[Definitive] Xbox 360 Thread


Recommended Posts

All your money are belong to us?  :laugh:

I know my Uni is saying that to me :p

586663849[/snapback]

lol, just wait till you graduate. they'll send you Emails, Phone calls, and Mail you requesting you to donate money to them! woot!

On a side note, Xbox 360 Roxors your boxors.

Replying to the side note: Yes it does :) I just hope it can play all of the X-Box games I want it to :)

586665370[/snapback]

Could I be so bold to as to ask if everyone things the Xbox 360 will win this round? The PS3 looks down for the count at the moment with the launch delay, losing developers/high costs + lack of screenshots to impress me.

Am I just getting mixed up in pre-launch hype?

Either two things will happen, I don't care which fanboy type I offend, because its the damn truth.

PS3 becomes to hard to develop for, developers get ****ed off with its high-end developer prices and complicated Cell chip, They leave and PS3 goes crash and burn because it can't survive on Sony's 3-4 good games per generation rule :) X-Box 360 Vs. Nintendo ensues (which is really the way I want it), better man wins.

X-Box 360 goes crash and burn due to being released too early, games aren't developed consistently enough, and it kinda becomes redundant a la Dreamcast. Great Console, but dead. PS3 Vs. Nintendo ensues, and its raw graphical power and much of the same Vs. X-Box 360 graphical power and innovation. Personally, I'd want Nintendo to win (I'm not a massive fan of Sony, and I'm a massive Nintendo fan at heart).

Of course...there is the potential 3rd option...which makes me sick to my stomach...and that's the media completely and utterly abondons Nintendo and its innovative ways, and sticks with the tried and true for a 3rd generation running, and the Revo becomes the Next-Generation Gamecube -- available, in-stock, but only just, and severely un-popular by media standards. Sony Vs. M$ happens, and hopefully Sony'll get pwned.

Personally, I think PS3 is gonna get knocked off the number 1 spot, and knowing Sony, as soon as they're not getting Number 1 fame, they're gonna disappear out of the market place (sore losers). While I love teh ph47 gfx of the PS3 (I felt a little giddy watching Vision Gran Turisimo demo, I was amazed, and even more amazed by Getaway 3), I have a nagging feeling its going downhill.

And screw this 'Market analyst crap', btw ;)

EDIT: Why is P1553d off banned? Its not even a swear word :/

EDIT2: So, the old swear word dodger trick works here, too :p

EDIT3: No, I'm not talking about using 1337 variations of words as a dodger ;)

Either two things will happen, I don't care which fanboy type I offend, because its the damn truth.

PS3 becomes to hard to develop for, developers get ****ed off with its high-end developer prices and complicated Cell chip, They leave and PS3 goes crash and burn because it can't survive on Sony's 3-4 good games per generation rule :) X-Box 360 Vs. Nintendo ensues (which is really the way I want it), better man wins.

X-Box 360 goes crash and burn due to being released too early, games aren't developed consistently enough, and it kinda becomes redundant a la Dreamcast. Great Console, but dead. PS3 Vs. Nintendo ensues, and its raw graphical power and much of the same Vs. X-Box 360 graphical power and innovation. Personally, I'd want Nintendo to win (I'm not a massive fan of Sony, and I'm a massive Nintendo fan at heart).

Of course...there is the potential 3rd option...which makes me sick to my stomach...and that's the media completely and utterly abondons Nintendo and its innovative ways, and sticks with the tried and true for a 3rd generation running, and the Revo becomes the Next-Generation Gamecube -- available, in-stock, but only just, and severely un-popular by media standards. Sony Vs. M$ happens, and hopefully Sony'll get pwned.

Personally, I think PS3 is gonna get knocked off the number 1 spot, and knowing Sony, as soon as they're not getting Number 1 fame, they're gonna disappear out of the market place (sore losers). While I love teh ph47 gfx of the PS3 (I felt a little giddy watching Vision Gran Turisimo demo, I was amazed, and even more amazed by Getaway 3), I have a nagging feeling its going downhill.

And screw this 'Market analyst crap', btw ;)

EDIT: Why is P1553d off banned? Its not even a swear word :/

EDIT2: So, the old swear word dodger trick works here, too :p

EDIT3: No, I'm not talking about using 1337 variations of words as a dodger ;)

586665508[/snapback]

Wow thanks for that in-depth look at the possibilities... Heh I sort of share your opinion on things, I think.

http://onthexbox.com

586666918[/snapback]

Ehh thanks but you could have told us what that link is about and such, instead of just blatantly advertising.

Oh, BTW, If Sony Vs. M$ happens...expect Innovation to come to virtually nil, and we'll see another Video Games Crash on our hands (at least console wise), due to the same **** being released day in, day out, on the same engine...practically same storyline...just different textures...but the worst thing is, It won't end, both companies have enough money to last forever :/

EDIT: That's neither Sony or M$'s fault FYI, its just thats the way the cookie crumbles. Two companies, going after the same hardcore audiences, releasing practically the same stuff. If that's all you have, its gonna get ugly by default :p

Oh, BTW, If Sony Vs. M$ happens...expect Innovation to come to virtually nil, and we'll see another Video Games Crash on our hands (at least console wise), due to the same **** being released day in, day out, on the same engine...practically same storyline...just different textures...but the worst thing is, It won't end, both companies have enough money to last forever :/

EDIT: That's neither Sony or M$'s fault FYI, its just thats the way the cookie crumbles. Two companies, going after the same hardcore audiences, releasing practically the same stuff. If that's all you have, its gonna get ugly by default :p

586668365[/snapback]

Actually Microsoft has more money on it's disposal, Sony owes a lot of money so if PS3, Blu-Ray or Cell does not fully take off they'll have some troubles.

X-Box 360 goes crash and burn due to being released too early, games aren't developed consistently enough

thats not fact that the xbox360 is too early, MS most likely know that the xbox couldnt beat the PS2, and the xbox was only plan to get a foot hold in the "consoles wars" with the big dogs. so they might have planed to make a 2nd console knowing the xbox couldnt win. just what i think?

thats not fact that the xbox360 is too early, MS most likely know that the xbox couldnt beat the PS2, and the xbox was only plan to get a foot hold in the "consoles wars" with the big dogs. so they might have planed to make a 2nd console knowing the xbox couldnt win. just what i think?

586669612[/snapback]

Well, they say the X-Box was made as an advertising tool for the X-Box 360. But even if it is the one they've been prepring for, they could still f**k it up.

And, really, that's just a *possible* outcome, another outcome is that Microsoft owns the other 2 :p

Well Xbox was just used to penetrate the market for Microsoft and set their foot in the door. The 360 is whats going to make them be a big player in the market this time around, because they have learned their mistakes and implemented everything they know into this. The launch titles are very good, considering the limited time they have to work on them... And plus they could always somehow patch the games at a later date using the hard drive that more than 80% of the players have anyways.

I don't know what you're smoking Tjalian, but there will be no ______ VS. Nintendo.

Nintendo has done the most brilliant thing ever. Not compete.

It WILL BE Sony Vs. Microsoft and when the dust settles, Nintendo will make a profit.

THATS the way it's gonna be.

586678434[/snapback]

Yes, there will, even if its in-direct competition, or unwanted competition, its *still* competition.

Take the DS and PSP for example. Nintendo claims they're not competing. But hey! Guess what? They're still competing, even if its indirect (which it really isn't, whether Nintendo likes it or not).

EDIT: But really, whoever wins out of Microsoft and Sony (plz say m$ kthxu), they'll be in-drectly facing Nintendo. So you're partly right, I'm partly right. Simple as :p

Oh, and you're definately right about the profit thing ;)

Yes, there will, even if its in-direct competition, or unwanted competition, its *still* competition.

Take the DS and PSP for example. Nintendo claims they're not competing. But hey! Guess what? They're still competing, even if its indirect (which it really isn't, whether Nintendo likes it or not).

EDIT: But really, whoever wins out of Microsoft and Sony (plz say m$ kthxu), they'll be in-drectly facing Nintendo. So you're partly right, I'm partly right. Simple as :p

Oh, and you're definately right about the profit thing ;)

586679169[/snapback]

I know MS will win, because no matter how powerful your console is, it dosn't justify a $500 or more pricetag. Not to mention that the 360 will have a little less than a year of sales on the PS3.

On the subject of DS vs. PSP, nintendo is right, they arent competing.

ds and psp choice is all about what you want as a gamer, the only thing they have in common is that they both play games, which one you chose is a sign of what you want out of a gaming system. Different but equal, know what I mean?

Also, Sony fears competion with Nintendo, thats why they keep trashtalking them.

Edit: And sony thinks that they're competing which just makes it worse.

They are both portable consoles and some people when they decide to buy a portable console has to choose which one suits him better.

Sony claims (amongst their many claims. Note: theyre not the only one with amazing claims) that their PS3 will be priced around the xbox 360 price mark. I think by the end of this month we will know for sure.

Edited by martinj

It wouldn't matter if the PS3 is magically priced the same as the 360 (it wont happen*) because by the time the PS3 comes out, there will be a price drop on the 360. Simple.

*It won't happen because the PS3 has cost Sony billions of billions of dollars to develop, simply because they are developing the Cell on their own. Microsoft can keep things cheap because they are using their partners IBM and ATI to make custom chips for them, which in the end is far cheaper than making it yourself.

PS3 is supposed to come out in Spring 2006, isn't it? Why would there be a price drop on the Xbox360 within 4-5 months of its release?

586681221[/snapback]

Well most likely to counter the launch of the PS3. I'm sure Microsoft will try something to distract attention from the PS3 launch, and that will most likely either be Halo 3 or a price drop (even if its only a slight one).

But on a completely different note, has anyone taken into consideration that the hard drive on the 360 is a laptop hard drive? I mean we all knew that but did anyone stop and think what that could mean? The first thing I realized was that the 360 will be able to be placed both horizontally as well as vertically. There is no doubt that the "ideal" position is vertical, as every 360 on display is vertical. But what about the hard drive? Isn't it a common known fact that if you place a laptop hard drive on its side while its reading/writing data, it significantly increases the risk of damage or decreases the life span on the drive?

I don't know, it's just been bothering me lately because the only position I can put it in my house is horizontal and I don't want to deal with dying hard drives. (My laptop drive died sooner than later because of this).

How do you know if its a Laptop Hard Drive? Wouldn't that make it completely against the idea of swapping HDDs whenever you chose, a feature M$ is trying to push with the 306?

And, to whoever I was debating with, Yes, I agree with you, I firmly believe they should not be competing. Its just, Sony's trying to compete with it whether anybody likes it or not. And scarily, a lot of the general user base also think they are competing. Hell, there are those who think the DS is still the new gameboy :/

I think that modern HD are less prone to that, and that they can run at 180, 90 and 45 degree angles perfectly. But don't quote me on it.

586682173[/snapback]

My hardrives are all mounted on there sides in my Antec P180 (and as they do in most computer cases now days)

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Are you going to do performance benchmarks comparing all states? I'd be interested in seeing that in the next "part".
    • My father still uses a programme written in dbase3. Still manages to work with a little help from dosbox. 
    • Microsoft hides these secret Windows 11 performance boost settings available on every PC by Sayan Sen Windows enthusiasts often look for ways to extract as much performance out of their systems as possible, and it's often the case that they try and do so while trying to minimize the heat and power consumption. This is especially relevant in the case of mobile Windows PCs since laptops and notebooks tend to get hot and management of that heat and power is harder in such a form factor. As such users often turn to techniques like under-volting which can be used to squeeze out the maximum capabilities of a chip while also maintaining lowered power levels. There are official apps from AMD and Intel with the likes of Ryzen Master and XTU (Extreme Tuning Utility). While these are quite handy, most enthusiasts probably prefer to dig into the BIOS and play around with settings there like Curve Optimizer on Ryzen, which lets users set various frequency-voltage scaling values. These are essentially called P-States. If you are not familiar with them, Processor Power Management is done through Advanced Configuration and Power Interface (ACPI) P-states and C-states. While P-states or performance pwoer states handle CPU voltage-frequency scaling, C-states deal with CPU sleep states so that some of the CPU functions, which are not necessary at that moment, can be disabled. The P-states and C-states work together to make the processor run more efficiently. It helps the OS and apps determine which cores can be parked and which should be boosted. Of course not every user is an enthusiast or knows the technicalities and integrities of how things like overclocking or undervolting work. Thankfully for them Windows itself offers something pretty cool, though it is hidden by default on all systems. By default, Windows only has two P-States, "Minimum Processor State" and "Maximum Processor State." However, this can be changed with a Registry trick to expand the options under a secret "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown. This essentially enables the HWP or hardware P-States available on a device, and these are not controlled just by the OS itself as the underlying hardware gets involved too. In total there are five Processor Performance Boost Mode profiles that control how Windows requests and allows CPU turbo/boost behavior under the different power policies. They are: Disabled: In this mode, processor boosting is effectively turned off. The CPU will avoid entering turbo or boost frequencies and instead operate closer to its base frequency ceiling. This can significantly reduce power consumption and heat output, but at the cost of reduced burst performance and responsiveness in short workloads. Enabled: This is the standard behavior where boost functionality is allowed under normal conditions. The processor can opportunistically increase frequency when workload demands it, balancing performance gains with power and thermal constraints as managed by the system. Aggressive: Aggressive mode favors performance more heavily, allowing the CPU to enter higher boost states more readily and sustain them longer. This should in theory improve responsiveness under bursty or heavy workloads but increases power draw and thermal output compared to the default enabled behavior. Efficient Enabled: This mode still allows boosting, but with a stronger bias toward energy efficiency. The system attempts to use boost more selectively, avoiding unnecessary frequency spikes when the performance gain is marginal. Efficient Aggressive: This is a hybrid approach where boost is still performance-responsive, but the system continuously weighs efficiency more heavily than in Aggressive mode. It aims to deliver noticeable performance improvements while reducing wasted power in less demanding scenarios. Here's how to enable the Processor performance boost mode: Open Registry Editor: Press Win+R, type regedit, and click OK. Go to: HKLM\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\Power\PowerSettings\54533251-82be-4824-96c1-47b60b740d00\be337238-0d82-4146-a960-4f3749d470c7 (where HKLM stands for HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE_) Modify the value of Attributes from 1 to 2 (you can find modify option by right-clicking) After that, exit Registry, you should now be able to see the new "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown menu: As you can see there are now five new P-States or CPPC states or power profile available that help define the boost mode processor setting on your PC. Wrapping it up here's a quick run-down of the settings as defined by Microsoft itself. Setting Description Disabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is disabled. Collaborative Processor Performance Control (CPPC) behaviour is disabled. Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Efficient Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Efficient Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows calculates the desired extra performance above the guaranteed performance level, and asks the processor to deliver that specific performance level. Efficient Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows always asks the processor to deliver the highest possible performance above the guaranteed performance level. In the next part we shall be comparing these settings to explore how much of a benefit or regression they can provide in terms of performance and power efficiency. If you decide to change the values on your system and are experiencing problems like crashes or an overheating PC, make sure to revert the steps back to the original state.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      rolfus earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Leroy Jethro Gibbs earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Conversation Starter
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Month Later
      AndreaB earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      agatameier earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      518
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      198
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      147
    4. 4
      ATLien_0
      93
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      78
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!