and cooled by a heatsink and dual high-speed fans. However the drive reportedly started dropping out of the array, exhibiting controller-level failures that eventually became not useable in any meaningful way. Rossmann said Samsung’s support process was marked by delays and confusion from the very start. After initially contacting the wrong regional support channel, he was redirected to Samsung’s memory support division where he submitted detailed diagnostics, logs, and proof of purchase. Rossmann runs a repair company and owns an ACE Lab PC-3000 machine, which is a professional-grade data recovery equipment. As such, he had been confident in his diagnostics. Samsung even seemingly acknowledged that later. Regardless, Rossmann claims that his initial support ticket was automatically closed before a full 24-hour response window had elapsed, forcing him to reopen the case and resubmit documentation. The controversy however intensified further from here after Samsung accepted the drive for warranty evaluation but later returned it with a repair report stating that the drive had passed its testing and that the SSD had been verified as functional. Rossmann strongly disputed those claims citing that his own independent testing on PC-3000 showed write speeds reducing to as low as 40–60 MB/s before the drive failed entirely. Samsung subsequently informed him that the SSD had been reset and reflashed, passing internal stress tests. However, the company also stated that replacement units were unavailable due to an industry-wide memory shortage and suggested that a refund process could be initiated if further testing confirmed the fault. Thus, to settle, the company offered a refund of $330, the amount that was initially paid by him to make the purchase. Here, Rossmann pointed out the seeming hypocrisy of the tech giant as in how no Samsung drive was apparently allocated for warranty replacements, but they were abundantly available for retail sales especially when using business accounts. As you can see, Rossmann is indeed right, there are Samsung 990 Pro 4TB SSDs on Amazon currently for $950 (shipped and sold by first-party Amazon US itself), and they are also available on Samsung's own store too, albeit for an even higher price of $1100. Thus Rossmann argues that Samsung’s inability or unwillingness to provide a replacement while the same model remains available for purchase at significantly higher market prices reflects a failure to honor its warranty obligations. He has issued a formal 60-day notice and says he intends to file suit in Texas small claims court, asserting that companies should face greater costs for denying legitimate warranty claims than for fulfilling them. You can check out the full video titled "Samsung's 990 Pro SSD warranty policy is a scam; I'm taking them to court," at the link below. Source and image: Louis Rossmann (YouTube) As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases
    • Was it too much to ask to show the icon in this article?
    • Frankly, I blame whoever is writing such articles. "A big improvement/update and/or new feature is now available to everyone! Also, use this unofficial tweak tool to enable it because it actually isn't available to you yet officially and might not in fact even be entirely ready or whatever, hence why it is perhaps not enabled for you*. But it's great and you should enable it!" I mean there's nothing wrong with sharing info about some feature you might need to enable via unofficial means, of course. It's just that these articles tend to essentially end up being two news pieces in one, and one of them tends to be a bit misleading. (*Yes, yes, the "it's a controlled rollout!" thing. Not a fan of that one either. The argument, not the actual rollout.)
    • Thank you. Will do. I read in the release notes that editor config might be at play here.
    • Actually, I think even Microsoft doesn't know how to control it
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      davidbazooked earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Jamswaz earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Jamswaz earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Rookie
      Marzoid went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Community Regular
      coch went up a rank
      Community Regular
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      509
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      185
    3. 3
      +Edouard
      157
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      83
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      75
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!