Recommended Posts

I?ve been getting into the auto racing vibe (Formula 1, cart, NASCAR etc) and I?m learning a new thing about the sport and its different modes.

Well I was watching the Aaron's 499 (NASCAR) today and they said it was a "restricted plate" track, well my question is what does that term mean, and what does that do to the race itself?

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/315387-nascar-restricted-plates/
Share on other sites

It is flat device with holes drilled in it designed to limit the amount of air that enters the engine. This effectively limits the horsepower of the engine and slows the cars down. AND SUCKs IMO because since the restrictor plates reduce the horsepower so much during plate races that aerodynamics often decide the winner instead of the engine. :pinch:

Yeah basically it takes an 800hp engine and turns it into a 425hp engine.

A restricter plate could be compared to breathing as a human. No restricter plate would be like breathing normally. With a restricter plate would be like have to breathe through a straw. As you can tell you would be short on air.

keeps track safer

585858393[/snapback]

That's highly debatable. Some of the NASCAR drivers hate the restritor plates because it makes the cars run closer together in tight packs which is extremely dangerous at 180+ MPH. The plates also take a lot of power away from the engines so the driver's don't have the luxury of acceleration to get away from wrecks that happen near them. Most of the drivers think there is a better way to limit top speed.

That's highly debatable.  Some of the NASCAR drivers hate the restritor plates because it makes the cars run closer together in tight packs which is extremely dangerous at 180+ MPH.

585858415[/snapback]

in other words, thats the reason for the huge pileup in the race right?

(25 cars) :whistle:

in other words, thats the reason for the huge pileup in the race right?

(25 cars) :whistle:

585858447[/snapback]

Restrictor plates cause the huge packs. They don't create the poor excuses for drivers that are currently out of their leagues in NASCAR. So yes, you can blame partially blame restrictor plates.

Restrictor plates cause the huge packs.  They don't create the poor excuses for drivers that are currently out of their leagues in NASCAR.  So yes, you can blame partially  blame restrictor plates.

585858465[/snapback]

well yea i know but i was just making sure id understand

however nobody knows how the crash started, the way i saw it dale jr hit the rear fender of the #4 car and all was shot to hell from there,

well thanks for clearing it up :D

Almost got it. It's actually a plate that goes between the intake manafold and the carb. It resticts the amount of fuel going into the engine. The carb's have almost a two inch hole for the fuel to come out of and the restricter plate holes are about half that size.

Last year Rusty Wallace ran some test laps without a plate and topped out at 220 mph by himself.

Well back in the 80's Bill Elliot was running at Daytona (I believe) and he got his car up to about 230mph.Once NASCAR saw this they thought these guys would be killing themselves trying to run this fast constantly. So they implemented the restrictor plates on tracks that are typically bigger than 2 miles. They did it with good intentions but this caused all the cars to bunch up together and run right at 200mph within inches of one another. When that happens all it takes is for one person to get out of control and their wreck gobbles up the rest of the field because they are so close to the accident and moving at 190-200mph.

If they didn't have the restrictors on the cars then the field would be much more spread out and that would keep so many people from being involved in these huge crashes.

2 years ago NASCAR tried to correct this problem by cutting the size of the fuel cells in half (for restrictor plate races). The theory was that this would spread the field out because some would get in and out of the pits faster. Therefore spreading the field out. But just like you saw today it didn't really accomplish that. I has helped a little. But if you know or ask any NASCAR driver they will tell you that restrictor plates are extremely dangerous and they want them gone. Being that I live where I do I am able to visit their shops and talk to these guys and they all hate them. Even the old school guys like Petty and Earnhardt Sr.

I don't know if anyone remembers this, but in 2000, at New Hapmshire, NASCAR used restrictor plates to slow the cars after the deaths of Adam Petty and Kenny Irwin.

At Daytona and Talladega, the restrictor plates where introduced after, I belive, Bobby Allison's car got over the catch fence at Talladega, into the stands, so NASCAR wanted to slow the cars.

I really liked the areo package that Winston Cup(now Nextel Cup) used back in 2000 and 2001 with the wicker-bills and the roof strips, that the Busch series currently uses. Back then, NASCAR belived the races were too noncompetitive, so they wanted to make the cars punch a larger hole through the air, thus creating a larger draft and a large pack of cars. I recall watching a Talladega race in 2000 with 70 or so lead changes.

Then NASCAR introduced the no passing below the yellow line rule to prevent drivers from making risky passes on the apron. I think the first race with that rule in effect, was a caution free race at Talladega.

NASCAR could have already done away with restrictor plates as technology has come far enough that the driver is safe enough if he takes the right precautions.

It makes Talladega and Daytona far too dangerous in my opinion as pack racing is just asking for half the field to be taken out in one shot. Saturday you'll see real racing under the lights at Darlington!

Almost got it. It's actually a plate that goes between the intake manafold and the carb. It resticts the amount of fuel going into the engine. The carb's have almost a two inch hole for the fuel to come out of and the restricter plate holes are about half that size.

Last year Rusty Wallace ran some test laps without a plate and topped out at 220 mph by himself.

585858484[/snapback]

u might wanna check out howstuffworks.com and it will make a lot more sense. But what u said is basically right. the two inch hole u are talking about is what the fuel/air mixture comes out of and enters the intake and then the engine. The fuel itself is sprayed by jets in the carb where it is also mixed with air. The jets are fairly small, compare to tip of writing pen.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • And thereby lies the rub. AV1 support is not as wide as paid analysts would have the industry believe. With AV2 around the corner, it's going cause more time backlog in adoption (how many recent purchasers will upgrade yet-again within the next 6-12 months? most would rather stay pat for another 1+ years before even thinking about upgrading their setups).
    • Microsoft OneDrive is getting a simple yet much needed feature by Sayan Sen Microsoft has been steadily expanding OneDrive’s file management capabilities over the years, including for shared content and shortcuts, although it has had its flaws, too. The cloud storage platform introduced support for folder shortcuts several years ago, allowing users to pin frequently accessed shared folders from OneDrive, SharePoint, and Teams. Now, Microsoft is refining that experience further with a new way to organize those shortcuts as revealed in a recent Microsoft 365 roadmap addition. Previously, shortcuts added through the “Add shortcut to My files” option would appear alongside all other files and folders in the root of a user's OneDrive. And although it's meant to be useful, this approach could also create clutter along the way, especially for heavy users who may have to work with large numbers of shared folders across multiple projects and teams on their systems. This is where Microsoft’s latest feature comes in, as it is looking to address this inconvenience by giving users the option to place new shortcuts inside a dedicated “Shortcuts” folder instead. The feature is designed to keep shortcut links organized into a single location instead of scattering throughout the main OneDrive directory. Hence, the idea is to make navigation and usability easier and simpler. The first time a user chooses this option, OneDrive will automatically create the folder, and to help make it stand out from the other folders, the Shortcuts folder will have a distinct visual identity featuring a unique color and a building-style icon. That being said, the new Shortcuts will behave just like any other folder in OneDrive, and as such, users will be able to move it to a different location, rename it, share it with others, or remove it entirely if they prefer a different structure. You can view the entry on the Microsoft 365 roadmap website here. Currently, the feature is in the "in development" phase, but the tech giant expects the rollout to start next month (July 2026). Do keep in mind, though, that new feature rollouts often get delayed.
    • VS Code 1.123 introduces massive upgrades for persistent AI developer workflows by Paul Hill Microsoft has just released Visual Studio Code 1.123 alongside its annual developer conference, Build 2026. This release, as always, has a heavy focus on advanced AI agent integration and making the built-in browser more robust. Notably, this update brings big sync changes that keep your AI agents persistent across sessions. With this update, VS Code now supports cross-machine syncing for chat histories, touched files, repository contexts, and related PRs via GitHub accounts, tying users even more into Microsoft’s developer ecosystem. This update also introduces the new /chronicle command that allows you to query past sessions using natural language, generate instant standup reports, and get personal productivity insights. Microsoft has also made some improvements to network-dependent operations, it explains: “When a terminal command that is run by a local agent requires access to domains that are not configured as allowed domains, the command is automatically retried inside the sandbox with unrestricted network access. After that, if it still fails, it falls back to unsandboxed execution. This allows network-dependent operations such as git fetch to finish, while keeping filesystem protections in place.” Microsoft has not stopped there; in this update, it also allows developers to drag, drop, and pin multiple agent sessions side-by-side for easy code comparisons in real-time. It also introduces the Research Agent, accessible via /research. This is a read-only, depth-optimized tool that gets data from the web, local codebase, and GitHub to give you a Markdown report on complex APIs or unfamiliar code. Now, let’s talk about the integrated browser and some security enhancements. VS Code 1.123 features enhanced screenshot capture tools that allow for targeted Area Screenshots and Full Page Screenshots to send layout context instantly to AI chat. The address bar has also been revamped, supporting favorite pages and tab management. Finally, on the security front, this update introduces a safety-first two-hour delay on third-party extension auto-updates to safeguard against compromised or buggy releases. This release is now available for Windows, Mac, and Linux. If you have VS Code, keep an eye out for the update availability notification. If you still don’t have VS Code, you can get it here.
    • I'm hoping with the Surface Pro 12, I can use either USB-C for my Xreal One Pro glasses. With my Surface Pro 11 OLED X Elite, I have to plug them into the top port. The bottom port will power it, but nothing shows on the screen. Maybe it's my setting. When I plug in the glasses, I have it output only to the glasses. So maybe I need to turn on both displays with it in the top port, then switch the glasses to the bottom port and set it to output only to the glasses. And then hopefully Windows remembers the settings for either the top port and bottom port (one of the awesome features of Windows where it remembers the exact configuration when plugging in external monitors.
    • Forgive my ignorance, but the only difference I see here is that a USB-A is now a USB-C, so there are two of them. For the modern age (and I'd argue since 2020), most products would now come with USB-C as an option, if not the default. Display, charging, devices, etc on TWO connectors, sometimes all combined! So having 2 of those powerful ports is great for something this size! Meanwhile my Surface Pro (5) has a single USB-A port which I cannot even get display out to, instead relying on some Surface Connect dock which I don't have. That is a poor experience, not to mention expensive and not compatible with other devices. Thank God USB-C is mainstream!
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      B2Proxy earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Year In
      MadMung0 earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      jefred earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Apprentice
      JoeyNeo went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • Week One Done
      oliviaexpo earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      482
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      227
    3. 3
      Skyfrog
      71
    4. 4
      FloatingFatMan
      60
    5. 5
      Nick H.
      54
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!