[S.T.A.L.K.E.R.] First DX9 Outdoor Images


Recommended Posts

I'm looking forward to this game and if I find the graphics lacking in any way I'll just put brute force to work and max out AA and AF @ 1600X1200 :shifty:

585841533[/snapback]

I got a couple of screenshots that are 1600x1200, though I'm not sure of the AA and AF. In fact, I don't think GSC have EVER released a screenshot using AA. Hopefully it's just that they haven't bothered, not an engine limitation.

ss_atem1_01-18-05_18-47-50.jpg

Yeah, 30 square kilometers worth of freeform environment is crap. As are advanced migrational AI methods, full Shader Model 3 support, fall back shaders (backwards compatability), a realistic player damage model, a 24 hour day night cycle, fully upgradable and customisable weapons, intensely detailed post-apocalyptic environments, up to 3 million polygons per frame, full post-processing support, multi-pass rendering, a unique detail object system allowing for higher level detail with less rendering time, parallax bump mapping, ODE based physics which are also used for a wide range of vehicles, vehicles with realistic damage models (aka, crumple damage), photo-realistic textures (because they are photos), true first person dynamic shadowing, material penetration as part of their realistic weapons system, iron sights, extremely large outdoor environments, equipment degredation and malfunction, AI clans, a reputation system among the 100 other AI humans in the game world, forward kinematics, unique locations remaining true to their real-world counterparts, dynamic weather effects (including lightning and wind), true wildlife which you can hunt/kill/eat, and an attempt at a gameplay dynamic which aims for near total realism. All of that really is total crap :rolleyes:

Question is: which of these things will actually be TRUE :whistle:

yeah it will.

but people... dont forget were talking about an outdoor game... you will mostly be outside, great buildings and huge landscapes are waiting for you to be discovered.

so no suprise that it does not look as good as hl?, and more like far cry and doom? wich are great games, with great graphics!

Granted they're a very low res, and desperately need some AA as a result...

But you're trying to say a game engine without parallax bump mapping, using simple shaders (most of the dx9 shaders can be converted to dx8 with minimal loss of image quality), and a non-dynamic shadow system looks better than these quick teaser pics?

These pics have more in common with Far Cry and Unreal 3 than HL2.

585839996[/snapback]

But they still look bad in comparison to any of those games.

Will it have HDR lighting?

585841844[/snapback]

Yes, but like Far Cry it may be exclusive to NVIDIA's 6x00 series and higher :(

I suggest people wait for E3, when GSC officially unveil their Dx9 renderer for outdoor environments. Maybe then we will see if these are old shots that Ingromania managed to get their hands on, or if these are what the final renderer will look like.

For the scale of the game I think it looks pretty good.  The gameplay is going to be the main draw to S.T.A.L.K.E.R. anyway.

585845142[/snapback]

For me it's the storyline, gameplay, replayablility and graphics, in that order hell I played CS for years even though the old HL engine was a dinosaur, But I do like eye candy! :yes:

I think chode introduced me to this game (through a post on the forums) I think the things that draw it in for me is; The environment & Freedom (Imagine slowly working your way towards the chernobyl reactor over several weeks, seeing the freakish things that happen. Hunting to survive, seeing the world change around you)

Not to mention, chernobyl has a weird & eerie effect on me and this is a much safer way to explore it :p

I say wait till the game comes out before saying if its better then other games.

But saying that when the first pictures came out for Doom 3 and Half life 2 they were the best ingame pictures i've ever seen, looking at the pictures of STALKER... not as good to be honest but as i said i will wait till i get the game ( maybe )

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Microsoft's fast coding model MAI-Code-1-Flash comes to Copilot Business and Enterprise by Karthik Mudaliar Microsoft’s recently announced MAI-Code-1-Flash model is now generally available to GitHub Copilot Business and Copilot Enterprise customers. With this support, organizations can have more centralized policy controls and billing while finally being able to use Microsoft’s lightweight, first-party coding model. According to GitHub’s announcement, Business and Enterprise plan administrators must enable the MAI-Code-1-Flash policy in Copilot settings before developers can access the model. Microsoft says that MAI-Code-1-Flash is for fast, iterative coding work rather than the most demanding architectural or debugging tasks. GitHub’s official model comparison page says that the model is great for "general-purpose coding and writing," while it excels at fast, accurate code completions and explanations Microsoft introduced MAI-Code-1-Flash on June 2 as part of a broader collection of internally developed MAI models. GitHub subsequently expanded support to Copilot CLI, the Copilot cloud agent, GitHub.com chat, GitHub Mobile, Visual Studio, JetBrains IDEs, Eclipse, and Xcode, but said support for managed Business and Enterprise customers was still on the way. In Microsoft’s own benchmark testing, MAI-Code-1-Flash scored 51.2% on SWE-Bench Pro, compared with 35.2% for Anthropic’s Claude Haiku 4.5. Microsoft also claimed that the model used up to 60% fewer tokens on SWE-Bench Verified. Do note that these are vendor-run results rather than independent measurements. The model is billed at provider list pricing under GitHub’s usage-based system. GitHub currently lists MAI-Code-1-Flash at $0.75 per million input tokens, $0.075 per million cached input tokens, and $4.50 per million output tokens. For organizations, the main incentive to use MAI-Code-1-Flash is likely to be efficiency rather than maximum capability. A smaller model that responds quickly and limits unnecessary output is quite useful for repetitive agent tasks at scale, especially after GitHub Copilot’s move toward usage-based billing. The "Flash" model is recommended for fast work and not necessarily for huge repositories with loads of context. It's better if teams compare their output with other larger models, especially if they're working on security-sensitive changes and complex, multi-file work.
    • yes AND no the "original" or plain/normal Optiplex 7010 won't be getting any more new firmware updates BUT the Optiplex SFF/SFF Plus {small form factor}, Micro/Micro Plus & Tower/Tower Plus 7010 editions DO get new updates such as this new one   and here are similar guides from the Dell web site for Dell systems: https://www.dell.com/support/kbdoc/en-us/000390990/secure-boot-transition-faq https://www.dell.com/support/kbdoc/en-us/000347876/microsoft-2011-secure-boot-certificate-expiration
    • AT&T has been spying on US citizens with the NSA for decades.. they just know how to keep it more under wraps.. the evil level is still there.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      bernmeister earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      tuben earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • First Post
      OffsetAbs earned a badge
      First Post
    • Reacting Well
      OffsetAbs earned a badge
      Reacting Well
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      462
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      212
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      158
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      71
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!