Recommended Posts

I'm not a Supra MKIV owner... yet... LOL I'm saving up to getting one atm, I wanna get rid of my temporary car asap. I've done a lot of research into Supras, so I might be able to help out a bit.

1998 Supra RZ are actually quite rare (well here in Australia anyway). After the mid-late 1997 models the engine isn't a standard 2JZ-GTE, it's still called a 2JZ-GTE but it's got VVTi which means this engine has more power over the previous 2JZ-GTE. Since I'm a Supra lover I'm going to be a lil bias and say that there isn't much to look out for but just try and look for one that is clean and don't buy the first RZ you see, that's a big no no, unless you consider yourself a lucky person.

As for the modifications, you can get a lot out of a 2JZ-GTE with a stock bottom end. One of the most famous Supras in America is owned by a guy called Peter Blach. His Supra pulls 1132hp at the rear wheels with a stock bottom end which is about 1331hp at the flywheel. Suprisingly that isn't the most powerful Supra in the US. He is running a Garrett GT42 dual bearing turbo with a GReddy 4row intercooler. But a turbo and cooler isn't everything when it comes to performance, you also have to remember to maintain your engine.

BoostLogic is very famous for their turbo kits for Supras. It is a good start to give them a call and ask what is best for your power requirement. SP Performance or something is also very famous for Supra tuning, give them a call too. It's better to seek the professionals and Supra specialists for help rather than a forum.

Hope that helped :D

I'd like to warn you first that having too much power (requiring a VERY tight on/off style clutch) is a real bear to drive. It really starts to suck after about 600hp. Also keep in mind that with a stage 3 turbo, you will have extreme turbo lag and have pretty crummy acceleration. A stage 2 is a better compromise

the stock 320 hp 315 ft/lb isn't anythign to laugh at either. I've driven one of these puppies (my old boss owned one) and it was pretty intense (and I've driven porsche's and lamborghinis before). He actually sold it because it was too much for him.

I'd like to warn you first that having too much power (requiring a VERY tight on/off style clutch) is a real bear to drive. It really starts to suck after about 600hp. Also keep in mind that with a stage 3 turbo, you will have extreme turbo lag and have pretty crummy acceleration. A stage 2 is a better compromise

the stock 320 hp 315 ft/lb isn't anythign to laugh at either. I've driven one of these puppies (my old boss owned one) and it was pretty intense (and I've driven porsche's and lamborghinis before). He actually sold it because it was too much for him.

585830977[/snapback]

I was thinking about going with stage 2 instead of 3. Or even a BPU kit, considering its my first car and all :p

Thanks for the help so far.

i plan on getting one after i get out of college. keep the focus as a daily driver (original plan was to boost this to at least 250whp, but then i saw this 800HP supra)

gonna up the turbo and build the engine to 800+hp and use it as a track car.

i love supras, their engines can handle so much and have so much potential

IMO, a Mark IV isn't worth what people are asking for them. The fact you can get insane HP out of them is cool, but I can think of a lot of other $35-40k used cars I'd rather have that would be a better track car than a Supra (if not as insane).

Or you could save the money and wait for the new V10 project Toyota has ... I have high hopes for that, and you wouldn't be paying a collector's premium.

IMO, a Mark IV isn't worth what people are asking for them. The fact you can get insane HP out of them is cool, but I can think of a lot of other $35-40k used cars I'd rather have that would be a better track car than a Supra (if not as insane).

Or you could save the money and wait for the new V10 project Toyota has ... I have high hopes for that, and you wouldn't be paying a collector's premium.

585837015[/snapback]

Each to their own opinion. Why do rich and famous people like Hulk Hogan drive a modded Supra when he has the money to do up a Ferrari? It's just a matter of what people like and they're willing to spend the money to get what they want out of life. You've got the Supra lovers, the GT-R lovers and even the Civic lovers. I don't say to someone with the riced up Civic "Hey man, you wasted your money on that piece of shizzle, you could've got a better car with all the money you spent" because I can understand that the car to them is a part of them.

Each to their own opinion. Why do rich and famous people like Hulk Hogan drive a modded Supra when he has the money to do up a Ferrari? It's just a matter of what people like and they're willing to spend the money to get what they want out of life. You've got the Supra lovers, the GT-R lovers and even the Civic lovers. I don't say to someone with the riced up Civic "Hey man, you wasted your money on that piece of shizzle, you could've got a better car with all the money you spent" because I can understand that the car to them is a part of them.

585842253[/snapback]

I agree, I'm just saying last generation Supras have gone up way too much in price lately. Same with last gen RX-7s. You'd be better off buying an older generation and spending more money on modifying it, IMO. Or, getting somethign that's actually a rare car, like a Skyline ;)

I?ve seen so many people buy cars like that for their first car and just end up crashing them within a month or 2. It?s probably not the best car to buy for your first car especially if you?re just starting out. Just because you have a supra doesn?t mean you?re invincible?

585837040[/snapback]

Theres difference though. I'm probably not crazy like them. I don't speed, even when theres no one around.

Also, the latest gen Skylines are illegal here.

I agree, I'm just saying last generation Supras have gone up way too much in price lately. Same with last gen RX-7s. You'd be better off buying an older generation and spending more money on modifying it, IMO. Or, getting somethign that's actually a rare car, like a Skyline  ;)

585842457[/snapback]

Oh ok, well over here in Australia, it's like Skyline central, everwhere you go there are Skylines. I suppose you can make your MKIV look different from the others too if you really cared about looks. I personally don't like a car that attracts too much attention.

lol,..

Go to a pet store. Get a brass air valve. Connect inline with the wastegate refrence line, bleed refrence boost to the atmosphere. Fools the turbo into thinking its not making what it really is, and makes more boost.

The USA spent millions to develop a pen that could write in outer space.

The russians did it for free, they used a pencil.

keep it simple

^^ And what do you drive?

With the MKIV, try and find a 6 speed aerotop. Most aerotops came in auto so it will be pretty hard to find.

585845317[/snapback]

Apparently aerotops only come in the SZ models which are non turbo and 5 speed. If there were any 6 speed aerotops then that means it's not a factory aerotop. Eitherway you don't get much wind into the car with the aerotop unless you open up the windows too... but I guess it looks good.

No actually, there are RZ and GZ (luxury model) that are aerotops. Also they tend to have a lot of body flex and the frame kinda bends.

585846978[/snapback]

You could be right, that's why I said "apparently". I've been hearing a lot of different things, but if I look for a Supra I wouldn't care if it had an aerotop or not, I take the aerotop as a bonus to the looks that's it.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Calling GTA 6 overhyped crap doesn’t make you edgy, it just makes you sound like someone who hasn’t enjoyed anything since the PS2 era.
    • I’m not arguing whether Rockstar likes money. Obviously, they do, they’re a business. I’m saying this isn’t new. They’ve always launched console first. This is just how Rockstar operates.
    • I'm not sure how old the school is, but they've been doing this since GTA 3. Back in those days we'd be lucky for game companies to release on the PC at all. And with the current state of Sony (or Microsoft) their gaming wing won't be getting a penny from me.
    • We now know when and how the Universe may truly end by Sayan Sen Image by Marek Pavlík via Pexels| Not representative A study by physicist Henry Tye of Cornell University suggests that the universe may not expand forever. Instead, it could eventually stop expanding, begin contracting and end in a "Big Crunch" roughly 20 billion years from now. The research, published in the Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics, was conducted by Tye, Horace White Professor of Physics Emeritus at Cornell University. Using recent observations from major dark-energy surveys, Tye and his collaborators developed a cosmological model that predicts the universe could have a total lifespan of about 33 billion years. Since the universe is currently estimated to be 13.8 billion years old, the model places it near the midpoint of its existence. According to Cornell University's summary of the research, the study centers on the cosmological constant, a term introduced by Albert Einstein in his theory of general relativity. In modern cosmology, the cosmological constant is commonly used to describe the simplest form of dark energy, the unknown phenomenon believed to be driving the accelerating expansion of the universe. "For the last 20 years, people believed that the cosmological constant is positive, and the universe will expand forever," Tye said in a Cornell University news release. "The new data seem to indicate that the cosmological constant is negative, and that the universe will end in a big crunch." The study draws on data from the Dark Energy Survey (DES) and the Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument (DESI), two major projects designed to investigate the nature of dark energy. According to Tye, recent observations suggest that dark energy may not behave exactly like a simple cosmological constant. To account for those observations, Tye and his collaborators proposed a model involving an extremely light hypothetical particle that evolves over time. In their calculations, this produces a negative cosmological constant and leads to a future collapse of the universe. The model predicts that cosmic expansion would continue for approximately another 11 billion years before reaching a maximum size, after which the universe would begin contracting and eventually collapse. Scientists have long debated how the universe might end. As explained in an article published in The Conversation by Stephen DiKerby of Michigan State University, several possibilities have been proposed. If dark energy remains constant and positive, the universe could continue expanding indefinitely, gradually becoming colder, darker and more diffuse in a scenario often called the "heat death" of the universe. Other theoretical possibilities include a Big Rip, in which cosmic expansion accelerates so dramatically that galaxies, stars and even atoms are torn apart, or a Big Crunch, in which expansion reverses and the universe collapses back into an extremely dense state. DiKerby notes that the Big Crunch idea itself is not new. What distinguishes Tye's work is that it attempts to use current observational data to estimate when such a collapse might occur and how it could unfold. Much of the universe's long-term evolution remains uncertain. According to current astrophysical understanding, stars will continue to form and die for billions of years. The Sun, for example, is about halfway through its expected lifespan. Galaxies are also expected to continue merging; the Milky Way and Andromeda galaxies are projected to collide several billion years from now. At the same time, the nature of dark energy remains one of the biggest unanswered questions in cosmology. While observations indicate that the universe's expansion is accelerating, scientists still do not know what is causing that acceleration. Future observations may therefore alter current predictions about the cosmos's ultimate fate. Tye emphasized that additional evidence will be needed before firm conclusions can be drawn. DESI continues to collect data, while upcoming observations from missions and observatories including Euclid, SPHEREx and the Vera C. Rubin Observatory are expected to provide more precise measurements of dark energy. "People have said before that if the cosmological constant is negative, then the universe will collapse eventually. That's not new," Tye said. "However, here the model tells you when the universe collapses and how it collapses." For now, the study presents one possible future for the cosmos rather than a settled prediction. Whether the universe ultimately ends in a Big Crunch, expands forever, or follows another path entirely remains an open question that future observations will help answer. Source: Cornell University, The Conversation This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • If you look around on Amazon, some of these are available for $9
  • Recent Achievements

    • First Post
      AndreaB earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      Huge Trailer earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Classifyskilleducation earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      eurospharma62 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      With What earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      570
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      175
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      73
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      68
    5. 5
      neufuse
      64
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!