[IPOD] Battary Drain when off.


Recommended Posts

Hey ppl,

Got an Ipod for about 2 month now and i love it. But i got a problem. When i turn the Ipod off (press and hold the play button) and 2 days later turn it on again, the Ipod starts to act all weird.

I know it's standard that you see the Apple logo if you don't use it for about 2 days. Don't know why bit it is.

The problem is that it drains my battery. It was half full when i turned it off, and 2 days later, when i turned the Ipod back on, the battery is just about drained.

wtf......

Seems like the Ipod is not completly turned of or something...

Edited by Boogiman
Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/314035-ipod-battary-drain-when-off/
Share on other sites

ipod doesn't turn off unless the battery is dead.

it uses some battery to keep the memory, and to poll for button presses. Also if you have the alarm set, it'll never go into deep sleep, and will drain the battery.

the battery meter in the top right is not accurate by any means, the only way to really know if the battery is dead is it'll tell you to plug it in, otherwise you're fine.

Mine does that too but if I mess around with it for awhile, like when I'm listening to music the battery meter goes back to normal.

585842412[/snapback]

Same here. I'll charge it, know it's full. Start to play, see it drop down to about 1/4 left, then a few minutes later it's full. :wacko:

Mine does that too but if I mess around with it for awhile, like when I'm listening to music the battery meter goes back to normal.

585842412[/snapback]

Same here.  I'll charge it, know it's full.  Start to play, see it drop down to about 1/4 left, then a few minutes later it's full.  :wacko:

585842482[/snapback]

Considered completely normal!! Documented here: http://docs.info.apple.com/article.html?artnum=61475

turning off a device will drain power, its part of the shutdown process that it needs more power, this is the most visible with mobile phones, but with the ipod the player will shut down, and draining battery power, when u fully boot it up, its like powering up an laptop, u drain a lot of power, and this still applys for the ipod. just use ure ipod more often

that's what I said above.

585842601[/snapback]

no you said....

ipod doesn't turn off unless the battery is dead.

it uses some battery to keep the memory, and to poll for button presses.  Also if you have the alarm set, it'll never go into deep sleep, and will drain the battery.

the battery meter in the top right is not accurate by any means, the only way to really know if the battery is dead is it'll tell you to plug it in, otherwise you're fine.

585842382[/snapback]

which has nothing to do with the 2 statements I responded to about the battery meter refreshing once the HD spins up...

Considered completely normal!!  Documented here: http://docs.info.apple.com/article.html?artnum=61475

585842574[/snapback]

So in a sense, yes the info you stated was contained in the article I referenced, but you said nothing about what I was responding to.

no you said....

which has nothing to do with the 2 statements I responded to about the battery meter refreshing once the HD spins up...

So in a sense, yes the info you stated was contained in the article I referenced, but you said nothing about what I was responding to.

585842624[/snapback]

I wrote: the battery meter in the top right is not accurate by any means

the article you referenced: iPod's battery indicator is approximate

how are they not the same?

What happens is that Apple decided that having the iPod drain batteries while it being off was worth it so that they can have that instant-on feature. The reason that the iPod is able to turn on right away is because it doesn't actually turn off, what it does is it turns off the screen, the hard drive, but it still keeps information in the memory, still polls the buttons to see if you press it. After two days or so, it decided that it has been wasting enough battery so it does a cold shutdown where nothing is running, that is when it has to display the Apple logo, because everything is being loaded into memory again.

My Rio Karma actually does a cold boot every time, not just go into sleep mode. It takes 6.28 seconds from pressing the power button until it is actually playing music. I dont know about you, but that is fast enough for me, all in all, I find this instant on capability not worth the battery trade off.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • The proportion (or number of iterations) has nothing to with this aspect of Copyright I am describing. In short, it doesn't matter how many times the manager tells you to change something or how. Your work product is always YOURS until and unless you then assign that to the person representing the client/company, usually for financial compensation -- either in salary or as a subcontract work for hire payment. if iterations determined copyright, then businesses would have learned to just keep making changes until they could claim they owned the copyright, without having to compensate the artist for their work. And that would be BAD. The only place where the amount of changes does have a role is in how much does a human modify a previous public domain work (from any source) before it is considered fair use or their own work, etc. For example, if a human makes substantial changes to a public domain (re: AI, by definition) work, then they can then claim that derivative work as their own...but NEVER the original version, of course. That's why anyone can make a movie about Dracula, for example, as long as it is based on the public domain novel, but not if they take new ideas from copyrighted movies made afterwards. As one of the people who personally advised the US Copyright Office on their recent ruling on these very issues, be assured that I specifically used the terminology precisely -- though I made it simple enough for laymen to understand it. If I made this confusing by doing so, I apologize. But, to be clear regarding your assumption that I would agree to your second statement that I quoted above -- the answer is NO. If AI does the work, no matter how much "direction" you give it, it cannot be copyrighted. All AI generated content is in the Public Domain and therefore the copyright cannot be assigned to ANYONE, even you -- until and unless substantial modifications are made to it BY A HUMAN BEING (yourself or a contracted artist/writer/etc.) and then that copyright on the derivative work is legally (in writing) transferred to you. This is a critical distinction. And it is important that people, especially AI sloppers, understand this. For example, YouTube is not paying AI slop generators for the copyright, etc. of their AI slop. What YouTube is doing is sharing AD REVENUE for permission to publish your AI slop. Copyright/ownership/rights never come into it. Importantly, that means that anyone can copy any AI slopware on YouTube, etc. and rehost it anywhere they want, even back on YouTube, and there is nothing legal that YouTube can do about it with regards to copyright protections, ownership, DMCA, etc. Anyone is legally free to use any AI slopware in any way they want. When this ruling was pending, I warned Disney legal of all of this before they did their OpenAI deal -- that it would literally dilute their entire IP portfolio forever. They ignored that warning for the PR and stock bump. But that is why, when the ruling came down last year, Disney quickly extricated themselves from that OpenAI deal, even eating the initial upfront fees -- followed closely by OpenAI ending their entire AI video generating business model. They adjusted their PR release dates to make this less obvious to shareholders, of course. Phew. I hope that this clears up the key distinctions for you and anyone reading. If you have any additional questions or even hypotheticals about AI and Copyright, please feel free to ask.
    • Each of the devices displayed on this page now has a little volume meter next to it to show if there is audio actively playing. About time.
    • Owing to the nature of Windows feature enablement updates, it was distributed over Windows Update services as a complete system upgrade rather than as an ordinary cumulative update
    • Microsoft confirms Windows 11 26H2, urges IT admins to prepare for release by Usama Jawad Windows 11 typically follows an annual update cycle, but Microsoft recently broke that tradition a bit by releasing a "26H1" version in the first half of this year as a "scoped" build for select new silicon PCs only. This version was not available for customers using 24H2 and 25H2 builds, as Microsoft is busy preparing version 26H2 for them, confirmed officially for the first time. In a Windows IT Pro blog, Microsoft has urged IT admins to prepare for the upcoming release of Windows 11 version 26H2. The company has confirmed that this will be a small enablement package (eKB) that will simply light up certain disabled features that are already present in the operating system's code base. This means that the "refined" Windows update and deployment experience will be simpler and quicker, with minimal disruptions, as the feature update will simply toggle a few flags rather than performing a complete replacement. Microsoft has explained that this is all possible because the standard Windows 11 releases share the same servicing branch and hence, the same source code. However, this also means that Windows 11 26H1 users won't be able to upgrade to 26H2 as that is a different branch, but this is something we have known for a while now. Similar to previous annual feature updates, Windows 11 26H2 will offer the following support cycles: 24 months of support for Home, Pro, Pro EDU, and Pro for Workstations editions 36 months of support for Enterprise, Education, IoT Enterprise, and Enterprise Multi-session editions Microsoft has not confirmed a concrete release date for Windows 11 26H2, but noted that it is "coming soon". If we go by the ongoing release cadence, we can expect it to begin rolling out in early October 2026. As such, IT admins have been encouraged to begin validating Windows Insider releases in the Experimental Channel, plan rollout rings, and strategize the utilization of their existing deployment tools.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Collaborator
      ryansurfer98 went up a rank
      Collaborator
    • Week One Done
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Year In
      Skeet Campbell earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Month Later
      Sharbel earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      576
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      188
    3. 3
      Michael Scrip
      79
    4. 4
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      78
    5. 5
      neufuse
      72
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!