Recommended Posts

It uses CSS to block content. You can easily block/unblock individual images, links and iframes. Its not easy to setup like Firefox adblock extension but it works very well. They are working on an easier method to install this script.

There are three versions, I'm using the c++ version. http://nontroppo.org/wiki/OperaAdblock

Discussion http://my.opera.com/forums/showthread.php?s=&threadid=88091

post-72-1114624695.png

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/313779-opera-8-adblock-extension/
Share on other sites

I think I'll stick with the Opera Ad Filter/filter.ini. It's easier and doesn't take extra system resources to use.

585838186[/snapback]

This doesn't take any system resources, only thing this does is it excutes a 79k file to write the url you want to be blocked, to a file. The exe never stays in memory.

No ads on neowin :D

post-72-1114626904_thumb.jpg

No ads on neowin :D

585838249[/snapback]

Why block Google ads? Or any of Neowin's ads for that matter.

They help support this free service which you are abusing, and they take next to no bandwidth.

I'm on dialup internet, and Google's ads don't even slow me down.

Edited by Chode
Why block Google ads? Or any of Neowin's ads for that matter.

They help support this free service which you are abusing, and they take next to no bandwidth.

I'm on dialup internet, and Google's ads don't even slow me down.

585839905[/snapback]

Personally, I _hate_ ads and the way I fixed it is with AdBlock from Firefox while subscribing to neowin :)

I don't see the problem with people going out of their way to block ads, it only proves that they would never click them anyways. If they never click on them then what is the point of downloading them? If you download the ads and never click them you cost the advertisers more money to pay for the bandwidth charges. Advertisers having to spend more money on hosting results in less revenue going toward the sites which place the advertisements.

I also hate hearing the "click them anyways once in a while" comments, that saturates the hits/success ratio and reduces the amount of money advertisers are willing to spend for placing the advertisements; afterall, why pay to place advertisements if the majority of hits they receive aren't converted to customers or long-time users? If advertisers knew that you were asking people of that they would hit you in the head with a hammer, or a lawsuit. Quit running scams.

People who block ads do less damage than those who download advertisements and never click on them. They also do less damage than those who click on advertisements with no intention of buying anything. Leave them alone.

I don't see the problem with people going out of their way to block ads, it only proves that they would never click them anyways. If they never click on them then what is the point of downloading them? If you download the ads and never click them you cost the advertisers more money to pay for the bandwidth charges. Advertisers having to spend more money on hosting results in less revenue going toward the sites which place the advertisements.

I also hate hearing the "click them anyways once in a while" comments, that saturates the hits/success ratio and reduces the amount of money advertisers are willing to spend for placing the advertisements; afterall, why pay to place advertisements if the majority of hits they receive aren't converted to customers or long-time users? If advertisers knew that you were asking people of that they would hit you in the head with a hammer, or a lawsuit. Quit running scams.

People who block ads do less damage than those who download advertisements and never click on them. They also do less damage than those who click on advertisements with no intention of buying anything. Leave them alone.

585870586[/snapback]

Ads I find distracting from the main information, I don't care for "Next generation Smilies" or "Lovely Wallpapers" or "Your Computer has Spyware, please click here" and the countless other crap that flashes and takes 1/4 of your screen. I'm willing to pay for services when I see fit, for example, If I used Neowin enough I'll pay for a subscription, same for any other service.

Ads I find distracting from the main information, I don't care for "Next generation Smilies" or "Lovely Wallpapers" or "Your Computer has Spyware, please click here" and the countless other crap that flashes and takes 1/4 of your screen. I'm willing to pay for services when I see fit, for example, If I used Neowin enough I'll pay for a subscription, same for any other service.

585870619[/snapback]

Sorry if I sound stupid or rude, but what was your point and how did it relate to my post? :unsure:

Sorry if I sound stupid or rude, but what was your point and how did it relate to my post? :unsure:

585870949[/snapback]

just making a point about people who hate adblockers (if theres such a term), I dunno, I was bored, and no helpdesk calls at the time, I had to fill time with some ramblings ;)

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Are you going to do performance benchmarks comparing all states? I'd be interested in seeing that in the next "part".
    • My father still uses a programme written in dbase3. Still manages to work with a little help from dosbox. 
    • Microsoft hides these secret Windows 11 performance boost settings available on every PC by Sayan Sen Windows enthusiasts often look for ways to extract as much performance out of their systems as possible, and it's often the case that they try and do so while trying to minimize the heat and power consumption. This is especially relevant in the case of mobile Windows PCs since laptops and notebooks tend to get hot and management of that heat and power is harder in such a form factor. As such users often turn to techniques like under-volting which can be used to squeeze out the maximum capabilities of a chip while also maintaining lowered power levels. There are official apps from AMD and Intel with the likes of Ryzen Master and XTU (Extreme Tuning Utility). While these are quite handy, most enthusiasts probably prefer to dig into the BIOS and play around with settings there like Curve Optimizer on Ryzen, which lets users set various frequency-voltage scaling values. These are essentially called P-States. If you are not familiar with them, Processor Power Management is done through Advanced Configuration and Power Interface (ACPI) P-states and C-states. While P-states or performance pwoer states handle CPU voltage-frequency scaling, C-states deal with CPU sleep states so that some of the CPU functions, which are not necessary at that moment, can be disabled. The P-states and C-states work together to make the processor run more efficiently. It helps the OS and apps determine which cores can be parked and which should be boosted. Of course not every user is an enthusiast or knows the technicalities and integrities of how things like overclocking or undervolting work. Thankfully for them Windows itself offers something pretty cool, though it is hidden by default on all systems. By default, Windows only has two P-States, "Minimum Processor State" and "Maximum Processor State." However, this can be changed with a Registry trick to expand the options under a secret "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown. This essentially enables the HWP or hardware P-States available on a device, and these are not controlled just by the OS itself as the underlying hardware gets involved too. In total there are five Processor Performance Boost Mode profiles that control how Windows requests and allows CPU turbo/boost behavior under the different power policies. They are: Disabled: In this mode, processor boosting is effectively turned off. The CPU will avoid entering turbo or boost frequencies and instead operate closer to its base frequency ceiling. This can significantly reduce power consumption and heat output, but at the cost of reduced burst performance and responsiveness in short workloads. Enabled: This is the standard behavior where boost functionality is allowed under normal conditions. The processor can opportunistically increase frequency when workload demands it, balancing performance gains with power and thermal constraints as managed by the system. Aggressive: Aggressive mode favors performance more heavily, allowing the CPU to enter higher boost states more readily and sustain them longer. This should in theory improve responsiveness under bursty or heavy workloads but increases power draw and thermal output compared to the default enabled behavior. Efficient Enabled: This mode still allows boosting, but with a stronger bias toward energy efficiency. The system attempts to use boost more selectively, avoiding unnecessary frequency spikes when the performance gain is marginal. Efficient Aggressive: This is a hybrid approach where boost is still performance-responsive, but the system continuously weighs efficiency more heavily than in Aggressive mode. It aims to deliver noticeable performance improvements while reducing wasted power in less demanding scenarios. Here's how to enable the Processor performance boost mode: Open Registry Editor: Press Win+R, type regedit, and click OK. Go to: HKLM\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\Power\PowerSettings\54533251-82be-4824-96c1-47b60b740d00\be337238-0d82-4146-a960-4f3749d470c7 (where HKLM stands for HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE_) Modify the value of Attributes from 1 to 2 (you can find modify option by right-clicking) After that, exit Registry, you should now be able to see the new "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown menu: As you can see there are now five new P-States or CPPC states or power profile available that help define the boost mode processor setting on your PC. Wrapping it up here's a quick run-down of the settings as defined by Microsoft itself. Setting Description Disabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is disabled. Collaborative Processor Performance Control (CPPC) behaviour is disabled. Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Efficient Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Efficient Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows calculates the desired extra performance above the guaranteed performance level, and asks the processor to deliver that specific performance level. Efficient Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows always asks the processor to deliver the highest possible performance above the guaranteed performance level. In the next part we shall be comparing these settings to explore how much of a benefit or regression they can provide in terms of performance and power efficiency. If you decide to change the values on your system and are experiencing problems like crashes or an overheating PC, make sure to revert the steps back to the original state.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      rolfus earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Leroy Jethro Gibbs earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Conversation Starter
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Month Later
      AndreaB earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      agatameier earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      518
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      198
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      147
    4. 4
      ATLien_0
      93
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      78
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!